Text

Testimony of Mc Cordaro,Ca Daverio,Ml Miele,Ds Mileti & Rj Watts Re Contentions 60,61,63 & 64 on Protective Action Recommendations.Related Correspondence
	ML20087J678
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	03/21/1984
From:	Cordaro M, Daverio C, Miele M, Mileti D, Watts R; ABB IMPELL CORP. (FORMERLY IMPELL CORP.), COLORADO STATE UNIV., FORT COLLINS, CO, LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:	;
References
	CON-DSB-65 OL-3, NUDOCS 8403230032
	Download: ML20087J678 (200)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:-. V ' RE1.ATED CORRESPOPiDENCE, - ~-; LILCO, March 21, 1984 CD 000d( P us

-m

'bl HAR 22 p UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '~ ' NUCLEAR. REGULATORY COMMISSION ~ - .l. 'l 4 Before the Atomic' Safety and Licensing Board In the' Matter of- ) )- - LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 ) (Emergency Planning 4 L(Shoreham Nuclear Power 1 Station, ) Proceeding) JUnit'1)' ) E LILCO'S TESTIMONY ON 4 . CONTENTIONS' 60,.61,.63, and 64 ,5, (PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS) d PURPOSE This~ testimony showe that protective action recommenda-f itions contemplated by the LILCO~ Transition Plan and the meth-5: - ods_~by which those recommendations would be chosen, comply with ' NRC and New York State' regulations and guidelines regarding - protective actions. Selective sheltering and selective evacua-ition vould_be;-suggested only.on1the recommendation of New York State and.are included in the Plan.to provide flexibility to ~ adapt-to a State recommendation-for selective sheltering or evacuation,.should the' State: choose to respond to an emergency at.Shoreham. Contrary to the intervenor's contentions, the LILCO Transition Plan states clearly the guidelines that would be used in recommending selective sheltering or evacuation for -radiosenaitive. populations. -) [} 5403230032 840321 PDR ADOCK-05000322 ~T PDR L_ 4

~, - n, 4 - -During:an emergency at a-nuclear power plant which re-sults in an offsite release, the downwind population may be ex-

posed ~to. radioactive materialuof.three forms:

radioactive -noble gases' radioactive halogen gases, and radioactive

particulates'..The LILCO Transition Plan has procedures devel-

'oped pursuant to; appropriate NRC regulations and guidelines that describe how the Local-Emergency Response Orgsnization -(LERO) would make a-protective action recommendation of shel-taring or evacuation for a segment.of the population. The rec-ommendation is based upon conditions at the time of an accident and the comparative-benefits that would be received by shel-tering and by evacuating. The recommendation of sheltering would provide protection to boaters, transients in the EPZ, people in cars, and people inside buildings within the EPZ. But'the recommendation will not result in zero dose. No pro- -tective action will result'in zero dose at any nuclear power plant in New York State cn in the country,.and.the NRC regula- ~ 'tions do;not.' contemplate that zero-dose must.be' achievable with protective actions in order that nuclear power. plants be al- ~ lowed to operate, contrary to the intervenors' suggestions oth-erwise. Nor do wind' shifts on Long Island. require that LILCO-recommend-evacuation out.to.5 to 7 miles in the event any evac-nation is recommended. The average wind speed on.Long Island is 8 miles, and the wind variability at Shoreham, a coastal lo-cation, is lower.than island or valley locations. In addition, N .JA ay ,-~y-w--=W ee,-----sv 4-w,=--" ee --++ew,re'm*-

L O; ~ . shifts in the wind would be taken into account by the Director 8 .of-Local Response in making a protective action recommendation, 'a.Ed' additional. recommendations.would'be made if necessary in ' response'to a shift in wind. The protective action recommenda- . tion.under the LILCO Plan would be~made for an area in the form of!a keyhole. ~This keyhole would' consist of a 360 degree area .m circling the plant'out:to 2. miles, plus (depending upon the projected doses) a.5 or 10 mile downwind sector consisting of certain zones. Most of the! zones that would be affected by an evacuation out to 5 miles'actually extend to about 7 miles. Attachments i' Attachment 1 -- LILCO Transition Plan, p. 3.6-5 Attachment 2 -- New York State Radiological Emergency Plan, pp..III-41-42 Attachment. 3 --' EPA's Prctective Action Evaluation, Part I: The Effectiveness of Sheltering as a Protec-

tive Action Against Nuclear Accidents Involving Gaseous Releases (EPA 520/1-78-001A)

'(1978), pp.'7.-10, 18',;24 -Attachment 4 -- EPA's Manual of Protective Action Guides (EPA 520/1-78-001A) Draft Appendix B: Planner's Evaluation Guide-for Evacuation and Shelter, pp. i, 11, B-9, 10 and 12 At'tachment 5 -- LILCO' Transition Plan, OPIP 3.6.1 -Attachment 6 -- LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP.3.8.2,

p. 22 of 38 JAttachment~ 7 -- LILCO. Transition Plan, OPIP 3.3.2, p.

41 of 163 Attachment-8'-- LILCO Transition. Plan, p. 3.6-6 - Attachment' 9 -- LILCO Transition Plan, Table 3.6.1 N

y;- Attachment 10 -- New York State Plan, pp. III-43 through III-44 ' 1 -- Deposition of. Edward P. Bennett, February 9, 1984, pp. 1-2, 46-47, 65 2 -- Deposition of Richard Taylor, February 9, 1984, pp. 1-2, 24-26, 38 . Attachment 13 -- LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.5.1, pp. 1-9 4 -- LILCO Transition Plan, Attachment 2.2.1 5.-- LILCO Transition Plan 3.8.2, Attachment 5 6 -- LILCO Transition Plan, Appendix A, Figure 3 7 -- LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.3.1,

p. 7 of 10 8 -- Shoreham FSAR, Table 2.3.2-1 9 -- Wind Direction Variability Analysis for Shoreham and other Sites

,e---, ,2-w,w-

LILCO, March 21, 1984 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of ) ) LONG ISLAND LIGHTINO COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 ) (Emergency Planning (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, ) Proceeding) Unit 1) ) LILCO'S TESTIMONY ON CONTENTIONS 60, 61, 63, and 64 (PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS) 1. Q. Please identify yourselves. A. My name is Matthew C. Cordaro. My address is Long Island Lighting Company, 175 East Old Country Road, Hicksville, New York 11801. My name is Charles A. Daverio. My address is Long Island Lighting Company, 100 East Old Country Road, Hicksville, New York 11801. My name is Michael L. Miele. My address is Long Island Lighting Company, Shoreham Nuclear Power

Station, P.O.

Box 628, Wading River, New York 11792

r ..My name is Dennis S. Mileti. My address is Depart-ment of Sociology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523. My name is Richard J. Watts. My business address is Impell Corporation, 225 Broad Hollow Road, Melville, New York, 11747. 2. Q. Please state your professional qualifications. A. [Cordaro] I am Vice President, Engineering, for LILCO. My professional qualifications are being offcred-into evidence as part of the document enti-tied " Professional Qualifications of LILCO Witness-es." I an sitting on this panel to provide the LILCO management perspective on emergency planning, and to answer any questions pertinent to manage-ment. My role in emergency planning for Shoreham ( is to ensure that the needs and requirements of emergency planning are being met, and that the technical direction and content of emergency plan-ning are being conveyed to corporate management. I' l. accomplish this-by supervising the development and I implementation of the offsite emergency response plan for Shoreham; the Manager of the Local Emer-gency Response Implementing Organization (LERIO) reports directly to me. ~. _.

n .,L [Daverio] I am employed by LILCO as Supervisor of Emergency Planning and Regulatory Services, and - have been working on emergency planning for LILCO over four years. I am also. Assistant Manager of LILCO's Local Emergency Response Implementing Orga-nization (LERIO). My professional qualifications are being offered into evidence as part of the doc-s ument entitled " Professional Qualifications of LILCO Witnesses." As Supervisor of Emergency Plan-ning and Assistant Manager of LERIO, I am responsi-H ble for implementing LILCO's Local Emergency Re-sponse Plan. As such, I am familiar with the - issues surrounding protective action recommenda-tions. [Miele] I am employed by LILCO as the Radiation Protection Section Supervisor of the Nuclear Engi-neering Department. My professional qualificatiens ' are being offered into evidence as part of the doc-ument. entitled " Professional Qualifications of LILCO Witnesses." I am responsible for the corpo- - rate overview of all technical aspects of LILCO's emergency planning for onsite and offsite ra-diological protection, and therefore am familiar with the issues surrounding protective action rec-ommendations. [Mileti) I am an Associate Professor of Sociology and Director of the Hazards Assessment Laboratory at Colorado State University. My professional qualifications are heing offered into evidence as part of the document entitled " Professional-Quali- ~ fications of LILCO Witnesses." [ Watts] I am the Health Physics Supervisor for the Radiological Services Section of Impell Corpora-tion. My professional qualifications are being of-fered into evidence as part of the document enti-tied " Professional Qualifications of LILCO Witnesses." I have been retained by LILCO to serve as a Radiation Health Coordinator for LERO and have participated in LERO drills in this capacity. As such, I am familiar with the iceuos surrounding these contentions. 3. Q. What is the " Preamble to Contentions 50-83"? A. The " Preamble to Contentions 60-83" (pages 119-20 of the contentions) reads as follows: Preamble to Contentions 60-83. 10 CER Section 50.47(a)(1) requires a find-ing of. reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a ra-diological emergency. In addition, 10 .CFR Section 50.47(b)(10) requires the development of a range of protective ac-tions for the public; guidelines for the

c,.

s -

.W7 choice of protective actions.must be consistent with Federal guidance. Such guidance includes the Manual of Protec-Ltive Action Guides ("PAGs") ,e (EPA-520/1-75-001), which sets forth the threshold projected dose-levels at which protective actions are to'be commenced. The PAGs are embraced in NUREG 0654, Sections II.J.7 and J.9, cnd are refer-enced in the LILCO Plan, at Section 3.6, and OPIP.3.'6.1. NUREG 0654. in Sections II.J.9.and J.10, requires.that there be established "a capability for implementing protective measures. based upon protective action guides and other criteria."- (Emphasis'added). In Contentions 60-83, Intervenors con-tend that LILCO's plan does not provide reasonable assurance that adequate pro-tective measures can.and will'be imple-mented to protact the population from the potential health hazards of an acci-dent at Shoreham. Thus, (a) there is no reasonable assurance that thc. measures proposed in the.LILCO Plan would, if taken, provide adequata protection from 'the potential consequences of an.emer-gency at Shoreham; and (b) there is no reasonable assurance that the proposed measures could or would in fact be taken in the event of an emergency. ?< 4. Q. What'is the "Further Preamble to' Contentions

~

60-62"? ?A. The "Further Preamble to' Contentions 60-62" reads as follows: c -Further Preamble to Contentions 60-62. .The LILCO. Plan provides that the protective action of sheltering '~ -may be recommended (Plan, at 3.6-5), Land that it.is "the preferred protec-i tive action if sufficient protection

is offered by sheltering, or if no

.J<-- .y v,.-,.-[,w..,7y,y ,,~,.a r y...,,,r ,,,,..,7%,,,,,-_,y,..,+,.,.g....,.m,,,,,7-.r--r.r,.._,w.,,y%yprm

~ lY ' ~, : additional, benefit is gained by evac-uation." '(OPIP 3.6.1, Section 3.2). Intervenors contend that as to the proposed protective action of shel-taring, the LILCOl Plan fails to.com- ~ ply with 10 CFR Section 50.47(a)(1) and NUREG.0654,' Section II.J.9, be-cause.there is no assurance that sheltering,-as a protective action, could or would be_ effectively imple-mented in'the event of an emergency in a manner which would protect the public. Indeed, the facts indicate that'many people will refuse to shel-ter and will, instead, choose to evacuate, and that many other per- ' sons, as a practical matter, will be unable to shelter. Thus, sheltering cannot be~ viewed as an adequate pro-tective action, as LILCO appears to believe, for the reasons set forth in SC Contentiona.60-62. [ Footnote omitted.] 4 Contention 60: Selective Sheltering 5. Q. What is Contention 60? A. Contention 60 reads as follows: Contention 60. At page 3.6-5 of the LILCO Plan, LILCO states: Th[e] protective action (of selective sheltering] may be or-dered at projected _ doses below the accepted PAGs to minimize radioactive exposure,-particu-larly to pregnant women and children. The Sheltering option may be recommended as an effective op-tion for individuals who could not-be safely evacuated. This - -. -.. _ ~.. _ _., - _ _ _... _. _ -...

i would include individuals who have been designated medically unable to withstand the physical stress of.an evacuation, as well as:those individuals who require constant, sophisticated medical attention. The Plan fails to set forth guide-lines to be used by command and con-trol personnel: (a) in choosing to recommend the protective action of selective sheltering; or (b) in de-termining the individuals who should or would be subject to such a recom-mendation. Rather, as quoted above, the Plan contains only generalized . statements which, in fact, provide no guidance at all. In addition, there are no procedures which indicate the means by which such a recommendation would or could be implemented. The Plan thus fails to comply with 10 CFR Sections 50.47 (a)(1), 50.47 (b)(10) and NUREG 0654, Sections II.J.9.and .J.10. 6. Q. What are the legal standards cited in Contention 60? A. The legal-standards cited in Contention 60 are the following: 10 C.F.R. 6 SO.47(a)(1) No operating licence for a nuclear power reactor will be issued unless a finding is made by NRC that the state of onsite and offsite emergency pre-paredness provides reasonable assur-ance that adequate protective mea-sures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.

. 10 C.F.R. 5 50.47(b)(10) A range of protective actions have been developed for tne plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an cmergency consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the inges-tion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed. NUREG-0654, II.J.9 Each State and local organization shall establish a capability for im-plementing protective measures based upon protective action guides and other criteria. This shall be con-sistent wi.th the recommendations of EPA regarding exposure resulting from - passage of radioactive airborne plumes, (EPA-520/1-75-OOl) and with those of DHEW (DHHS)/FDA regarding radioactive contamination of human food and animal feeds as published in the Federal Register of December 15, 1978 (43 FR 58790). NUREG-0654, II.J.10 The organization's plans to implement protective measures for the plume ex-posure pathway shall include: -m. The bases for the choice of rec-ommended protective actions from the plume exposure pathway during emergency conditions. This shall include expected local protection afforded in residential units or other shelter for direct and inhalation exposure, as well as evacuation time estimates. 7. .Q. Does the LILCO Transition Plan identify " selective sheltering" as a potential protective action? _ _. ~

_9 A. Yes, at page 3.6-5 (Attachment 1 to this testimo-ny). 8. Q. What is " selective sheltering"? A. Selective sheltering is a protective action that may be ordered at projected doses below the Envi-ronmental Protective' Agency's (EPA's) accepted PAGs (Protective Action Guides) to minimize radioactive exposure, particularly to pregnant women and chil- .dren. 9. Q. Why does the LILCO Transition Plan include selec-tive sheltering? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] Revision 3 of the LILCO Plan states at 3.6-5 (Attachment 1 to this testimony) that selective sheltering for children and pregnant women or other persons deemed radio-sensitive would not be implemented "without consul-tation with the N.Y. State Commissioner of Health." ,u LILCO included selective sheltering in the Plan in order to be consistent with the New York State Ra-diological Emergency Plan page III-41 (Attachment 2 to this testimony) and to ensure that Local Emer-gency Responsa Organization (LERO) personnel would be familiar with the State terminology should New

i 4 . l p York State decide to take an active role in an emergency response for Shoreham. In short, the Plan includes selective sheltering to provide the - flexibility to adapt to a State recommendation for ~ selective sheltering, should the State choose to respond to an emergency at Shoreham. . 10. Q. What does the New Ycrk State Radiological Emergency Plan provide regarding selective sheltering? A. - [Cordaro, Daverio,. Miele, Watts) -The New York i State Plan ~, page III-41 (Attachment 2), states as follows: In general, protective actions will be taken in accordance with the EPA PAG guidelines. The Commissioner of Health may recommend protective ac - tion at projected doses below these guidelines to minimize' radioactive - exposure, particularly of pregnant women and children. The. Selective - Sheltering Option will provide this flexibility. In addition, the Selec- - tive; Sheltering-Option may be recom-mended by the State Commissioner of Health as an effective option _for in-dividuals who could not be safely evacuated, if a Selective or General 1, ' Evacuation may otherwise-be recom-mended. This would includa individu- - als who have been designated medi-cally unable 1to withstand the physical and/or psychological stress of an evacuation, as:well as those individuals who require-constant, so-phisticated medical attention. g -c v ' S e m h b e-n w 4 g wy -gy -y ge-y>mB-: o 9 w, y e,wg -ww-g-yN-e w-- -= w y reti teru--y*g .cgp -ta-wgei-F- MP%

eMrye-p-'+Wre-A ywy----gr4 p-9 grg-m=-pgv-g-ic-

A & 11. Q. Under what' circumstances, then, would LERO recom-mend selective sheltering? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] Without instruc-tions from the State Commissioner of Health or other State officials, LERO would not recommend se-lective sheltering for radiosensitive persons. If sheltering were advisable for any portion of the population that was considered radiosensitive, LERO would recommend sheltering for the entire popula-tion in the affected area. Fcr a discussion of when and how LERO might recommend sheltering to those organizations such as hospitals, where evacu-ation might put residents at risk, see LILCO's tes-timony in response to Contention 72. 12. Q. Dr. Mileti, in other testimony you have said that the evacuation advisories at Three-Mile Island, which were directed only at pregnant women and young children, were a message about risk to the entire population, and therefore it is only natural that other members of that population evacuated as well. Does'this mean that selective sheltering is not a workable alternative? A. [Mileti] No, selective sheltering is an opticn for response to emergencies at nuclear power plants.

r Selective sheltering is applicable to emergency planning in two ways. First, selective sheltering could refer to "special" groups of people within a larger population that are taking some other pro-tective action, for example, evacuating. This type of selective sheltering could apply, for example, to people who are too infirm to engage in evacua-tion (the way in which the LILCO Plan applies it). This application of selective sheltering is not complicated by being perceived as risk information for people in the area not advised to engage in this particular protective action, since those peo-ple would also be taking some (other) protective action. Second, selective sheltering could refer to public advisories that certain demographic groups (for ex- . ample, pregnant women and children) in a specific locality shelter while others in the same area are not advised to take any protective action. In this case, it is possible, given that the public would likely interpret'such an advisory as a statement about the risk in a particular area, that other people not " demographically" included in the advis-ory would also shelter. However, when one is con-sidering sheltering, it is hard to see how

2' E c; '. N ' t4 gi p' 2 m. c,

.a; M.

., %g 3 'e ~1$- y o: w y a x. 2 ;' ~- .. m =c. .x,e.y 3 ? N A sadditional persons,shel'tering would detract from n ~ 2' public safety. .e 4 s J m-

13'. S Q.sN The contention says that the Plan (does not have any sS

,4-N s . ;,J ' %,,,7 ~ . gtiidelines" for choosidg selective sheltering. Is e - ~"

thisQrue?

s ..\\

~:

2, ; . ~,.. +. '~ ~ 3" A.. 'T.Cordaro, ' Daverio,' Miele, Watts] No. The Plan g - .N Dy does state guidelines for cholising selective shel-

\\

-y. tering for'radiose'nsitive population,s. It would be s. , l' implemented.(at the' instruction of the State) "for ,s ',y _g. projected doses below the accepted PAGs" (that is, - dyf _ ~~ below one. rem whole body..or-five rem thyroid) for " pregnant women and children." (Attachment 1 to s x m.- .^ N. -this testim'ony.) As to selective eheltering as a I ^ s, recommendation in lieu-of evacuation for people l

1..

n under medical care, the, guidelines followed are .,4 A;explEin d in LILCO's' testimony in response to Con-s c tention 72. a m' 14 a Q. How would the option of selective sheltering be im-e- plemented? q A. '[Cordaro, Daverio, Miele', Watts] The State (or

g., '

LERO, if reqhested by the State) would issue a spe-cific prote'ctive action recommendation of selective ' sheltering for radiosensitive persons via the u e eA-

_ Emergency Broadcast System. Again, only at the State's direction, should it choose to respond dur-ing an actual emergency, would selective shcitering be recommended to.a portion of the population when 'the remaining population-in the same area took no protective action. Contention 61: Sheltering 15. Q. What is Contention 61? A. (Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] Contention 61 reads as follows: Contention 61. Intervenors contend that a-protective action recommenda-tion of sheltering would not or could not be implemented. Specifically, a substantial number of people who might be advised to shelter, as a practical matter, will be unable to do so.because: A. A large number of homes and other structures in the EPZ are con-structed of wood and have no base-ments. According to LILCO's shielding factors (Plan, Table ~ 3.6.5), the protection offered by such shelter is limited, at most, to a reduction in dose of only 10 per-cent from that received with no shel-ter. As a practical matter, persons with access to such structures have little~" shelter" available, and thus sheltering should not be considered as a protective action for these per-sons.

" ~ B. Persons who.are traveling in their cars or other vehicles at the time of a sheltering recommendation ~ may not be able to reach shelter fast enough to obtain_any. protection from a release of radioactive fission -products. Vehicles offer essentially no protection _from radioactive doses. [ Contention 61.C, dealing with implementing protective action recom-mendations at schools within the.EPZ, is addressed in-LILCO's testimony on 1 schools.] D. Transients who are on beaches, in parks or in other outdoor ' recreation areas will.have no access tofshelter. Contrary to the' require-ment.of NUREG 0654 Section J.10.a, 'the Plan fails to identify public sheltering areas. (See FEMA Report, _at 8). E. Persons who are in boats in the EPZ will'have no access to shel-ter. Moreover, even if people were willing and able to follow a sheltering rec-cmmendation, there is no1 assurance that taking such. action would provide -any significant dose. savings and thus

prevent-persons in the EPZ from

_. receiving health-threatening radia-tion doses for the following reasons: [ Contention 61.F was not admitted by the Board.1 G. Many other homes in the EPZ, even iflthey provideLmore shielding -than a-wood house,.will only reduce d; doses about 50 percent. In a severe accident, a 50-percent dose reduction will still result in health-threatening doses. -H. According to LILCO, the aver- ' age sheltering factor available in

1 l l the EPZ is 0.7, which means that, on the average, those who follow a shel- .tering recommendation will nonetheless receive 70 percent of the dose they would receive from the plume if they were outside the shel-ter. I. The cloud doses resulting from a release of radioactive fission products from the Shoreham plant could be so substantial that even ~ taking into account the 30 percent average dose reduction provided by shelter in the EPZ, persons who fol-low a sheltering recommendation could still receive doses that would cause adverse health effects. [ Footnote omitted.] Thus, sheltering is not an adequate protective action in the event of an emergency at shoreham, and the Plan, therefore, fails to comply with 10 CFR Sections 50.47(a)(1) and 50.47(b)(10), and NUREG 0654 Section II.J.9. 16. .Q. What are the legal standards for Contention 61? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The legal stan-dards are the following: 10 C.F.R. S 50.47(a)(ll No operating license for a nuclear power reactor will be issued unless a finding ~is made by NRC that the state of onsite and offsite emergcncy pre-paredness provides reasonable assur-ance that adequate protective mea-sures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency.

- 10 C.F.R. 6 50.47(b)(10) A range of protective actions have been developsd for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during - an emergency consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective ' actions for the inges " tion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed. NUREG-0654, II.J.9 Each State and local organization shall establish a capability for 4 implementing protective measures based upon protective action guides.and other criteria. This shall be consistent with the rec-ommendations of EPA regarding exposure resulting from passage of radioactive airborne plumes, (EPA-520/1-75-001) and with those of DHEW (DHHS)/FDA regarding radioactive contamination of human food and animal feeds as published in the Federal Register of December 15, 1978 (43 Fed. Reg. 58,790). NUREG-0654,'II.J.10 . The organization's plans to implement protective measures for the plume ex-posure pathway shall include: Maps showing evacuation routes, evac-uation areas, preselected ra-diological sampling and monitoring points, relocation centers in host areas, and shelter areas; (identifi-cation of radiological sampling and monitoring points-shall include the designators in Table J-1 or an equiv-alent uniform system described in the plan);

. Contention 61.A: Shielding Factors 17.

Q.

What types of radiation exposure might result from 'an accident at a nuclear power plant? A. (Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts) During an emer-gency at a nuclear power plant, the downwind popu-lation may be exposed to radioactive material of three forms, as follows: (1) Radioactive noble gases. These are chemically inactive gases that travel in the plume and cause -^ an external dose to the whole body. (2) Radioactive-haloge'n gases. These are chemi-( ~cally active gases, primarily iodine, that also travel in the plume. These gasos, when inhaled, migrate through the' blood and tend to~ concentrate in the thyroid. Thus, inhalation of these gases will result primarily in a thyroid dose. (3)_ Radioactive particulates. These are dust-like particles that are deposited from the plume on to-surfaces in the downwind a;ea. These particulates may result in an external whole body dose. In_ad-dition, deposited particulates when disturbed may become airborne again and cause an internal dose if inhaled. I l

i. 18.

Q. How much less shielding does a person get if he is in a wooden home with no basement than if he is in aEmasonry home with a basement? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The relative. whole body dose shielding benefit obtained by being inside a structure will differ for radiation emit-ted from the different types of radioactive materi-al mentioned above. In general, the more substan-tial the structure, the more benefit it will provide. The thyroid dose comes from inhaled gases, however,_and therefore the rate of air transfer through the structure becomes the critical factor. 'The thyroid dose sheltering factor pres-ently used is based upon guidance from the 1978 version of EPA's Protective Action Evaluation (EPA 520/1-75-001). Since it is difficult to generalize about windows, doors, and ventilation types for the many different structures in a community, a con-stant air replacement rate is assumed in the 1978 EPA 520. The following table shows the shielding benefits from different' types of structures, based on the .1978 EPA 520 (see Attachment 3 to this testimony). The thyroid plume factors are based upon an assumed exposure duration of one hour.

