ML20086G384
| ML20086G384 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 05/17/1995 |
| From: | Mcckoy C GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 2.206, OLA-3-I-MOSBA75, NUDOCS 9507140286 | |
| Download: ML20086G384 (5) | |
Text
-.
1 - g 3 g f) - 7 5 Exhibit].i.paae 1.a[f d
pf-03-1?u es 42 a
00 Georga Power Co7aa 401nwness Center Parkway g
r Post 0"ce Sox 1295 Bemingrwn. Alatau 35201 NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION mME 2
g g y,,u. 3
- C)$ M,,g p3 $$
Docket No.
92 W AJ Ottcal Exh. No. 1*+
U
(,
in the matter of GN
'd
'I bRE Stan IDENTIRED M
SE C.K.M:Co v.:e prece~r Applicant RECEIVED DOC
., Pt.cear g
Georgia v:ev %ee:
Intervenor 7
REJECTED ver Conto Offr tre soonem everre sfriem Ccatractar DATE ON7dY Otner witness 5 eMb/
December 10, 1991 Reporter C Ens e ELV-03293 Docket Nos. 50-424 50-425 U.S. Nucisar Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Attn:
Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Subject:
Additional Information Regarding Mr. Marvin HobbyAmended 10 CTR S 2.206 Petition Filed by and Mr. Allen Mosbauch Gentlemen:
O By letter dated October 3, information.("GPC") responded to your August 22,1991, Georgia Power Company The request for additional information sought.1991 req
\\
information associated with several allegati petitioners in a July 8, 1991 supplement to their originalons submitted by the petition.
Subsequent to GPC's October 3, 1991 response identified information which is relevant to the pr, epa we have Director's Decision in this mattel'.
ration of a of the information provided in this letter.The NRC may be aware of most all material and relevant facts and circumstance deliberations.
of your I.
Reconended D Pover comoanv_.ecision and Order in Marvin Hobbv v.
Georcia By Order dated November 8, Labor Case No (the " Order")1991 in the U.S. Department of Williams recom. 90-ERA-30, the Honorable Joel R.
of Mr. Marvin Hobby be dismissed with ereiudigg. mended to t had called the NRC's attention to this proceeding GPC previously in the Company's response, dated September 28
, as explained 1991, in this matter.
1990 and April 1,
_v.-
e 9507140286 950517 PDR G
ADOCK 05000424
'w h
- dpa PDR
... ~
jf' ExNbit 7f' N e A of T i
At +-03-iMa s a?
P,06
]t I
L GeorgiaPower A i
(
}
~
petition Mr. Mosbaugh knew:
- 1) Operations Department annagement identified the noncompliance of Technical Specifications on a j
i morning status conference call, and 2) the reason for the noncompliance of Technical specifications was that information 4
]
concerning equipment out-of-service had been placed on the back j
of a Limiting Condition of Operation status sheet.
Thus, it j
appears Mr. Mosbaugh possessed information prior to September l
1990 which was contrary to the statements made in his i
l September 11, 1990 petition.
l
.k Particinants in an Anril is. 1990 conference call Recardina 1
IV.
LER 1-90-006.
i l,
j GPC's October 3, 1991 scpplemental response sets forth the basis of GPC's April 1, 1991 statement regarding the Senior Vice President's lack of participation in a telephone conference call late on April 19, 1990 which finalized LER 1-90-006.
In late October, 1991 in conjunction with discovery in Mr. Mosbaugh's l
Department of Labor proceeding, GPC obtained cassette audio tapes which were surreptitiously made by Mr. Mosbaugh during, j
approximately, the February-September, 1990 time frame.
One of those tapes of April 22., 1990 discussions (identified as Tape No.
a
- 71) indicates that Mr. Hairston was nga a participant during the I
April 11, 1990 telephone conference call when language concerning i
emergency diesel generator start counts was finalized in the LER.
j The following is a transcript of a portion of this tape which l
contains a discussion between Mr. Mosh ugh (" ALM") and another j
participant ("P") on the April 19th conference call.
AIM: I think there is a high probability that there is I
a problem with their statement [in LER 90-06 concerning i
diesel generator start information).
