ML20086J815
| ML20086J815 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1983 |
| From: | Holyoak R COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20086J811 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8401250312 | |
| Download: ML20086J815 (7) | |
Text
...
r h
73 l
30 )9 ca; :s2C-3 Revision 22 Augus 25
'.962 l
d
- iNEC ATTAchME's? C
'i CF7-SITE PRCCEcua! *CCIFICATICa FCR.*
e,
~
&ck af Caa-0t t e)M.h)
Meta)b J/3 3
y i
Please AE.*0VE tMe following pagas f ecra your centrcllec cec y
" 1 '
_ Precacures Manual.
of sne LaSalle County Statica pages as incicatec anc AEMCVE anc CESIACY :ne INSERT sne new
.l SIGN :ni s transmi ttal form i n :ne spaca i
superseced pages.
RETURN :nis signec snee provicec for Manual notcar calcw.
tc:
./"
CFfica Sucervisce t
LaSalle Ccunty Statica A.
- n. rc1ycax 5:stion Sucerintancen:
~~
LaSalle County 5:atien c%-/05 sa.wat -c:.can s rca2 rwAs Cara
.,..w,L.w.-sea (IF Nga CLCER, PLEASE ACVISE)
~
(.
CCC1)*t%T RD$,!.3,$ '
W*N* UW l~b
__. ' ~b-
]
L2 P rJet.
b 19,00- 5 N
I
~l
!3fo-J I
.[a,,,,,
13 d o - I _
f' t,
1330- 50
._._/._._____.___._
C
.e 4,
l blo - I d
'..t
'f l
B4'01d50315 840118
~~
10f(
PDR ADOCK 05000373 j
F PDR
\\ ~~
1 1
i i
a.me ap.
moe-.
1l __.
1..
...._._~__.,_L_-.
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NOR: OM6eepEl DUC.DATE 83/10/25 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET a FACIp:50e373.LaSalle County Station, Unit 1, Commonwealth Edison C 05000373 50-374 LaSal l e Count y Station, Unit 2, Commonwealth Edison' C 05000374 AUTH.N AMF.
AUTHUR AFFILIATION o
Commonwealtn Edison Co.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENI AFFILIATION Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Director
SUBJECT:
Forwards Central Files version of revised emergency plan 4
implementing procedures,incluoing Procedures LZP-1200-5 re generating station emergency procedure guidelines for offsite protective actions & LZP-1310-1 re notifications.
ENCL.!. SIZE:... jh.
./
DISTRIBUTIUN CODE: X005S COPIES RECEIVE 0:LTR.
TITLE: Emerg Plan (CF Avail)
NOTES:
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES 10 CODE /NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE /NAME LTTR ENCL NRR LB2 BC 1
0 BOURNIA,A.
01 1
1 INTERN
/D 02 1
1 FEMA TECH HAZ09 1
1 IE/0EPER/EPB 03 2
2 IE/0EPER/IRB 1
1 NRR/OSI/AEB 1
1 NRR/DSI/RAB 1
0 REG FILES 07 1
1 TOTAL NUMBEH OF COPIES REwu1 RED: LTTR 10 ENCL 8
l
'? 5:c-2 A- :cype.r :
8.evisi:n :c y
t.3sge I c,..)
anuary 11, 1_::.
I Jus *MOU.O TV4 J1A 1 f,gn DAf f.!, ?.7eLJA. ir0d
- c
-, pp ui-
-a
. p e-..n c
-4 i
r
!A 4-UNIT
-(
STA71CN TII / MacEcRE tic.
CSE/' LO"IMA,d M*;- A/ #M /MM:
gyS7.33 TI57/?MccEuas 717t.I y
ECUIPMENT No.
CSICIPTICN CF TisT/StccEuas
~
a.
Answer the icilewirs questient with a ;'yes" er ".-c*, =nc previes rescific SAFET( P/ALVATICN:
recsens justifying the decisien:
- r malfuncien ci Is se prei:chility ei en =c=urrenes er the :=nsecuencs ei en ecci ent, l.
ecui= ment imeer =nf to sciety s =revicusly awfueree in se Final Scisry Anciysis taccr*
1eermanne?
Yes V No, Sec=use: D**e. 4 A % ft+.t y Is : e pessi*cility i=r en==:! der:r er malfuncien :! = S!?srent tyce en any :revieusly 4
/
o, Sec=use:
2.
N Y as swiuarsd in se Firal Sefery Anclysis Racert creers ?
d flNf De<<
i 1 ic=1 Seecir~c=:icn,.-ecucso?
Is the margin.cf safety, es defined in the ':esis !=r :nv i 3.
