ML20086C298

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs of Agreement on Bedrock Legal Issue Concerning Authority to Retain Antitrust License Conditions Contained in OL If Actual Cost of Electricity Exceeds That of Alternative Sources
ML20086C298
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse, Perry  Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 11/07/1991
From: Goldberg R, Strother C
GOLDBERG, FIELDMAN & HJELMFELT
To: Bechhoefer C, Bollwerk G, Mark Miller
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#491-12348 A, LBP-91-38, NUDOCS 9111220107
Download: ML20086C298 (2)


Text

y[


m u

T y ft

};i ' y

, e i[ [ }.. '

s

-m..

1.h r L

,y 40

. GOLDDERG, FlCLDMAN & 'LCTH AM, P. C.

1 e eoo rartccstu stat et. % wc bhk "h P3 A7 atuotN Oost.esme w AsMiwotoN, D. C, 2000 5 c==otorecto=AN OLENN W, LCT64AM S E LI PHOD.F-cooNNudo D. S,ROTHEM. JR.

p(.

N tiOM 463 9300 I

'sosuuA t. utwitn bum W.4 4

arwntta u. AtacRt Mc satscopirR 7 t oori ass-esos ce covenss

- Dayt0 C. HJttM7ELT

.;-l BY TEL,ECOPIER p

Marshall E.-Miller, Chairman 2

Charles Ber;hhoefer, Administrativa Judge G.

Paul Bollwerk, III Administrative Judge Atomic Safaty and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-4350' East West Highway

~ Room E-522

+

~

Bethesda, Maryland -20814 Fax No.

(301;'492-7285 In the Matter of Ohio Edipon Company (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1),

. J'he Cleveland Electric Illun11J14t;1D9_QQGPADY, The, Toledo Fglison Comonny

-(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1)

(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, U tit 1)

(Docket Nos. 50-440-A and 50-346-A)

Re:- Agreement on " Bedrock" Lecal Issun u

Gentlemen:

In accordance with the Licensing Board's October 7,

-1991 Prehearing-Conference' Order, LBP-91-38, please be advised i

that-all of the parties (specifically,. Ohio Edison Company,'The E

Toledo Edison Company, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Coinpany, the NRC Staf f, the Dcpartment of Justice, the City of Cleveland,'American Municipal Power - Ohio,- Inc., and the Alabama Electric' Cooperative, Inc.) have agreed upon the following "badrock" lega.1 is.bue in this proceeding:

Is the' Commission without authority as a matter of law under Section 105 or the Atomic Energy Act to retain-the antitrust license conditions contained D

in an '.,perating license if it finds that the ac-l tual cost of electricity from the licensed nucleat Q1hpoh

[

}

.M t

Y

.......c..

GOLDSERG, FIELDM AN & LETH AM, P. C, Marshall E. Miller, Chairman Charles Bechhoefer, Administrative Judge i

G.

Paul Bollwerk, III, Administrative Judge November 7, 1991 Page 2 powter plant is higher than the cost of electricity fro:: alternative sources, all as appropriately meaiured and compared?

The part.,= also agree that the following issue is subject to motions for summary disposition:

Are the Applicants' requests for suspension of the antitrust license conditions barred by res judica-ta, or collateral estoppel, or laches, or the law of the case?

Res octfully submitted, YA

ibd[Adv Channing D.

Strother, Jr.

Attorneys for the Intervenor City of Cleveland, Ohio

-RG/COS/cp cc:

Commission Secretary - (by first class mail)

Service List - (by first class mail) l t

i l

I l

l I

i l

_