Dose Reduction Factors Particulates Gases Whole Body Whole Body Thyroid Surface Structure Plume Plume Deposition Outside 1.0 1.0 1.0 Wood, no basement 0.9 0.5 0.4 Wood, basement 0.6 0.5 0.1 - Masonry, no basement 0.6 0.5 0.2 Masonry,' basement 0.4 0.5 0.1 Large Building 0.2 0.5 0.05 A re91 sed draft of portions of. EPA's Manual of Pro-tective Action Guides (EPA 520/1-75-001A), dated June 1983, has provided new guidance on thyroid dose shielding: 0.36 for structures of wood or ma-- sonry with or without a basement, and 0.06 for large buildings (see Attachment 4 to this testimo-ny). The new model, which is more realistic, shows a greater benefit because it assumes a logarithmic air exchange rather than a linear exchange. These new values will be incorporated into the LILCO Transition Plan's protective action procedure OPIP 3.6.1 (Attachment 5 to this testimony). 19. Q. .Because some-people have no basements, or live in frame houses, would it make sense to eliminate sheltering as a protective action for (a) all the r w-we w ,r,- ,,,r, ,-.---~-,-,,,,w-----

'^ - people in'the EPZ, (b) those people who have no basements or (c; thone who do not live in masonry ~ hcuses? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] No, it would not. From the above table it can be seen that, general-ly, a wooden house without a basement offers less benefit than the basement of a masonry house. But for a release of short duration that is composed of particulates and gaseous iodines that could result in a thyroid inhalation dose, a wood frame house will provide a substantial sheltering benefit. Mnking protective action recommendations requires in part that one compare, based upon the circum-stances of a particular accident, the dose that might be received by the population if it shelters to the dose if it evacuates. Thus, a recommenda-tion for sheltering should not be. discounted; all sheltering action would provide benefits to some extent. - The comparison of doses that might be re-ceived under evacuation and under sheltering must be considered in making a recommendation. Further, it is not feasible to evacuate a portion of the population based upon home structures, be-cause of the confusion it would cause. The I

~-- - s protective.ection recommendations prepared under OPIP-3.6.1-(Attachment 5 to this testimony) use an average: whole-body plume shielding f actor for Suffolk County of 0.7. This shielding factor is representative of-the housing in the County. Sheltering probably would be the appropriate pro-tective action under the following conditions: (1) If the projected dose is only slightly~above the Environmental: Protection Agency Protective Ac-tion. Guides (EPA PAGs), or of short duration, and the area shelters will provide enough benefit to make evacuation. unnecessary; or -(2)-If the roads are hazardous due to' weather and therefore' evacuation cannot safely be accomplished; or (3)'If sheltering would result in lower doses when compared to the doses that might be received if people evacuate. =20. Q. Couldn't people without basements make their way to a neighbor'.s house or to a nearby public building?

r: z - A. l[Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] We do not think [ i it'is reasonable to expect' people already in a . building to seek shelter in another building, for - several reasons. First, while theoretically it could be beneficial r for-people in homes without basements to seek shel- -tering in a basgment elsewhere, as a practical mat- -ter it could cause confusion and result in a . greater. net dose,_because people would be required to go outside tci search for better shelter. While they were outside, they would have no protection from-a plume and, for example, might receive a thy-roid inhalation dose as well as a whole body dose. Second, if sheltering is-recommended because the roads are hazardous due to-snow and ice, then it -would not be advisable to have people leaving their homes to' seek "better" shelter. In addition, as stated in'the County's contention, automobiles offer limited protection from either whole body or thyroid doses. It is not advisable to have. people driving around unnecessarily in the plume. ~ ' Third, in the public education program, LILCO explains where the best locations for sheltering l are within a particular type of structure.

=

g e t-e y e 44, y H e--p e gq-,-hpe-ticumee ggnima,g-e e. .a-N,,-e9 ogwi. 99y g y q.gmqq g-gh gmy5gi--n-fr y e ege, -y+-w a=-pe+-+g.-~eywg-rw y 79.gr w .ps tp r y sp ag gu e*+Mgro

< Consequently,: LILCO has not included in its plan-ning any notion that-people should look around to seek the "best" building in which to shelter when sheltering is thel recommended protective action. ~ . Contention 61.B: Persons In Automobiles 21. -Q. Suppose.a person were traveling in his car at the time a sheltering recommendation is made. Might he be unable to reach shelter in time to avoid expo-sure to radiation? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts) If sheltering is recommended, people in cars will hear the sirens if they are in the 10-mile EPZ and so almost all will -have immediate access to radios and will be able to respond. If the driver lives in the EPZ, he would be able to reach a place of shelter (his home) quickly. If the driver does not live in the EPZ, he could quickly seek shelter in a building. Even if the driver chose to drive out of the EPZ he would be traveling faster than the average wind speed experienced near the Shoreham plant. Conse-quently, in 30 minutes, a person would be able to drive to a point outside the EPZ from any point within it, assuming he must drive 10 miles and does so at 20 mph.

s - p. Contention 61.D: Shelter for Transients 22. Q. Does the plan identify buildings within the EPZ for transients seeking shelter in r'esponse to a protec-tive action' recommendation of sheltering? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] No. In the LILCO Plan, LILCO has chosen not to identify specific public buildings for shelters within the EPZ for transients' use if' sheltering is recommended to the-population, because (1) it is not likely that non-residents would be able to find a particular build-ing, and (2) residents should be encouraged to re-turn to their homes which would make any subsequent evacuation easier. ~ 23. Q. If a sheltering recommendation is made, what will transients do who are on the beaches, in parks, or in other outdoor recreation areas?- A. '[Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The EBS message on sheltering in the LILCO Transition Plan, OPIP 3.8.2, p. 22 of 38 (Attachment 6 to this testimo-ny), instructs people not at home to seek shelter inside buildings. The transient population that would be located at parks and beaches would only be there during warm weather when roads would be . ~.

J - passable. Therefore,-when the sirens are sounded the transient population will be able to mobilize rapidly and seek-shelter in a building or return home. Contention 61.E: Boaters - ;24 Q. If a sheltering recommendation is made, what will persons in boats do? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] Sirene can be heard out to about two miles on the Long Island Sound, so some boaters will hear sirens. They will receive sheltering instructions over their radios. In addition, upon reaching an Alert, the Coast - Guard in New Haven will be notified as indicated in OPIP 3.3.2 ( Attachinent __ to this testimony). If protective action recommendations are made, the Coast Guard will transmit messages to all boats via marine band radio, advising people to leave the area and explaining to them which areas should be avoided. Coast Guard boats will be dispatched to notify any remaining boaters to advise them to leave the area, and to, restrict all marine traffic b within the lO-mile'EPZ. g-c- g,,-, yy-.y.,,eg- ,w yw-w-- -e%,--- --,,---~ww- --wsy-yr-+r-e-= ve---+- y- -4N#"vT--*---'T '--"-T-'w-v7---T"- Contentions 61.G, 61.H, and 61.I: Protection Offered by Taking Shelter 25. Q. Contentions 61.G, H, and I allege that cheltering will not totally protect people from radiation ex-posure. Is this.true? A. [Cordaro,'Daverio, Miele, Watts] Yes. Sheltering reduces the amount of radiation exposure, but it cannot totally eliminate a potential dose from being received by the population. As shown in NUREG-0654 guidelines, protective actions need not be recommended below a threshold level. When threshold levels are reached, the protective action recommended should provide the largest dose savings l-for the public, taking into account the circum-stances at the time of-the accid'fnt. But a protec-tive action will not result :ba zero dcse. The NRC regulations do not contemplate that zero dose must be achievable with protective actions in order that nuclea*: power plants be allowed to operate, con-trary.to the intervenorc' assertions otherwise. 26. Q. Would this be true of every other emergency plan for power plants operating in New York State? t ,n -s ,mn.- ...,---m c,- - - -

4 A. [Cordarc, Daverio, Miele,. Watts] Yes. No power plant in New York State, or in the country, can use ~ protective actions to achieve zero dose in the event of an accident. Contention 63: Selective Evacuation 27. Q. What is Contention 63? A. Contention 63 reads as follows: Contention 63. The LILCO Plan states at page 3.6-6: Selective Evacuation may be im-plemented to evacuate from'the affected area of the plume expo-sure EPE members of the general public who might have a low tol-erance to radiation exposure. 'Specifically, this would. include-pregnant women and children-12 years.and under. The Plan fails to set forth guide-lines to be used by command and con-trol personnelt (a) in choosing to recommend the protective action of-selective evacuation; or (b) in de-termining, identifying and locating the individuals who should be subject to such a recommendation. In addi-tion, there are no procedures which indicate the means by which such a recommendation could or would be im-plemented. The Plan thus~ fails to comply-with 10 C.F.R. S 50.47(a)(1), 50.47(b)(10),'and NUREG-0654 Sections II.J.9 and.J.10. - - - - -. -.,. - ~ - _. - _

l 28. Q. What are the legal standards cited in the Conten-tion? A'. 'The legal standards are the following: 10 C.F.R. 6 50.47(a)(1) No operating license for a nucle-ar power reactor will be issued un-less a finding is made by NRC that -the state of onsite and offsite emer-gency preparedness provides reason- .able assurance that adequate protec-tive measures can and will be taken in_the event of a radiological emer-gency. 10 C.F.R. 5 50.47(b)(lo) A~ range of protective actions have been developed for the plume ex-c posure pathway EPZ for.emerg'ency-workers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency consistent with Federal' guidance, are developed and in place,;and protective actions'for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed. NUREG-0654, II.J.9 Each State and local organiza-tion-shall establish a capability for implementing protective mea-sures based upon protective action guides and other criteria. This shall be consistent with the rec-ommendations.of EPA regarding ex-posure'resulting from passage of radioactive airborne plumes, (EPA-520/1-75-001) and with those 7 of DHEW (DHHS)/FDA regarding radioactive contamination of human food and animal feeds as published in the' Federal Register of December 15, 1978 (43 Fed. Reg. 58,790). ,J.. ,_--.2,~_--,_.,_.

5:. .~ NUREG-0654, II.J.10 The organization's plans to im-plement protective measures for the plume exposure pathway shall include: m. The basesEfor the choice of rec-ommended protective actions from the'plumo exposure pathway daring emergency conditions. This shall include expected local protection afforded in residential units or other shelter for direct and inhalation exposure, as well as evacuation time estimates. 29. -Q. 'What is selective evacuation? A. This is a protective action that limits the evacua-tion to a-portion of the population defined by other-than by. geographic' location, usually ra-diosensitive persons such as pregnant women and children. 30. Q. What does the LILCO Transition Plan say about se-lective evacuation? A. The LILCO Transitio'n Plan at page 3.6-6 (Attachment 8 to this testimony) says the following about se-lective evacuation: Selective Evacuation Selective Evacuation may be imple-mented to evacuate from the affected area.of the plume exposure EPZ mem-bers of the general public who might a ,,,..-n.- . ~. - - - - - - -,.,,,,.,,,.-,,.,. .c., a- , w

w 7 -have a low tolerance to radiation ex-posure. Specifically, this would in-clude pregnant women and children 12 years.and under. This protective action strategy has been adopted from the New York State Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan (III-53,54). It may.be imple-mented for projected dose levels of 1 to 5 rems whole body or 5 to 25 rems to the thyroid, but not without con-sultation with the N. Y. State Com-missioner of Health. - Thus, contrary to what the contention says, tne Plan clearly states the. guidelines for choosing se-lective evacuation as a protective action. The dose guidelines are "projccted dose levels of 1 to 5 rems whole body or 5 to 25 rems thyroid." The persons affected are defined as " pregnant women and children 12 years.and under " 31. Q. On what does LILCO base the guidelines for selec-tive evacuation set out in the Plan? A. . [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] These guidelines were taken directly from' EPA's Protective Action Guides (PAG's). The PAG's-(see Table 3.6.1 cf the LILCO Transition Plan, which is Attachment 9 to this testimony) call for no action if the projected dose is less than 1 rem whole body (or 5 rem thy-roid), and for mandatory evacuation if the +p-re--- ya w ,=g 7--y- , - - ~, - - - ,v-w y,e-,-m-,- w+ w y w

i , projected dose is 5 rem or above whole body (or 25 ~ rem or above thyroid). Between 1 and 5 rem whole body (5 and 25 rem thyroid) the protective action is " shelter as a minimum," with a recommendation te " consider" evacuation, particularly for children and pregnant women. The comment to this dose is that "[i]f constraints exist, special considera-tions should be given for evacuation of children and pregnant women." Thus, the PAG's allow flexi-bility in the 1-5 rem whole body range and in the 5

to 25 rem thyroid range for selective evacuation.

32. Q. Dr. Mileti, you've said that when children and pregnant women were advised to evacuate at Three -Mile Island, this sent a message to everyone else that they might be at risk also. Does this mean that selective evacuation is not a viable alterna-tive? A. [Mileti] ENo, selective evacuation advisories are one option for protective action during an emergen-cy at a nuclear power plant. But it is important for those who might issue a public advisory for se-lective avacuation (the evacuation of only people with certain demographic characteristics from a specific locality while others in the same area are

E i t not included) to understand that actual public re- ~.. sponse likely would not match the advisory. If children-twelve years of age or younger and pregnant-women.were advised to evacuate a specified locality, some others who are not pregnant or not twelve' years of age or younger would also evacuate that area.- This is because a selective evacuation advisory to certain demographic groups.would also contain location-specific information regarding risk to everyone in thet area. Some people would, consequently, define the area as "at risk." Those who are not included in the demographic group ad-vised to evacuate under a selective evacuation but who are in the same locality, could personalize the risk and. evacuate although it is not recommended that they.do so. Likely publ'c response to a selective evacuation-i advisory during a nuclear' power plant emergency does not preclude the option of issuing one. It does, however, suggest that those who might decide to issue such an advisory should be aware of the public response that the advisory would likely pre-cipitate. In this way, decisions about public emergency information (including advisories) and

i public safety could be reasonably matched to likely public response. I might also add that emergency - planners for Long Island-Lighting Company are well-aware.of this likely_public response.to a selective - (demographic)fevacuation advisory for a specific location associated.with a nuclear power plant ac-cident. 33. -Q. When would LILCO recommend the protective action of ~ se1ective evacuation? A.. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] Ravision 3 to the LILCO. Plan stater, at 3.6-6 (Attachment 8 to this testimony) that the protective action of selective evacuation would not be implemented without " con-sultation with the N.Y. State' Commissioner of Health." - LILCO placed this provision in the Plan in order to maintain consistency.with the New York . State Plan and assure that LERO personnel familiar with.the terminology that might be used if New York State participated in the emergency response. LILCO would recommend selective evacuation only if instructed to do so by New York State. In the ab-sence of such an instruction, LILCO would recommend n evacuation for a general population in a specific area. + ,w,- -.=,,,,y .~y .-,,,,,,-,,,y,.. ,-,_y .w,7,m,.,,.

'34. -Q. -What procedures would be used to implement a recom-mendation of selective evacuation? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The State (or LERO,-if requested by the State) would issue a spe- ~ cific recommendation of selective evacuation using the procedures outlined in the evacuation section of the~ State Plan at III-43 (Attachment 10 to this testimony). The public would be notified of the recommendation to evacuate selected segments of the population by the broadcasting of EBS messages ad-vising the public of the recommended protective ac-tion. Contention 64: Wind Shifts 35. Q. What is Contention 64? A. (Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] Contention 64 reads as follows: Contention 64. The LILCO Plan proposes an EPZ consisting of 19 sep-arate zones. In the event-of a ra-diological emergency at Shoreham requiring evacuation of the EFZ, it .is LILCO's-intended strategy to evac-uate all zones within two-miles of the Shorehaa plant, but only a por-tion of those zones outside of the two-mile radius. (See OPI? 3.6.1, ). LILCO's plan, howev-er, fails to account for the fact t-

p_ - that the wind shifts.quickly on Long Island,fwith average vind speeds of approximately 10 miles per hour. Under such conditions, a shift in wind direction could quickly direct the plume over an ataa that was not s in the original-plume pathway, and - thus not included in the initial evacuation order, before that, area could be evacuated. Ir.tervenors contend that given. wind conditions on Long Icland, in the event any evacuation due.to a ra-diological etaergency is required, LILCO must' evacuate at least a radius of five to seven milec around_the plant. Any-partial evacuation of only certain zones within a five to seven mile radius would expose the , population of the nearby unevacuated zor.es to the risk of a sudden wind shift and. consequent health-threatening exposure to radiation. Under these conditions, the LILCO evacuation plan fails to constitute an adequate protective action, as re-quired by 10 CFR Sections 50.47(a)(1)

f and 50.47(b)(10).

36. Q. .What.are the legal standards for contention 64? Ju [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The legal stan-dards cited'in. Contention 64 are.the following: t' C 10 C.F.R. 6 50.47(a)(1) No operating license for a nucle-ar. power reactor will be issued un- -less a. finding is made by NRC that the state.ofronsite and offsite emer-gency preparedness provides reason-able assurance that adequate protec-tive measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emer-gency. g 9-e, -v--- 4 + w .--.e,*ww,4 ~,qg aw--re-.- e --y e>r-, e,-.,n w*V~ w -rvm'--r+- e s'~ m ww~ w rw+-- - -- -v -m er -v'** ~-w s"'ww-m

s 10 C.F.R. 6 50.47(b)(10) A range of protective actions have been developed for the plume ex-posure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guidelines 4 for the choice of protective actions during an emergency consistent with Federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed. 37. Q. Contention 64 alleges that evacuation of certain zones is inadequate because the wind may shift quickly and that therefore at least a radius of five to seven miles must be evacuated-if any evacu-ation at all is called for. Do you agree that, re-gardless of conditions at the tirae of an. accident, 'LILCO should recommend in its Plan an evacuation of a radius of 5.to 7 miles from the plant uhenever evacuation is recommended? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] No, we do not. Evacuation recommendatichs should be made for a particular portion of the EPZ based on circumstanc~ es at the time of an accident. A blanket evacua-tion recommendation like that for everyone in the EPZ likely would not be necessary, and is not con-templated by NRC regulations. -,_=.. _. (38. Q. Do guidelines provided by New York State to nuclear plants require such evacuation out to 7 miles? 'A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] No. As explained by New York _ State's experts (see excerpts of depo-sitions that are Attachments 11 and 12 to this tes-timony),.there are situations where wind direction can be predicted, and thus unnecessary evacuation can be avoided. (Attachment 11 at 46.) Current meteorological conditions at the time of the acci-dent should be used in deciding the appropriate protective action recommendation. (Attachment 12 at 25.) 39. Q. How is a protective action recommendation of evacu-ation made by the Local Emergency Response Organi-zation to the public? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The offsite LERO organization independently calculates projected doses and derives a protective action recommenda-tlon. When the projected dose to the population exceeds the EPA Protective Action Guides, OPIP 3.6.1 (Attachment 5 to this testimony) is used to i evaluate the most appropriate protective action based upon evacuation times, release direction and duration, sheltering factors, plant conditions, and other pertinent data. ~ _ _ _. _ -,.

1 l l - -These data are also evaluated by Shoreham onsite personnel who independently arrive at a protective action recommendation. If the recommendations are inconsistent, the Radiation Health Coordinator will investigate.the basis of the site's. recommendation. The Radiation Health Coordinator discusses his con- ]clusionsregardingprotectiveactionswiththeDi-6_rechor'of Local Response. "^ ' w a ^ The Director then.makes a protective action recom- ^[ mendation.for speci ic zones in the EPZ. This rec-ommendation is broadcast to the public via the EBS ~ ( radio network. 40. D. What information does'the Director of Local Re-sponse receive,-in addition to the information pro-vided'from the" Radiation Health Coordinator, in de-termining;what protective action recommendation to Emake to the public? ~ ')O [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The LERO organi-zati'on has its own field monitoring teams, OPIP 3.5.J pp. 1-9 (Attachment 13 to this testimony), provided by DOE-Radiological Assistance Program ' team members, to evaluate actual doses from the field. In addition, meterological data are avail-able from the National Weather Service and y n ~, ,--m,- m~e, re----

s P' m -Brookhaven National Laborato'ry. Extensive resourc-es are also detailed in the DOE-RAP local ra-diological emergency response plan in Plan Attach-ment 2.2.1 (Attachment 14 to this testimony). If there is sufficient time, the Director would re-ceive this information prior to making a recommen-dation. 41. Q. . ould the protective action recommendation from W LERO ever suggest evacuation out to 7 miles? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts]. The protective action will take the form of a keyhole. This key-hole will be made up of a 360' degree area circling the plant plus a downwind wedge of at least 67 de-grees. Depending on the projected doses the pro-tective action recommendation will be one of the following: ~(a) 2 miles. (b) 2 miles plus a 5-mile downwind sector. (c) 5 miles plus a 10-mile downwind sector. These keyholes are described in the Plan at OPIP 3.8.2, Attachment 5 (Attachment 15 to this testimo-ny).

' ~* / q. y, +: y IS' r ~ The~ reason for the 2 or 5 mile circular area is so s-that in case of a change in wind direction, those s n areas near the plant will have-already taken pro-Y tective actions. 'As can be seen from looking at ~?- ~- the~ zone map _in the Plan at Appendix A, Figure 3 ^ -(Attachment 16 to this testimony), the zones af- \\ ~fected by a five mile' evacuation actually go out to 'about seven miles except inizone J. When weather i forecast information indicates that the wind direc-tion will change, the protective action is recalculated and if necessary a new protective ac- ~- tion recommendation is issued. If between the time the Director of Local Response 42. Q receives the onsite suggestion as to protective ac- , tion and'an actual announcement _is made, the wind "were to-shift, would the Director of Local Response ~ 9 know about it? c(s y N -A2 jcordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts) The wind direc-s i tion-is one of the significant' pieces of informa-i tion on the New York State Radiological Data Form, s 'w ~ ;. Econtained in OPIP 3.3.1, p. 7 of 10 of the LILCO x i Plan.(Attachment l'7 to this testimony). . henever W s m -N cany of.the information' changes the site personnel ' 'h will transmit an updated form. If the wind shift v-, <u w .u" 1 g% .2 o p

. _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _. causes new zones to be affected, then the protec-tive action will be modified and the EBS message will be changed to reflect the new conditions. It is important to note that efforta are continually made to anticipate future wind direction changes by consulting sources of weather forecast information. ~ 43. Q. What would be recommended if the wind shifted after an evacuation of a certain area were already un-derway? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] Once an evacua-tion of an area is started it would not be discon- ~ tinued because of a wind shift. These people would be advised to return to the area only after the energency has terminated. The additional persons susceptible to exposure.aus a result of the shift in wind would also be asked to move. 44. Q. Is the average wind speed approximately 10 miles an hour on Long Island? A. [Cordaro, Daverio, Miele, Watts] The Shoreham [ -. -FSAR, Table 2.3.2-1 (Attachment 18 to this testimo- .ny), reports that'the average windspeed on Long Is-land, based on data from Suffolk County Air Force Base taken over 19 years, is 8 miles an hour.

.m 43-s 45.- Q. . Does the wind shift quickly on Long Island? [Cordare, Daverio, Miele, Watts} As seen from A. Table ~2 of the attached study entitled " Wind Direc-- tion ~ Variability'Analycis (for).Shoreham and Other Sites,".Shoreham is considered a coastal location. Generally,. coastal. locations have lower wind variability than island or valley locations. In ' fact, even as compared to other coastal locations i studied, Shoreham has a' lower wind variation. CONCLUSION ' 46.. Q. Ple'ase summarize your. testimony. A. The protective action. recommendations contemplated. by the LILCO Transition Plan,'and the methods by which those. recommendations would be chosen, comply - with NRC.and-New York State regulations and - guidelines regarding protective actions. Selective sheltering-and. selective evacuation would be sug-i r gested only on the recommendation of New York 4 ~ State, and are. included in the Plan to provide b flexibility to adapt to a State recommendation for selective sheltering or evacuation, should the State choose to. respond to an emergency at t. .) 9 w.e-yg -'4 a, wg a b -.y e-y 9 g gkwey .p m

'%es ees q.- y 9 y p y

age-a-g g9-,g .s3g,.m. p r ey syii_-ep+4pg,9--eepg.y%9 m p e, e- -ywwy.ei-aye<ye-y ow w -Wy + v,em

l: Shoreham. Contrary.to the intervenor's conten-Ltions,'the LILCO Transition Plan states clearly the

guidelines that would be used in recommending se-

~ lective sheltering or evacuation for radiosensitive During an emergency at a nuclear power plant which results in an offsite release,~the downwind popula-y . tion may be. exposed to radioactive ~ material of three forms: radioactive noble gases, radioactive halogen gases, and radioactive particulates. The LILCO Transition Plan has procedures developed pur-nuant tc appropriate NRC regulations and guidelines, that describe how the Local Emergency Response organization'(LERO) would make a protec-tive action recommendation of sheltering or evacua-tion for a segment of the population. The recom-L mendation is based.upon conditions at the time of an accident and.the comparative' benefits that would I ' be received by' sheltering and by evacuating. The - recommendation of sheltering would provide protec-i' . tion to boaters,-transients in'the EPZ,' people in cars, and people inside buildings within the EPZ.

K But the recommendation will not result in zero dose.