_Yes
/
No, Sec=use:
DA d
~
O
~.
[d O
ww
=
-a N MAk n & :chW r--
?,ri m.a av O!O
/
, me
-==,,,ec sy i
--r,,-
w e
-..m-,
,p>,,g y.,,,+s g
.wi 6
-w-,,m-g
...my
,e..-,rwwW-we-.i.-e-,----%-m
--e -
a m
m
.a s.
l-.
UP 320-2 A TACFMOl? :
tavisi n :0
(?sge 1 c! 2)
~
l Nl5hb.5O [33Md f3$ 3dfd[ 3dl,UdIib3 ::
i 4 8 SN##
UNIT I
STAUCN 337/:MCCEUa! 10. / 2 8 /.3 /d - /
IYS73ht Ate &h f,,
y W
71s~/?Macut:11 itit.1 W t 3 /0 -1
/
ECUIP. MENT No.
O!!CUFPCN C* Tis?/:Mc:Euas ni f
Answer so icliewing gustices wis c *yes' er ac, crd. revics gecific c
SAr s f 9/Al.UARCN:
rocsons justifyirg se decisicru er malfunaffen d Is se ;:remisility d en sc=urrenes er 6e==nsecuenca ei en cci enf, 8.ccr-1.
saiernent T-.-.. to scisef ys,=reviously ewiucree in se Finci Sciary Analysis facreassa?
Yes
/ No, Secause: u.~// s s
[M
/
~
4 4
e 4
e a
y gg evciucfte in Me EtncI IcYeff Analysis.Tecerf :Tecise?
Y ss
-No, 3ec= usa:
- w Is se margin ci sciety, es afined in se ':csis i=r ny Tec' nic=1 Scaificcfien,.vaces?
.GG 3.
Yes
/ No, 5 a =use: fps.s., #
+.
S Y
A d l.
/
4/sr 4
g
~
cre 2
..ec sy 4
~ ~ ~ -
- 8 hW'We-gw,.. _ _,, _
i l
'J;-4 ::-1 t
Aav8sien :
AMCNPCl?
'anuest / t:, '?
(?nge 1 Of :)
It ???nal}
PMCC" CURE HIMMY ANO SMm IV ALU,a?!CN
(!O C.5M 50.SS)
I i
oces mis creencurenwmen m am a enan:;. :===
j Orecacurt as cascr'Isc in 29 ?'tial Saftf/ Atttiv53 Atccr".?
Y93 I
).
'lo f 4
iS4 Onar?qein OS Itenfitc38 i
. Sceci?c:CCt's 't'vcNeci i.
No (
)
1
+
i v
v SAFiTf EVALUATICN: Answer =s fellcwing cusscens wem a **Ves" or "no", anc ;:revice scacific reasons jusetying =e cac:: co:
Is tre crecacilift of an cc=urrettes. =s caruscuence Of.sn ac=icant, cr me masfurtc=cn cf wrer/wtated et;uiernerrt. as Orwicumy etatuatsc 1.
in Ute E*nal S4fsf/ Analysis Recert. Increastc?
i d No.tocaus: N
't es ls Te ecsaibiller r 3rt accicant er 29 t?talfurteticrt Cf a cif'trerft 8
Anasysis 3 1
r/ce man arty. rwicumy cratuatsc in =s Final Satsf/' /Nc. :scause: h J
./h
==
g crestaci Yss 3
Is =s margin of wtsft, as estinec in =e bass :r 3rty Tecnnical a gj 3
Y!s
' 7 N o :ecsuse; 3.
Scec fic3 Con, tsc1. caci h
j Anv answer
- Yes (
1 allAntarn.'lo._(
!v Eecuest anc r1ctfvg Nuc*aar Regulatstaf Cernmissicf1 m:ncrizsten for :nsege.
neceived (
)
. autneri:stien
+
y 6n1 cat 8 t'Pcc3 curt g
- N7:
Imciementsten Any answer enecxed "yes
. M could ::s riecrud in =e (IAll4 arttual ricari '3 ze N RC.
pmeg ay 0Y-Catn 1
w.-
--me
.#-.w.
,.,g
-e
,w_
,m
-,.-,w,v.
..w-..-
u-
-m
^
~
i-- - -- -_._.
.~
'AP 320-2
- i mCF.P.ENT.:
Revisien *0
(?tge't of 2)
January 11 ' 10, l
~
100FMO.5S FOR,',iAT FOR SAFETI E!ALUAii0il :e i
I UNIT "S
d-STATICN 71:7/seccscuas no.
