ML20087G494
| ML20087G494 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 08/11/1995 |
| From: | Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9508170027 | |
| Download: ML20087G494 (5) | |
Text
SoutParn Nuclear Oper:_ ting Company Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 3M01 TAphone (205) 868 5131 k
h Southern Nudear Operating Company o.<e uorey Vice President Farley Project the southem electrtC System j
August 11, 1995 10 CFR 26.71 Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Eilness For Duty Perfornunce Data Gentlemen:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for the six-month reporting period, January 1995 through June 1995, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d). The data is summarized in the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted,
$k )WI D. N. Morey DNM/JMG : FFD Performance Data Sheets : Southern Nuclear FFD Program Summary cc- (See next page)
, a,.r ".. C~,
3 9508170027 950811
.I l PDR ADOCK 05000348 4
F pop i
i
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 cc: Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. R. D. Hill, General Manager - Plant Farley U. S. Nuclear Reculatory Commission. Washington. DC Mr. B. u. Siegel, Licensing Project Manager - Farley U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Region II Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator j
Mr. T. M. Ross, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley j
l 1
l l
page 1 of 2 Fitness for Duty Program
. Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Southern Nuclear Operating Company 06/30/95 camewy e Menshe Enone J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant and Corporate Headquarters Locanon Elizabeth A. McDoagal (205) 868-5707 comme e Pnone(mecoe weeamoe)
Cutoff s: ScreervConfirmation (ng'mt)
@ Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 50 / 15 ng/mL Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
Long-Term Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel l
Average Number witt Unescorted Access 1323 62 232 l
Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 17 0
32 0
946 11 I
Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 Observed behavior 5
1 0
0 0
0 377 0
16 0
40 0
Random Follow up 10 1
0 0
14 1
1 Safety & Health
)
re-test, rtw 23 0
1 0
0 0
l l
Total 432 2
49 0
1000 12 REV.1/92
+2
'f o
2 A
e 4
g 1
a p
5
~
4 3
2 1
lats s e uT 0
0 0
0 fe o Rt 1
lo s
h e e o
0 0
4 4
r c lc u n A
s a
o t
l s
-ye c
b xn nE uS T+ i 0
0 0
0 ikc F
c if i
s c
ee h n e
pi 0
0 1
1 p
m m S
Af a r
o f
s rk s
a 0
0 0
0 t
ip se O
T e
e v
m i
a t
c 1
0 1
2 i
o s
C o
P an d
au e
jn 1
0 6
7 m
a r
M ifn s
s o
r r
s o
o C
t t
e c
c f
e a
a r
y r
t o
o tn n
l n
p o
o w
m C
C o
m m
E r
e r
d e
e e
k s
T-T-
n g
r t
l a
e n
o a
e iL L
S T
c o
h d
rB
+
Joseph M. Ferley Nuclear Plant and Southern Nuclear Operating Company Support Personnel Fitness For Duty Program The data generated under the Fitness For Duty (FFD) program from January 1995 through June 1995 hat, been reviewed and analyzed. The data reflected in this report covers the following personnel: 1) workers, including contract personnel of the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant; 2) Southern Nuclear Operating Company employees located at corporate headquarters in Birmingham, Alabama; and 3) Southern Nuclear Operating Company support employees located at Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant.
The random pool contains not only those badges for unesconed access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. Contractors without approved programs are included in the testing pool while on site. Testing during this time period was performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends, and holidays. During this testing period, the rate of testing was equal to 50% yearly of the total population.
In summarizing management actions associated with the FFD program, it should be
)
emphasized that the incidents of confirming positive tests were very low. Consequently, management actions relative to determination of FFD have been limited. Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no funher action is taken.
Management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period included i
two Farley Nuclear Plant employees. One individual tested positive in follow up and was terminated. The other individual tested positive for-cause and was terminated.
During the first quarter of 1995, an evaluation of the random selection program was performed by an independent consuhant confirming that the random selection process continues to operate properly and efficiently. Monthly quality control checks of the Fitness for Duty random pool revealed no major discrepancies.