P:
What George told me over the phone--
l ALM George who?
1 I
P:
George Bockhold--
ALM: When?
P Esfore we issued the LER.
AIM: Yeah.
7:
We had a big conversation on those numbers with George (Seekho14), uh, [esorge] Emirston--
l
(
_ AIM: Yeah.
i
-s-
- 4
ExhibitT,page. 1 of.7_.
JfJi-03-1994 09:47 l
P.07 l!O
! ' (. Georgi'aPower d 78
--or not Nairston, [ Bill) Shipman.
1 AIM:
They were all on there.
I P3
--and what George (Bockhold) said is they had i
explained to the Region that they had had--they used--
Tom got those numbers from what we presented to the NRC and then he just added the additional starts after that---
ALM:
That's right.
P:
But--and we questioned that with George (Rockhold) and what George [Bockhold) said is, 'Yes, we did have failures; the Region was aware we had failures, but we were in the troubleshooting mode and once we cleared the troubleshooting mode than we had that many successful starts.'
ALM:
That's not true--
P:
That's what I was told.
1 AIR:
You can interpret--
ALM:
Yeah, but that was a presumption on George's part--
Pt No.
George did not presume anything.
He made that as a statement of fact and all that information was presented to him before he made the NRC presentation (on April 9', 1990) and that's the way he made the presentation.
ALM:
OK, well that's--
Pt George was aware of the fact that (inaudible)--
AIR:
You've got to establish -you know, you have weasel words in this thing, yo,u've got to establish a criteria, OK, between X and X, how many successful starts do I think I had?
What's my criteria?
The words in there say ' failures and problems.*
What's a problem?
O I
-s-
..e..
- - - -,.... < - -. ~..... + -..., _,,... ~.--.....,, _ __,,,,,,. -....~,,..__....
_.w.m.,,-.,--_
JUN-03-1994 09:as Exhibit I, Pap 9 d5 g,og GeorgiaPowerA P:
would have been to word it to sayWell, I th have had eighteen consecutive start appropriate way
'We have had -we from this date going back.'
s without a trip ALM:
Whatever-the words in there are p:
Well, they weren't--
weasely, OK, -
AIR:
'since the 20th.'-they say ' failures and probleas' and ey say P:
standpoint, they weren't intended to bThey e y.
From m e weasely.y AIX:
You need to decide what we missed -All I'm sa ways.
er
, you know,ent we P:
You'll
[Bockhold] probably want to mention that to George ALM:
.I We need to decide what we mi not, but I have yet to be able to figurevie ssed various ways of interpreting it s true or each method of interpreting the words
, I find a flaw withre out, among th k
excerpt, the participant indicated that mas can b i
Mr. Bairston participated in conversati ted portion of this i
12R.
- r. Shipman and not This is consistent with the collections which fina participants during the August reflected in documents ve recollectio 1
Mr.plemental response. enclosed in GPC's October 3, 19 l.
sup Mosbaugh, as of April 27Moreover, the conversation indi as GPC's prior responses include an Aoonclusion of " m 1990, had not reached a personal cates that 4
Mr. Dockhold from Mr. Mosbaugh whi h i pril 30, 1990ent" relative to the IJDt.
Mr. Nosbaugh's conclusion regardi c
meno to information in the LER crystalliz ng incorrect, materialndicates to us tha had been forwarded to the NRC ed only After the
\\
original I2R i
3
[O
Jut 4-03-1994 09:49 gg 5 g 5-O( ceorsieeomer A I hope this information will be helpful to resolve these matters in an expeditious manner.
assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.If I can be of any further Very truly yours,
~
C. K. McCoy Enclosure cc:
Georcia Power Company Mr. A. W. Dahlberg Mr. W. G. Hairston, III Mr. W. B. shipman Mr. P. D. Rushton Mr. J. T. Beckham Mr. M. Shelbani NORMS O
U.
B. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator
(
Kr. D. 5. Mood, Licensing Project Manager, NRR Mr. B. R. Bonser, Senior Resident Inspector, Vogtle Document Control Desk O
-