|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20133D1201996-12-16016 December 1996 Requests Authorization for GE to Conduct narrowly-focused Review of Design Certification Rule for ABWR Before It Is Sent to Ofr & to Urge That Staff Rule Issuance Activities Be Expedited to Max Extent Feasible,All Re 10CFR52 ML20116C3331996-07-25025 July 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Draft Final Design Certification Rules for ABWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20116C2501996-07-24024 July 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20115J6831996-07-23023 July 1996 Comment on Supplementary Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Design Certification of ABWR Under 10CFR52.GE Concerned About Lack of Design Finality Inherent in Identified Draft Rule Provisions ML20092B5721995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 52 60FR17902 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR Design ML20087H7241995-08-16016 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Comment on Revision of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20087H8501995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design. Supports NEI Comments L-95-015, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design1995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design ML20087F8181995-08-12012 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Design. Recommends That Staff Require Use of Armored Electrical Cable in Advanced LWRs ML20087H8301995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087H8221995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087F7951995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Boiling Water Reactor Design & Standard Designing Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087F9161995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Advanced Reactor Design Certification Rules ML20087C1971995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certifications for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor & Sys 80+ Designs.Doe Believes That Such Designs Can Significantly Complement Nation Energy Strategy ML20087C0411995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087C7671995-08-0606 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR42 Re Std Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR Design & for Sys 80+ Design L-95-225, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re, Std Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design1995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re, Std Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087C0691995-08-0404 August 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification of Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Designs.Urges Commission to Carefully Consider Recommendations for Correcting Process Deficiencies Inherent in Noprs ML20087C0901995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors ML20087C0981995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors ML20087C1051995-08-0404 August 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for Advanced BWR Design.Urges Commission to Modify Proposed Rules as Recommended by NUMARC to Ensure Stability & Certainty of Part 52 Licensing Process ML20087C1351995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Design Certification Rules for GE ABWR & ABB/C-E Sys 80+ Std Plant Designs.New Process Must Greatly Reduce Financial Risks of Unwarranted & Uncontrollable Delay Characteristics ML20087C1091995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20087C1261995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for General Electric ABWR & Abb/Combustion Engineering Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20087H7501995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for ABWR Design & Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087C1481995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs. Endorses & Supports Positions Set Forth in NEI Comments ML20087H7331995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR Design & Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design.Concurs w/ABB-CE Comments & NEI Recommendations ML20087C1531995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20087C2611995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs. Goal of Safer,More Reliable New Nuclear Plant Designs Has Been Emphatically Achieved ML20087C2021995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for General Electric ABWR & Abb/Combustion Engineering Sys 80+ Standard Plant Designs ML20087C1631995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports Comments Submitted by NEI ML20087C1711995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports Comments Made by NEI ML20087C1321995-08-0303 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Rulemaking for Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087C3071995-08-0303 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CR52, Std Design Certification of Us ABWR Design ML20087C0781995-08-0303 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20087C0761995-08-0202 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Design Certification Rule 10CFR52 Re Standardized Advanced Reactors.Urges Commission to Carefully Consider Industry Comments & to Adopt Recommedations Therein ML20087C2891995-08-0202 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52, Design Certification for Standardized Advanced Reactors & Sys 80+ ML20087C0851995-08-0202 August 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Std Advanced Reactors.Urges Commission to Carefully Consider Industry Comments & to Adopt Recommendations ML20087C1451995-08-0202 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification for Standardized Advanced Reactors ML20087C2291995-07-31031 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re, Std Design Certification for Us ABWR Design ML20087C0971995-07-31031 July 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20059L2041994-01-26026 January 1994 Transcript of 940126 Briefing by GE in Rockville,Md Re Status of ABWR Application for Design Certification.Pp 1-45. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20127M3111992-11-19019 November 1992 Transcript of ACRS ABWR (GE) Subcommittee 921119 Meeting in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-295 1996-07-25
