ML20087L227
| ML20087L227 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 03/19/1984 |
| From: | Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | James Keppler, Quamme D, Reichel N CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.), NRC |
| References | |
| SWM-056, SWM-56, NUDOCS 8403270093 | |
| Download: ML20087L227 (5) | |
Text
y..
STONE AND WEBSTER MICHtGAN, INC.
P.O. BOX 1963, MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 48640
~
3-/?-34 o^rs 1450ii'
- o.
o.
1
. o. ~a N/A
[FR)pC1 PAL STAFF
' ' * "
- SWM-OS6 RP vm g.
g 3 f
9/RA hF~
DEAR SIRS:
N rw= ouo--a ans E arrac==o: O==~r== a r=6v, TO
. DISTRIBUTION aA
.,c,,,,o
,.. f.
~
Co i==
aestra _== noouCI=L =
A saru = CA oS gg
' h, 7 M I
?
=ACM o-3
~~
O maa--as O s ciicario~s O oocu =~rs O ~orms o, co~===~ca STATUS l
PLEASE NOTE l
SENT FOR YOUR O6 O a ov==
0==visio~s O o-issio==
0 ova' O :o===~r l^**' * =
O a=>s-.r av O a ov== *===vis== I,,,n','s,,,
O *ooirio~.
O coa==crio~s O uns O
oa-.rio~
O ~o co--=~r O u=*c.:= vasta O co--=~rs O
O. s==
0 co~cu=== ca O sua.=-=.= orio DO CLOSED D
YOUR ATTENTION 15 DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING:
nsLsAsso Pon: O
=cario. O uac==== o==cass av =*r==i4ts 0
t=*====v>== *~o su.-rr
-rs as acouciet==
- ew== a saru = ciaos.
O o=*== su. rr
-rs as aeouc ='s.
cao i'-
u== ciaos o-Coocu==~rs O===
O s o==r a.
O t=*====vvaa oas co r =*e= o v>== =*r== 46==*=== roua a ova 6 oa co--=~rs.
O =*= aciu.o-osoca===> r o v>. -ar==*i. =r s.a - aso aerua~. a== =~c'es== co-o v>..
o==.
O== n.ust v ar==
o= a= = *eco o*~cs iro. voua u o==va
~., a.or. van. -= us.
IM PO RTANT 'E.n'"E[C,m co~4.esa 1,.=
=m.M D. N r" ~
YA
-4.=
-,r ur.V7N vD o'uGM
=7.W=ar T
'C
's =
"".="a-= "vM.
a 4
oA vN D = MM =
i.ac-a-
s osv.
ThefollowingClosedCIOItem/HoldPointNotificationfs&) is (are) attached for your action /infonnation:
EL-or6 l
L l
DISTRIBUTION:
J. E. Karr CIO Site File (original + 1)
CIO Program Manager
- DLQuamme, CPCo NIR
- ;ichel, CPCo RAWells,.CPCo
, 't JGKeppler, l NRC' e403270093 840319 JJHarrison, NRC PDR ADOCK G5000229 S
.RJCook, NRC (site)
@ 22 i
APAmoruso (2)
Initiator ffer ? l
F SheSt 1 of 1 STONE & WEBSTER
'**f """ **ln uD POnNT nuvaER oS CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION O TRACKED ACTION ITEM
~
@ TRACKED INFORMATION ITEM MIDidND HUCLEAR PldNTJ.0, N0.14509 O TRACKED RECOMMENDATION ITEM REFERENCE (S)
O UNTRACKEDITEM Checklist MP-MIS-008E-0001 O HOLD POINT NOTIFICATION CONDITION DETAILS During evaluation of the training for PQCI C-1.50 CIO observed the following:
a) The reference document section of lesson plan shows C-306 at Rev 11 when Rev 12 is current.
b) Attachme A Table B-2 the " note" paragraph addresses spacing of different diameter grouted anchor bolts, referenced Spec C-305 fias a spec change notice #13007 wiiich also addresses spacing of different diameter anchor bolts.
There is an inconsistency between the two.
CIO requests a review to see what impact these items have on the training provided.
Also provide information on liow MPQAD assures that changes,such as SCN#13007 or revision 12,are reflected in the lesson plan, when pertinent.
YES
[o".s, bNO ATTACHMENTS DATE RESPONSE REO'D.
