ML20086J815

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Public Version of Revised Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures,Including Procedures LZP-1200-5 Re Generating Station Emergency Procedure Guidelines for Offsite Protective Actions & LZP-1310-1 Re Notifications
ML20086J815
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/25/1983
From: Holyoak R
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20086J811 List:
References
NUDOCS 8401250312
Download: ML20086J815 (7)


Text

. . . . . .

r h

73 ca; :s2C-3 l,

30 )9 Revision 22 Augus 25 '.962 l* d .*iNEC ATTAchME's? C .

'i e,

CF7-SITE PRCCEcua! *CCIFICATICa FCR.*

~

&ck af .

Caa-0t t e)M.h) Meta)b J/3 . .____ __ .._ _

3 i y Please AE.*0VE tMe following pagas f ecra your centrcllec cec y

" 1 ' of sne LaSalle County Statica _ Precacures Manual.

ne INSERT sne new pages as incicatec anc AEMCVE anc CESIACY

.li superseced pages. SIGN :ni s transmi ttal form i n :ne spaca RETURN :nis signec snee provicec for Manual notcar calcw.

tc: ./"

CFfica Sucervisce t LaSalle Ccunty Statica A. n. rc1ycax

! . '- 5:stion Sucerintancen: -

~~

LaSalle County 5:atien

.  !- c%-/05 _ _ _

sa.wat -c:.can s rca2 rwAs Cara

! .,..w ,L .w.-sea

'* (IF Nga CLCER, PLEASE ACVISE)

~

(. -

W*N* UW

' CCC1)*t%T RD$,!.3,$ '

l~b __. ' ~b-L2 P rJet.

] .

b 19,00- 5 -

I

!3fo-J N -

~l . _ -. .

f' 13 d o - I _ _

I _

.[a,,,,, -

t, _

.e 1330- 50 C -

._._/._._____.___._ _

4, l blo - I d

' . .t

'f l -

~~

! B4'01d50315 840118

! PDR ADOCK 05000373 j F PDR

\ ~~ 10f( 1 1

i -

i a.me ap. moe-.

1 l __ . ,_ _ . , , - 1.. ...._._~__.,_L_-. . _ _ _ , . - _ _ _ _ _ . . _ , . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . _ _

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NOR: OM6eepEl DUC.DATE 83/10/25 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET a FACIp:50e373.LaSalle County Station, Unit 1, Commonwealth Edison C 05000373 50-374 LaSal l e Count y Station, Unit 2, Commonwealth Edison' C 05000374 AUTH.N AMF. AUTHUR AFFILIATION o Commonwealtn Edison Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENI AFFILIATION Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Director 4

SUBJECT:

Forwards Central Files version of revised emergency plan implementing procedures,incluoing Procedures LZP-1200-5 re generating station emergency procedure guidelines for .

offsite protective actions & LZP-1310-1 re notifications.

DISTRIBUTIUN CODE: X005S COPIES RECEIVE 0:LTR . ENCL .!. SIZE:... jh. ./

TITLE: Emerg Plan (CF Avail)

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES 10 CODE /NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE /NAME LTTR ENCL NRR LB2 BC 1 0 BOURNIA,A. 01 1 1 INTERN /D 02 1 1 FEMA TECH HAZ09 1 1 IE/0EPER/EPB 03 2 2 IE/0EPER/IRB 1 1 NRR/OSI/AEB 1 1 NRR/DSI/RAB 1 0 REG FILES 07 1 1 TOTAL NUMBEH OF COPIES REwu1 RED: LTTR 10 ENCL 8 l

y :

'? 5:c-2 A- :cype.r 8.evisi:n :c t.3sge I c,. .)

anuary 11, 1_::.

-a . .,--- -, pp

-. r '

. p e-..n I Jus *MOU.O c -4 TV4ui- J1A 1 f,gn DAf f.! i, ?.7eLJA. ir0d

  • :c

!A 4- UNIT -(

-- STA71CN TII / MacEcRE tic.

gyS7.33 CSE/' LO"IMA ,d M*;- A/ y #M /MM:

TI57/?MccEuas 717t.I ECUIPMENT No.

~ -

CSICIPTICN CF TisT/StccEuas a.

Answer the icilewirs questient with a ;'yes" er ".-c*, =nc previes rescific

. SAFET( P/ALVATICN:

recsens justifying the decisien:

r malfuncien ci
l. Is se prei:chility ei en =c=urrenes er the :=nsecuencs ei en ecci ent, ecui= ment imeer =nf to sciety s =revicusly awfueree in se Final Scisry Anciysis taccr*

- 1eermanne? Yes V No, Sec=use: D**e. 4 A % ft+.t y 4 en any :revieusly

. 2. Is : e pessi*cility i=r en ==:! der:r er malfuncien :! = S!?srent tyce Y as / N o, Sec=use:

swiuarsd in se Firal Sefery Anclysis Racert creers ?

i De<<

d flNf

... 1 ic=1 Seecir~c=:icn, .-ecucso?