No protective action will result in zero ^ dose at any. nuclear-power plant.in New York State. or in the country, and the NRC-regulations do not Y s w l contemplate that zero dose must be achievable with protective actions in order that nuclear power plante be allowed to operate, contrary to the in-tervenors suggestions otherwise. Nor do wind shifts on Long Island require that LILCO recommend evacuation out to 5 to 7 miles in the event any evacuation is recommended. The aver-age wind speed on.Long Island is 8 miles, and the wind variability at Shoreham, a coastal location, is lower than island or valley locations. In addi-tion, shifts in the wind would be taken into ac-count by the Director of Local Response in making a protective action recommendation, and additional recommendations would be made if necessary in re-sponse to a shift in wind. The protective action recommendation under the LILCO Plan would be made for an area in the form of a keyhole. This keyhole would consist of a 360 degree area circling the plant out tx) 2 miles, plus (dep'ending upon the projected doses) a 5 or 10 mile downwind sector consisting of certain zones. Most of the zones that would be affected by an evacuation out to 5 miles actually extend to about 7 miles.

f r ? ~ l k 6 i-i i 3 9 + - ~--,-,,,,,

Y -(' and bed sheets can be employed as effective 1 . respiratory filters when folded several times and 2 he)d over the mouth and nose. 3 4 - t Potassium Iodide (KI), which is used as a thyroid 5 blocking agent, will be used only by those emergency 6 workers who have previously been screened for its-7 Adequate supplies of KI will be maintained by 8 use. LILCO and distributed by the Local Emergency 9 Response Organization through the authorization of 10 the Health Services Cocrdinator, refer to KI 11 Distribution,-Procedure 3.6.2 12 13 Selective Sheltering 14 15 This protective action may be ordered at projected 16 doses below the accepted PAGs to minimize 17 radioactive exposure, particularly to pregnant women 18 and children. The Selective Sheltering option will 19 provide this flexibility. 20 21 This protective action strategy has been adopted 22 from the New York State Radiological Emergency 23 Preparedness Plan (III-50,51). It would not be 24 recommended without consultation with N. Y. State 25 Commissioner of Health. 26 -( 's 27 ~ Sheltering 28 29 The Director of Local Response upon the advice of 30 the Manager of Local Response and/or the Radiation 31 t Health Coordinator may recommend the initiation of 32 Sheltering actions for desipated sectors of the 33 population within designated zones. Public 34 notification of the need to take shelter will be 35. accomplished via the notification system described 36 in Section 3.3. 37 38 The Sheltering option may be recommended as an 39 effective option for individuals who could not be 40 safely evacuated. This would include individuals 41 I who have been designated medically unable to 42 ~ l withstand the physical stress of an evacuation, as 43 well as those individuals who require constant, 44 sophisticated medical attention. 45 46 Sheltering actions may be terminated when the 47 likelihood of exposure has been reduced tc 48 49 appropriate levels. REV. 2 ( 3.6-5 s 7 - - * - w-t %.m'= y -- - - - + -g,ry---.,.h+,r.,ww-.- a- .,w,mvwe,. ,y gia-g.-**ee w sen. M *te y-t-um-w-- ycew --e-<e. - me r-e w. ww w %-e.e m 1W"W-

i+--'-e*evem w

-rmw-e-w-e-mv-q

g 3 t t k i t l- / u .e .-.v. \\., 1 h f5 NEW YORK STATE q' R ADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY 84 PREP AREDNESS PLAN O (including site Specific Plans) m49 cil g, gar ggra+-A

d __ -.--

,.v-~ W k %+ .g*A A a ' ci, +g 4 l' ^ g 4 ,h.. }, = se g. c c 'g, A J n ^~ i g. f. 3 1 e f m' vs r; a 4 4 e '4 y e a g.- ( ( s k. b*

t
g g

+ J r a M ~ .) 'p ~ b 'iQ f '? h ' {' L =..' =* o .g j+,

t

_4 7 g. s g w: A ..:s, s.

.- e. NDI YOP/. STATE PADI0 LOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN Prepared for the Disaster Preparedness Commission of the State of thw York Mario Cuomo, Governor l l \\ l i l l f.. By the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Group ! ('- e

7 %.., ....__n. 4 e the activation of the State ECC and the appropriate district and county EOC's. F (2) Selective Sheltering i t In general, protective actions will be taken in accordance with the EPA PAG guidelines. The Commissioner of Health may recomend protective action at projected doses below these guidelines to minimize radioactive exposure, particularly of pregnant women and children. The Selective Sheltering Option will provide this flexibility. In addition, the Selective Sheltering Option may be recommended by the State Commissioner of Health as an effective option for individu&ls who could i not be safely evacuated, if a Selective or Caneral Evacuation may otherwise be recornended. This would include individuals who have been designated medically unable to withstand the physical and/or psychological stress of an evacuation, as well as those individuals who require constant, sophisticated medical attention. The implementation and execution of the Selective Sheltering Pesponse Option will include the following: e the appropriate local health officar, in conjunction with the special facilities administrators and other local officials will make an initial detemination of the number of nonevacuative individuals and their medical care requirements. This will be compared with the sheltering and medical capabilities otherwise available to these individuals; l r e if this preliminary disposition indicates that j additional medical pcrsonnel, equipment, and/or supplies are needed, local and State officials will l assist in acquiring whatever is needed; s the local health officer will conduct an on-going assessment as to the possibility and desirability l of evacuation for those persons initially l detemined to be non-evacuative. This assessment would be based on the availability of evacuation capabilitie:, which would minimize the medical risk to those persons; and e when the projected dose rstes, as translated into dose assessment, outside any facility reach the varous protective action levels, the County 00P, through the local health officer, will notify the facility and other local officials, who will begin i the immediate impicmentation of sheltering for these persons. (3) General Sheltering For actual or projected off-site doses of 1 to 5 rem to III-41 P.ev. 11/83

b the whole body or 5 to 25 rem tc the thyroid, the prot 6ctive action response option " General Sheltering" I cay be implemented for the affected areas of the plume expos!re EPZ. This response option can also be ,f implemented, for puff-type releases of lower doses, as a precautionary measure. For higher doses where evacuation would be indicated but where evacuation cannot be implemented, bec4use of tine constraints and/or impediments to highway movement, " General Sheltering" may be implemented in lieu of evacuation. General Sheltering will be implemented by the local chief executive, upon the recommendation of the State Commissioner of Health. Instructions of Genneral Sheltering are provided for each household, school, special care facility, group quarters, and place of business in the plume exposure EPZ. These instructions are contained in the emergency public infomation pamphlet distributed annually to the population within the plume exposure EPZ population. Information of General Sheltering is initiated by the county public notification system, with explicit directions over the emergency broadcast system. Implementation can be affected for various Emergency Response Planning Areas (a subdivision of the plume exposure EPZ) or for the entire EPZ. Instructions to the public include directions to stay indoors; close and seal, where applicable, all doors and windows; and turn off air-conditioners. c Instructions on respiratory protection may be prescribed using common household items such as towels and [. handkerchiefs. The preponderance of General Sheltering will take place in residences and businesses. Levels of l. l radioactive surface contamination will be measured for l all affected areas. Areas requiring decointamination l may require temporary relocation of persons within that area. (4) Selective Evacuation For actual or projected off-site dose levels of 1 to 5 rem to the whole body or 5 to 25 rem to the thyroid, the protective action response option Selective Evacuaton may be implemented, to evacuate from the affected areas l of the plume exposure EP7 mecbers of the general public who might have a low tolerance to radiation. Specifically, this would include pregnant women and children 12 years old and under. Selective Evacuation will be implemented by the 1ocal chief executive, following consultation with and the reccomendation of the State Conmissioner of !!ealth and l with the coordination support of Director, Office of l Disaster Preparedness. III-42 Rev.11/83 \\

t O s E i mL l. O k 1

r Ni onE tal Prottetion 460 Agency l GE.PA Protective Action Evaluation l Part I ~ The Effectiveness of Sheltering as a ~ Protective Action Against Nuclear Accidents involving Gaseous Releases l e i e

v

,.,----,,-%----,e,.__,

,-,,w,y%, _,, .....,y-g, 7,. _,.y.,_. ,_9, j

PROTECTIVE ACTION EVALUATION i 7-PART I ( f j._ .THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SHELTERING AS A PROTECTIVE ACTION AGAINST NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS INVOLVING GASEOUS RELEASES { f' APRIL 1978 George H. Anno Michael A. Dore l: Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation Programs Washington, D.C. 20460 e N. e y w- ,c. - -. ._m,_ o-,, - -.m, _ -. -__y

m. i 7 Ic; The entry of outside airborne radicactive cloud material is assumed to be dependent on the shelter-structure ventilation rate (forced, natural, o or both) assumin;; constant homogeneous mixing based on simple one-compsrt-br ment cutside/inside air exchange. This type of stirred-tank mixing and ventilation model has been applied in studies of the relationship between indoor / outdoor pollutants (e.g., NO, NO, CO, and 0 ) and has predicted 2 3

nes3 concentration versus time profiles that are similar to those measured [6).

ion 3 The radioiodine fallout deposition inside the shelter is then also assumed ccusing to be dependent on the ventilation rate as well as the fallout deposition ~ r'tructurz velocity; these aspects are also discussed below. h5Cf Shelter Structure Ventilation A review of literature on ventilation rates of hcmes md buildings indicates a wide variety of air change estimates rarging anywhere from s0.1 to 6 per hour for single-family dwellings to si to 9 changes pe-hour for large structures. The wide ranges are, of course, due to the various types of construction--whether the portals and windows were

dal, shut or sealed, and such environmental factors as wind speed, tenpera-23 Cf ture dif ferential, and humidity.

Also, in some instances, it was not clear whether air change rates included internal forced-air systems. A review by Handley and Barton (7) of published info mation on home ventilation rates resulted in their suggesting the use of the range from 0.5 to 1.5 air changes per hour for homes and 2.0 air changes per hour for modern high-rise apartment buildings. A check with commercial home air-conditioning and heating vendors seems to generally support ed those recommendations. For example, usually a 4-ton (1600 cfm) unit jr is recommanded for a 1500-f t single-family dwelling with from 10- to 2 20-percent outside air makeup. Such an installation results in from 0.8 d to 1.6 air changes per hour with outside air. Of course, some systems

n-are installed for complete internal recirculation with no outside air

)d nakeup other than normal expected structural leakage. Municipal code requirements for building ventilation rates--for

d high-rise office buildings, large apartment complexes, auditoriums, etc. -also seem to support the value of two af r changes per hour as 8uggested by Handley and Parton [7).

For example, a check with the ,f

r, l 8 Health Division of the Los Angeles City Building and Safety Department [ [8] indicated internal air turnover time of from 5 to 10 min depending getf on occupancy requirements, with a representative value of about 7 min-- g g with 15 percent outside air makeup as a cc.nfort-level requirement-- po which corresponds to 0.9 and 1.8 air changes per hour and N1.3 air changes diff per hour. Considering the above data, the rates for single-family dwellings and large structures are generally comparable, assuming internal forced-air systems. In the absence of forced-air ventilation systems, home and building yy air change rates would be expected to vary much more widely-as indicated This conclusica by the published data examined by Handley and Barton [7]. is also supported by observations of Yocom, et al. [9] who note that particulate pollutant levels are lower in public buildings than in homes. The ASHRAE Handook of Fundaneidals [10] points to the lack of published data on air change rates for different buildings, exclusive of air pro-vided for ventilation, when utilizing the air change method for estima-ting infiltration requires experience and judgment. Table 2 gives ASERAE Handook values that may be used with reasonable precision in making infiltration estimates for residences with dif ferent room conditions. Table 2 AIR CHANGES TAKING PLACE UNDER AVERAGE CONDITIONS IN RESIDENCES, EXCLUSIVE OF AIR PROVIDED FOR VENTILATION Ntenber of Air Changes a Kind of Room or Building Taking Place per Hour Rooms with no windows or exterior doors 1/2 Rooms with windows or exterior doors on one side 1 Rooms with windows or exterior doors on two sides 1 1/2 Rooms with windows or exterior doors on three sides 2 2 Entrance halls "For rooms with weatherstripped windows or eith srcem sash, us'e two-thirds these values. The other is the " crack method" based on measured leakage character-istics of the building components and sel.icted pressure differences.

= 9 Another approach in making air change estimates due to natural E ventilation for houses is given by Coblentz and Achenbach (11], who suggest ~ the following empirical relationship in which the air change rate is proportional to the outside wind speed and inside/outside temperature ang:s differential (i.e., without inside forced ventilation): arnal I (changes /hr) = A + BW + CAT "I where td A = air change rate for W = 0, AT = 0 (0.12 to 0.18), usion B = 0.013, C = 0.005, l**

W = wind speed, mph,

0 ~ inside outside' Assuming the upper limit of A = 0.18 and AT = 20*F gives air change rates iSHR/E f about 0.35 per hour for a 5-mph wind speed and about 0.5 for 15-to 20-mph wind speeds, which appears to be sorewhat on the low side compered with other data reviewed. This difference, however, may be due to new, well-built houses that made up part of Coblentz and Achenbach's field samples. In contrast, measured air che.nge rates given by Megav [12] for a hut structure that were made in conjunction with radioiodine penetration experiments were substantially higher, ranging anywhere from about 2 per hour to 8 per hour (the latter, however, for open windows). An examinA~ a r tion of Megaw's data reveals an indication of' air-change-rate proportionality with outsid. wind speed that, roughly, was about 0.5 (changes /hr) per (ci/hr). This figure corresponds to only an " eyeball" esticate from Megav's data, which are complicated by variations in wind direction. Such variations would give rise to different pressure dif ferential dis-tributions due to asymmetric flow patterns, which would af fect the internal pirds air change rate. Based on the above review of air change rates that might be expected for single-family dwellings (small structures) and various building eter. Structures that could be used as temporary public shelters, values of [ f ro: 0.125 to 3 air changes per hour were assumed in performing shelter-structure effectiveness calculations. It was felt that +0.125 changes ,C

7,.. t 4 10 per hour might represent relatively " tight" structures (either large o; it I small) and that %3 air changes per hour might represent a practical por otd upper limit of structural ventilation. Of course, as indicated, cuch larger vr. lues of 6 to 9 air changes per hour have been measured; but it was felt that these values would represent extreme cases (e.g.', open windows or portals), which do not represent practical cases if good planning is assumed. Caseous Fission-Product Ingress p The extent to which radiciodine will penetrate a structural shield-b: ing facility is dependent on the gross tightness of the structure, the ventilation rate, filtration, and the chemical and physical properties of the released material and the interacting species. Ihny of these facets of a gaseous fission-product release from a nuclear accident are currently unknown, particularly for radioiodine, which leads to difficulty in accurately predicting the ingress of gaseous radioactive material into shelter structures. For the rare gases (Xe and Kr), most are willing to accept virtually no effective " structural filtering," because of their inertness and stability as gaseous forms. Accordingly, in this study no ef fective filtering action has been included in esti-mating their internal structure concentrations. For the halogens, which are here assumed to be all radioiodines, the-case is more complicated and suf fers from scarcity of experimental f work on indoor / outdoor pollutant-level relationships dealing with the ingress of radiciodine into various potential sheltering structures. The radioiodines are of course particularly important sources due to their large contribution to the WB dose, as well as being totally responsible for the thyroid dose. Three known chemical forms of radioiodine present as airborne gaseous species in power-station areas during and after handling defec-tive fuel elements are elemental fodine (1 ), hypoidous, acid '(H'0I), and 2 organic iodides (CH I). The ratio of the three species would depend 3 on the conditions under which an accidental release might take place. Elemental iodine is thought to be the primary form released from uranium-oxide fuel. It hydrolyzes rapidly in water, generating HOI, or

s. 18 ,ttutt*** I L' 0.II 0.5 x (0.9) + 0.5(0.38) = 0.64 18o geh ttu t** c where the attenuation for the walls (0.38) is based on a wall-mass th% thi ness of 4 (in.) x 2.54 (cm/in.) x 2.7 (gm/cm ) = 28 gm/cm cloud-(assuming 8-in, concrete bricks with a 50-percent void volume). Attenuation of cloud-gamma radiation for large structures suth as office buildings and maltistory structures could be cignificantly more than for cimple structures such as single-family dwellings. Attenuatica d wher 8-in.-thick solid concrete, either exterior walls or interior walls (e.g., fire-resistant stairwella) may be equivalent to mass thickness g(g of around 45 to 50 gm/cm, corresponding to attenuation factors of 0.2 g to 0.17 (Fig. 3). Table 3 summarizes representative cloud-gamma attenua- ,g tion factors for the types of structures noted. g< Table 3 s REPRESENTATIVE CLOUD-GAMMA ATTENUATION FACTORS Structure Attenuation Factor Wood frame house, no basement 0.9 Masonry house, no basement 0.6 Basement of wood house

0. 6 -

Basement of masonry house 0.4 Large pf fice or industrial building 0.2 or less The above values do not suggest any substantial protection from external cloud-gamma radiation affarded by lightly constructed,- frame single-family owellings. In this study, however, estim'ates of shelter-ing ef fectiveness were made assuming somewhat more substantial gamma-attenuation protection, A(x) = 0.4 to 0.9 for small structures. For large 1 n

Rf \\ ' L. 24 ,circula g,3edos ,finit*~ ) Te le 4 t gassles. REPRESENTATIVE REDUCTION FACTORS FOR SURFACE SOURCE t k where D doses G Structure I.nd/or. Location Reduction Tac la above a hypethetical, infinite, smooth plane 1.00 t k la above ordinsry ground 0.70 j t where in above center of 50-ft roadway half contaminated 0.55 ? a to Cars, pickups, buses, and trucks on 50-ft road: giveg Road fully contaminated 0.5 l Road fully decontaminated 0.25 0.4 t Trains 1-and 2-story wood frame homes (no basement) 0.4 l-and 2-story block or brick homes (no basement) 0.2* t Home basement--l' o:- 2 walls fully exposed: 0.l* I d 0.05" 1 I story, less than 2 ft of basement walls exposed 2 story, less than 2 f t of basement valls exposed 0.02" 2 3-or 4-story structures, 5000 to 10,000 ft per floor: 0.05" First and second ficots 0.01" Basement 2 Multistory structures, >10,000 f t per floor: 0 0l* Upper floors O.005* f Basement 'Away from deors and windows. e l l C _w.-.

4 e 0 e y e

-- 3.- '? .= o DRAFT A APPENDII 3 ) )G l PLANNER'S E7ALUATION CUEE FOR EVACUATION AND SHELTER e e e e e f i ?.

,_o. Conten ts (' 'l Page t-1. INTRODUCTION........................ 3-1

2.

PROIECTIVE ACIIONS 3-4 i

2.1 E va cua ti on................... '.. 3-4 2.2 Sheltering 3-7 t 2.3 Dual Protective Actions............... 3-14 3-16 3. GENERAL CUIDANCE FOR EVACUATION AND SELTERING REFERENCES................'............ 3-24 e 4 e ) )O e e J e 4 4 e 4 4 0 0 9 0 .p, e e 9 1 r r,

Table zara Table 3-1 Typical dose reduction factors for sheltering..... B-8 Table 3-2 Typical inhalation dose reduction factors...... 3-12 Figures Page Figure B-1 Whole body dose reduction factor versus air :hange rate for small structures and large structures (ideal shelter timing)................ B-11 Figure B-2 Thyroid dose reduction factor versus ehelter exit delay period for small structures and large structur'es....... c 3-15 ( l 71gure B-3 Decision curves for evacuation following sheltering for thyroid dose.................. 3-17 ) k,. ! Figure 3-4 Decision curves for evacuacion following sheltering for small structures and whole bcdy dose. B-18 Figure R-5 Decisfon curves for evacuation folleving sheltering for large structures and whole body dose....... B-19 9 D D e e 11 -e e, e e m. _.-+m, .._m.., ,_ww- ,-..%.,_,_,..~p,m..,_4m.,w,- ,_,,,m%,,p.y..,.,.,. -. -,.,... _ _,,, - -.

t* tg natural ventilattoa, ine.cnally..:u., te le forced ventilation, -U or uncontrollable outside forces; prir.u ily wind. Assuming constant atmospheric and plune conditions and no effects from filtration, deposition, or radioactive decay, one can l sse the following model to roughly estimate the indoor concentration t as a fraction of the outdoor concentration for different plume exposure periods and for different ventilation rates. C = C,(1 - e

)

~ g where Ci = concentration inside, Co = concentration outside I L = ventilation rate' (hr-1) $j t = plume exposure time (hr) p u Typical values for the ventilation rates are in the range of 0.1 to several air changes per hour. Iri the absence of data, an air I't exchange rate of 0.125/hr may be assuned for relatively air-right 9 I structures such as well sealed residences, interior rooms with no

E 1

windows and doors chinked or'large structures with ventilacion shut it ?; off. For' structures with so special preparation except for closing p. t'ha doors and windows, an air exchange rate of 1.0/hr may be ~ s h. assumed. Using the above model to calculate indoor concentrations ik relative to outdcor concentrations for one, two, and four complete d h air changes, the indoor concentrations wculd be about 64 percent, 87 percent, and 98 percent of outside concentrations, respec.tively.

?.

t -,h f * () 39 ,} f ,.. ~. - -

..r-e - /, s-i It is apparent that sta' ing in'she[ ten for soie'.-time than dat y O ' required for two air changes is' sot very effective for reducing inhalation e=posure. The 'DRF for whole body dose shotm in Table 3-1 uill becose less effective'(increhse) with increasing plu=e exposure / t time. because of the "inside-outside air exchange. This relacionship is shown in Figure B-1 for. plume durations ranging,from 0.5 to 6 hours. This effect is not dramatic for whole bcdy dose because a ) aajor portion of the dose vould be contributed from the large volume of the plume cutsida compared to the small volume inside the shelter. Therefore the shelter is a partial shield even if the concentration inside c.quals the concentration cutside. Contrary to the w' hole body DRF for cheitering, the inhalation DR7 is entirely a function of the ratio of inside ter outside air concentrations. Table B-2.shows dose reduction factors for inhalation expcaure pathways as a function of plume exposure duration for the two typically used ventilation rates. Note that for tighc structures, the iirside concentration is about half the outside concentration after 6 houra whereas for other structures, J generally typical of homes, the ratio of indoor to outdoor concentration reaches one half during the fir.se hour of plu=e e'xposcre. i The DRF in Table B-2 can be improved (reduced) by simple filtration over ;the mouth and nose using such co==on items as touels (three er more folded layers) or ha dker'shiefs (8 or more folded s O% l n 1 1 B-10 ~w

w==*

m.* * * + >

Table B-2. Typical inhalation dose' reduction' factors for different structures with time. O ratio of duration of inside to ~ outside gent 11ation pime exposure rate L(hr-1) t (br) concentration DRF 0.125a 0.5 0.062 -0.000 60% 0.12 0.06 1 ~ 2 0.22 0.12 3 0.31 0.17 4 0.40 0.20 0.53 0.29 6 I 1.0b 0.5 0.40 0.20 0.64 0.36 1 d 0.87 0.56 2 3 0.95 0.68 4 0.98 0.75 0.997 0.83 6 Applicable to relatively " airtight" structures such as well s-(a) sealed residences, interior roons with no vindows and doors chinked, or large structures with' ventilation shut of* =, NA Applicale to " structures with no specisi preparation except (b) j- { .{ for closing of doors and windows. 'l e 5 F o -{ ~ ) I

4 b.

.l t

%.o' B-12 I d

4 A 4 w o k e J W-w-y.._y

-EPC OPIP 3.6.1 l[- ' Approved: Effectivegate OPIP 3.6.1 PLUME EXPOSURE PATHWAY PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS + 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure provides guidance for making protective action decisions to mitigate the consequences of a radiological release in the plume exposure pathway. The resulting guidance derived by using this procedure is intended to assist the Director of Local Response in making a protective action decision. It is intended that sound judgment along with a personal assessment of the progress of events will be supplemented with the guidance found in this procedure. 2.0 -RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 The Radiation Health Coordinator'is responsible for advising on Protective Action Determinations based upon recommendations provided by SNPS and if time permits, an independent development of Protective Action Recommenda-I tions based upon dose projections or offsite radiological i. monitoring survey data. 2' 2 The Radiation Health Coordinator is responsit e for i relaying Protective Action-Recommendations from the DOE-RAP Team to the Director of Local Response following an independent and final review. 2.3 The DOE-RAP Team is responsible for performing protective action calculations and determining protective action recommendations using the procedures and worksheets j-contained in this OPIP or equivalent. 3.0 PRECAUTIONS IL 3.1 The dose-saving effectiveness of protective actions can L be influenced by many variable factors such as expected l duration of releases, involved population, weather condi-tions, projected evacuation times, and plant conditions. Whenever possible, these factors should all be considered prior to the recommendation of protective actions. ( Rev. 2 10/17/83 ~ . ~.. -... - - - - -. - -.. -..... -

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 2 of 44 3.2 P Sheltering is the preferred protective action if suffi-cient protection is offered by sheltering, or if no addi- ~ * - tional benefit is gained by evacuation. The evacuation of hospitals and nursing facilities should be sought as a last means since sheltering is the least disruptive to the patients. 4.0 PREREQUISITES i 4.1 The Shoreham Nuclear Power Station has declared a General. Emergency. { 4.2 ' Dose projections have been completed in accordance with l IRDAM, OPIP 3.5.2--Assessment and Dose Projection, or i offsite dose levels have been measured in accordance with j' OPIP 3.5.1, Downwind Surveying, or with procedural equivalents. e L O l (: Rev. 2 p 10/17/83 b

a OPIP 3.6.1 Page 3 of 44 ( e 5.0 ACTIONS AIRBORNE RELEASE - HP-85 OPERATIONAL - SECTION 5.1 AIRBORNE RELEASE - HP-85 IMOPERATIVE, MANUAL METHOD WITH TI SECTION 5.2 AIRBORNE RELEASE - PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOR SPECIAL FACILITIES - SECTION 5.3 WATERBORNE RELEASE - SECTION 5.4 j 5.1 Airborne Release - HP-85 Operational 5.1.1 If the HP-85 has been set up, proceed to Step 5.1.2. Otherwise, perform the following steps: Connect power cord to HP-85 and plug into a. outlet. Insert cassette into front slot and ( '- turn it on. (Power switch is located on the rear of the machine on the right hand side.) The system will load programs into memory and then respond with the following display: SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Autost ***LILCO/ENTECH Kl: INFO = PROVIDE COPY OF GENERAL INFORMATION AND COMMENTS K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) INFO CONTIN k5 Rev. 3 ,-__--____w ,_,,,g,, -g,-------c..- ..,7 ,,_n,,-. y,,

s OPIP 3.6.1 Page 4 of 44 ( i -p b. Press K1 for information or push K2 to -- t continue. The machine will repsond with information (if desired) and then display the following: l SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Autost ***LILC,O/ENTECH ENTER CURRENT DATE MONTH / DAY / YEAR - MM/DD/YY ? i_ .c. Enter the current date. Separate month, day and year by a slash or'a space. Any incorrect entry by the user will have to be l(i re-entered. The machine will then respond I with: ENTER CURRENT TIME.(24-HR CLOCK) HOUR: MIN - HH:MM ? d. Enter the current time. Separate hour and minute by a slash or space. The machine will f then echo the current date and time and ask the user to update or continue: Rev. 2 10/17/83 . ~

+ OPIP 3.6.1 Page 5 of 44 t - t CURRENT DATE 10/01/83 CURRENT TIME 14:23 K1: UPDATE = RE-ENTER DATA K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) UPDATE CONTIN I If K1 is pushed, go to Step 5.1.1.c and e. re-enter data. If K2 is pressed, the machine will respond with the following help message: CHAINING TO PROGRAM ACCDOS (,' RUN PROGRAM 'ISOTOP' NEXT. UNLESS YOU WISH TO RESTART WITH DATA FROM A FILE PREVIOUSLY SAVED. (PRESS K4:GO TO CONTINUE) GO f. Pushing K4 gives t'he main menu: I l Rev. 2 10/17/83 L l O

