ML20087H364
| ML20087H364 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 08/11/1995 |
| From: | Mccoy C GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| LCV-0660, LCV-660, NUDOCS 9508180045 | |
| Download: ML20087H364 (4) | |
Text
.
Gecrg.a Power Compa 7y 40 inverress Center Pak way Post Otu Bon 1295 B:rmegham Alabama 30201 TeJephone 205 677 7122 b
Georgia Power C. K, McCoy fyl';.l'Q ""'"
tre sawn e vcire mrem August 11, 1995 Docket.Nos. 50-424 LCV-0660 50-425 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Fitness For DJLty Performance Data Gentlemen:
Georgia Power Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six-month reporting period, January 1995 through June 1995, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). The data is summarized in the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, N
C. K. McCoy CKM/JMG : FFD Performance Data Sheets : Vogtle FFD Program Summary cc: (See next page)
,s, - 37
.h r1 r.
9508180045 950811 DR ADDCK 05000424 hl PDR J
k
> -; a ;
GeorgiaPbwek A e
- U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 P
i cc: Geornia Power Company l
Mr. J. B. Beasley, General Manager - Plant Vogtle Mr. M. Sheibani, Supervisor - Nuclear Safety and Compliance U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington. DC Mr. L. L. Wheeler, Licensing Project Manager, Vogtle U. S. Nugicar B_cuulatory Commission. Reuion II Mr. S. D, Ebneter, Regional Administrator j
Mr. C. R. Ogle, Senior Resident Inspector - Vogtle j
t i
i t
l l
I LCV-0660 File: J.03 E
1
.n
.s a
page 1 of 2 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 9
Georgia Power Company 06/30/95 Company e Mwes Enene Vogtle Electric Generating Plant - Waynesboro, GA Lomeon Ron Bush (205) 868-5104 comaci w Pnon. 4,unne. onee)
Cutoff s: Screen / Confirmation (nymt)
@ Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 /15 ng/mL Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiatss
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
Lorg-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number wrtt Unescorted Access 1015 44 348 5
0 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive PreAccess 29 0
12 2
694 4
k Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 Fg Observed behavior 2
0 0
0 1
0 Random 284 0
35 0
52 0
Follow up 9
0 0
0 7
0 Other safety & Health re-test, rtw-3 0
0 0
R 1
Total 327 0
47 2
762 5
REV.1/92
I page 2 of 2-Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Amphe-Phency.
Refusal Man]uana Cocame Opiates tammes chdce Alcohol to Test 1
2 3
4 5
Licensee Employees 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Long-Term Contractors 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
Short-Term Contractors 3
0 0
2 0
1 0
A TM 3
2 0
2 0
1 0
8 e
o e--
h
-ert--
9-P
-m w-w e
a-t
e Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Fitness For Duty Program Summary The data generated under the Fitness For Duty (FFD) program from January 1995 l
through June 1995 has been reviewed and analyzed.
The random pool contains not only those badges for unescorted access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. Contractors without approved programs are included in the testing pool while on site. Testing during this time period was performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends, and holidays. During this testing period, the rate of testing was equal to 50% yearly of the total population.
In summarizing management actions associated with the FFD program, it should be emphasized that the incidents of confirming positive tests were very low. Consequently, management actions relative to determination of FFD have been limited. Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken.
There were no management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period.
During the first quarter of 1995, an evaluation of the random selection program was performed by an independent consultant confirming that the random selection process continues to operate properly and efliciently, Monthly quality control checks of the Fitness for Duty random pool revealed no major discrepancies.
.