2 E# /3.70- /
system e-
.i 7:37/Paccscuas itit.:
dm _
__%#% d [#.-> 6#d-4 t M 6, v
yv,j y
i V
ECUIPMENT Nc, CESC!PTICN OF TI57/? Rec 2cuas
_, L L Y h. A c_' t _ ?_
0,A$&f SAr Y P/Al.UAilCN: Answer the following questiens with a yes* cr *..o*, and provice saecific reescos justifyirg the decisien:
Is the probesility of en oc=urrenes er the c=nsecuenes of n =ccident, er melfunctien ei 1.
ecui= ment imocrmat to sciety as previcusly esclucted in the Finci Sciary Acc incrocsed?
Yes i
Nc, Bec= usa:
g y-f I~
{.
I l.
Is he pessi*cility for en =c=ident er melFanc;ien ei a different :yce then :ny revicusly
'I 2.
Yes X No,Se se:
evolucted in the Finct Sciary Anclysis hpert =rected?
N T $$ A=0'*?
Is the mergin ci sciety, es defined in the 'esis ice any Technic =1 Scecific=tien, reducac?
l+
lj 3.
Yes K i%, Sec=use: gyh
,[r j
4 8
e g
T C
'Y Octs ESrfCrmec 3y Accreved 3y Octe 1O l
g l
l
. - - - -. ~.
' U 320-1 e
A-*7.cMME.t? :
9Cvisi:n 20 (page 1 ef ;)
'anuar f i1' ;%',
100550.3S ?0EiAT FOR SARTI ML'JAiiO3 1:
~
i I
La % Ue of ungr 57ATICN MlA
/t=a.act:CKi no. L W /330-30
~
svsies 7)d/?necteuas 7tTu Ad1Gu /A/.e 0 JJ N M /A-84w [md /
ECUIPMENT No.
CEIC!PTICN OF GST/2RCc!:URE N
ha Q/m
&%Y3
-< h. A 5 ot=.
w SAcT/ 9/ALUATICN: Answer se icilewing gestiens wint e,yes* cr "ne*,
.no provids :=ecific d
rsesera justifyirg the decisien:
er nciknetien ci Is ss prei:cisility ei c:t ce=rrenes er the :=r=acuenca ei en =c=ident, l.
~
ecuicment irecer =nt to sciety =s provicusly evcluctue in se Final Sciary Aneiysi ecerr incesesad?
Yes Y
No, Sec= usa:
m m
Is se ;cssi'cility icr en :e=! ent er ineifunction :i e di!Ferent :yce t =n :ny =rsvicusly Y es Y
No, Bec::u:a:
2.
evoicerad in the Final Safety Anclysis heerr :rected? &
i -
MA o,-
is the.-z:rgin ci safety, es defined in the '-esis fer :ny Technic =1 Scecific=rien, recuese 3,
Yes X
No, See:use:
M mJ I
e
% M-m Octe'7.C/E2
?stfer.ec Iv IO I D
- c.e Aperevec 3 e
m 9
---,w-a-
,w w-rw
--4 g--y s-
=---o.
o w--w-r're,-
---*4=-
--eye
-s--re+
-m-m,-ma,'-e w'
6-
.. ~
LAP 820-2 ATTAC.9 MENT F S*VI8IC" 10 (Page 1 of 2)
Januar/ 11, 1983
~'
10C850.59 FORMAT FOR SAFiTf EVAL.UATION zo
^
i O '-
h UNIT STATICN I e P /4 /c-/ REV /
M/4 U
-MS"T*RocEcuaE no.
SYSTEM hN Coh b - Ab Pb.
TESTTPROCEDURE TITt A
ECulPMENT No.
CESCtlPilCN OF NROCEDURE I-<5se P w',.'O... @
Lb A-m Joe SAFETY EVALUATION: Answer the following questions with o,"yes" or "no", and provide soecific reasons justifying the dec!sion:
1.
Is the probability of an occurrence er the consemence of en accident, er malfunction of emipment impermnt to safety iously evolueted in the Final Safety Analysis Recort a
increased?
Yes.
No, Becausa:
be n d a-vWastm.c t Is the possibility for on accident or malfunction of a dlFferent type than jc y previously 2.
evoluered in the Final Sciety Analysis Report created?
Yes V No, Sec=use:
~
C 8-S-ef o 1Mb d-k
'g
~.s 3.
Is the margin of
,, as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification, reduced?
~
Yes No, Because:
b nob A
w e t.
C g
u MO Co,. 8das
~
F.. w a 3y Care ['*O M
Approved 3y o
(
--.i-cw
.w--
-e7
--,-,-,-.=gr7w wwe
,,e--.%
e,-
m
- p-,nw---
t,ww-w----w
-amiu-..-
e e
rwe
--m
-