= OPIP 3.6.1 Page 6 of 44 a.r SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ACCDOS **LILCO/ENTECH (MOD 01 - 10/14/83) Kl:ISOTOP = SET UP IS0 TOPICS K2:CHIQS = ATMOSP. DISPERSION K3: DOSES = COMPUTE DOSES K4: SURVEY = OFFSITE TEAM REPORTS K5:PROACT = PROTECTIVE ACTIONS K6:UTILIT = DATA FILE HANDLING K8:STOP = STOP AND SAVE FILES PROACT UTILIT STOP ISOTOP CHIQS DOSES SURVEY l 5.1.2 If survey team data is available, implement OPIP 3.5.1, Thyroid Dose Commitment Using TCS Air Sampler in Downwind Survey Procedure. 5.1.3 Return to the main menu (shown in Step 5.1.1.f above). Push K5 to run 'PROACT' program. The machine will display the following: SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/ENTECH Kl: ENTER DATA = SEASON / WEATHER CONDITIONS K2: COMPUTE = DOSES @ ACTIONS AT ONE LOCATION K3:

SUMMARY

=

SUMMARY

OF LAST TWELVE CASES K4:ZERO = ZERO PROJECTED DOSE / ACTION DATA K8:STOP = RETURN TO ACCDOS ENTER STOP DATA COMPUTE

SUMMARY

ZERO Rev. 2 10/17/83 -,w---,

s OPIP 3.6.1 Page 7 of 44 ( _. \\ p - t5.1.4 Press K1 to enter data. The machine will respond with the following help message: DATA ENTRY CAUTION: ENTERING NEW DATA WILL INITIA.LIZE THE DOSE PROJECTION DATA AND PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS. ABORT AND LIST THIS DATA IF YOU WISH. USING THE '

SUMMARY

' OPTION,.OR RETURN TO 'ACCODS'_AND SAVE THE WORKFILE ABORT CONTINUE I 5.1.5 Press K2 to continue. 'Ihe machine will prompt for data entry: ENTER RELEASE DURATION (HOURS) o FROM-START TO FINISH (A ZERO ENTRY WILL DEFAULT TO 10 HOURS) ? l 4 5.1.6 Enter release duration. The machine will echo the release duration and ask the user to update or continue: SELECTED RELEASE DURATION = 10 HOURS Kl; UPDATE = RE-ENTER VALUE K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE (SELECT. OPTION - PRESS KEY) l UPDATE CONTIN (: Rev. 2 10/17/83 ~ I

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 8 of 44 [5.1.7 Press K2 to continue. The machine will ask for the following: ENTER DATE OF RELEASE INITIATION (PAST OR FUTURE) MONTH / DAY / YEAR - MM/DD/YY ? 5.1.8 Enter date of release initiation. Separate month, day and year by a slash or a space. The 4 machine will indicate the current time and ask for the. time of release initiation: ([ THE CURRENT TIME IS 15:42 ENTER TIME OF RELEASE INITIATION (PAST OF FUTURE --24-HOUR CLOCK) HOUR: MIN - HH:MM ? 5.1.9 Enter time of release initiation. Separate hour and minutes by a slash or a space. The machine will echo the release date and time, and ask the user to update or continue: b Rev. 2 10/17/83 9 m - r w, ~e,'-~~ ar-,---,~ ,---------+,-,a--..----+ww-a-.-.-rw----,--,--ve.--n-..--,-w-,--~-,,,---w--w-,v-en-w,-.rw-,-w -+w w~ ^

\\ OPIP 3.6.1 Page 9 of 44 y, YOU HAVE ENTERED THE FOLLOWING: RELEASE DATE: 10/01/83 RELEASE TIME: 14:00 .Kl: UPDATE = RE-ENTER DATA K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE UPDATE CONTIN 5.1.10 Press K2 to continue. The machine will printout the following: 4 i THE DATA PROVIDED INDICATES THAT THE RADIOACTIVE RELEASE STARTED 1.713 f. HOURS AGO [ Kl: UPDATE = TRY AGAIN K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) UPDATE CONTIN 5.1.11 Press K2 to continue. 'The machine will display the following menu and printout instructions for - I guidance: DO YOU NEED A PRINTED COPY OF THE l: SEASON AND WEATHER DEFINITIONS? L (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) YES NO Rev. 2 10/17/83 l [ .....~..

b of 44 a P -- t 5.1.12 Press K1 for a copy of the conditions. The machine will then display the following menu: ~ SEASON AND WEATHER CONDITIONS Kl: SUMMER = SUMMER SEASON K2: WINTER = WINTER SEASON K5: NORMAL = NORMAL WEATHER K6:ADVERS = ADVERSE WEATHER K7: SEVERE = SEVERE WEATHER (SELECT APPLICABLE CONDITIONS) NORMAL ADVERS SEVERE SUMMER WINTER 5.1.13 Select ' SUMMER' or ' WINTER' depending on the time C. of the year (K1 or K2). The machine will display the same menu with the remaining condition to be chosen: SEASON AND WEATHER CONDITIONS K5: NORMAL = NORMAL WEATHER K6:ADVERS = ADVERSE WEATHER K7: SEVERE = SEVERE WEATHER (SELECT AP-PLICABLE CONDITIONS) NORMAL ADVRS SEVERE I 5.1.14 Select ' NORMAL,' ADVERS' or ' SEVERE' depending on weather conditions (KS, K6 or K7). Utilize guidance printed out. The machine will echo the conditione chosen: k Rev. 2 10/17/83 k y y-__,_-,,

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 11 of 44 e t YOU HAVE SELECTED THE FOLLOWING SEASON AND WEATHER CONDITIONS: SEASON: WINTER WEATHER: ADVERSE Kl: UPDATE = REVISE SELECTION K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE. (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) UPDATE CONTIN l 5.1.15 Press K2 to continue. The machine will respond with the following menu: ( SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT I PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/ENTECH Kl: ENTER DATA = SEASON / WEATHER CONDITIONS DOSES @ ACTIONS AT ONE K2: COMPUTE = LOCATION

SUMMARY

OF LAST TWELVE K3:

SUMMARY

= CASES ZERO PROJECTED DOSE / K4:ZERO- = ACTION DATA RETURN TO ACCDOS K8:STOP = ENTER STOP DATA COMPUTE

SUMMARY

ZERO I 5.1.16 Press K2 to compute protective actions. The machine will respond with the following: b Rev. 2 10/17/83 _-.___,e-v.. ...e....- ,y ,_--3 .-.-___,_r,.. ,-..._.c....

1 OPIP 3.6.1 Page 12 of 44 r -t p DO YOU NEED A PRINTED COPY OF THE CURRENT AVAILABLE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS WITH DOSE KATE DATA? (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) YES NO 5.1.17 Select K1 or K2 as appropriate. The machine will display (or printout) the following: d CURRENTLY AVAILABLE DOSE RATES DISTANCE DOWNWIND (MILES) DEGREES (- 33-FT MET ALL 180.0 150 FT MET ALL 180.0' SURVEY A 4.0 180.0 SURVEY B NONE 0.0 SURVEY C NONE 0.0 SURVEY D NONE 0.0 SURVEY E NONE 0.0 SURVEY F NONE 0.0 l l PRESS K4:GO TO CONTINUE GO 5.1.18 Press K4 to continue. The machine will now ask for the data source (RMS or HP-85): e k.) Rev. 2 10/17/83 i l l

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 13 of 44 .. e. SELECT SOURCE OF DOSE RATE DATA Kl:85B = HP-85B PREDICTIONS AND SURVEY DATA K2:RMS = RMS (EMSP) PREDICTIONS AND SURVEY DATA (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) 1 85B RMS 1 NOTE IF IRDAM PROGRAM HAS BEEN USED FOR DOSE ASSESSMENT, USE RMS OPTION. CAUTION IF THE HP-85 HAS BEEN USED FOR DOSE PROJECTION, CONTINUE WITH THE FOLLOWING STEPS. IF THE RMS HAS BEEN USED FOR DOSE PROJECTION, PROCEED TO STEP 5.1.27. r 5,1.19 Enter Kl. The machine will display the following: ENTER DOWNWIND DIRECTION OF INTEREST t l (0 to 360 DEGREES) ? / Rev. 2 10/17/83 l

~ OPIP 3.6.1 Page 14 of 44 ._.[5.1.20 Enter.p.lume direction (e.g., south = 180 degrees). .The machine will display: ENTER RECEPTOR DISTANCE (SELECT FROM THE FOLLOWING SET 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 7.5 10 OR ENTER 'ALL' FOR ALL) ? 5.1.21' Enter ALL. The machine will display the following: h' YOU HAVE SELECTED THE FOLLOWING RECEPTOR OATA DOWNWIND DIRECTION (DEG.) 180 RECEPTOR DISTANCE (MILES) ALL Kl: UPDATE = RE-ENTER DATA K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE K3: ABORT = RESELECT OPTION (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) UPDATE CONTIN ABORT 5.1.22 Push K2 to continue. The machine will indicate on the CRT that it is computing protective actions. The machine will printout the following: (.~ Rev. 2 10/17/83

p OPIP 3.6.1 Page 15 of 44 .- r. SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/ENTECH BASIC INFORMATION DATE TIME CURRENT 10/02/83 10:29 RBSVS SOURCE 10/02/83 10:01 ST. VENT SRCE 10/02/83 10:02 MET, X/Q DATA 10/02/83 10:04 DOSE CALC. 10/02/83 10:07 SEASON /WEATH. 10/02/83 10:15 START OF REL 10/02/83 09:00 RELEASE DURATION (HRS) = 10 SEASON: WINTER WEATHER: ADVERSE L-D,IST SRCE DATE TIME .5 85B 10/02/83 10:28 1.0 85B 10/02/83 10:28 1.5 85B 10/02/83 10:28 2.0 85B 10/02/83 10:28 2.5 85B 10/02/83 10:28 3.0 85B 10/02/83 10:28 3.5 85B 10/02/83 10:28 4.0 85B 10/02/83 10:28 4.5 85B 10/02/83 10:28 5.0 85B 10/02/83 10:28 5.0 SURV 10/02/83 10:00 7.5 85B 10/02/83 10:28 10.0 85B 10/02/83 10:28 (..: Rev. 2 10/17/83

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 16 of 44 e. e. p -- t t DIST DIREC PLUME EVAC. EVAC. TION TRAVL TIME EXPO. (MI) (DEG) (HRS) (HRS) (HRS) .5 180.0 .10 3.75 5.12 1.0 180.0 .20 3.75 5.02 1.5 180.0 .30 3.75 4.92 2.0 180.0 .40 3.75 4.82 2.5 180.0 .50 4.42 5.39 3.0 180.0 .60 4.42 5.29 3.5 180.0 .70 4.42 5.19 4.0 180.0 .80 4.42 5.09 4.5 180.0 .90 4.42 4.99 5.0 180.0 1.00 4.42 4.89 7.5 180.0 '1.50 4.83 4.00 10.0 180.0 2.00 4.83 4.30 l DIE OPTION WH. BODY CH.THYRD (MI) (REM)_ (REM) .([i .5 85B/SH 7.97E+001 1.92E+002 .5 85B/EV 5.83E+001 1.04E+002 1.0 85B/SH 3.59E+001 7.36E+001 1.0 85B/EV 2.57E+001 3.89E+001 1.5 85B/SH 2.55E+001 5.61E+001 1.5 85B/EV 1.79E+001 2.90E+001 2.0 85B/SH 2.01E+001 4.04E+001 2.0 85B/EV 1.38E+001 2.05E+001 -2.5 85B/SH 1.67E+001 3.35E+001 l, 2.5 85B/EV 1.29E+001 1.90E+001 3.0 85B/SH 1.44E+001 2.87E+001 3.0 85B/EV 1.09E+001 1.60E+001 3.5 85B/SH 1.28E+001 2.55E+001 3.5 85B/EV 9.50E+000

1. 39E4001 4.0 85B/SH 1.13E+001 2.25E+001 l

4.0 85B/EV 8.23E+000 1.21E+001 Rev. 2 10/17/83 l _... _..___ ___._ _ _. _ _. _ _... _, _ _ _ _ _., _. -.,... _ _ _ _. _. ~. _, _. _

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 17 of 44 p I 4.5 85B/SH 1.02E+001 2.03E+001

4. 5' 85B/EV

?.30E+000 1.07E+001 5.0 85B/SH 9.35E+000 1.86E+001 5.0 85B/EV 6.54E+000 9.56E+000 5.0-SRV/SH 7.00E+000 2.18E+001 5.0 SRV/EV 4.89E+000 1.12E+001 7.5 85B/SH 6.62E+000 1.31E+001 7.5 85B/EV 4.54E+000 6.62E+000 10.0 85B/SH 5.18E+000 1.02E+001 10.0 '85B/EV 3.18E+000 4.63E+000 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION (EVAC ZONES, SHELTER, OR OTHER) DIST -ZONE RMS/85B SURVEY TM .5 C EVACUATE NO DATA ABCDE

(;

1.0 C EVACUATE NO DATA ABCDE ~ 1.5 C EVACUATE NO DATA ^ ABCDE 2.0 C EVACUATE-NO DATA ABCDE 2.5 C EVACUATE NO DATA ABCDEGHI '3.0 C EVACUATE NO DATA ABCDEGHI . 3.5 C EVACUATE NO DATA ABCDEGHI 4.0 C EVACUATE NO DATA ABCDEGHI 4.5 -H EVACUATE' NO DATA ABCDEGHI l 5.0 H EVACUATE EVACUATE ABCDEGHI' ABCDEGHI 7.5 N EVACUATE NO DATA 'A...JLMNO 10.0 M EVACUATE NO DATA A...JLMNOR Rev. 2 10/17/83 z .- - ---_ _,, _.._,.,. _ _. ____,.._. _,,_-_,_,.._ _,. _. __. _ -._..,.,_,_,.,~ _., ~._

e I '~' OPIP 3.6.1 Page 18 of 44 -- [5.1.23 The printout indicates the following information in order:- a. Time each routine was performed b. Release duration c. Season and weather conditions d. Time, locations and sources for protective action data-Plume travel time, evacuation times and e. exposure times for receptors mentioned above f. Whole body and child thyroid shelter and evacuation g. Protective action recommenations 5.1.24 The machine displays the following menu: /..(. SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT + PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/ENTECH K1: ENTER DATA = SEASON / WEATHER CONDITIONS DOSES @ ACTIONS AT ONE K2: COMPUTE = LOCATION

SUMMARY

OF LAST TWELVE K3:

SUMMARY

= i - CASES ZERO PROJECTED DOSE / K4:ZERO = ACTION DATA RETURN TO ACCDOS K8:STOP = ENTER STOP DATA COMPUTE

SUMMARY

ZERO 5.1.25 If a split plume exists, repeat Steps 5.1.16 through 5.1.23. /. l' Rev. 2 10/17/83 3-r v. . +,, .-..-,m. ,,m..-%vy.,.4-%- ~y-, ,, - ~~~. ,.,___.._w__,_- ,-r-.,* e,-.-.,_,e.,,-,,r.,,-+.. .,e,3m__._

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 19 of 44 -- [5.1.26 Provide the printout to the Radiological Health Coordinator / DOE-RAP Team Captain for interpretation. 5.1.27 The display will show the following: SELECT SOURCE OF LOSE RATE DATA Kl:85B = HP-85 PREDICTIONS AND SURVEY DATA K2:RMS = RMS (EMSP) PREDICTIONS AND SURVEY DATA (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) 85B RMS 5.1.28 Enter K2. The machine will ask for the following: ENTER DOWNWIND DIRECTION OF INTEREST (0 to 360 DEGREES) ? l 5.1.29 Enter downwind direction of plume (e.g., south = 180 degrees). The machine will ask for the following: e 1 ~ Rev. 2 10/17/83

2b of 44 g P l ENTER RECEPTOR DISTANCE. SELECT FROM THE FOLLOWIG SET: 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 7.5 10. (ONE DISTANCE AT A TIME) ? 5.1.30 Select a distance for which RMS gives doses. The machine will echo data: I YOU HAVE SELECTED THE FOLLOWING RECEPTOR DATA DOWNWIND DIRECTION (DEG.) 180 RECEPTOR DISTANCE (MILES) 5 K1: UPDATE = RE-ENTER DATA K2: CONTIN = CONTINUE K3: ABORT = RESELECT OPTION (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) UPDATE CONTIN ABORT 5.1.31 Enter K2. The machine will ask for the following: ENTER OFFSITE DOSE RATE DATA AS PREDICTED BY THE RMS SOFTWARE l I WHOLEBODY DOSE RATE (MR/HR): ? k'- Rev. 2 10/17/83 L

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 21 of 44 , (. c [-5.1.32 Enter whole body dose rate. The machine will now ask for the following: _ THYROID DOSE RATE (MR/HR): ? 5.1.33 Enter thyroid dose rate. Machine will echo both dose rates and ask the user to update or continue: YOU ENTERED THE FOLLOWING PJfS DOSE RATE DATA (MR/HR): WHOLE BODY: 1234 THYROID: 5678 Kl: UPDATE = RE-ENTER DATA K2: CONTINUE = COMPUTE DOSES (SELECT OPTION - PRESS KEY) UPDATE CONTINUE l 5.1.34 Press. K2 to continue. The machine will display the following data: l i-Rev. 2 ~ 10/17/83 l l t-

p; y

OPIP 3.6.1 + ed Page 22 of 44 _1 p. SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/ENTECH EVALUATION OF FOLLOWING LOCATION DISTANCE (MILES) 5 DIRECTION (DEGREES) ISO RELEASE INITIATION (+or-) -2.53 PLUME TRAVEL TIME (HRS) 1 EVACUATION TIME (HRS) 4.42 EVAC. EXPOSURE TIME (HRS) 5.94 EVACUATION ZONE H PRESS K4:GO TO CONTINUE GO 5.1.35 Press K4. The machine will display the following: k'! DOSES AND ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS SHELTER EVACUAT. EVAC. ZONE DOSE-REM DOSE-REM OR SHELTER RMS CALCULATION WB 8.64E+000 7.34E+000 ABCDEGHI TH 5.39E+001 3.38E+001 ABCDEGHI SURVEY TEAM WB 7.00E+000 5.95E+000-ABCDEGHI TH 2.18E+001 1.36E+001 SHELTER PRESS K4:GO TO CONTINUE GO i 5.1.36 The machine has displayed doses and protective actions for the receptor location. Press K4. The machine will display the following menu: I Rev. 2 10/17/83 f ..,._,,,-.c, y_. 7.,-,,,..,,. ._,..,.,.,,,m_%.-_,,,,,y-., -.,,_,..y,.,,_. .mm ,m_,_._ _w...,_.-

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 23 of 44 e SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/ENTECH K1:ENTERDAT1= SEASON / WEATHER ~ CONDITIONS K2: COMPUTE = DOSES @ ACTIONS AT ONE LOCATION K3:

SUMMARY

=

SUMMARY

OF LAST TWELVE CASES K4:ZERO = ZERO PROJECTED DOSE / ACTION DATA K8:STOP = RETURN TO ACCDOS ENTER STOP DATA COMPUTE

SUMMARY

ZERO 5.1.37 If more RMS receptor locations are to be entered, select K2 and repeat Steps 5.1.16 through 5.1.36. b 5.1.38 When all receptors have been calculated, press K3 (

SUMMARY

). The machine will printout the following: l SNPS - OFFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/ENTECH f BASIC INFORMATION DATE TIME f CURRENT 10/02/83 11:47 RBSVS SOURCE 10/02/83 10:01 ST. VENT SRCE 10/02/83 10:02 MET, X/Q DATA 10/02/83 10:04 DOSE CALC. 10/02/83 10:07 SEASON /WEATH. 10/02/83 11:31 START OF REL 10/02/83 09:00 (' Rev. 2 10/17/83 l

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 24 of 44 ._ i l l RELEASE DURATION (HRS) = 10 SEASON: WINTER WEATHER: ADVERSE DIST SRCE DATE TIME 5.0 RMS 10/02/83 11:32 5.0 SURV 10/02/83 10:00 4.0 -RMS 10/02/83 11:45 DIST DIREC PLUME EVAC. EVAC. TION TRAVL TIME EXPO. (MI) (DEG) (HRS) (HRS) (HRS) 5.0 180.0 1.00 4.42 5.95 4.0 180.0 .00 4.42 6.37 -DIST OPTION WH. BODY CH.THYRD (MI) (REM) (REM) 5.0 RMS/SH 8.64E+000 5.39E+001 5.0 RMS/EV 7.34E+000 5.38E+001 5.0 SRV/SH 7.00E+000 2.18E+001 5.0 SRV/EV 5.95E+000 1.36E+001 4.0 RMS/SH 7.00E+000 1.90E+001 4.0 RMS/EV 6.37E+000 1.27E+001 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION (ZONES, SHELTER OR OTHER) DIST ZONE RMS/85B SURVEY TM 5.0 H EVACUATE EVACUATE ABCDEGHI ABCDEGHI 4.0 C EVACUATE NO DATA ABCDEGHI i (~ Rev. 2 10/17/83 w + yy-- --,e, ,,.. ~ <,c~.m -,-r,%_.,.w-., ,w-ee,,- ,,+re---.-,,. ,..,+,----,----n_._.-, ..-,-,-y_. ,,m..

a 4 2.~.- n-.-. OPIP 3.6.1 Page 25 of 44 {- P - t 5.1.39.The printout indicates the following information l (in order): a. Time each routine was performed b. Release duration c. Season and weather conditions d. Time, location and sources for protective action data Plume travel time, evacuation times and e. exposure times for receptors mentioned above f. Whole body and child thyroid shelter and evacua_ ion doses g. Protective action recommendations 5.1.40 The machine displays the following menu: (- SNPS - 0FFSITE DOSE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PROACT **LILCO/EITIECH Kl: ENTER DATA = SEASON / WEATHER CONDITIONS K2: COMPUTE = DOSES @ ACTIONS AT ONE LOCATION K3:

SUMMARY

=

SUMMARY

OF LAST TWELVE CASES K4:ZERO = ZERO PROJECTED DOSE / ACTION DATA K8:STOP = RETURN TO ACCDOS ENTER STOP DATA COMPUTE

SUMMARY

ZERO l 5.1.41 If a split plume exists, repeat Steps 5.1.36 through 5.1.40. {. Rev. 2 10/17/83 .m _.nw., ,n.. e-..,..--me,. e, ,,.,,,m,,e.--

a ( OPIP 3.6.1 Page 26 of 44 { e. - - - t 5.1.42 Provide the printout to the Radiological Health ~ Coordinator / DOE-RAP Team Captain for interpretation. 5.2-. Airborne Release - HP-85 -Inoperative, Manual Method with TI. V 5.2.1 Obtain a copy of the Protective Action Recommendation Worksheet (Attachment 1). 5.2.2 Using TI-59 with the printer, perform the followin's steps for loading programs into the calculator: Turn on calcula' tor. Turn on printer. Ensure a. f(f that the printer buttons marked TRACE, ADV, - PRINT are not depressed. Presss CLR. b. Press 3 2nd OP 17. Display will read s 719.29. Press CLR. 1 ~f c. Enter cards into the side slot on the calculator. Ensure that CLR has been pressed before entering each card. Display will read .1, 2, 3 or 4 for the corresponding card side entered. d. Press CLR. Press 'IU3T. ,n 5.2.3 Record the parameters used in OPIP 3.5.2, Dose Projection, on the 'worksheet. Wind speed - Item 2a a. k Rev. 2 10/17/83 ~

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 27 of 44 ./ r -- t b. Wind direction - Item 2b ..~ 5. 2. '4 Obtain the following from the Radiological Emergency Data Form and record on the worksheet: ~ a. Release duration - Item 1. If a value cannot be determined, utilize a default value of 10 J hours. b. Time of release start - Item 3. c. Time of calculation - Item 4. 5.2.5. Utilizing results of IRDAM system, perform the following: a. kecord distances (Item 5) for which dose rates have been calculated. b. Multiply dose rates by release duration (Item

1) and record doses in the appropriate locations-on the worksheet:

1. Wholebody doses (Item 13) 2. Thyroid doses (Item 17) 5.2.6 Using Evacuation Zone Map located in the EOC, determine the evacuation zone (A-S) and affected downwind for the appropriate distance (Item 5) and wind direction (Item 2b). L. Rev. 2 10/17/83

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 28 of 44 ('.. p t '5.2.7 Circle the appropriate. weather conditions (Item

4) following'for guidance:

s ^ CAUTION SEASON AND WEATHER DEFINITIONS SELECT OPTIONS USING THE FOLLOWING GUIDANCE:

1. SUtNER/ WINTER SEASONS SUMMER:

MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND THROUGH LABOR DAY WINTER: REST OF THE TIME ~

2. NORMAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SUMMER:

DRY ROADS. NO PRECIPI- '(l-TATION WINTER: DRY ROADS. NO PRECIPI-TATION

3. ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS SUMMER:

FOG; WET PAVEMENT WINTER: PASSABLE ROADS PARTIALLY ~' COVERED BY SNOW OR ICE

4. SEVERE WEATHER CONDITIONS l

SUMMER: HURRICANE WINTER: BLIZZARD; IMPASSABLE L ROADS OR DRIVEWAYS r l f L / \\ 5.2.8 Determine the evacuation time and record time in I j Item 10. The evacuation time is found as follows: Using prevailing weather conditions (Items 9a a. and'9b), turn to the correct table of i. s I (I. Rev. 2 10/17/83 4 ~ ^- l l l r y t.,-. m g E. h .~e wr E._.,- ,--..s,--,. ,,,.r -,,-.w.,-+-m_., ...,-.-.--w,-.-,,....--.3,..,-.m.

