ML20086G361

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-MOSBA-67A,consisting of Sonopco Project:Georgia Power Clarifies Recent Publicity About Vogtle Diesel Generators
ML20086G361
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 05/17/1995
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OLA-3-I-MOSBA67, NUDOCS 9507140261
Download: ML20086G361 (2)


Text

O:O:O:O: : :9: :0/.we.v.we v.v.w. v v-

)hdC- Y2'/ f26 - RA - 3 1/L$5M '57# -Exhibit

- - . .b,pah.d ob . .:i:

!! 3 7 e..

/ cs e ww.w.x.-. c.

SONOPCO Prdeat

.--. . w ~ :ma=v

USNRC a= ws~^

i

('y M 95 JLN -6 P3 :41 :I.

){ Georgia Power clarifics recent publicity about Vogtle diesel generators  :.:

' Fl S RY  :-:

$ llecent news media repoils liave stated that Georgia P g giy _ yl mis-  :::

.: lead the Nuclear itegulatory Conunission (NitC) carlier s yegg in providing i

9

- data about the reliability of cincrgency dicscl generators at Plant Vogtle. "That is  :.:

~

j .

not true." said Ken McCoy. vice president of the Vogtle ProJcct.

U "The original data submitted was in error, but we had no Intent to misicad the  :.:

NitC. As soon as Georgia l'ower detennined that there was a concern in (lint O

$ data, the company ver' bally notified them of the concern and subsequently pro-  ::.

.: vided a written correction."  :::

?. ..

I: The issue concerned tlic ntunber of times two backup dicscl generators suc-  :::

cessfully operated during testing. "The NitC had people there while we werc  :.:

- running the tests and they reviewed the results. lu their review, Clie NIRC had all  :::

$ of the same infornmtion we had." McCoy said. O

~
.- Problems in getting a generator started contributed to the March 20 site arca
::

-:. cmcrgency at the plant. But contrary to recent news media reports. the NitC O

-
reviewed and was briefed on the dicscl generating testing after the March 20  ::.

g:: -

incident and before the restart of Unit 1.  :.:

Georgia Power had originally submitted information that said one of the genera-  :::

..: tors successfully started 18 times. while the second generator successfully :c-

- started 19 times without failurcs or problems occurring. ,

Actually, it was detennined later that the employces who gathered and prepared .$.

- the data for the NIRC did not use all available information in determining suc-  :::

cessful generator starts. .:.

Instead, they used data from the operators' logs only. Operators consider a test 'd

)f

. " successful" if the dicscl generator starts up. Based on that, the operators  ::'

$ logged these start attempts as successful for both generators.13ut a subsequent  :.

review of an engineers' log showed that some of the start-up tests did in fact  :

.: I
have problems or failurcs af ter operating for a period of time.  :::
.: "That's the basis of the confusion," McCoy said. "Our first report was based on  :::
an incomplete revicw of the logs." 0

$ The erroncous statement is one issue raised in a pctillon filed with the NitC by  :-:

.: Allen Mosbaugh, a fonner Georgia Power employce. The NitC is treating Mos-  :::
haugh's filing as a pelillon pursuant to federal regulations that pennit anyonc 0
to file a request to the NIRC regardless of merit. The pclition is based on false  :
. and inaccurate statements. and the issues raised in the pctillon already have  ::

(^'j been reviewed and discussed by Georgia Power with the NitC.  ::

0 q .

EXHIBIT d

92 PROJECT'-

94 ue r

{SM88sk !!884 PDR

r i .,

'. (0 ,;- c.,

't th' O

l mfCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS510ft i so- 9 a u-+c + J Docket No ro-y33.ct4 3 Official Exh. No. l~s . 67.4 0 +-

,(

In the matter of _ 6 BC IDENTIRED Staff RECEIVED Appl: car.1

- REJECTED intervenor__

Contg Offr

_ DATE

  1. F~ O '9 T Contractor Witness S t >n J 4<J Other Beporter C. R W