3. Is the margin .cf safety, es defined in the ':esis !=r :nv i

~

_Yes / No, Sec=use: DA d

~.

O O ww -

[d

=

r--.- - -a

?,ri m .a av N MAk n & :chW ,

-==,,,ec sy . .

me

/ O!O i

--r,,- -, w -

e -

-..m-, ,p>,,g y.,,,+s , . - , - - , . - - * - g .wi 6 -w-,,m-g ...my ,e..-,rwwW-we-.i.-e-,----%-m --e_- ,

.a .

s. l l-. . UP 320-2 A TACFMOl? : tavisi n :0 ,

~

(?sge 1 c! 2) l Nl5hb.5O [33Md f3$ 3dfd[ 3dl,UdIib3 ::

i SN##

UNIT I

-- STAUCN 4 8 __

337/:MCCEUa! 10 . / 2 8 /.3 /d - /  :

IYS73ht f,, y 71s~/?Macut:11 itit.1 W t 3 /0 -1 Ate W &h -

. / l ECUIP. MENT No.

O!!CUFPCN C* Tis?/:Mc:Euas * '

ni f Answer so icliewing gustices wis c *yes' er ac, crd .c revics gecific

. SAr s f 9/Al.UARCN:

rocsons justifyirg se decisicru er malfunaffen d

1. Is se ;:remisility d en sc=urrenes er 6e ==nsecuenca ei en cci enf, 8.ccr-T-.-.. to scisef ys ,=reviously ewiucree in se Finci Sciary Analysis

~

saiernent facreassa? Yes / No, Secause: u.~// s /s [M .

4

. gg e a y 4

e 4

Y ss -No, 3ec= usa:

evciucfte in Me EtncI IcYeff Analysis .Tecerf *

Tecise?

QA

  • w

.GG

3. Is se margin ci sciety, es afined in se ':csis i=r ny Tec' nic=1 Scaificcfien, .vaces? ,

Yes / No, 5 a =use: fps.s. , # ,

+.

S g Y 4 '

/ 4/sr

~

2 ..ec sy

. A d l.-

4 cre

~ ~ ~ - -- . _ - - _ . _ _

" #8 hW'We-gw,. . _ _ ,, _

i l .

'J;-4 ::-1 t

Aav8sien :

AMCNPCl? 'anuest / t:, '?

(?nge 1 Of :)

It ???nal} .

PMCC" CURE HIMMY ANO SMm IV ALU,a?!CN

(!O C.5M 50.SS)

I i

oces mis creencurenwmen m am a enan:;. := == '

j, Orecacurt as cascr'Isc in 29 ?'tial Saftf/ Atttiv53 Atccr".? .

'lo f Y93 I ).

4 iS4 Onar?qein OS Itenfitc38 i

. Sceci?c:CCt's 't'vcNeci i.

+ 1 No ( )

vi v SAFiTf EVALUATICN: Answer =s fellcwing cusscens wem a **Ves" or "no", anc ;:revice scacific reasons jusetying =e cac:: co:

1.

Is tre crecacilift of an cc=urrettes. =s caruscuence Of.sn ac=icant, cr me masfurtc=cn cf wrer/wtated et;uiernerrt. as Orwicumy etatuatsc i

in Ute E*nal S4fsf/ Analysis Recert. Increastc? "

't es d No.tocaus: N 8

1 ls Te ecsaibiller r 3rt accicant er 29 t?talfurteticrt Cf3 a cif'trerft Anasysis

==

g r/ce man crestaci arty: . rwicumy cratuatsc in =s Final Satsf/' /Nc. :scause: h J Yss

- ./h 3

Is =s margin of wtsft, as estinec in =e bass' 7 3

r N 3rty a gj
3. Y!s o Tecnnical
ecsuse; Scec fic3 Con, tsc1. caci h

j Anv answer

  • Yes ( 1 allAntarn.'lo._(

v Eecuest anc r1ctfvg Nuc*aar Regulatstaf Cernmissicf1 m:ncrizsten for :nsege.

. autneri:stien neceived ( )

+ y 6n1 cat 8 t'Pcc3 curt g

  • N7: Imciementsten ,

Any answer enecxed "yes

could ::s riecrud in =e pmeg ay (IAll4 - . M arttual ricari '3 ze N RC.

Catn 0Y-l 1

w.-

--me . - - - - -

~

. i-- - -- -_._. .~ _ _ _ -- -- - - -- -. . _

^

  • i mCF.P.ENT .:

'AP

- 320-2 Revisien *0 l

' (?tge't of 2) January 11 ' 10, "

l 100FMO.5S FOR,',iAT FOR SAFETI E!ALUAii0il :e

~

i STATICN d- I UNIT "S 2 E# /3.70- /

e- 71:7/seccscuas no.

system

__%#% vd [# .-> 6#d-4 t M 6,

.i 7:37/Paccscuas itit.: dm _ yv ,j .

y V i ECUIPMENT Nc, --

CESC!PTICN OF TI57/? Rec 2cuas

_,LLYh.A c_' t _ ?_ - - - . .