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 29 of 44 ) i p t CAUTION IF SEVERE WEATHER CONDITIONS EXIST, RECORD IN ITEM 10 AN EVACUATION TIME OF 24 HOURS. b. Utilizing affected downwind sector (Item 8a), find the left-most value that contains the zone (Item 8b) and record the evacuation time on the worksheet. 5.2.9 Using TI-59 with printer, enter data as follows: Enter windspeed (Item 2a), press STO 19. a. b. Enter release duration (Item 1), press STO 08. Enter distance to receptor (Item 5), press c. STO 09. 4 d. Enter time release has been in progress (Item 7c), time until release is expected to start (Item 7f), press STO 10. CAUTION IF ITEM 7f IS CHOSEN, ENTER IT AS A NEGATIVE NUMBER. Enter evacuation time (Item 10), press STO 11. e. Rev. 2 10/17/83

m g e 3bof44 ag { r -t f. Enter projected wholebody dose (Item 13), press STO 17. g. Enter projected thyroid dose (Item 17), press STO 18. 5.2.10 Run protective ection program by performing the following: a. Press A. Projected doses are printed out. Prompting for monitoring team data is asked for. At this point, the calculator display will read 3637320211. b. If monitoring team data is available, enter monitoring team dose rates (Items 14 and 18) ( on the worksheet. Multiply dose rates by release duration and c. enter into appropriate space on worksheet (Items 15 and 18a). I l d. The machine has prompted for monitoring team data (rem). Enter monitoring team data in the appropriate registers. i CAUTION ENTRY OF MONITORING TEAM DATA i INDICATES THAT IT IS MORE RE-LIABLE THAN THE PROJECTED DOSE. l IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, DO NOT ENTER MONITORING TEAM DATA. k Rev. 2 10/17/83

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 31 of 44 r -- t e. Press B. All calculations are performed and resulting protective action is displayed. f. Printer will output: Worksheet # Most reliable wholdbody dose 16 Most reliable thyroid dose 19 Wholebody evacuation dose 20 Thyroid evacuation dose 21 Wholebody shelter dose 22 Thyroid shelter dose. 23 Protective Action Recommendation 26 g. To display: Wholebody indicated action - 24 press RCL 27 {, ' Thyroid indicated action - press 26 RCL 26 5.2.11 Record these items on the worksheet. 5.2.12 To re-run program, perform the following: a. Press RST b. Repeat Step 5.2.9 entering data which has changed Perform Steps 5.2.10 and 5.2.11 c. 5.2.13 If a split plume exists, repeat Steps 5.2.1 through 5.2.12 for the other plume direction. 5.2.14 Provide the worksheet to the RAP Team Captain and Radiological Health Coordinator for interpretation. C. Rev. 2 10/17/83

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 31a of 44 ( e 5.3 Protective Actions - Special Facilities 5.3.1 Schools ~ a. For an Alert or higher emergency classification school protective actions are recommended based upon the following table. Protective Action for Schools Outside EPZ Protective Action Protective Action Wi.th Students Who Live for General Public for Schools in EFZ in EPZ Early dismissal of Early dismissal of all N3 protective actions rccommended anywhere students to their students to their homes, in EPZ

homes, Shelter all schools Retain students, who Sheltering, but no cvacuation recommended with students living live in the EPZ, at cnywhere in EPZ in the EPZ.

Bring school when school day buses to schools, ends. ( Evacuation recommended - Relocate students to Retain students, who live cnywhere in EPZ pre-designated centers in the EPZ, at school when outside EPZ. school day ends. 9 Rev. 3 --e---- ,,-,-,-,,.g,, ,-w,- ,n ---m-, -,n---,,

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 31s of 44 l { e ~ t5.3.2 Hospitals and Nursing / Adult Homes a. Obtain the list of hospitals and nursing homes from OPIP 3.6.5, Attachment 2. Determine which facilities are located in these zones along with their distance and downwind direction from SNPS. b. Calculate location specific whole body and thyroid projections for these facilities. If appropriate send field monitoring teams to the facilities in the downwind direction. Using the following shielding factor table c. calculate shelter dose to patients or residents, and sesff Hospital Nursing Home Whole Body 0.2 0.4 Thyroid 0.5 for fir'st 0,25 for first 2 hrs.** 1 hr.* 1.0 greater than 0.5 greater 2 hrs. than 1 hr. Assumes only adult population, which has thyroid dose conversion factor equal to 1/2 of child. Child dose is used for general population and hospitals.

- Air filtration factor assumes ventilation control and shelter is taken in interior areas.

d. Discuss results of calculation with Radiation Health Coordinator, Director of LERO and Manager of LERO. Inform Special Facilities Evacuation Coordinator of protective action recommendation for these facilities. The Special Facilities Evacuation Coordinator e. will contact each facility in affected zones and inform them of the protective action recommendations. 'k/ Rev. 3

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 32 of 44 ,{- .. e. NOTE WHEN DISCUSSING PROTECTIVE ACTIONS WITH THE HOSPITALS, REQUEST THAT A STAFF PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED IN RADIOLOGY OR NUCLEAR MEDICINE BE CONSULTED BY HOSPITAL ADMINISTRAT6RS. f. If facilities decide to evacuate, proceed in accordance with OPIP 3.6.5. 5.4 Waterborne Release l 5.4.1 Complete the Waterborne Release Protective Action l Recommendation Worksheet (Attachment 3) as follows: Recorded projected doses (OPIP 3.5.2) on the a. worksheet. b. Compare doses with the Waterborne Guidance f-(, Chart (Attachment 1, Part II). l 5.4.2 Check worksheet fc.r completeness and submit them j to the Radiological Health Coordinator / DOE-RAP Team Captain for review.

6.0 REFERENCES

l 6.1 EPA - 520/1 001 i 6.2 EPA - 520/1 001B l 6.3 Offsite Survey Map (OPIP 3.5.1, Attachment 11) 7.0 ATTACHMENTS l 1. Protective Action Reco"mmendation Worksheet 2. Evacuation Times by Wind Direction 3. Thyroid and Whole Body Guidance Charts 4. EPA PAG Guide (: Rev. 3

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 33 of 44 ( Page 1 of 6 P PR'OTECTIVE ACTION REcobefe! DATIO!? WORKSHEET ~ PART I a AIRBORNE RELEASE 1. Release duration hours 2. a. Wind speed sph b. Wind direction degrees CAUTION FOR GROUND RELEASE, USE 33 FOOT WIND SPEED AND DIRECTION READINGS. FOR ELEVATED RELEASE, USE 150 FOOT READINGS. (.' 3. Time of release start (use 24-hour clock) hours 4. Time of calculation (use 24-hour clock) hours miles 5. Distance to receptor I 6. Plume travel time hours item 5/ item 2a 7. Time until exposure begins (choose a or d) a. If release has begun b. Difference (item 4 - item 3) = hours c. Time hours (item 6 - item 7b) -(- Rev. 2 10/17/83 ,.-_.7- ,.,m_.,,, ,.,.,-w-%,y,,,. ,y__m. _,..,.., _ _.,,,...,. -.-

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 34 of 44 ( Page 2 of 6 P ~

PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION WORKSHEET (continued)

Distance (from item 5) miles f d. If release will begin later e. Difference -(item 3 - item 4) = hours j f. Time (item 6 + item 7e) hours'i 3 8. a. Affected Downwind Sector b. Evacuation Zone {' (A-S from Offsite ' Survey Map) i. 9. Weather condition ([ ' (circle one for a, b, and c) a. Normal Adverse Severe b. Summer Winter 10. Evacuation time (Use information recorded in items 8 and 9 along with Attachment 2 to deter-mine evacuation time. hours See procedure Step 5.2.8.b 11. Exposure time hours Item 10 - (item 7c cg; 7f) f (. ' Rev. 2 10/17/83 ,--,-.,-__,_-r.---w-. -.. -.,,.,,,,, - _ -, _,. ~, _, -.., .u ,-,y-,

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 35 of 44 ~( Page 3 of 6 p ~ PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMEIOATION WORKSHEET (continued) CAUTION IF ITEM 11 IS A NEGATIVE NUMBER, ENTER ZERO HOURS. 12. Evacuation Exposure Period Smaller of item 1 or hours item 11 13. Projected whole body dose (IRDAM dose rate x rem item 1) 14. Monitoring team whole rem /hrr ({. body dose rate 15. Monitoring team whole j body dose j rem (item 14 x item 1) i 16. Most. reliable whole l body dose rem (item 13 or item 15) 17. Projected thyroid dose (IRDAM dose rate x rem item 1) 18. Monitoring team thyroid rem /hr dese rate rem 18a. Monitoring team thyroid dose (item 18 x item 1) 19. Most reliabile thyroid rem dose (item 17 or item 18a) (. Rev. 2 10/17/83 y n ,,, ~ +,.,,, e 4- - - y--,, - av

OPIP 3.6.1 -/ Page 36 of 44 \\ Page 4 of 6 .. P. PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION WORKSHEET (continued) Distance'(from item 5) miles 20. Whole body evacuation dose (item 12 x item 16/ item 1) rem 21. Thyroid evacuation dose (item 12-x item 19/ item 1) rem 22. Whole body shelter dose (item 16 x 0.7*) rem

Average shelter protection factor 23.

Thyroid shelter dose (pick a or b) a. For release duration C. :. less than 1 hour (item 19 x 0.5) rem b. For release duration equal to or greater than 1 hour item 19 x l~1 - 0.5 - rem l l_ item 1_ 6 l 24. Whole body 16dicating action - refer to whole l body guidance chart (Attachment 3)* l (Indicate no action, shelter, or evacuation) 25. Thyroid indicated action - i refer to' thyroid guidance l chart (Attachment 3)*- (Indicate no action, l shelter, or evacuation) i Rev. 2 10/17/83

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 37 of 44 ( Page 5 of 6 t ~ PROTECTIVE ACTION REC 0riliENDATION WORKSHEET (continued) Distance' (from item 5) miles 26. Protective Action Recommendation (Most severe of item 24 or item 25) CAUTION USE ATTAGMENT 4 IF ADDITIONAL TIME IS AVAILABLE FOR CONSIDERATION. I ~ Approved by ED/RM Time Date k,. PART II - WATERBORNE RELEASE 27. Projected whole body doce (swimming) (OPIP 3.5.1) rem-28. Projected skin dose (swimming) (OPIP 3.5.1) rem l 29. Projected whole body dose (boating) rem f 30. Protective Action l Recommendation l (use waterborne guidance chart below) T Rev. 2 10/17/83 l

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 38 of 44 / 2 ('

Page 6 of 6 t

PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOM::I2iDIT10N WORKSHEET ~ * (. continued) WATERBORNE GUIDANCE CHART IF THEN 1 Projected whole body or skin l Instruct the U.S. Coast Guard dose due to swimming (item 27 1 to instruct all swimmers to or 28) is equal to or greater i reenter boats within a 1-mile J than 1 rem ' distance of the plant. l Sound sirans with EBS message I for swimmers to leave water in beach areas. Projected whole body do'se due l Instruct the U.S. Coast Guard to evacuate all boats and to boating (item 29) is equal lI vessels within c 1-mile distance ([ to or greater than 1 rem of the plant 1 Waterborne Protective Action Recommendation i i i Approved by Rad'iation Health Coordinator L i Time Date I t I - b_ Rev. 2 10/17/83 f g -* + ve-= r =e m,- y-,y+ y--,--,,yw,eg,--c-e-.m.--m-,-~--,---ev +---~~t

w rw +'w--w~ee-'--w'ww--w e----1--=rw-=w-"ww'e---e-e
v-**---w-ve=*

--Nww--wi--eee-r-e--

f OPIP 3.6.1 Page 39 of 44 .( Page 1 of 4 .P t EVAGIATION TIMES BY WIND DIRECTION SUMMER (NORMAL CONDITIONS) l WIND DIRECI1ON ii i ii i ii i l l (toward) ll 20MES l TIME II ZONES l TIME ll ZONES l TIMES l l ll l ll l ll l l l E llABCDE l 3.25 llABCDEJ l 3.25 l l ABCDEFGH l 4.00 l l ll l ll l ilIJ0PS I l l ll l ll l ll l l l ESE llABCDE l 3.25 llABCDEIJ l 3.83 llABCDEFGH l 4.00 l l ll I 11 I IIIJ0PS I l l' il i 11 I il I i i SE llABCDE l 3.25 lIABCDEHIJ l 3.83 l l ABCDEFGH l 4.00 l l ll l ll l lIIJNOS I l l 11 I il I 11 I i l SSE llABCDE l 3.25 llABCDEHI l 3.67 llABCDEFGH l 4.00 l 1 1I I II I IIIJMNO I l l 11 I il I il I I l S l l ABCDE l 3.25 llABCDEGHI l 3.67 l l ABCDEFG'? i 4.00 l l ll l ll 1 IIIJLMNOR l l 1 II I II I ii l i i SSW llABCD2 l 3.25 llABCDEGH l 3.67 ll ABCDEFGH l 4 58 l 1 II I Il l l lIRINNR I l ll 1I i ii i i l SW llABCDE l 3.25 llABCDEFG l 3.92 IlABCDEFGH l 4.58 l 1 ll l ll l I IIAIMR l l l-11 1 11 I il i I I WSW llABCDE l 3.25 ll ABCDEFG l 3.92 ll ABCDEFGH l 4.58 l l l 1l l ll l llIKLQR l l l l l l 1 i I i I l W-llABCDE l 3.25 l l ABCDEFG l 3.92 ilABCDEFGH l 4.58 l l 11 1 11 l ll1x0 l l l l l l I (: L Rev. 2 10/17/83 ,e --,.,,-,-,-,.,,y~.-,,- _,--,vw, ,,,,-,-.,wr,y- ,,.,.%.---.,,,-,,,,,.,-,~~v-w,

OPIP 3.6.1 Page 40 of 44 (' Page 2 of 4 y. EVACUATION TIMES'BY WIND DIRECTION (continued) SUMMER (ADVERSE ODEDITIONS) l WIND DIRECTION II I il l ll l l l' (toward) ll-20MES l TIME l ZONES l TIME ll ZONES l TIMES l l l ll l

I I

II I I l E llAECDE l 3 92 l l ABCDEJ l 3.92 llABCDEFGH l 5.08 l ' l 11 l ll l llIJ0PS l l l ll l ll l li - 1 I l ESE llAECDE l 3.92 IlABCDEIJ l 4.33 llABCDEFGH l 5.00 l l ll l 11 I llIJCPS I l l Il I ll l ll 1 I I SE IlABCDE I 3.92 l!ABCDEHIJ l 4.33 ll ABCDEFGH l 5.08 l 'll l l1 l llIJNOS I l l IT I ~ ll l ll i l l l SSE IlABCDE I 3.92 llABCDEHI l.4.17 l l ABCDEFGH l 5.08 l l l! II I IIIJMNO l l l-11 II I II I l - l S llABCDE l 3 92 - ll ABCDEGHI l 4.17 ll ABCDEFGH I 5.08 l l l! l ll l llIJLMNOR l l I il i ll 1 l l ll l -SSW-llABCDE l 3.92.llABCDEGH I 4.17 l l ABCDEFGH l 6.00 l 1 ll 'I I IIIJKI.MNR l l l ll i' ll 1 ll l l l SW llABCDE l 3.92 l l ABCDEFG l 5.00 llABCDEFGH l 6.00 l l ll l ll l I1IJKLMR l I 1 11 1 II I II I I - l WSW llABCDE. l 3 92 ' l l ABCDEFG l 5 00 llABCDEFGH l 6.00 l 1 lI-1 II I IIIJKLQR l l I ll I II I ii l l l W llABCDE l 3 92 l l ABCDEFG l-5.00 llABCDEFGH l 6.00 l l ll 1 ll l llIJKQ l l e Rev. 2 f 10/17/83 +

y g-y

,e ,,,--.py

3,

,7-,.-. ---,..w--p -,--,e-,yw-w-.--e,-.- m %---.m-r-we,. _..,--.--,e-.--en. ,,.w,-w ---m.-z.e

m OPIP 3.6.1 Page 41 of 44 ( Page 3 of 4 o EVAGATION TIi3S BY WIND DimECTION (continued) WINTER (NCRMAL CONDITIONS) . I WIND DIRECTION l l l ll 1-1l l l l (toward) ll 20MES l TIME 'l 20MES l TIME I1 ZONES l TIMES l 17 11 I il I il l l l E llABCDE l 3.08 llABCDEJ l 3.08 ll ABCDEFGH l 3 58 l I ll l ll l llIJ0PS I I I 11 I ll l Il l l 1 ESE llABCDE l 3.08 llABCDEIJ l 3.42 l l ABCDEFGH l 3.58 l l ll l ll l llIJ0PS l l ~! II II l ll l l l SE llABCDE l 3.08 llABCDEHIJ l 3.42 IlABCDEFGH l 3.58 l l l ll IIIJNOS I l l li i il I il i I l SSE llABCDE l 3.08 llABCDEHI l 3.42 l l ABCDEFGH I 3.58 l i II i lI I IIIJMNO l l l 11 I Ii l ii i I l S llABCDE l 3.08 llABCDEGHI l 3.42 ll ABCDEFGH I 3.58 l ( l ll l ll l 11IJLMNOR I l l Il 1 il l ll l l l SSW llABCDE l 3.08 llABCDEGH l 3.42 l l ABCDEFGH l 4.17 l 'l. 11 I ll l 'lIxLMNR I l l 11 1 11 1 Il i l l SW llABCDE l 3.08 l l ABCDEF G l 3.58 llABCDEFGH l 4 17 l l ll l ll l 1IIxLMR I l 1 11 I il I ll l l I WSW lIABCDE l 3.'08 llABCDEFG l 3.58 llABCDEFGH l 4.17 1 il l ll l IIIJU.QR I l l. I - ll 1 II, 1 ll l 1 I t i W llABCDE l 3.08 l l ABCDEF G l 3.58 llABCDEFGH l 4 17 l I ll l ll 1 IIIxo I l l l a O (': Rev. 2 10/17/c3 y w ,,. + _ -,. - _ ,-._.,,y .m ...,,,__..7.,,y.% ,em_.,,-,,.,,_,,,,%_w...r,_,,,,... .,,__m

l 7_ _ OPIP 3.6.1 Page 42 of 44 ( Page 4 of 4 f' -t EVACUATION TIMES BY v1ND DIRECTION (continued) WINTER (ADVERSE CONDITIONS) ' l WIND DIRECTION l i i ii l ll 7 l l (toward) ll ZOMES l TIME ll ZONES l TIME Il ZONES I TIMES I l ll l ll l 1i i l l E llABCDE l 3 75 llABCDEJ l 3.75 llABCDEFGH l 4.83 l l ll l ll l llIJ0PS I l l ll 1 ll l ll l l l ESE. IlABCDE l 3 75 lIABCDEIJ l 3.83 l l ABCDEFGH l 4.83 l l ll l 'll l IIIJ0PS I l l ll l 11 l ll l I 1 SE llABCDE l 3 75 llABCDEHIJ l 3.83 llABCDEFGH l 4 83 l l 11 'l ll 1 IIIJNOS I l 1 11 I il i ll l l l SSE' llABCDE l 3 75 llABCDEHI l 4.42 ll ABCDEFGH I 4 83 I i 11 l ll l IIIJMNO l l 1 11 l 11 I il 1 I g i S IlABCDE .l 3 75 llABCDEGHI l 4.42 ll ABCDEFGH l 4.83 l ,.(- l ll l ll l lIIJ1MNOR l l l ll l ll l ll l I 1 SSw llABCDE l 3 75 llABCDEGH l 4.42 llABCDEFGH l 5.67 l l ll l l1 I llIKLMNR l l I II I II I II I I I Sw llABCDE I 3 75 l l ABCDEF G l 4.75 lIABCDEFGH l 5 67 l l ll l ll l llIALMR l l I II i 11 l ll l l l wSw IIABCDE 1 3 75 l l ABCDEFG l 4.75 llABCDEFGH l 5 67 l 1 II I II I IIIALQR I I i t l I il l II I II I I 1~ w IIABCDE l 3 75 Il ABCDEFG l 4.75 ll ABCDEFGH l 5.67 l l 1 ll l 11 I llIno I I i l l i ' D l Rev. 2 f-10/17/83 r - -. - ~. -,.... - _ - - -..

p.: OPIP 3.6.1 Page 43 of 44

f.

\\' Page 1 of 1 I, THYROID GUIDANCE CHART IF l THEN Projedtdd dose (Item 19) is No action less than 5 rem I Shelter dose (Item 23) is less Shelter

than 25 rem Shelter dose (Item 23) is equal Shelter
to or greater than 25-rem and evacuation dose (Item 21) is equal to or greater than shelter n dose i

Shc1ter dose (Item 23) is equal l Evacuate cto or greater than 25 rem and evacuation dose (Item 21) is less than shelter dose Shelter is to be with ventilation control. Ventilation control means turning off air conditioners or fans, closing doors and (:y: windows thus preventing access of outside air. Proceed to a s basement if available. .WHOLE BODY GUIDANCE CHART IF 1 THEN ~ Projected ' dose (Item 16) is No action. less than 1 rem j Shelter dose (Item 22) is less Shelter

than 5 rem Shelter dose (Item 22) is equal Shelter
to or greater than 5 rem and evacuation dose (Item 20) is equal to or greater than shelter dose Shelter dose (Item 22) is equal Evacuate to or greater than 5 rem and evacuation dose (Item 20) is l

less than shelter dose I l Shelter is to be with ventilation control. Ventilation control means turning off air conditioners or fans, closing doors and (- windows thus preventing access of outside air. Proceed to a basement if available. Rev. 2 10/17/83 ~

O. h q n ) i } EPA PAG GUIDE 4 .. 3 Pr Josted see. (see) to the Pegeletten poeemmended AettenoieI Caumente i i Whcle body el pe planned preteettee mettsne.(b) py,,g.,,3y,,, ,ng,q LERG ser fosse en edeteory te seet ehetter and esatt preteettre sett no ser i ThFreld e5 rwrther Instrwettene. 6e recensidered er leoniter entirennentet redletten levels. terminated. i Whole body 1 to e5 Seek shelter as e minlose. Er eenstrelate estet, Consider eveeuellen. Eveemste unless eenetrelate estre speelet constegretten ThFreld 5 to *FS 14 tapreetteet, eheeld be ss en rer j flentter envirere.entet redletion levels. eveemetten er entieron Centret seeese. and pregnant oseen. i i i Whole body 3 end ebeve tendwet sendetery esseuetten. Seetring shelter useld be j fleniter environmental redletten levelo and adject eroe en etternative ir l Thyroid M and ebeve for sondatory eveemetten beend en these 3 cools. eeeewetten were not Centret access, immediatelF poselble. I i Projected Bees (Woof te l Emergener Tees #erters i Whole beer 5 Control esposere er emergener team members to these Although reeptretore end i levele eseept for lifeseeing etestone. (Appropriate etable ledine shewld he i Thyreld 15 eentrole for emergene, worters, inetwee time used where erreettre to llettettons, respiraters, and etable ledine.) centret deee to 1 emergeneF te** eer*ere l s e l te. ele beer 75 centret eiposure er meersener team members perrorelns thrrete deee ser not be Ilrenewing 45estene to thte levet. (Centret er Llos e Itatting teeter cor er o.. re.i n w -et erreen.e.> urese.in..inei-o. N>NO t A. ga ;5 l te>n.e -uene ore,eeos.onded ror,ienni. -.. creteou. -u-doeieien. et u.e u-er u.e i-ident .e.t toi,e e. iou, eenauen. inte een.iderou. i i Gif <*>.t u.o u.o er u.e i-ident, erneieio -, ispi-t is -lapeet,reteou.e -u-in =eepint.nh u.e - l + <o l ),< ,rimei,ie er -inteini.,enen-es, ores se ice - r-senau, e*ie.eue. o. MDO+ g"hH y l NN B p t l l

y 1 3: i L

_4 _ ~ .m._ _ _.._=, Att9chment 6 Mt: OPIP 3.8.2. Page 22 of 38 4- ,g Page 12 of 22 EBS SAMPLE HESSAGES (continued) 'MESSACE F - GENERAL EMERGENCY (SHELTERING) l (continued) 3, Sheltering is recommended for people in some planning zones. Sheltering is to remain indoors with all windows and doors closed. Air conditioners / heaters should be turned off, fires should be extinguished, and fireplace dampers closed. The . people.who should shelter are in planning zones (identify by zone letters and area description). People in the affected zones who are not,at_home s_hould-seek shelter inside buildings. . The 10-mile emergency planning zone circling Shoreham is roughly bounded by-Main Street in downtown Riverhead to the east, Main Street in Port Jefferson to the west, and Sunrise Highway to the south. If you live within the 10-mile emergency planning zone, you would have received monthly newsletters and other emergency [ information. h If you are located within the 10-mile planning zone and do not have 'a Shoreham Public. Emergency Procedures Brochure, public information and a map of the zone are included in a special insert of the Suffolk County Telephone Book and a more detailed map is in the lecal Yellow Book. l Posters with emergency information have been provided to motels, restaurants, gas stations, public parks, beaches, and recreational facilities. If you are not within planning zones (identify), there is no reason i for you to shelter. If you are outside the 10-mile emergency l planning zone, there is no reason to take any action. If conditions change in the future, these recommendations may change and we will inform you immediately. Once again, the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station is in a General Emergency. There has been a release of radiation into the air. It is advised that people in planning zones (identify) shelter, that is,. remain indoors with outside ventilation sources closed off. -People in the affected zones who are not at home are again advised L j to shelter inside buildings. This message will be repeated every fifteen minutes over this station unless new information is available sooner. Keep tuned to this emergency broadcast station for the latest official information. Rev. 3 l I -e++ m-n -+ew w*-e-e w

+-m-<en

,,ne-e -=---r.-.-v--ew+-= +sw-- = =. .=~-*we*-.m +--===-vrr---re 1=na==--

e=~-~~m-*-,=--m+

< - - - = * =

L i-r

OPIP 3.3.2' Pag 2 41 cf 163 b a 3 C -Page 2 of'3-n E SUPPLEMENTARY NOTIFICATIONS CALL CHECO.IST #4 j (continued) i e4 RESPONSIBLE TELEPHONE NAME OF' PERSON VERIFICATION EMERGENCY CALLER ACENCY/t1ESSAGE NUMBER ACCEPTING CALL TIME / INITIALSITIME/ INITIALS I l NOTE: NOTIFY FOR ALERT OR HIGHER l~ l CLASSIFICATIONS. l l. Support Services NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY / / Coordinator Message: Request that the telephone j representative assigned to the Local Emergency Response Organization be notified to report to the 4 Local EOC in Brentwcod. l l NOTE: NOTIFY FOR ALERT OR HIGHER l l CLASSIFICATIONS. l Evacuation UNITED STATE COAST GUARD / / Osordinator 4 f. Message: Give a summary of the situ-stion and request clesr-ance of boats from Island Sound wIr.hin miles l (as directed by the Direc-tor of Local Response). 1' i Backup Customer Service to SNPS l Method: Control Room to U.3. Coast Guard via the Federal Telephone System. i NOTE: Names and telephone numbers confidential and withheld from general publication. Rev. 3 l 1

B

Attachmnnt 8 .(n.. t" ~

_ Selective Evacuation e

1 from the.affected area of the plume exposure E 2 t 3 members of the general public who might have a low 4 tolerance to radiation exposure. 5 Specifically this 6 would include pregnant women *and children 12 ye,ars and under. 7 8 from the New York State Radiological.Emerge 9 10 Preparedness Plan (III-53,54). 11 It may be 12 whole body or 5 to 25 rems to the thyroid, but n 13 without consultation with the N. Y. State 14 Commissioner of Health. 15 16 Evacuation 17' 18 for certain. sectors of the general population toCirc 19 20 initiate 21 Response,an evacuation. The Director of Local .(s based u 22 in Section 3.6-B,pon recommendations as. designated 23 3 may call for the evacuation of public will be notified of the need for ansectors within the 24 The 25 evacuation b Section 3.3.y the same methods as described in 26 Details of evacuation routes and 27 traffic control points are specified in Appendix A 28 29 Should a general evacuation be or 30 of the zones within the plume exp.dered, some or all 31 affected. osure EPZ may be 32 The general public owning cars will be instructed via EBS radio to use the designated 33 evacuaticu routes. 34 As the evacuation proceeds evacuation route spotters will report the progr,ess 35 to the local EOC. Overall direction of traffic 36 control aspects of the evacuation will be through 37, the Traffic Control Coordinator, refer to Traffic 38 Control Procedure 3.6.3. 39 At the direction of the will be established and potential imnediments toTra 40 41 ~ evacuation will be removed through the use of tow 42 trucks or other heavy equipment. 43 44 Those persons without a means to evacuate will be 45 transported by buses that will follow the 46 pre-established routes identified in the public 47 information brochure. 48 .T/ The Transportation Support 49 3.6-6 REV. 1

,z.% r Ns-S- +- i i i I l l l l I I I 1 i l v ww,~~-u-w,---or,,w-rym n e w-r--ev w r

, ~,,-.

