ML20086G584

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Rev B to TS Change Request 93-16.Request Originally Submitted to NRC on 940929.Rev Reflects Incorporation of NRC Review Comments Re Plant Conversion to Improved TSs Per NUREG-1433
ML20086G584
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  
Issue date: 07/07/1995
From: Hunger G
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
RTR-NUREG-1433 NUDOCS 9507170001
Download: ML20086G584 (3)


Text

.... ~

9 Et; tion Suppsrt Deprrt,tsent 5$5r-10CFR50.90

=

v PECO ENERGY

l a*lsi=ae,s 965 Chesterbrook Boulevard Wayne, PA 19087-5001 July 7,1995 j

Docket Mos. 50-277 50-278 License Nos. DPR-44 DPR-56 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission w -..

.. Attn: 'Docutheht Corsrol Desk "

Washington, DC 20555

?

Subject:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Revision B to TSCR 93-16 Conversion to improved Technical Specifications i

References:

(1)

Letter from G. A. Hunger, Jr. (PECO Energy) to USNRC dated j

September 29,1994 t

Dear Sir:

In Reference (1), PECO Energy Company submitted Technical Specifications Change Request (TSCR) 93-16, requesting changes to Appendixes A and B of the Facility Operating Ucenses for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3.

a.

This TSCR proposed an overall conversion of the current PBAPS Technical Specifications (TS) to the improved Technical Specifications (ITS), as contained in MUREG 1433, " Standard Technica! Specifications, General Electric Plants, BWR/4."

L Revision B thTSCR 93-16 is the result of incorporation of NRC review comments.

i Page insert and removal instructions have also been provided to facilitate updating TSCR 93-16 for Revision B.

RCCG6 s

9507170001 95o707 i

DR ADoCK o5ooo277 PDR-1

,,_r,-.

~ -. -.

.------w..

... -...,, -,. ~., -, -,.,

--.-.-.-.m,

4

' July 7,1995 Page 2 We have Ietermined that this revision does not alter our evaluation of any of the 10CFR50.59 standards, and therefore, does not affect our conclusion that Revision B to TSCR 93-16 does not constitute an unreviewed safety question. We have determined that the proposed revision does not affect the conclusions of the No Significant Hazards Consideration and the Environmental Assessment.

if you have any questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours,

.0.

G. A. Hunger, Jr.,

Director - Ucensing TRL/

Affidavit, Enclosure cc:

T. T. Martin, Administrator, Region I, USNRC W. L Schmidt, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, PBAPS R. R. Janati, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania i

i

]

?

I i

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ss.

COUNTY OF CHESTER W. H. Smith, III being first duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Vice President of PECO Energy Company; the Applicant herein; that he has read the attached Revision B to Technical Specifications Change Request No. 93-16 for changes to the Peach Bottom Facility Operating Licenses DPR-44 and DPR-56, and knows the contents thereof; and that the statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

$ Y.

Vice Presi nt

(

i Subscribed and sworn to before me this day i

l of 1995.

6 hh?

L ary Public Notarial Seal Mary Lou Skrockl. Notary PubRc Tredyffnn Twp., Chester County My Comm:ssion Expires May 17,1999 Membw. F%nnsykarna Assombon of Nolanes