0,A$&f SAr Y P/Al.UAilCN: Answer the following questiens with a yes* cr *..o*, and provice saecific reescos justifyirg the decisien:

1. Is the probesility of en oc=urrenes er the c=nsecuenes of n =ccident, er melfunctien ei ecui= ment imocrmatito Nc, sciety as previcusly esclucted in y- thefFinci Sciary Acc I~

-- incrocsed? Yes Bec= usa: g

{.

I l.

'I 2. Is he pessi*cility for en =c=ident er melFanc;ien ei a different :yce then X No,Se :ny revicusly se:

Yes evolucted in the Finct Sciary Anclysis hpert =rected?

N T $$ A=0'*?

l+

3. Is the mergin ci sciety, es defined in the 'esis ice any Technic =1 Scecific=tien, ,reducac?

lj __

K i%, Sec=use: gyh ,[r Yes j ,

4 8

e g

'Y Octs T C ESrfCrmec 3y Octe 1O Accreved 3y -

l l

- g l - _ _ _ _

- . . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - . . - . . . . - -- .-.-. _.. . . - . . . - _ _ . - - - - . ~ . _ _ - . - _

  • e

' U 320-1 A-*7.cMME.t? :

9Cvisi:n 20 l

- (page 1 ef ;) 'anuar f i1' ;%' ,

1:

~

. 100550.3S ?0EiAT FOR SARTI ML'JAiiO3 i

ungr I

-- 57ATICN La % Ue of _'

/t=a.act:CKi no. L W /330-30

~

svsies MlA 7)d/?necteuas 7tTu Ad1Gu /A/.e 0 JJ N .

M /A-84w [md /

ECUIPMENT No.

CEIC!PTICN OF GST/2RCc!:URE ha N

Q/m

&%Y3 -< h . A 5 ot=.

w d .no provids :=ecific SAcT/ 9/ALUATICN: Answer se icilewing gestiens wint e ,yes* cr "ne*,

rsesera justifyirg the decisien:

er nciknetien ci

l. Is ss prei:cisility ei c:t ce=rrenes er the :=r=acuenca ei en =c=ident, ~

ecerr ecuicment irecer =nt to sciety =s provicusly evcluctue in se Final Sciary Aneiysi

- incesesad? Yes Y No, Sec= usa:

m

& m ,

2. Is se ;cssi'cility icr en :e=! ent er ineifunction :i e di!Ferent Y es
yce Y t =n No,:ny =rsvicusly Bec::u:a:

evoicerad in the Final Safety Anclysis heerr :rected?

i-

  • o ,- MA '

3, is the .-z:rgin ci safety, es defined in the '-esis fer :ny Technic =1 Scecific=rien, recuese Yes X No, See:use:

M mJ I

e

?stfer .ec Iv  % M-m Octe'7.C/E2

c.e IO I D Aperevec 3 e

m 9 - ---,w-a- ,w w- rw --4 -- g--y s- -- =---o. o w--w-r're,- ---*4=- --- --eye -- - -s--re+ -m- m,-ma,'-e -- w' 6- -

.. ~ . . - - . - -- . . . ..- . .-

._ LAP 820-2 ATTAC.9 MENT F S*VI8IC" 10

~'

(Page 1 of 2) . Januar/ 11, 1983

^

.. 10C850.59 FORMAT FOR SAFiTf EVAL.UATION zo i

STATICN O '- h UNIT I e P /4 /c-/ REV /

SYSTEM M/4 U -MS"T*RocEcuaE no.

hN Coh b - Ab Pb.

-TESTTPROCEDURE TITt A

. ECulPMENT No.

' - CESCtlPilCN OF NROCEDURE I-<5se P w',.'O... @

Joe Lb A-m .

-- SAFETY EVALUATION: Answer the following questions with o ,"yes" or "no", and provide soecific reasons justifying the dec!sion:

1. Is the probability of an occurrence er the consemence of en accident, er malfunction of a

emipment impermnt to safety ,

iously evolueted in the Final Safety Analysis Recort

.- increased? Yes . No, Becausa:

vWastm.c t be n d a- -

2. Is the possibility for on accident or malfunction of a dlFferent type than jc y previously

~

evoluered in the Final Sciety Analysis Report created? Yes V No, Sec=use:

'g C 8- S-ef o 1Mb d- k ,

~.s

~

,, as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification, reduced?

,: 3. Is the margin of No, Because: l Yes C g A w e t. b nob '

u

~

F.. w a 3y MO Co,. 8das  :

Approved 3y M Care ['*O o

( ._ -

--.i- cw .w-- , - - - -e7

--,-,-,-.=gr7w wwe ,,e--.% .


e,- m - - - '-- - *p-,nw--- t,ww-w----w -amiu-..- e e rwe .-- --m