= _. _ c r t t Functions 8 es c .2 .2 8 4 4 f

2

~ e es c z 2" : Ot 8 0 % 53 m e,: .e.a:e di := : : = u Director Local Resoonse F F F F F F Manager of Local

Response

5 S S S S S Health Services Coordinator 1 S S S S S Radiation Health Coordinator S S S S S S Evacuation Coordinster S S (.' Traffic Control Coordinator S S Special,Facilitigs Evacuatton Coordtnator S S Transportation support e S Coerdinator S S U Support Services Cam dinator S S Relocation Center Coordinator 5 S Logistics Support Coordinator S S Security Caordinator g g Emer. Medical Public Service Coord. S S Sanitary Support Coordinator S S a F = FRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY S = SUFFORTING RESPONSIBILITY T'igEre 3.6. l' a Protetyive Actions Function k ~ s I 0" b e. w-v REV, O

b i 0

. 0

e M.

NEW YORK STATE f RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN Oncluding Site Specific Plc.ns) I + -a. ~ ~, pyy,"FoEF %** .. - ~ ^ .. ~ I 3 q I w a s s., 2* ~

i

.. J1 '% ,t! X k*i 'L. ~ s, p's,Q f "*,.@i.. 1 ), y s, a g'. s.. r .'#., 0 '. k,..T M . 4 I .k-M.4 w .g g p. 4 4

i D

't I j _1 [ /.,$, 3' p 3 ,,,j g.. ~M ~1 g .a . 2 _i 2. 1 i ~ 3 ) = s' ; g f' i ,l . J' L'* y' Y ^ j ~ ~. -N;. i v. ,e 3,; rr g r jw f, =7

~ g NEW YOPf. STATE PADI0 LOGICAL E!1ERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN Prepared for the Disaster Preparedness Comission of the State of Ikw York Mario Cuomo, Governor l I I L i By the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Group .('f a m.,- ,n. -nw..,, ,,,,,,....,,,,,...,,.-,,w._, ,,-=.n. n,,,.-wa,, -,,,-..,,.. n-

Non-institutionalized mobility impaired persons can g request transportation by calling telephone number (s) y that will be announced over the emergency broadcast l {- media. In addition, these impaired persons may be identified in advance by the submission of a mail-in postcard furnished as part of the emergency public infomation pamphlet, distributed annually to the-plume exposure EPZ population. 4 -Implementation of Selective Evacuation is initiated by the public notification system, with explicit directions over the broadcast media. Implementation can be effected for various Fhergency Response Planning Areas (EPPA's) or for the entire EPZ. Instructions include the specific assignment of evacuatin routes and reception centers in the host area. Persons without personal transportation will be provided pubite transportation. Congregate care shelter, with appropriate medical facilities and personnel, will be .provided in the host areas. (5) General Evacuation For actual or projected off-site doses in excess of 5 rem to the whole body or 25 rem to the thyroid, the protective action response option General Evacuation may be implemented for the affected areas of the pirie exposure EPZ. General Evacuation will be impleuented by the local chief executive, following consultation with or upon the recomnendation of the State Commissioner of Health, and with the coordination support of ODP. Each County within the plume exposure EPZ has a detailed evacuation plan and maps showing evacuation routes. Evacuation areas loction and relocation centers and Congregate Care Centers are also shown in County Plans. All maps and charts are included in Site Specific Sections of this Plan. Non-institutionalized mobility impaired persons can -request transportation by calling telephone number (s) that will be announced over the broadcast media. In addition, these impaired persons may be identified in advance by the submission of a mail-in postcard furnished as part of the emergency public infomation pamphlet, distributed annually to the plume exposure EPZ population. This pamphlet also provides instructions on General Evacuaton for each household, school, special care facility, group quarters and place of business. i Implementation of General Evacuation is initiated by the i county public notification system, with explicit direction over the broadcast media EBS. Implementation i can be effected for various ERPAs or for the entire EPZ. III-43 Rev.11/83

Instructions to the public include the assignment of specific evacuation routes and reception centers. Public transportation will be provided to persons p without transportation. Special traffic control g procedures and mechanisms will be implemented to insure an efficient vehicle flow. Congregate Care Centers will be provided in host areas, including provisions for feeding, lodging, and medical care. Special care facilities, including hospitals and nursing homes, have specific evacuation procedures, including the acquiring of special transport vehicles. Each NFO has evacuation plans for onsite personnel. NFOs will coordinate evacuation procedures with local authorities to insure suitable off site locations. Nomally on site personnel will use the evacuation routes that are used by public in the ERPA where Nuclear Power Plant is located. Evacuation routes are shown in County Plans and Site Specific Sections. Evacuation from one county into another county or state will be coordinated by the New York State Office of Disaster Preparedness. County evacuation plans are included in County REPPs. Summary tables including evacuation routes, reception centers, host areas, and evacuation times are included in Site Specific Section Part II, Section I. 9 (6) Thyroid Blocking Agents Potassium Iodide (KI) in water soluble table fom (130 ~ mg) is recommended as an appropriate thyroid blocking agent for use by emergency workers, and staff and patients or inmates of facilities where evacuation is not possible or feasible. Distribution to the general population is not recommended. When emergency workers and the other persons listed above are likely to receive a projected dose of 25 REM to the thyroid, KI should be considered as a protective measure prior to receiving such a dose. l The State Commissioner of llealth is the primary health officer responsible for recommending the use of KI. When time pemits, the Commissioner will consult with appropriate local health officials. If the Commissioner is not available and time is of the essence, the affected local health officials shall be responsible for such recommendations. 6. EllEPGEliCY PERS0t!!lEL -- RADIOLOGICAL EXPOSURE CONTROL The Radiological Exposure Control procedure (Part III, Section I-G) has been developed to provide the State Commissioner of Health with the capability of controlling and minimizing the III-44 Rev.11/83 O

.- 1 1 I w e e ~ r -+ - - - - 9 r-g-e -r-9wy-

) ' 1 l \\ = 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2 r Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ? 1 3 4 In the Matter of: 5 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Docket No. l (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, 50-332-OL-3 (Emergenc 6 Unit 1) Planning)y ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7 8 Hauppauge, New York February 9, 1984 g 9 DEPOSITION OF EDWARD P. BENNETT, called 10 for examination by counsel for LILCO in the 11 above-entitled action, pursuant to notice, the witness 12 J having been d61y sworn by NICHOLAS J. TORRE, a Notary 13 Public in and for the State of New York, at the offices 14 of the Suffolk County Executive, H. Lee Dennison f 15 Building, Veterans Highway, Hauppauge, New York, at 16 11:10 a.m., the proceedings being taken down by E 17 i Stenotype by NICHOLAS J. TORRE, and transcribed under 18 his direction. 19 20 21 h 22 i r 23 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY, INC. 223 Jericho Turnpike 24 Mineola, New York 11501 (212)343~0171 (516)741-5235 25 (212)895-3109 a %1 COMPUTER AIDED TRANSCRIPTION

2 APPEARANCES: i On behalf of Suffolk County and the Witness: 2-3 CHRISTOPHER M. McMURRAY Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, Christopher, & Phillips 4 1900 M Street, N.W. 5 Washington, D.C. 20036 b On behalf of Long Island Lighting Company: 7 JAMES CHRISTMAN GEORGE-MARTIN 8 Hunton & Williams 9 707 East Main Street P.O. Box 1535 10 Richmond, Virginia 23212 11 ALSO PRESENT: 12 FABIAN PALOMINO - New York State STUART GLASS, F.E.M.A. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 l 24 25

i A I i 46 2. f If we have a large amount of heat, 3 . accompanying any release, the release, that release d Wo'uld be relatively buoyant and would go to much higher 5 layer in the atmosphere, yet may still be well mixed 6 within a layer and be characterized as ground level. 7 Q I think we can go to the next contention 8 and probably finish up fairly quickly. 9 To ask you another question on this 10 subject, do you agree with the statement, "Given wind 11 conditions on Long Island, in the event any evacuation i 12 due to a radiological emergency is required, LILCO must 13 evacuate at least a radius of five-to-seven miles around i Id ' the plant"? 15 Do you agree with that statement or not? 16 A No, I do not. 1:7 Q Would you explain.why you don't agree, 18 sir? - 19 A The reason is that there are, in fact, 20 situations where wind direction can be reasonably -21 - predicted. 22 That is so as to preclude such evacuation 23 of'all zones. 24 25 4 s -e ..-,y. w,--,, --,,,,,,,-,--,-,,..~,.,,,~,,,+-,--w-w,-v,,,,--,,-= ,e- ,,,-m w.

1 47 y t 2 Whether you have a gradient, a wind 3 ,r.esulting from a given pressure gradient, where there is a relatively strong pressure gradient compared to what 4 5 we discussed previously, of a weak pressure gradient, 6 wind direction is persistent and can be forecast with 7 good professional judgment. 8 O Could you, if you had to or were asked 9 to, sir, set up a plan such that one would know under 10 what conditions one had to evacuate at least a radius of 11 five-to-seven miles around a plant? 12 A I suppose given money, time and 13 resources, I certainly could. 14 That is not to say that this is -- 15 O It would be complicated? 16 A It certainly would require the l'7 expenditure of resources, not only in designing such a 18 plan but in carrying out the plan. 19 O Moving over to snow removal, sir, which I 20 believe in your view, you have looked mostly at 21 Contention 97.B, and to the extent that the same subject 22 is addressed in 66.D, I guess that would be incorporated 23 into your studies or your analysis, analyses, if that be 24 25 l

4 l 65 1 CERTIFICATE 2 P - t 3 I, NICHOLAS J. TORRE, a stenotype - reporter and notary public, within and for the State of 4 New York, do hereby certify: 5 That EDWARD P. BENNETT, the witness whose 6 examination is hereinbefore set forth, was first duly 7 sworn by me, and that transcript of said testimony is a a true record of the testimony given by said witness. 9 I further certify that I am not related 10 to any of the parties to this action by blood or 11 12 marriage, and that I am in no way interested in the l l outcome of this matter. 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set 14 f day of, Februar 1984. 15 my hand this "7 M 16 v NICHOLAS J. TORRE 17 l 18 19 20 21 l l 22 23 24 i ~ 25 l 4 ,y. ..y_, ..--. ~.-. -

[- "~ L d. 2 e s y t a-e 2 2 s a 4 (-

_ _ _ _ 2 l 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2 Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 5 3 4' In the Matter of: 5 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY Docket No. (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, 50-332-OL-3 (Emergenc 6 Unit 1) Planning)y 7 8 Hauppauge, New York February 9, 1984 9 DEPOSITION OF RICHARD TAYLOR, called for 10 examination by counsel for LILCO in the above-entitled 11 action, pursuant to notice, the witness having been duly 12 sworn by NICHOLAS J. TORRE, a Notary Public in and for 13 the State of New York, at the offices of the Suffolk 14 County Executive, H. Lee Dennison Building, Veterans 15 Highway, Hauppauge, New York, at 2:00 p.m. the 16 proceedings being taken down by Steno'fpe by NICHOLAS J. TORRE, and transcribed under his direction. 18 l ) 19 20 21 22 23 TANKOOS REPORTING COMPANY, INC. 24 223 Jericho Turnpike Mineola,' New York 11501 25 (212)343-0171 (516)741-5235 (212)895-3109 COMPUTER AIDED TRANSCRIPTION

1 APPEARANCES: 2 ? 2 i on behalf of Suffolk County and the Witness: 3 CHRISTOPHER M. McMURRAY Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, Christopher, 4 & Phillips 1900 M Street, N.W. ~ 5-Washington, D.C. 20036 6 On behalf of Long Island Lighting Company: 7 JAMES CHRISTMAN 8 GEORGE MARTIN Hunton & Williams 9 707 East Main Street P.O. Box 1535 10 Richmond, Virginia 23212 11 ALSO PRESENT: 12 FABIAN PALOMINO - New York State 13 STUART GLASS, F.E.M.A. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

n 1 24 ("## *** 2 Is that what you are talking about? A Yes, that is what I am referring to. O And does that appear to be eight kilometers there, rather than eight miles? A There is no scale on here. 7 Is there one some place else on here? g O Look at all of the pages. A I don't see a scale. The original 3g document this came from had a scale. I believe that was 33 in kilometers. There are numbers along here, but no 12 units assigned to it. O Good enough. Can you identify, for the rec rd, what document it was that that came out of? 15 A Yes, your special fuel limitation 16 extension request for -- not sure of the plant. 37 That was information used, which had 18 information on Shoreham on it. 39 20 rganizati n, actually. 21 Let me ask you if you agree with this statement: Contention 64, from that, "Given wind 23 24 25 l l

25 1 conditions on Long Island, in the event any evacuation due to a radiological emergency was required, LILCO must 4 -evacdate at least a radius of five-to-seven miles around the plant." Do you agree with that? A No, because it is based on the current .j meteorological conditions at the time of an accident. g Must be based on that. It can't be a 9 flat answer that they should evacuate five miles all of the time. 33 9 2 It must be based on current meteorological data at the time of the accident or incident. 14 O How should that meteorological at the 15 time be applied to determine the right thing to do about 16 evacuation? A Well, during the accident, an accident ,g scenario, current meteorology is provided. It is up to 3, the decision of the decision makers to determine that they are in a situation were the winds will be light and 21 variable. 22 There is a possibility of a wind shift or 23 i 24 25 .f k'

i i l 26 1 [windshifts, say, and it must be shown that the 7 projected radiation doses are such that they would 3 - ' require evacuating a whole five-mile area. 4 O So that, if you had to make a decision, 5 y u w uld want to look at the dose projections, under 6 the conditions at the time? 7 A I Would not make the decision. O This is hypothetical. If you had to, if you would -- MR. PALOMINO: Whoever would. 0 . -- you would think that whoever makes the 12 decision should look at.the current dose projections given the meteorological conditions at the time? A Given all of the inputs that go into the making of this assessment. O Do you feel that this variability of the ,7 a ss e, o e am, makes emergency planning 18 poss M e? 19 A No. 20 O If you were to recommend to the people 21 22. doing the emergency planning for Shoreham how they should take into account this information that you have 23 24 25 i

38 1 CERTIFICATE I, NICHOLAS J. TORRE, a stenotype 3 reporter and notary public, within and for the State of New York, do hereby certify: 5 That RICHARD TAYLOR, the witness whose 6 examination is-hereinbefore set forth, was first duly 7 sworn by me, and that transcript of said testimony is a 8 ~ true record of the testimony given by said witness. 9 I further certify that I am not related 10 to any of the parties to this action by blood or 11 marriage, and that I am in no way interested in the outcome of this matter. 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hhve hereunto set 14 my hand this / day of, February, 1984. 15 @M 16 f/ W NICHOLAS J. TORRE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 l r

i f ( 3

. 3 -EPC OPIP 3.5.1 \\ Approved: Page 1 of 53 /_ l 'Ef fectivqr Da te - t OPIP 3.5.1 DOWNWIND SURVEYING 1.0 PURPOSE To describe the procedure to be followed for the conduct of Offsite Radiological Surveys. DOE-RAP Team personnel may use i' their own procedures. 2.0 RESPONSIBILITY The Offsite Radiological Survey (ORS) Team is responsible for implementation of this procedure or its technical equivalent. 3.0 PRECAUTIONS Maintain frequent communications contact at regular intervals. 4.0 PREREQUISITES (? '4.1-An Alert or higher emergency classification has been declared at SNPS, the Local EOC is activated, and the communication links between DOE-RAP at the Brookhaven Area Office (BHO) and the Offsite Radiclogical. Survey (ORS) Teams are established. o4. 2 The ORS Teams have-been mobilized in accordance with OPIP 3.3.3, Standby and Mobilization. 5.0 ACTIONS 5.1 Team Briefing 5.1.1 ORS Team members report to the staging area at BHO or the Local EOC for a briefing by the Environmental Survey Function (ESF) or the RAP I Team Captain.- a. If direct deployment is required from the staging area at BHO, then the ESF will brief ORS Teams via telephone or radio communica-tions from the Local EOC. k' Rev. 2 10/18/83 4 ~

OPIP 3.5.1 Page 2 of 53 ~ I b. If.the ORS Teams are not directly deployed from -BHO, then the ORS Teams will pick up their Offsite Radiological Survey Kits and report to the Local EOC for their briefing l unless otherwise instructed by the ESF or the i RAP Team Captain. 5.1.2 Ensure that the ESF or the RAP Team Captain will include the following items (as a minimum) in the brigfing for the ORS Teams: a. Team identification b. Communications equipment and channel c. Protective equipment (including use of KI) 4 6. Authorized exposure limits e.- Survey locations f. Survey equipment g. -Type of data (air sample, soil sample, water, vegetation, feed, dairy products, and foodstuffs) 5.1.3 The ORS Team members will complete Offsite Radio- ' l, logical Survey (ORS) Briefing Form, Attachment 1,. 1 - from briefing information provided by the ESF or the RAP Team Captain. 2' Equipment Check / Team Preparation 5 5.2.1 Assemble protective equipment as checked off on the Offsite Radiological Survey (ORS) Briefing Form, Attachment 1, and obtain Offsite Radio-logical Survey (ORS) Kits from the staging ares at BHO; two ORS Kits are located at BHO and two I l ORS Kits are kept at the Local EOC. 5.2.2 Perform equipment check using Offsite Radiological, Survey.(ORS) Kit Inventory, Attachment 3. Observe j proper meter response and see that equipment cal-i ibration atickers are valid (see equipment opere-l' tion attachments). Be sure to remove the control TLD from the ORS Kit and leav'e at the Local EOC or BHO, as directed by the 'ESF. 5.2.3 Log predeployment personnel dosimeter readings onto the Offsite Radiological Survey Briefing Form, Attachment 1, Item 11. Rev. 2 r l 10/18/83 L

i OPIP 3.5.1 Page 3 of 53 p 5.2.4 Use an AC source to check the TCS EAS-1 Air .- t Sampler motor. Do not put on the filter canister. -5.2'.5 If the ESF advises that potassium iodide (KI) administration is required, fill out Attachment 9, then take one KI tablet (130 mg) at this time. Inform the ESF or the RAP Team Captain when this is done. 5.2.6 Perform communication check with the ESF at the Local _EOC. Maintain proper communication prac-tices and always identify both_ parties, e.g., "Offsite Radiological Survey Team #1 to ESF." 5.2.7 Put on appropriate protective clothing (see ,, Donning Protective Clothing) and dosimetry equipment (see Attachment 8, Use of Direct-Reading Dosimeters and TLDs), as outlined in ORS Briefing Form, Attachment 1, Item 9. 5.2'8 Proceed to the survey vehicle. Check for a full tank of gas, operating cigarette lighter socket, lights, and operability of the battery. Start f. T['. the engine and with it on, plug in the cable of the TCS EAS-1 Air Sampler, without the filter, into the cigarette lighter socket and observe sampler ~ operating (it should sound like a small vacuum cleaner). If the emergency vehicle is not equipped with a cigarette lighter socket, use the vehicle battery with jucper cables to facilitate connection of the DC adapter directly to the battery terminals (ensure correct polarity when installing cables). 5.2.9 Inform the ESF that the Offsite Radiological Survey (ORS) Team is now ready and is starting L its mission. j 5.3-Survey 5.3.1 Proceed to the designated survey points, as listed on ORS Briefing Form Attachment 1, Item 6b, using 1 the Preselected Sampling Locations List, Attach-ment 10, and the Offsite Survey Map, Attachment I. 11, located in the ORS Kit. fb i Rev. 2 l 10/18/83 L l i

OPIP 3.5.1 Page 4 of 53 . I5.3.2 While enroute to the survey point, keep th'e RO-2A and RM-14 with HP-270 probe on (see equipment operation, Attachments 4 and 5) and begin record-ing periodicall reading on the RM-14 greater ; than' 1200 cpm (y any/hr) on the Offsite 1 mR Radiological Survey Data Sheet,d points, mark the. Assign a number to any non-fixe location on the map, then enter the point number assigned'and the exposure rate on the ORS Data Sheet, Attachment 2. ~ 5.3.3 Record any abnormal events or conditions which you observe on the Offsite Radiological Survey Data Sheet, Attachment 2. 4 5.3.4 If plume tracking is not. required, proceed to ] . Step 5.3.6. 5.3.5 Based on the survey data to be col'lected as indicated on the ORS Briefing Form, Attachment 1, Item 10, drive from point to point noting and reporting the following: - ([;' a. Plume boundaries are described by a dose rate of 1 mR/hr. (This is equivalent to approximately 1200 cpm on the RM-14 with HP-270 probe.) -b. Plume centerline is described as the point at-which the RM 14 with HP-270 probe (open window) reading peaks and begins to decrease. Return to the peak concentration area. c.- At the plume centerline, report the maximum plume whole body dose rate measured with the-RO-2A instrument at 4 feet above the ground and the measurement location to the ESC immediately'after measurement (see Attachment 4, Operation of Eberline-Model RO-2A). Mark the location on the map and ORS Data Sheet, -., Item 10 (2), pling is required, If plume centerline air sam d. collect an air-sample using Step 5.3.7. 5.3.6 At the survey' location, perform the following: i a. Obtain gamma (closed window of RO-2A) measure- < ' (: .ments at 3 inches and 4 feet above the ground Rev. 2 10/18/83 f n-- + e + - - - -, ~..,

~ (C. OPIP 3.5.1 Page 5 of 53 p t and record these readings on Attachment 2. (If the 4 foot reading is noticeably higher than the 3 inch reading, it should be assumed that the pred.ominant gamma source is the airborne plume). b. If. readings increase with decreasing height above the ground, assume that the source is on the surface. In this case, take several smear samples (with gloves) over a 4" x 4" area of the ground and/or a soil sample when conditions permit. c. Use a plastic bag for the soil sample and fill out a label to tag the bag. Label all samples with proper ID information: sample number, sample location, initials, date, time, and team ID. d. When monitoring, periodically check beta (open window of RO-2A) reading at 3 inches e-and 4 feet above ground. Record any readings ..(. significantly different from the window-closed readings. 5.3.7 At the survey location, take an air sample, as required by the Radiological Survey Briefing Form, 4, Item 10 (2), as follows: plug in Leaving the vehicle engine running,for about a. the TCS-EAS-1 air sampler. Run it a 1/2 minute, warm-up period without.the filter / canister installed. b. Open the TCS EAS-1 one quart can containing the canister. Inspect the canister for visi-ble defects; the canister is r.ot acceptable for use if the moisture check dot is blue. c. Turn off the warmed-up sampler, center the canister over the suction opening on the side of the sampler. Stretch the elastic retainer over the duter end of the canister, making sure'the fit is tight. d. Position the air sampler 4 feet above the ground, as far away from the vehicle exhaust pipe as the cable will allow. Rev. 0 5/12/83 - -., - -... ~.

