ML20085J076

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That WCNOC Proprietary Safety Evaluation Supporting Cycle 9 Reload TS Changes Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790
ML20085J076
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/24/1995
From: Liparulo N
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To: Russell W
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML19330G057 List:
References
CAW-95-825, NUDOCS 9506210410
Download: ML20085J076 (7)


Text

e Westinghouse Energy Systems Nuclear Technology Division Electric Corporation e n 355 Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15230-0355 May 24,1995 CAW-95-825 Document Control Desk (J.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

.- Attention: Mr. William T. Russell APPLICATION FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

Subject:

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC). " Safety Evaluation To Support Cycle 9 Reload Technical Specification Changes"

Dear Mr. William T. Russell:

The proprietary information for which withholding is being requested in the above-referenced letter is identified in Affidavit CAW-95-825 signed by the owner of the proprietary information, Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The affidavit, which accompanies this letter, sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses with specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations.

Accordingly, this letter authorizes the utilization of the accompanying Affidavit by Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC).

Correspondence with respect to the proprietary aspects of the application for withholding or the Westinghouse affidavit should reference this letter, CAW-95-825, and should be addressed to the undersigned.

Very tnily yours,

'l h

'f DLC/bbp N. J. Liparulo, Manager Nuclear Safety Regulatory & Licensing Activities j

Attachment cc:

Kevin Bohrer/NRC (12H5) 1 CAW 8MM3RAU3/ SAP 147 9506210410 950614 PDR ADOCK 05000482 i

P PDR i

g, &

,ny w

E CAW-95-825 e

AFFIDAVIT O

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA:

E ss q

COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY:

Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Henry A. Sepp, who, being by me duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on l

behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (" Westinghouse") and that the averments of fact set forth' in this Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief:

-l l

i

,f Henry A. Sepp, Manager Regulatory and Licensing Initiatives Sworn to and subscribed j

before me thisj4 r# day of,/ n 4 Y

,1995 n.1 P f

Notary Public

.a x-1 m M Sed John Paul Fisher. Notary Pubec y d sa M

7 I

Meneer.eseans==- =>d N 1654C-DLDi:051M3

.. CAW-95-825 (1)

I am Manager, Regulatory and Licensing Initiatives, in the Nuclear Technology Division, of

' the Westinghouse Electric Corporation and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rulemaking proceedings, and am autimrized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Energy Systems p

Business Unit.'

i (2)

I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the prcvisions of 10CFR Section 2.790 of the l

l Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit.

l (3)

I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by the Westinghouse Energy Systems Business Unit in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.

(4)

Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining l

1 whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.

(i)

The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.

(ii)

The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.

Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:

leS40-Dif-2:051693

\\'

. CAW-95-825

'(a)

The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a l

i competitive economic advantage over other companies.

(b)

It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.

(c)

Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.

(

(d)

It reveals cost or price inforniation, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.

(c)

It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.

(f)

It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.

There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:

(a)

The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.

(b)

It is information which is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information, awar uswn

y; y

s.

f'y

. 4.,

CAW-95-825 m

QM-w

'(c)J Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage 4

by reducing his expenditure of resources at our expense.

s - (d).

Each component'of proprietary information pertinent to a particular:

n[

competitive' advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive <

y advantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be the key 'to the entire puele, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage.

x (e)

Unrestricted' disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of -

p Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advantage to the competition of those countries.

(f)

The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a h.

competitive advantage.

(iii)'

The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the' provisions of 10CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the '

Commission.

- (iv)

The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available'.

information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method l to the best of our knowledge and belief.

-(v)

The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in the " Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC)

Safety Evaluation to Support Cycle 9 Reload Technical Specifications Changes", being.

transmitted by the Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC) letter and.

Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk, Attention Mr. William T. Russell. The proprietary information as submitted for use by Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation'for

' the Wolf Creek Generating Station is expected to be applicable in other licensee 1&MC@Lf4.0$ leos w

& r


e q-w m

m-

-~

k.,

_ ~

%m

.i p

y e

.
^

s

~' V

'.5 ~

l CAW-95-825 /

s i su'omittals in' response to certain NRC requirements for justification of transit analysis -

q s

4

- mohodology.

p t

This information is part of that which will enable Westinghouse to:

c!

j

'(a)

. Identify the regulatory and industry criteria applicable to' transient analysis -

- methods.

q H

(b)

. Establish applicable analytical techniques.

l

'l (c)

Perform non-LOCA safety analyses.

q Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows:

'i

-(a)

Westinghouse plans to sell the use of similar information to its customers for -

]

purposes of obtaining approval of transient analysis methods.

j (b)

Westinghouse can sell support and defense of safety analyses'and safety

.l evaluations.

I J

i Public disclosure of this proprietary information is likely to cause substantial harm to j

. the competitive position of Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of competitors to provide similar transient analysis methods and licensing defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the j

information.

. The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result.

of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse.

effort and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.

)

In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort, 1154C DLf-3:051695 e.-

., ~ -

o.:

c.

i r,;

4

l _' CAW-95-825 ;

7, i

having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended for developing -

l

-i analytical methods to perform transient analysis.

l-i Further the deponent sayeth not.

.9 4

L i

(!

i t

k

'i

)

..i i

-l 1

l i

I l

i i

j i

i b

r 163ODir4:05tM5