ML20086R015
| ML20086R015 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 12/18/1991 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20086R011 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9112310113 | |
| Download: ML20086R015 (2) | |
Text
-.
-..___._-..____m.
es tro o
UNITED STATES
,,[3 fp g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
WASHING TON, D. C. 20$$5
%,*****/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REL ATED TO AMENDMENT NOS.155 AND 128 TO, FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. OPR-51 AND NPF-6 ENTERGY OPERATIONS. INC.
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE UNIT NOS. 1 ANO J glCKETNOS.50-313AND50-368
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated Ma ;22, 1990, as revised September 5,1991, Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee submitted a request for changes to the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 ANO-1&2), Operating License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6. The requested changes would modify the ANO Industrial Security Plan to delete a vital area at the site as a result of-the perimeter upgrade project.
2.0 EVALUATION The licensee's proposed modification to delete a specific vital area from the current physical security-plan comitments will not alleviate the licensee from other security requirements associated with this area. The licensee has
. comitted to retain the existing security lighting, CCTV, fences, patrols,- and
-to provide compensatory measures when necessary. This change will not affect methods in which security equipment is operated, maintained, tested, respondad to, or compensated for.
Accordingly, the staff finds the proposed changes to be. acceptable provided that the licensee continues to operate, maintain, and test the security equipment that remains in place at this location.
In addition, the licensee will be required to respond to alarms and implement compensatory measures when
-appropriate.
It is the staff's determination that the amendment to-the Arkansas Nuclear One Industrial Security Plan, which is described in the September 5, 1991, letter from the licensee, does not increase the risk of sabotage at the facility, and that the plan continues to satisfy 10 CFR Part 73.55 requirements.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
r In accordance with the-Comission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official o
L had no coment, i
l I
i 1
9112310113 911218 POR ADOCK 05000313 P
PDR 1
. 4.0 ENVIRONf1 ENTAL CONSIDERATION The amendments are related solely to safeguards matters and do not involve any significant construction impacts. Accordingly, tFe amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(12).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
B. Mendelsohn R. Manili Date: December 18, 1991 1
l
.