-(j OPIP 3.5.1 Page 6 of 53 F. e. Adjust the flow rate to approximately 5 CFM. Set the timer to 25 5 minutes. = UFR (Rotate dial past the 5-minute mark, then turn back.) f. Start the sampler and record the starting flow rate on the ORS Data Sheet, Attachment 2. Use a stop watch to verify the run time. - g. When the air sample time is completed, record the final flow rate reading on the ORS Data Sheet,. Attachment 2. Carefully remove the ~ canister from the sampler and put it in a plastic bag. Avoid contact with the white i filter cloth wrapped around the outside and the bare filter. Be sure to record start /stop times and flow rates on the ORS Data Sheet, h. Connect the brass-shell GM-1 probe cable to -r-the RM-14 count rate meter to " DETECTOR" input connection (see Attachment 5, Op' RESPONSE" to (a eration of Eberline Model RM-14). Switch " SLOW". In this' position, allow 20 seconds meter response time for each measurement. i. Using the above setup, measure the background at '4 feet above the ground or inside the vehicle. Record this background cpm on the ORS Data Sheet, Attachment 2. J. Insert the GM-1 probe into the center hole of the canister and adjust the scale of the RM-14 as necessary. Record the stabilized filter / canister reading (cpm) on the ORS Data Sheet,. Remove the GM-1 probe. k. Carefully remove the white fiber cloth which is wrapped around the canister by pulling the red tape on the top rim of the canister. Hold the canister in the plastic bag while doing this to avoid contacting the cloth and l to prevent silver zeolite crystal bits from l falling out after the cloth wrapping is removed. Return the fiber cloth to the quart can. Rev. 0 5/12/83 ._ _ _. _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _. _. _. _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _. - _. _ _ _... _ _ _

6 OPIP 3.5.1 Page 7 of 53 p l.- Insert the GM-1 probe into the center hole of the canister and record the' stabilized bare canister reading and time of measurement on the ORS Data Sheet, Attachment 2. 4" Place the bare canister with the plastic bag .m. into the quart can and label the can with the -following informe. tion: Date and time of sample Map location Start and stop time 4 Starting and ending flow rate Sample number (sequential) Team ID n. Flece the quart een inside a plastic campic bag and ensure that a label is attached, o. Report the ORS Data Sheet information for the air' sample to the ESF. 5.3.8 Report dosimeter readings to the ESF at regular .(i intervals -(see OPIP 3.9.1, Dosimetry and Exposure ~ Control). 5.3.9 Immediately report any equipment or supply -shortages to-the ESF. 3 5.3.10 Repeat Steps 5.3.2 through 5.3.8 as necessary for other survey locations. --5.3.11 ~When all survey and sampling activities are com-pleted and the'tcam receives no further requests from the ESF or the team is relieved by a second team, return to the Emergency Worker Decontamina-tion Center, in Brentwood, unless instructed otherwise by the ESF or the RAP Team Captain. 5.3.12 Do not remove protective clothing or respirator until instructed by Emergency Worker Decontamina-tion Facility-personnel (see Attachment 6, Section 5.5, Removing Protective Clothing; Attachment 6, Section 5.7, Step-off Pad Use; Attachment 7, Section 5.5, Removing Respirator). h. Rev. 2 10/18/83 .\\

OPIP 3.5.1 Page 8 of 53 4 e 5.4 i. Decontamination / Sample Return 5.4.1 When all survey and sampling activities are com-pleted, the team _will return to the Emergency Worker. Decontamination Facility, in Brentwood. The decontamination facility has the capability to decontaminate emergency workers and equipment in the event of a radiological release at SNPS. 5.4.2 When the ORS Teams arrive at the Emergency Worker Decontamination Facility, they notify the ESF of l their arrival and proceed to the Vehicle Decon-tamination Area. The ESF or designee will meet the ORS Teams there and have the ORS personnel monitor the sample bags and data sheets with the RM-14 and HP-210 probe. If the plastic bags with I the samples inside and/or the dets sheet are not j -contaminated, then the ESF will bring them into the EOC for future analysis. If they are con-taminated, then the ORS personnel will put the sample bags and/or data sheet into " clean" bags before being brought by the RAP Team Captain or designee into the EOC for future analysis. q 5.4.3 The ORS Team members will then enter the Emergency Worker Decontamination Facility and follow the instructions of the monitoring and decontamination personnel. Be sure to take along your dosimeters, exposure record card, ORS Briefing Form, Attach-ment 1, and KI Record Sheet and Consent Form,. All other equipment will remain in the vehicle until the equipment and vehicle has gone through monitoring and decontamination. 5.4.4 Record post survey dosimeter readings.on the ORS Briefing Form, Attachment 1. l 5.4.5 The ESF or designee will examine all records, data sheets, and samples turned in by the ORS Teams, making copies of those items needed for dose assessment, and forward all samples for lab analysis. 5.4.6 Before the Offsite Radiological Survey Team returns the Offsite Radiological Survey Kit, make sure that all supplies and any contaminated equipment removed from service is replaced. k Rev. 2 10/18/83

.y '3... S ~. s ~ ig.. i ~ 1 - ( OPIP 3.5.1 Page 9 of 53 a s .. t

6.0 REFERENCES

s s -s 6.J. - *0 PIP 3.3.3, Standhy'.a'nd Mobilization 6.2 OPIP 3tD.1, Dosidetry.and Exposure Control + ' 6.3 - O?IP 3.9.2, Radiological Monitoring and Decontamination of Emergency 4 Workers 'and Evacuees 7.0. ATTACHMENTS +- ~ ~ 1. Offsite Radiological Survay_(ORS) Briefing Form c - 2. ~ Offsite Radioljogical Survey (ORS) Data Sheet ~ x T'x 3. ,0ffsite Radiological Curvey Kit Inventory R . 4. Operation of Eberline Mode 1~ RO72A Ion Chamber ~ 5.- Operation of Eberline Model RM-14 kiseof. Protective <ClothingandStep-OffPads . f' 6. - (.. y,

7. y Use of Full Face Raspirators

. 8. .Usevof Direct-Reading Dosimeters and TLDs 9. Pot 51ssiun Iodide Distribution 10. Proselected Sampling-Locations 11.- ffsite Survey Map N + n 4 t Rev. 0 5/12/83 s y--,, ,,-gr, -M-t e-y.%, ,r.,. m 4,e u--,.,, em=.s. +,-..,..,-a,-- w.--,

t 3 3- }. wi 3 % 4 i f. I

k-e Attachm3nt 14 l 4 e + '.2.1 ? Page 1 of 17 g ?

FEDERAL RADIOLOGIC /C MONITORING AND 1

~ ASSESSMENT PLAN 2 x: (FRMAP) SUPPORT 3 - FOR 4 LOCAL. RADIOLOGICAL 5 -EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN 6 ~ 7 l 8 9 d.# Introduction 10 11 This.atischment summarizes the DOE Federal 12 1 Radiological. Monitoring ~and Assessment Plan (FRMAP) 13 capabilities"that-can be p.rovided'to LERO. Section II 14 describes the specific capabilities and expected 15 mobilization and travel times for the Brookhaven Area 16 Office Region-l' coordinating office. Section III 17 describes DOE FRMAP' general capabilities including a 18 ~,qbrief discussion on hew it is activated. 19 - ^ 20 ' ~ Region I spect'fic capabilities and mobilization and 21 travel times are based on discussions with the 22 b Brookhaven Area Office FRMAP Regional Coordinator. 23 The general capabilities sununary is based on two 24 " papers given at the"American Nuclear Society Executive 25 Conference on Emergency Preparedness in February, 1980 26 -(References 1 & 2) and Report ERDA-60 (Reference 3). 27 28 Theimobilization time, which is defined as the time 29 ' required to load ^ equipment and initiate travel, is 30 ~ usuall'y about 2 houra. Travel times in this 31 attachment are specific to the Shoreham Nuclear Power 32 Station. 2These are best estimate mobilization and 33 ~ r travel-times based on a normal situation. 34 35 II. ' Region I Specific Capabilities and Mobilization 36 and Travel Times 37 38 All maio"r DOE laboratories and facilities maintain 39 accideht' teams, which can be made available through 40 a the FRMAP to any nearby location. A number of 41 specialized instruments have been developed to aid-in 42 the rapid assessment'and mitigation'of the 43 44 J v 45 46 w-47 j T-REV. 0 48 x :. - - u( y ~. v u -e w- ,, + s.. ,r. .-,-...--n--,-,,,,,,.--,-.-n..n.,,-...-n.-,.,-n w.,,, .,.----.,n,_-,-

. ~.. _ _ -N4,y 3A.2.1 Page 2of 17 l e t t consequences of a major nuclear accident. The 1 personnel involved with these responses have routine 2 radiological-related duties on a daily basis at 3 leading nuclear facilities thereby ensuring not only 4 continuing experience and training, but also providing 5 the conditions fdr keeping state-of-the-art equipment 6 - operable and calibrated. 7 8 Capabilities 9 10 Indepsndent dose assessment of an emergency at 11 Shorchem Nuclear Power Station (SNPS) will be 12 performed by the DOE-RAP representative reporting 13 from Brookhaven Area Office (BHO) 14 15 The headquarters for the United States Department of 16 Energy (DOE), Region I, DOE-RAP Team is located at 17 BHO, approximately six miles from the Shoreham site. 18 19 i LILCO has requested, due to the proximity and 20 g' - experience of the DOE-RAP personnel, that DOE-RAP 21 assist in accident assessment during any event 22 i (. classification in which the Local EOC is activated. 23 DOE has agreed to this request and will conduct the 24 accident assessment effort for LERO. 25 26 BHO is notified by LILCO Customer Services by means 27 I of a commercial telephone. During off hours, BHO 28 Security serves as the mechanism to provide 29 ~ notification for the on-call Duty Officer. 30 31 Since a DOE-RAP team representative will be one of 32 the primary respondents to the Local EOC to assist in 33 accident assessment, there is a dedicated telephone 34 line for his use between the Local EOC and the BNL 35 Emergency Operations Center. This link will be used 36 to coordinate DOE-RAP team members who will receive 37 direction from the Local EOC, and then subsequently 38 l used by that individual to mobilize additional 39 resources of the Department of Energy at BHO, as 40 41 required. W = . ( REv. 3 v-pv r-ww,- 4 e n,w -me-w - r, -w e-,s,~,- ,-<-es---g-y ,-~,nve,,a, ma,,-w.,w-em,-,m-s-m -- s ,---wr,g-- , - -w+---m,-wc,--

~ I l (.2.1 Page 3of 17 p DOE-RAP provides assistance only. Although this is a 1 federal program with highly developed expertise, this 2 l program will not assume the' responsibility of LERO for 3 4 1 the protection of the health and welfare of its citizens. A DOE-RAP representative from the 5 Brookhaven Area Operations Office will report to the 6 Local EOC in Brentwood, Long Island, to assist the 7 Director of Local Response in accident assessment and 8 9 radiological exposure control functions. 10 Brookhaven Area Office can provide support to the 11 12 LERO to accomplish the following goals: 13 14 Alpha, beta, and gamma radiation surveys Radiation monitoring of air, food, water, 15 16 milk, and personnel Gamma spectrometry and radionuclide 17 18 identification Airborne radioiodine sampling and analysis 19 r to concentrations as low as 3x10E-08 20 l ~ 21 /- microcuries per cubic centimeter 22 Radiological control advice S' 23 Medical advice 24 < Laboratory analysis Support by Government laboratories such as 25 Bettis, Knolls, Argonne, and Oak Ridge 26 27 Communications 28 FRMAP Teams have state-of-the-art high and low-range 29 30 alpha, beta, and gamma radiation survey equipment as 2 31 well~as sodium iodide-scintillation spectrometry 32 analysis equipment. 33 The Brookhaven Area Office (BHO) is located six 34 miles-from the~Shoreham Nuclear Power Station in 35 36 Suffolk County. 37 t .(' REV. 3 1 I i .-_,,,_,.,-..,._..,.,___-..._....,m,.._,_.-..

a ( Page'4 of 17.2.1 ?_ ~ III. DOE FRMAP General Capabilities l 2 NEST /AMS 3 4 The Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST) is 5 maintained in a constant state of readiness for 6 assistance in emergencies. NEST is a DOE operation 7 and consists of-personnel and equipment drawn from 8 Andrews Air Force Base, the Lawrence Livermore 9 Laborato n (LLL), Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, 10 Sandia Laboratories, and EG&G, Inc., a DOE 11 Contractor / Laboratory. This capability incorporates a 12 t broad spectrum of technical expertise, special 13 instruments, and the logistics support base to respond 14 rapidly to large scale emergencies. Included in NEST 15 responses are special radiation detection systems, a 16 comprehensive communication system, logistics support 17 . hardware, the Aerial Measuring System (AMS), airborne 18 radiscion surveillance systems, aerici photographic 19 capabilities, multispectral scanner systems, and 20 background survey files. Atmospheric Release Advisory 21 (' Capability (ARAC), an atmospheric modeling system 22 computer linked.to the National Weather System and the 23 USAF Global' Weather System, can be utilized to support 24 a major emergency. 25 26 RESPONSE EQUIPMENT 27 28 The special response team is organized to deploy most 29 rapidly those personnel and equipment-that are. 30 immediately required. If the situation is of major 31 proportion, added equipment in the following 32 categories is available. 33 34 1 Airborne Systems 35 36 Helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft are equipped with 37 gamma and neutron detection equipment. Gamma spectral 38 data is recorded with positio.. information derived 39 from measurements of several exposure rates and 40 . principal isotope identification. On the ground the 41 p REV. 0

- ~,. - ~.. _ - - (.2.1 Page 5 of 17 recorded data can be converted to equivalent exposure 1 rate at one meter above the ground and' plotted as 2 isopleths on maps or aerial photographs for immediate 3 use by the responsible authorities. 4 5 Aerial photography is performed with large format 6 cameras. A twelve channel Daedalus Scanner is 7 available for very sensitive thermal mapping or 8 similar diagnostic or assessment applications. 9 10 Standard Health Physics Instruments 11 12 Packages of standard health physics instruments are 13 available with current calibrations. Team scientists 14 select the appropriate instruments for the predoninant 15 7 isotopes. A TLD reader and 250 TLD's are includad. A 16 variety-of alarming dosimeters are carried by 17 personnel working close to the incident site. Also 18 . included are air samplers, portable counting 19 C'. > equ pment, battery powered. analyzers, and source 20 han ling equipment. Anti-contamination clothing and 21 2 breathing apparatus are also available. 22 23 l l 24 Communications 25 An extensive communications system is deployed with 26 the special team. A memorandum of understanding 27 l-between-DOE and AT&T assures rapid telephone response 28 for the communications system connection. The 29 switching hardware for a twelve line telephone system 30 and radios for HF and VHF transmissions are installed 31 in an airline cargo In addition, the system 32 contains a portable pod. microwave system to provide video, 33 data, audio, telephone, and control communication 34 between a field command post and an incident site-35 which may be up to 50 miles apart. Telephone with HF 36 L backup is the primary longer distance communication 37 system. On-scene communication is assured with VHF 38 radio, repeaters, and pagers. 39 40 L Included in the communication array are all the basic 41 support elements to establish a field command post. 42 T21s includes typewriters, telecopiers, copy machines, 43 status boards, etc. 44 L ( REV. O i-

(.2.1 Page 6 of 17 t All of the equi ment and systems described above are 1 pa'ckaged for de loyment within two hours of a 2 request.. Existing airlift agreements between DOE and 3 l the Military Airlift Command assure rapid response. 4 Most of the equ pment can also be flown on commercial 5 widebody aircra t and trucked the final distance to a' 6 site if time so dictates. 7 8 Backup Support 9 10 There are many specialized systems located throughout 11 DOE national laboratories which could be made 12 available for specialized needs or excreme emergency 13 situations. The members of the special regional DOE 14 field teams and the DOE Headquarters Emergency Action 15-Coordinating Team are prepared to locate special 16 L-equipment, arrange transportation, and logistically 17 support the equipment onsite if risk to the pubite and 18 national priorities so require. 19 20 C.- ARAC-21 22 The ARAC system, located at LLL, is a system for 23 computer based atmospheric modeling system which is 24 i real-time linked to the National Weather Service and 25 the.USAF Global Weather System.. To insure accurate 26 modeling for small areas around a fixed site, 27 meteorological data from the site is required. In 28 addition, topographic data is added for the site 29 i l environs. Many calculational models are available to 30 l the field team. Source terms may be discrete 31 (explosion), continuous (plume), or patterns if 32 particulates are present. Software is available to 33 make dose assessments and to accumulate these if the 34 release is continuing over a aeriod of time. ARAC can 35 also predict plume patterns w'aich may be extremely 36 aluable for evacuation planning, locations where air .37 v monitoring should be emp aasized, or planning-releases 38 c which are under limited. control. Finally, aerial 39 teams can continuously compare and update ARAC data 40 with actual in-plume measurements to assist in 41 - improving source term estimates. Communication.with 42 ARAC is via computer terminal api telecopier., Because 43 .(~ REV. O _..,..__,.._.__-.._m._,__

---._..---a -4. _ _. - - ._-._e. .a___m ..n. 1 1.2.1 Page 7 of 17 r t of.its Telatively long deployment time of 1 approximately 48 hours, ARAC could only be used as a 2 back-up to LERO's offsite dose projection done at the 3 Local EOC. 4 5 If the Brookhaven Area Office determines it is 6 needed, the NEST /AMS and ARAC capability of DOE FRMAP 7 is. activated by_Brookhaven by calling the DOE 8 Headquarters at the Emergency Operations Center in 9 Germantown, Maryland. NEST /AMS capability exists at 10 nearby Andrews Air Force Base and would not require 11 the travel time from Las Vegas. ARAC meteorologists 12 could also be sent to the site fr.om other nearby 13 -locations in the southeastern part of the U.S. 14 15 16 REFERENCES 17 4 18 19 1. DOE Emer gency Response Resources For A Major Incident, 20

{.

John F. Joyle, EG&G, Inc., Energy Measurements Group 21 Assistant NV Program Manager for AMS/ NEST, paper given 22 at American Nuclear Society Executive Conference on 23 Emergency Preparedness,- San Antonio, Texas, February 24 11, 1980. 25 26 2. Nuclear Accidents Response, L. Joe Deal, Department of 27 -Energy, paper given at American Nuclear Society 28 Executive Conference on Emergency Preparedness,- San 29 Antonio, Texas, February 11, 1980. 30 4 31 3. ERDA - 60,-Energy Research and Development 32 Administration Radiological Assistance Plan, Division 33 of ' Operational-Safety - Headquarters, July,1975. 34' REV. 0

(.2.1 Page 8 of 17 r r DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 1 2 EQUIPMENT INVENTORY 3 4 FIELD KITS 5 6 7 Instrument Kit (3 each) 8 9 Quantity Description 10 11 1 Victoreen Radector III, beta-gamma 12 (Ion Chamber) 13 14 1 Victoreen CDV-700 count rate meter with 15 end window, thin wall and underwater GM 16 probes 17 18 1 Alpha scint. probe 19 20 C._ ~- Battery operated air sampler and filters 21 1 22 4 200 MR self-reading dosimeters 23 24 4 200 R self-reading dosimeters 25 26 1 Dosimeter charger 27 28 6 TLD dosimeters 29 30 Misc. - Stop watch, flashlight, tape ruler, check sources 31 and batteries 32 33 34 Field Kit (1 each) 35 36 Quantity Description . 37 38 1/16 x 5 inch diameter scint. with thin 39 1 window 40 41 Eberline PRM-5 pulse rate meter 42 1 43 Eberline RASP-1 Ruggedized alpha probe 44 1 e e REV. O 1 e-. ,,w.- .,,n-., ,.,_...,,..,,,-..n,,.-n---_. ,s,- ..,,m., n n,_.,,,,,,

4 ~ (.2.1 Page 9 of 17 r 1 Eberline SPA-3, 2 inch scint. probe 1 2 1 -a Eberline HP-210 beta window pancake GM 3 probe 4 5 Misc. - Spare parts, tape ruler, check sources, voltmeter, 6 spare batteries, cables and gloves. 7 8 9 Super Field Kit (1 each) 10 11 Quantity Description 12 13 1 1/16 x 5 inch diameter scint. with thin 14 window 15 16 1 Eberline SAM-2 mini scaler and rate 17 meter 18 19 1 RD-22, 2 x 2 inch scint. probe 20 21 - (. Misc. - Rechargeable battery pack for SAM-2, tape ruler, 22 and cables. 23 24 25 Multi Channel Analyzer Kit (1 each) 26 27 Quantity Description 28 29 1 Davidson Model 4106 M.C.A. (4096 30 Channels) 31 32 Digital Cassette Recorder 33 1 '34 . 1 Silent 700 Printing Terminal 35 36 Inverter Power Supply and Power Cord 37 1 1 M ~ REV. O

(.2.1 Page 10 of 17 t M.C. A.. Detector Systems 1 2 Quantity Description 3 4 1 Bicron 3 x 3 NaI Detector 5 6 1 Canberra 2005 Preamp 7 8 1 Canberra 2012 Amplifier 9 10 1 Canberra 3002 H.V. Supply 11 12 1 ORTEC High Purity Ge Detector 13 14 1 ORTEC 572 Anplifier 15 16 1 ORTEC Mini NIM BIN and Low Voltage 17 Supply 18 19 1 Beta and Gamma Reference Source Set 20 ,'(- 21 1 30 Liter Dewar 22 4 23 24 Environmental Radiation Monitor (1 each) 25 26 Reuter Stokes RSS-lll, Range 0-5000 micro R/hr. 27 28 29 Porta-Air Sampler Kit (5 each) 30 31 Quantity Description 32 33 1 Portable (AC/DC) field iodine air 34 l sampler 35 36 1 Victoreen CDV-700 count rate meter with 37 6306GM probe and shield 38 39 Sample canisters (silver loaded 40 5 silica-gel) 41 42 Sample canisters (TEDA charcoal) 43 5 . (., REV. 0

a- '(.2.1 Page 11 of 17 Misc. - 1 copy sampling procedure, technical report, 1 -battery adapter cable, 25 ft. extension cable, 2 screwdriver. 3 4 5 Porta-Air Sampler Supply Kit (1 each) 6 7 Quantity Description 8 9 17 Sample canisters (silver loaded 10 silica-gel) 11 12 4 Sample canisters (TEDA charcoal) 13 14 2 One gallon can (silver loaded 15 silica-gel) 16 17 1 Roll particulate pape.r 18 19 Beaker 20 1 . C. - 21 ~ Screwdrivers 22 2 23 Scissors 24 2 25 CDV-700 and 6306 probe 26 1 27 Misc. - Blank labels, pre-marked labels, plastic bags. 28 29 30 Environmental Air-Sampler (18 each) 31 32 Contains AC powered pump, lapsed time meter, flow gauge, 33 hose,- filter holder, rain cover, filter stand and power 34 cord, 5 sample canisters, 6 particulate filters, padlock, 35 chain. 36 37 38 High Volume Air' Samplers- (2 each) 39 40 Staplex particulate monitors. 41 42 b REV. O

I (.2.1 Page 12 of 17 [ Data or Reference' Kit - Color Code - Dark Brown Attache 1 Case (2 each) 2 3 . Road Maps ~ 4 Radiation Handbooks and RAP Manual 5 Data Pads, Graph Paper, Pencils, Ruler 6 Masking Tape and Rope Tape 7 Signs and Tags 8 Small Sample Containers 9 Tape Measure. 10 Pocket Knife 11 Polaroid Camera and Film ~ 12 Smear Books and Filter Paper 13 Calculator and Charger 14 Small Plastic Bags 15 16 17 i Protective Clothing Kit - Colet Code - Brown (4 kits for 2 18 people each) 19 20 ' 'j Head Covers 21 1/2 Face Respirators and Filters (2 A.O., 2 MSA, 2 22 Wilson) 23 Gloves (Heavy Plastic and Autopsy) (2 sizes) 24 Coveralls (Medium and Large) 25 Shoe Covers (Medium and Large) 26' Splash. Suit and 1 Poncho 27 Tape (Wide, masking) 28 -Wash and Dry Packets 29 -Plastic Bags (Medium and Large) 30 31 32 l Sample Collection Kit. - Color Code - Green (4 each) 33 34 -Plastic Bags (3 sizes) 35 l Sample Containers - Bottles (3-5 sizes) 36 Sample Containers - Can (3-5 sizes) 37

Masking Tape 38 Grease Pencils 39 Trowel 40 Tags 41

_. Scissors 42 Tongs 43 k. 1 ~ REV. O i' .2.1 Page 13 of 17 Run Bags - (3 each) 1 2 Each bag contains rain suit, coat, gloves, hat, socks, 3 underwear, toilet articles,-rain boots, and coveralls. 4 5 6 Gasoline Powered Generators 7 8 2500 Watt, 115 Volts, AC (One cach) 9 500 Watt, 115 Volts, AC (Two each) 10 Gasoline Can, 5 gallon (3 each) 11 Filter Funnel (3 each) 12 13 14 (- b i j .t I - l REV. O l-i

(.2.1 Page 14 of 17 INDIVIDUAL ITEMS 1 2' Survey Instruments: 3 4 Quantity Type Description 5 6' 3 Victoreen 471A Wide range beta-gamma (Ion 7' Chamber) 8-9. 3 Victoreen CDV-720 Wide range beta-gamma (Ion 10: Chamber) 11-12: 1 Teletector 6112 Beta-gamma with telescoping 13 probe.(GM) 14 15 1 -Victoteen CDV-715 Gamma (Ion Chamber) 16 17 l - Victoreen CDV-700 Count rate meter (GM) 18 19 {E - 1 Victoreen CDV-700 Count rate meter, scint. 20-and GM 21. 22-3 Eberline E120 Count rate meter (GM) 23 24 1 Victoreen Radector II Beta-gamma (Ion Chamber) 25 26 3 .Nucor CS-40A Wide range beta-gamma 27 (Ion Chamber) 28 29 2 Ludlum 12-S Micro R meter (scint.) 30 31 1 Eberline PRM-5-3 Lin-Log Pulse Rate Meter 32 with PG-2 low energy-gamma 33 scint probe 34 35 1 Eberline PAC-4G-3 Lin-Log Gas proportional 36 survey meter with AC-21 37 alpha probe 38' 39 'l Eberline PAC-4G-3 Lin-Log Gas proportional 40 (Floor Monitor Mount) survey meter with AC-21 41 alpha probe, AC-21B beta 42 probe 43 -(- REV. O

1 (.2.1 Page L5 of 17 1 Eberline PAC-ISA Alpha seint. detector, SPA-1 1 probe with sample tray 2' 3-4 Eberline PAC-4S Lin-Log alpha scint. detector 4' 5 1 Ludlum 12 Count rate meter with alpha 6 L scint. 7. 8 2 1.FE Corp NP2 Neutron detector (Snoopy) 9' 10 Scalers and Detectors: 11 12 1 Eberline PS-1 Portable scaler 13 14 l' Eberline PS-2 Portable Scaler (2 High 15; Voltage adj. ) 16: 17: Portable Scaler and 18 2 Eberline MS-2 rate meter 19-(: : 20; x-2 Eberline SH-3 GM counter with sample 211 tray 22 23: 1 Eberline SH-5 Gas Flow counter with 24-sample tray 25. - 26: 1 . Eberline HP-210 Beta window pancake GM 27 probe 28-29 L 2 Eberline SH-4 Holder with sample tray for 30 HP-210 probe 31; 32-1 Eberline FC-2 Lab. type, lead shielded, gas 33-flow proportional counter and 34 gas cylinder 35; 36-37 4 REV. O ~ s,.e4g-w gyiw 'r-p

ew.ww--y 4-fpgy..--

w-y--.g -ke7-We-wwpm,ew---g .c-wgyw-9-.,qe rw-- p.g---g+PM'*h-e*rr-T+m' 9- -mer--wi-e1w+- er -e-f a*T-- m

(.2.1 Page 16 of 17 4 Equipment for Use on Emergency Truck l'< 2 Road Maps-3 RAP' Manual 4 First Aid Kit 5 Tool Kit (Fundamental) 6 Jumper Cable 7 Fire extinguisher 8 Flares (9) 9 Blankets (2) .110 Shovel 11 Flashlight-12 Plastic Tarpaulin 13 Flood light 14 15 16 Miscellaneous Protective Clothing 17 18. Cov'eralls - 12 pair 19 ' (' Head covers, cotton - 18 20 Apron, rubberized - 1 21 Leather gloves, lead lined - 1 pair 22 Leather work gloves - 4 pair 23 L Cotton work ~ gloves - 5 pair 24 Rubber gloves - 5 pair 25 Plastic gloves, disposable - 150 pair 26 l Shoe covers, rubberized - 24 pair 27 l Shoe covers, canvas - 3 pair 28 Shoe covers, light plastic - 20 pair 29 Shoe covers, heavy plastic - 8 pair 30 Rubbers, yellow toe - 2 pair 31 Rain boots, rubber pair 32 Tarpaulin,-canvas - 3 33 Respirator (A.O.), 1/2 face - 1 34 35 Respirator-(M.S.A.), 1/2 face with spare filters (Type H) 22 pair 36 Respirator filters (Wilson) Type R12 - 16 pair 37 _ Protective eye glasses, plastic - 6 pair 38 7 39 l 40 (; L REV. O

( ..2.1 Page 17 of 17 1 . Miscellaneous' i Items Portable AMPortable communications transceivers (5) 1 2 Binoculars /FM broadcast receivers (2) - 2 pair 3 Ribbon TapeRadiation signs and tags (assorted) 4 5 Rope 6 Pads 7 . Pencils 8 Reinforced filament tape 9 Plastic bags 10 Plastic bottles, 100ML - 100 each 11 Marinelli beakers 12 Vacuum drying oven for silica-gelSpare TEDA char 13 14 -e Spare type R51 filters foBattery packs for Eberline scalers 15 16 Sample canisters for env. r battery operat 17 Particulate filters-for env. r samplers ed air samplers r ai air samplers (-200) 18

o.