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20133D1201996-12-16016 December 1996 Requests Authorization for GE to Conduct narrowly-focused Review of Design Certification Rule for ABWR Before It Is Sent to Ofr & to Urge That Staff Rule Issuance Activities Be Expedited to Max Extent Feasible,All Re 10CFR52 ML20116C3331996-07-25025 July 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Draft Final Design Certification Rules for ABWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20116C2501996-07-24024 July 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20115J6831996-07-23023 July 1996 Comment on Supplementary Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Design Certification of ABWR Under 10CFR52.GE Concerned About Lack of Design Finality Inherent in Identified Draft Rule Provisions ML20092B5721995-08-31031 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 52 60FR17902 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR Design ML20087H7241995-08-16016 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Comment on Revision of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20087H8501995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design. Supports NEI Comments L-95-015, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design1995-08-15015 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR Design & Sys 80+ Design ML20087F8181995-08-12012 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Design. Recommends That Staff Require Use of Armored Electrical Cable in Advanced LWRs ML20087H8301995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087H8221995-08-10010 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports NEI Comments ML20087F7951995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Us Boiling Water Reactor Design & Standard Designing Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087F9161995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Advanced Reactor Design Certification Rules ML20087C1971995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certifications for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor & Sys 80+ Designs.Doe Believes That Such Designs Can Significantly Complement Nation Energy Strategy ML20087C0411995-08-0707 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087C7671995-08-0606 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR42 Re Std Design Certification for Us Advanced BWR Design & for Sys 80+ Design L-95-225, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re, Std Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design1995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re, Std Design Certification for Us ABWR Design & Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087C0691995-08-0404 August 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification of Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Designs.Urges Commission to Carefully Consider Recommendations for Correcting Process Deficiencies Inherent in Noprs ML20087C0901995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors ML20087C0981995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors ML20087C1051995-08-0404 August 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for Advanced BWR Design.Urges Commission to Modify Proposed Rules as Recommended by NUMARC to Ensure Stability & Certainty of Part 52 Licensing Process ML20087C1091995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Supporting Pr 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced Boiling Water Reactor & Sys 80+ Std Designs ML20087C1261995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for General Electric ABWR & Abb/Combustion Engineering Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20087C1631995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports Comments Submitted by NEI ML20087H7501995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certification for ABWR Design & Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087H7331995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR Design & Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design.Concurs w/ABB-CE Comments & NEI Recommendations ML20087C2611995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs. Goal of Safer,More Reliable New Nuclear Plant Designs Has Been Emphatically Achieved ML20087C2021995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for General Electric ABWR & Abb/Combustion Engineering Sys 80+ Standard Plant Designs ML20087C1711995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification for Standardized Advanced Reactors.Supports Comments Made by NEI ML20087C1531995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20087C1481995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Std Design Certifications for Us Advanced BWR & Sys 80+ Std Designs. Endorses & Supports Positions Set Forth in NEI Comments ML20087C1351995-08-0404 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Proposed Design Certification Rules for GE ABWR & ABB/C-E Sys 80+ Std Plant Designs.New Process Must Greatly Reduce Financial Risks of Unwarranted & Uncontrollable Delay Characteristics ML20087C0781995-08-0303 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20087C1321995-08-0303 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Rulemaking for Std Design Certification for Sys 80+ Design ML20087C3071995-08-0303 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CR52, Std Design Certification of Us ABWR Design ML20087C0851995-08-0202 August 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification Rules for Std Advanced Reactors.Urges Commission to Carefully Consider Industry Comments & to Adopt Recommendations ML20087C0761995-08-0202 August 1995 Comment on Proposed Design Certification Rule 10CFR52 Re Standardized Advanced Reactors.Urges Commission to Carefully Consider Industry Comments & to Adopt Recommedations Therein ML20087C2891995-08-0202 August 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52, Design Certification for Standardized Advanced Reactors & Sys 80+ ML20087C1451995-08-0202 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Design Certification for Standardized Advanced Reactors ML20087C0971995-07-31031 July 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for Sys 80+ Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor ML20087C2291995-07-31031 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re, Std Design Certification for Us ABWR Design 1996-07-25
[Table view] |
Text
y
. Station Support Department
+
_- DOCKETED
965 Chesterbrook Boulevard 95 AUG -4 P3:54 wovn.. e4 ,9087-ss9, July 31,1995 0FFICE OF SECRETARY DOCKETING & EERVICE BRANCH Mr, Samuel J. Chilk DOCKET NtNBERm x.' -
Secretary of the Commission PROPOSED RULE rn 6as U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Qof:R., \"RC)3, Attn: Docketing and Service Branch Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
PECO Energy Company Comments Concerning 10CFR52 Proposed Rule, " Standard Design Certification for the U.S. Advanced Boiling ,
Water Reactor Design" (60FR17902, dated April 7,1995)
Dear Mr. Chilk:
This letter is being submitted in response to the NRC's request for comments concoming the 10CFR52 Proposed Rule, " Standard Design Certification for U.S. Advanced Bolling Water Reactor Design," published in the Federal Register (i.e,60FR17902, dated April 7,1995).- PECO Energy Company appreciates the opportunity to comment on this proposed rule which will add a new appendix to 10CFR52 regarding the design certification for the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR). This proposed rule will provide a method by which applicants and licensees intending to l operate a U.S. ABWR design may do so by appropriately referencing the proposed appendix. i a
PECO Energy endorses the Nuclear Energy instif ute's (NEl's) position and comments concerning ;
this proposed rule. The proposed rule should be modified to resolve NEl's comments so that the proposed rule achieves the goals of 10CFR52. As currently written, the proposed rule threatens the !
viability of the ABWR standardized design.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours, i
G. A. Hunger, Jr.
Director - Licensing l
l 950BO90101 950731 PDR PR gt) 52 60FR17902 PDR-