INITIATOR /DATE If f
N APPROVED /DATE SIE4l0 kwh &
A l/ >lB'/
ul$v
- 2. /Y
[
/
'/
RESPONSE
Reference Page 1 of attached correspondence, Serial 27325 dated February 24, 1984, CFEwert to BHPeck.
1 YES N O. s)
NO ATTACHMENTS EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONDkNT TITLE DATE
,Md// 4' (Ym by 6.+A/
/
COMPLETION DATE
.a RESPONSE ACCEPT DATE RESPONSE VERIFIED / CLOSED DATE M$&,ED 3/19lE*/'
&WW
- See Attachment 2
-1
p,'
'?,-
ITEN CSto I
A TTGCHmEHT" I.
y_'
PME I 0F X To BHPeck
- ?
From GFEwert CONSUMERS POWER Date February 24, 1984 COMPANY Subject
' MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT-Internal CIO ITEMS 054 AND 057 Correspondence
> ~
FILE 24.0 SERIAL 27325 CC-DEBeaudoin GEParker GFE 61-84 DDJohnson NIReichel HPNunes RAWells Following is MPQAD's. response to the subject Sthae. and Webster CIO Items:
-ITEM 56 Part-A This part reports that the MPQAD lesson plan for PQCI C-1.50 in the refer-
'ence document section referenced Revision 11 of Specification C-306 while Revision 12 is the currant issued revision.
This is in keeping with current pra'ctice in the MPQAD Training Branch and in no way impacts the validity of the training.
MPQAD lesson plans are developed utilizing various documents as references.
In order to know the revision of the document vhen the lesson plan was
~
developed the' revision number is included in the lesson plan. Thereafter the revision number is only changed when a revision to the lesson plan is b
required.. Required. revisions to lesson plans are determined by appropriate personnel and are based on changes to documents which impact lesson plan source documents which in turn may impact information in the lwson plan.
In this case the revision of Specification C-006 from Rev 11 to Rev 12 did not result in a. revision to the PQCI.
In turn a revision to the. lesson plan was not required. ks a result there is no training impact and the training is acceptable.
Part B
- This part reports that PQCI C-1.50 Attachment A Table B-2 is inconsistent-with referenced Specification C-305 which has a Specification Change Notice No.113007 against it.
This is also in keeping with current MPQAD practice and does not. impact training.
In this case the process outlined in the second paragraph of-the response to Part A was'also followed to determine if~the lesson plan required revision.
Since the.PQCI/did not require revision due to the SCN,'the lesson plan did.
not require revision and there is no impact on training.
1The basis for not revising the lesson plan is that the SCN is clear and usable by inspection personnel without additional training or revisica to
.the'PQCI.
Inspection personnel are required by the PQCI General Instructions to research and' utilize'the latest inspection criteria.
IC0284-G303A-QLO7 d
-ww
-a
.-~-,.,,w
,e-<w y
,-,-+--,-,-,-+wv.-.,c
,s,,<-%-
e
-e-,-*
e.,..A yv.--n3+---,
--yim', * -
- +-ww
-a.-vp -- eg
+ -, y e-e c
- ITEM OSto
\\
nTThCHRENT L Oo. ; _,
rRCE.10f.L i
ITEM 57
'This item recommends that evaluations that are used as part of the " approval to instruct process" be performed on no later than the first training class taught. MPQAD Training Branch practice is to evaluate on instructor the first time that an instructor instructs a course (lesson plan or lesson plans). This.in fact is required by Training Branch Instruction TBI 1.3.
The TBI establL.hes a process by which an instructor tecomes approved to instruct both a first course and additional courses. ~The TBI does not require that an instructor become reapproved each time a lesson plan is revised. This is not necessary as the instructor has demonstrated capa-bility through the original approval process. The evaluation may take place doing a pilot class, on actual class, or during any other method that allows the instructor to demonstrate capability and be evaluated.
+
e e
r l
,.5
~ %
/*
- IC0284-0003A-QLO7_
0 I
m.m___
A
=.
- =
' ' O f' CIO Item 056 Page 1 of'1 Explanation'of Response Acceptance CIO agrees with the response lto this item since the conditions have been reviewed and found they do act effect the validity of.the training.
- It should be noted, however,- that for Condition a) Rev 12 should be re-flected-in Lesson Plan C1.50 Rev 14 since Rev 12 was initiated on Jan-
- uary 9,1964, and the C specs were released for distribution on January 20, 1984; i.e., 1 to 3 weeks prior to.the lesson plan development (February 1, 1984).
No further. action / response is required.
l-4
)
cv e
[
l'