19 (300) 4 20 e i u l I b p REV. O'

3 .- 5

F g-g_- OPIP 3.8.2 P ga 33 cf.38 in d Page-1 of.61 - 9 ' DESCRIPTION OF PLAlpIINC. ZONES / AREAS FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY E ll'

4 l.

Wind -l l l Direction l-Zones l Area Description l .I (From) l l l l///////////l 0 - 2 Miles l l 1 l l 1 l A, B, C, D, & E l-The area in East'Shoreham east of Woodville Road and Ridge Road, south to l l All l l. l Whiskey Road. The area north of Whiskey Road and east of Ridge Road. The' l l l l area north of 25 between Willt.m Floyd Parkway and 25A. The area in Wading l l l l River west of Hulse Landing Road. l l l ~l l l///////////I O - 5 Miles I 1 I I l- -l l ESE l A - E, F l The area north of 25A between Pipe Stave Hollow Road in Miller Place and l l l Hulse Landing Road in Wading River. Plus the area north of 25 between William l l l l Floyd Parkway and 25A. The area north of Whiskey Road, east of Ridge Road. l l l 1 I I I l l l E l A - E, F, G l The area in Miller Place east of Pipe Stave Hollow Road and north of 25A. l l ENE I l The area east of Miller Place-Yaphank Road between 25A and 25. The area north l l NE l l of 25 between Miller Place-Yaphank Road and 25A, plus the area between l l l l Smith Road and William Floyd Parkway. The area north of 25 between William l 1 l l Floyd Parkway and 25A. The area in Wading River west of Hulse Landing Road. l l l 1 l l l l l l NNE I A - E, C, H l The area east of Woodville Road in East Shoreham. The area east of Miller I l l l Place-Yaphank Road between 25 and 25A. The area between Smith Road and William l l l l Floyd Parkway. The area north of the LIE between William Floyd Parkway (Exit 68)l 0 l l- ! a'nd Exit 69. The area in Wading Ri'rer north of 25 and west of Iluise land'ing l l l l Road. I l l, l l l i Rev. 3 ? 1

7 t OPIP 3.8.2 erge 34 ef 38 ~. Page.2 of 6 DESCRIPTION OF FLANNING ZONE 5/ AREAS FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY (continued). l Wind i l l l Direction l Zopes l Area Description l l (From) l l l l l lt//////////l 0 - 5 Miles (co.ntinued)_ i l I I l N l A - E, C, H I l The area east of Woodville Road in East Shoreham. The area cast of Miller l l l l Place-Ysphank Road between 25 and 25A. The area between Smith Road and l l l l William Floyd Parkway. The area north of the LIE between William Floyd l l l l Parkway (Exit 68) and Edwards Avenue (Exit 71). The area vest of Hulse l l-l l Landing Road in Wading River. l I l 1 l l l l l l NNW l A - E. H, I l The area in East Shoreham east of Uoodville Road and Ridge Road, as far south l l l l as Whiskey Road. The area north of Whiskey Road, east of Ridge Road. The l I l l area north of the LIE between the Willan Floyd Parkway (Exits 68) and Exit 71. l l l l The area west of Hulse Landing Road in Wading River. l l l 1 l l I I i l NW l A - E, H, I, J l The area in East Shoreham east of Woodville Road and Ridge Road, as'f ar south l l l l ss Whiskey Road. The area north of Whiskey Road, east of Ridge Road. The l l I l area north of the LIE between the William Floyd Parkway (Exit 68 ) and Exit 71. l l l l Avenue. (Exit 71). The area west of Edwards Avenue, includina Wildwood State l l l l Park. l 1 I I I I I I l WNW lA-E, I, J l The area in East Shoreham east of Woodville Road and. Ridge Road, as f ar south l l l l as Whiskey Road. The area north of Whiskey Road. The area north of 25 between l l l l William Floyd Parkway and Wading River-Manorville Road. The area north of the l l l l LIE between Exit 69 and Edwards Avenue (Exit 71). The area west of Edwards l l l l Avenue, including Wildwood State Park. l I l l l Rev. 3 n

(~~ qo g CPIP 3.8.2. P ge 35 cf 38 ~ Page 3 of 6 ' DESCRIPTION OF FLANNING ZONES / AREAS FOR THE SUFFOLK CDUNTY (continued) s ? l Wind l l l l Direction l Zones l Area Description l l l (From) l l l l l l l///////////l 0 - 5 Miles (continued) _l l I I l l W l A - E, J l The area in East Shoreham east of Woodville Road and Ridge Road, south to. l l WSW l l Whiskey Road. The area north of Whiskey Road, east of Ridge Road. The area l e I l l north of 25 between William Floyd Parkway to Edwards Avenue. The area west of l ) l l l Edwards Avenue, including Wildwood' State Park. l l l I l l l 1 I l All lA-J l The area in Miller Place east of Pipe Stave Hollow Road and north of 25A. l l l l The area east of Miller Place-Yaphank Road between 25A and 25. The area north I l l-l of 25 between Miller Place-Yaphank Road and 25A, plus the area between Smith l l l l Road and William Floyd Parkway. The area north of the LIE between William l l l l Floyd Parkway (Exit 68) and Edwards Avenue (Exit 71). The area west of Edwards l l l l Avenue, including Wildwood S*. ate Pat'k. l l " l l l ~ l 4 l//2////////l 0 - 10 Miles I I i l l l N l A - J. L, M, N O. R l The area in Miller Place east of Pipe Stave Hollow Road and north of 25A. l 1 l l The area east of Miller Place-Yaphank Road. The area cast of Port Jefferson-l l l l Patchogue Road between 25 and the LIE. The area north of the Sonrise Highway l l l l between Gerard Road and Old Moriches-Riverhe'd Road. The area east of I a l .l l Old Moriches-Riverhead Road within the Town of Brookhaven. The area south of l l i l l Old Country Road, west of Mill Road. The area west of Edwards Avenue, l l l l including Wildwood State Park. l l l 1 i i 1 Rev. 3 1 i { 1

~ {~ t' \\ OPIP 3,8.2 Page 36 cf 38 At tachtent :5 Page 4 of 6 - DESCRIPTION OF FLAFNING ZONES / AREAS FOR THE SUFFOLR CoUtrTY (continued) l Wind l l l l~ Direction l Zones l Area Description i I (From) l l 'l 1///////////10 - 10 Miles (continued) ! l l l-l 1 l NNW l A - J. M, N, O I The area in Miller Place east of Pipe Stave Hollow Road and north of 25A. l l 1 i The area cast of Miller Place-Yaphank Road, Middle Island Road, Yaphank-l l l l Middle Island Road. and Gerard Road to Sunrise Highway. The area north of -l l l l Sunrise Highway between Gerard Road and Old Moriches-Riverhead Road. The area l l I I east of Old Moriches-Riverhead Road within the Town of Brookhaven. The area l l l l south of Old Country Road, west of Mill Road. The area west of Edwards Avenue, I l l 1 including Wildwood State Fark. l l l 1 i l I i 1. l NW l A - J N, 0, S, P-l The area in Miller Place east of Pipe Stave Hollow Road and north of 25A. The l l l l area east of Hiller Place-Yaphank Road between 25 and 25A. The area cast of l l l l William Floyd Parkway south to Sunrise Highway, plus the area in Upton between l l l l Smith Road and William Floyd Parkway. The area north of the Sunrise Highway l l l l between William Floyd Parkway and Old Moriches-Riverhead Road. The area west l l l 1 of Old Moriches-Riverhead Road to Osborne Avenue in Riverhead. The crea west l l l I of Doctor's Path and Pennys Road. l l 1 I l l l 1 1 l WNW l A - J, 0, P, S l The area in Miller Place east of Pipe Stave Hollow Road and north of 25A. The l l W l l area east of Miller Place-Yaphank Road between 25 and 25A. The area north of I l l l 25 between Middle Island Road and William Floyd Parkway, plus the area between l l l l Smith Road and William Floyd Parkway in Upton. The area north of the LIE f rom l l l l Exit 68 to Exit 69. The area north of the Sunrise Highway f rom Chichester i l l l Avenue to Old Moriches-Riverhead Road. The area west of Old Mqriches-Riverhead l l 1 l Road to Osborne Avenue in Riverhcad. The area west of Doctor's Path and l l l l l Pennym Road. l l 1 i Rev. 3

if ~ t9 g orIP 3.8.2 Prge 37-ef 38 ' Page 5 of 6 DESCRIFTION OF PLAINIING ZONES / AREAS FOR Tl!E SLTFOLK COUltfY (continued)' l Wind l l l l l Direction l Zonet l Area Description I (From) l l l 1 l///////////10 - 10 fliles (continued) l l l 1 I l I WSW l A - J. P l The area in Miller Place east of Pipe Stave Hollow Road and north of 25A. The l I l l area east of. Miller Place-Yaphank Road between 25A and 25. - The area north of I I .l l 25 between Miller Place-Yaphank Road and 25A, plus the area between Smith Road l l l l and William Floyd Parkway. The area north of the. LIE between William Floyd l j l l l Parkway'(Exit 68) and Edwards Avenue (Exit 71). The area north of Old Country. I l l l Road between Edwards Avenue and Roanoke Avenue. The areas west of Doctor's l I l l Path,. nortn of Middle Road, and the area west of Pennys Road. l l l l 1 I I- .I l l E l A - J, K, Q l The area east'of Main Street in Port Jefferson, east of Jayne Boulevard, and I j' l ESE l l Old Town Road to 25. North of 25 between Old Town Road and William Floyd l l l l l Parkway, plus 'the area between Smith Road and William Floyd Parkway in Upton. l l The area north of the LIE between the Willam Floyd Parkway (Exit 68) and l I l l l l Edwards Avenue (Exit 71). The area west of Edwards Avenue, including Wildwood l I l l l State Park.' l 4 l l l l l l l 1 i l ENE' l A - J, K, Q, L R l The area cast of Main Street in Port Jefferson, east of Jayne Boulevard, l l l l l Old Town Road, and Port Jef ferson-Patchogue Road to llorse Block Road. North l i l l l of the LIRR tracks between llorse Block Road and Yaphank Road in West Yaphank. l l l l West of Yaphank-Middle Island Road in Cordon Heights. The area north of 25 l l l l f rom Middle Island Road to William Floyd Parkway, plus the area between Smith l i l l l Road and William Floyd Parkway in Upton. The area north of the LIE f rom the l l l l the William Floyd Parkway (Exit 68) to Edwards I. venue (Exit 71). The area west l 8 l l l l of Edwards Avenue, including Wildwood State Park. l l l l i Rev. 3 4 i l

C' ge-g- -CPIP 3.8.2 P ge 38 cf 38-Page 6 of 6 DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING ZONES / AREAS FOR THE SUFFOLK COUlffY (continued) I Wind l l l l Direction l Zones l Area Description l !- (From) l l 'l 1///////////10 - 10 Miles (continued).I l l l l l .l NE l A - J, Q, K, L R, M l The area cast of. Main Street in Port Jef ferson, east of Jayne Boulevard, Old l 1 l l l Town Road, and Port Jefferson-Patchogue Road. North of the LIE between l l l l Exits 64 and 66. The area north of Sunrise Highway between Gerard Avenue and l l l l William Floyd Parkway in Yaphank. The at'en north of the LIE from William Floyd l l l 1 Parkway (Exit 68) to Edwards Aver.ue (Exit 71) and the area west of Edwards l l l l Avenue, including Wildwood State Park. l l l 1 1 I I i l l NNE l A'- J, E, L, M, N, R l The area in Mt. Sinal east of Crystal Brook Hollow Rnad. The area east of I l l l Jayne Boulevard, Old Town Road, and Port Jefferson-Patchogue Road. tiorth of l l l l the LIE between Exits 64 and 66. The area north of Sunrise Highway between l l l l Cerard Avenue and William Floyd Parkway in Yaphank. The area north of the _ l l l l LIE from William Floyd Parkway (Exit 68) to Edwards Avenue (Exit 71) and the l l l l area. west of Edwards Avenue, including Wildwood State Park. l I l l 1 1 1 4 i f a i = i Rev. 3 l 1 ^

_.-n.. a I a!- o O t ,. 6 l t = m i _ ~.. ~. - _. - - - _. - - _ -.__ _ _.. - _ _ -. --_ _. _ _. - - _.. - _ _ _. _, _

LONG ISLAND r I m e / 8 = ) ~ LJ w ]n = ~.l phW ~ e a *f,',%. x u g e,, a yr Q ).C 9 -=- = l / ,,, ? c" N Y de ,r

I. R L,g,,

w;

w V

>) g 14 ') n ?% '1 s A.?[, ^! . Q s.;i f, h 9 \\g ~. c.r.. f p, ,/ ,\\ n\\5 b g yf T,'. g 0 ~ 9 m 7 / \\n f

,.j: 7 n.W'

/ [ [jf' 7b

% 1hf (j d @

^' r a,, d3 )/[w%Ir,,i* !p,. ua a c: Q n + f l g

%c y a e,

j ~ gfsftoEN g

r. u -

% am g - f' g Q . ~ f g*L=er' f i ,'H) w 4 's p%.. 4-r s n nC u,. -s / ,5 g . 'AOpj, y A w \\ Bf WjZ ~N 1 %lI /t V E r m 1 %f r##a b [%, 4 i

90.,

/ rsta o A c. j -,e m k_ y ?

lk r

<4 e ., bl c s.w :g i>, f. gw ? '," r Gj We g ^

s

%[ =mos.oe , a U NY I j $$pf.ep; %g g; :'s,. ,f g \\ u ~s f a E s. 'g e gf ---{ - I 1~ %,,, u, 3 [ 4 /} r [ if ~^v< 5 q { p c ' l ucwrau. I j; g [ E [' v K W L-f;,; sy W q a y r m k 'w \\ wy ~> 2J ' ) GREAT SOUTH BAY 2 ft/ y. ( n ? W~ny - y c ,a

SOUND ~ LEGEND y i LtLCO PLANT PROPERTY

. :. : l

-) I h?ERTURE I CAD

c. m

p.,r,

\\ su 3

g.x 7,*

J l \\ JV I / i A y EAST M T l gk N A , 4,,, 3 //T [ v e 4 M ORIC H E S BAY $c$rY ^? 4 E VACUATION AREA BY ZONES 'x AND ZONE DESIGNATIONS

~ l 4 I e e G 7

f. '

B e e =w-- , - +,+ v.

d&md u '7 i . 7

),.

1 7 M ) OPlP 3.3.1 / Page 7 of 10 ay Page 1 of 4 m ~ RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY DATA FORM PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION .s 4 1. -D' ate and> Time of Message 8. There has: Tratismittal: A NOT been a release of Date N Time radioactivity. (24-hour clock) B been a release of radio-activity to the

2..Facillityprovidinginformation:

, ATMOSPHERE. ~ 4 -Al Indien-Point Unit No. 2 C been a release of radio-B' IndianyPoint Unit No.-3 activity to a BODY OF ?,C C Ginna: Station WATER D Niiies Mile Point Unit No. 1 D been a GROUND SPILL re-g f C 'FitcPatrick Plant lease of radioactivity. F Shorehad Scation .C "Other 9. The release is: ~ ' ^ A continuing ^ - 3.' Reported by: B terminated - A Name C NOT applicable. B. Titlem ~ 10. Protective Actions: e vi. ?_ 4. Thist.'..'A.is ...,an exercise. A There is NO need for

B' is NOT J-1 Protective Actions out-

.c; side the site boundary. 5. Emergency Glassi;fication _3 Protective Actions are 1li E B Alerte e" ^/ under consideration. -A Unusdal Event C Recommended Protective I C lite 7 rea. Emergen'cv .? Actions: A D uneral^Eme rgency ~ ' Shelter within a y sj j miles /or 6. Th,t's classification'occured #t, sectors /or ERPA's. T i.m'e' k"~ Evacuate within Date

(24-nour cicek) miles /or

+ w

3 sectors /or ERPA's.

^- g;, Ww -7. Brief Evenp Descrf.ut' ion'/ , [ Initiating Condition.: '.o . mil'. l eather: r _[ i y,ij [ A' Sind speed miles i. sper hour or meters p. s 3%per second. C Direction (from)

f JP<

_ 1 ~ degrees. ~- 1 .f,'.i . _.y 3 ? 'C ~ Stability class (A-G) ( ' c-v D General Weather Condi- ,s tion (if available) s." s ^ + ' q,7,, - s m,~ s ,T. h_ . Q Message received by A~ Rev. 2 10/25/83 <]- 'l_ g w., sM \\ x p .~ s ,+ .e y f '. f ~ r -A \\ 'p., _=. g

e 1 ~ > 8 t o l-

/;. _._=- % 8 SNPS-1 FSAR TABLE 2.3.1-1 r - t EXTREME WIND SPEEDS (MPH) l SUFFOLK COUNTY AFBCs> Month Peak Gust (mph) i January 58 . February 61 March 60 April 58 May 43 June 40 July 44 August 100(2) September 76 October 48 November-62 December 61 (1) Peak-wind gusts recorded at Suffolk County AFB for 10 yr' period 1960-1969 (1) Peak wind gust of 100 mph recorded with passage of Hurricane Carol in August 1954. .i 1 of 1

d U R E .~ e 9 i f w --e 9 .w-m- --y< e---w-pr- -v-yv-- +ww=. w ,e r'C--v P

. 9 WIND DIRECTION VARIABILITY ANALYSIS SHOREHAM AND OTHER SITES LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY .The Shoreham site experiences wind direction shif ts, as do all other nuclear plant sites. The va riability of the wind at Shoreham and eigh t other nuclear plant sites has been studied to determine the relative magnitude of variability from site to site. This variability analysis utilized meteoro-4 logical data for each site, a computer program which determined the degree of wind direction persistance (i.e. invariability) of the data, and a manual calculation procedure which converted the computer output into a measure of wind direction variability. The results of this evaluation clearly show that the winds are less variable at Shoreham than at the other sites. Data from nine different nuclear power plant sites formed the basis for'this l-i s tudy. These sites were. chosen to represent a cross section of meteorologi-cal and topographical conditions throughout the eastern United States. The site names,-locations, and governing topographical characteris' tics are shown i l 'in Table 1. Nuclear power plant sites were selected over governsent weather staticas to. taka advantage of the high quality of instruments and data [ inherent in nuclear-related data collection programs. In order to assure that a reasonably long period of data was considered, one complete year of hourly wind direction observations was analyzed for each site. The year chosen met two criteria - the data must be of very high data recovery (i.e. very little missing data), and the data mst have been used by the utility -(and approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission) in the design o'f nuclear safety-related systems and equipment. In some instances, a second year of data was analyzed independently, to assess the variation of variablity from one year to another. 54 1160002-60 H0 FED FE8 0 31984 mm

2 Wind dirretica cbcarvatiens at all sitsa were made at approximately 10 meters above ground level; this is the standard set by the meteorological community and the NRC. In addition, Shoreham data from 150 f t above ground level were also studied to examine the variation of variability with height. Each year of data at each site uns _ analyzed independently. The first step in the analysis procedure consisted of using a computer program to determine requently the vind persisted in (i.e. did not shift out of) any 45' how f compass sector. The results of this analysis were then subjected to a procedure which yielded the pe rcentage of time that the wind direction shifted at least into the adjacent 45' sector (at leas t, because shif ts of more than one sector can occur within one hour). Appendix A contains a detailed explanation of this analysis procedure. The final results of the wind variability study are depicted in Table 2. Several important conclusions can be drawn from these results: 1. Winds at Shoreham are less variable than at almost every other site. 2. Winds at Shoreham are slightly less variable at 150 f t above the ground than at 10 meters. 3. Winds at coastal sites vary less than at inland sites.

4. [ There is no difference in. variability when different data year periods are used (i.e.,

see various sites contained in Table 2 that utilize different 1-year data periods). B4-1160002-60

TABLE 1 SITES USED IN WIND VARIABILITY ANALYSIS Site Name Location Topography Shoreham Brookhaven, NY Coastal Davis-Besse . Oak Harbor, OH Coastal River Bend St. Francisville, LA Inland Plain Beaver Valley Shippingport, PA Valley Millstone Point Waterford, CT Coastal Zimmer Moscow, OH Valley N' orth Anna Mineral, VA Inland Turkey Point Florida City, FL Coastal Pilgrim Plymouth, MA Coastal 9 e S e B4-ll60002-60 3

TABLE 2 PERCENTAGE OF TIME THE AVERAGE HOURLY WIND DIRECTION (DETERIMINED 45* SECIOR INCREMENTS) SHIFTED AT LEAST INTO ADJACENT SECTOR u Sites Year Percent Inland Locations River Bend (33-f t) 1/1/78-12/31/78 45 North Anna (33-ft) 1/1/78-12/31/78 39 Valley Locations Zimmer (33-ft) 1/1/78-12/31/78 42 Beaver Valley (33-f t) 1/1/76-12/31/76 40 Beaver Valley (33-f t) 1/1/78-12/31/78 40 Coastal Locations Millstone Point (33-f t) 1/1/74-12/31/74 33 ~ Millstone Point (33-f t) 1/1/78-12/31/78 32 Pilgrim (33-f t) 1/1/75-12/31/75 29 Turkey Point (33-ft) 1/1/81-12/31/81 28 Shordram West (33-f t) 1/1/74-12/31/74 27 Shoreham West (33-ft) 9/27/73-12/31/73 27 1/1/75-9/30/75 Davis-Besse (33-ft) 1/1/82-12/31/82 26 Shoreham (150 ft) 9/27/73-12/31/73 25 1/1/75-9/30/75 B4-1160002-60 4

l Appendix A WIND VARIABILITY ANALYSIS PROCEDURE SHORERAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION The percentage (P) of time the average hourly wind direction (determined in 45' sector' increments) shifted at least into the adjacent sector was determined from the following equation: (T-M) - (S + C) P= X 100% (T-M) where. i T = total number of houra in the year analyzed M = number of missing hours of meteorological data S = number of hours when the average hourly wind direction (determined in 45' sector increments) - did not shift into the adjacent sector, and C = number of calm hours. A computer program which' utilized a year of average hourly wind direction data was used to determine values of "M", "S". and "C" for each data base. i l The value of "S" represents the sua of the hours when the average hourly, vind direction did not shift into the adjacent sector for espisodes of vary-ing durat$on which occurred during the year analyzed. Values of -the variables for each data base are summarized in Table A-1. A-1 l. ~. _ _. _ _ _ _ _.. -,. _ _ _. -.. ~..,,., _. _ _ _. _.. - _ - - -. - - _

b To help in the explanation of how the values presented in Table A-1 were determined, a hyp'othetical day of 24 average hourly wind direction values (presented in Table A-2) was analyzed. The episodes when the average hourly wind direction did not shift into the adjacent sector (wind per-sistence episodes) and the total number of missing and calm hours are summerized in Table A-3. Using the data presented in Table A-3, the fol-loving values were determined for the aforementioned, equation: T = 24 M= 2 S = [(2x2)+(3x2)+(4x2)] 12 ("6" represents the first hour of each of the 6 wind persistence episodes. The first hour of a persistance episode represents a shift of at least i one sector from the previous hour.) ,C'= 3 P = 'J2% l l~ l t u

6 Table A-1 Input. Data Used In Analvsis Data Site Period T M S C P Shoreham West 1974 8760 140 6255 16 27% Davis Besse 1982 8760 44 6439 0 26% River Bend 1978 8760 78 4227 531 45% ~B cver Valley 1976 8784 649 4842 76 40% Millstone Point 1974, 8760 260 5528 163 33% %immer 1978 8760 170 4640 322 42% North Anna 1978 8760 85 5249 12 39% l Turkey Point 1981 8760 113 6243 8 28% Pilgrim 1975 8760 55 6176 13 29% Shorehsa West Sept 73-Dec 73 8856 454 6118 15 27 % Jan 75-Sept 75 Shoreham West

Sept 73-Dec 73 Jan 75-Sept 75 8856 571 6184 4

25% Be:.ver Valley 1978 8760 396 4999 42 40% Millstone Point 1978 8760 471 5559 89 32% i I cData is from th 150-f t tower level whereas all other data is from the 33-f t tower 1sval. A-3 l _ _.,.... _ _ _ _. _, -. _. _ _.. ~. -. - ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _... _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _

t ~ Tcblo A-2 Hypothetical Day of 24 Average Hourly Wind Direction Values Wind Hour Direction 1 Missing 2 Missing l 3 N 4 N 5 5 6 N 7 E 8 E 9 E 10 S 11 E 12 E 13 S 14 S 15 S 16 E 17 E 18 W 19 W r 20 W i 21 W 22 Calm 23 Cals ~ 24 Calm t

4 Table A " OCCURRENCE OF WIND PERSISTENCE EPISODES PERIOD - HYPOTHETICAL DAY i HOURS OF PERSISTENCE WIND ' FROM 2 3-4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18-19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TOTAL ,N O O 1 0 0 1 NE O O O O O O j E 2 1 0 0 0 3 i SE O 'O O O O O {S 0 1 0 0 0 1 j sW 0 0 0 0 0 0 l W 0 0 1 0 0 1 !W 0 0 0 0 0 0 i TOTAL 2 2 2 0 0 6 I i i l1 NUMBER OF 999 OCCURRENCES = 2 = Missing t HUMBER OF 997 OCCURRENCES = 3 = Calms NUMBER OF 888 OCCURRENCES = 0 l l HAXIHUH RUN LENGTil = 4 i i A-5 .}}

ML20087J678

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

6.0 REFERENCES

Response

6.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu