ML20085D829
| ML20085D829 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/1983 |
| From: | Blake E METROPOLITAN EDISON CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Buck J, Edles G, Kohl C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8307290130 | |
| Download: ML20085D829 (45) | |
Text
1 7
i 1
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSsONAL CORPORATIONS 1800 M STREET, N. W WASHINGTON. D. C. 20036 (ao2) saa-sooo RAMSAv D. POTTS. P C JoMN 4. McCutLOUGM. P C.
JErrERv L. TAsLON ANDREW D EtuS LTEUART L. PfTTMAN. P C J. PATRICK MICREY, P C
@f ORGE F. TROWRRIDGE. P C GEORGE P MICMAELv.JR P C JACK MCKAY RICMAND A. SAMP TMOMAS M. McCORM'CM THOMAS E, CROCMER. JR GTEPMEN D. POTTS. P C.
J. TMOMAS LENHART. P C.
TELECOPIER JOHN L CARR. JR.
WENDEUN A. WMtTE C11RALD CHARNOFF. P C.
STEVEN L I*ELTZER. P C.
PMayPg.MARygy STANLEY M, SARG PMitup D. eOSTwiCn. P C DE AN D. AUuCn. P C.
(202) ez2+oso & saa.iise RootRTM GORDON mRiSTs L uMoo R TipOTMy MANLON.18 C.
JOHN ENGFL P C
$7 0RGE M. ROGE RS. J R., P C.
CMARLES S TEMRIN. P C.
~
BARSARA J. MORGEN (gSuE M. SMITM SONNIE S GOTTUES y,RgameA S, RyTLgDGg K THERINE P CHEER J M S.
N LANDE R. P C.
NT PN 3 WNPC.
SCR MS S
JANiCE LEMRE* STEIN mRuCE W. CMuRCM LL P C.
JAuES s. HAMum. P C (202) e22-sOTa SCOTT A. ANENBERG LESU R A. NICHOLSON. JR., P C RANDAL5.MELL PC TRAVIS T. SROWN. JR.
^" ' E "'d E E MARTIN D. MMALL P C.
ROSERT E. ZAMLER. P C.
SMEu"' "cc MAMY RfCHARD M. KRONTMAL KICHARD J. KENDALL P C.
RosEPT S ROSSINS. P C.
STEf%eEN 3. MEIMANN M
J1Y E. SILSERG. P C.
STEVEN M. LUCAS. P C TELEX SANDRA E. BRUSCA*
BARGARA M. ROSSOTTI.
- C.
DAVf D M. RUBENSTEIN. P C.
EILE E bE O*
59-693(SMAWLAW WSM)
E NETH I
TMAN GE" RGE V. ALLEN. JR, P C.
MsCMAND E. GALEN PAMELA M. ANDERSON DE CM L KLEI ALEXANDER C TOMASZCZum M
N/LTMallelEL P SREED. JR., P C VICTORIA J. PERMINS STEVEN P Pf7LER.N 6 KENL WESS E R P C.
MAT SF R vESO PMIUP D. PORTE MICHAEL A. SWIGER MARK AUGENeuCM. P C.
JOMN N O NEILL JR.
RPCMARD J. PARRa.NO ERNTIT L BLARE. JR., P C.
JAY A. EPSTIEN ELLEN A. FREDEL ELLEN SMERIFF U
CA71RTON S. JONES. P C RAND L ALLEN JOMN F' DEALT *
- MOMAS A. mAxTE R. P C.
TIMOTHY S Mc5 RIDE SANORA E. FOLSOM EILEEN M.GLEIMER J1 MIS M BURGER.PC.
EuSABETH M. PENDLETON COUNSEL JUDITH A SANDLER DAVID R SAMR (MELDON J. WEISEL P C.
MA RRY M. GLASSplEGEL EDWARD D. YOUNG. Ill C.. SOWOOIN TRA4N
.,~
m.
. a WReTER S DeRECT OLAL NUMSER l
July 26, 1983 822-1084 m~
Administrative Judges G
Gary J. Edles, Chairman
'4 i
John H. Buck M
d Christine N.
Kohl DC g
g 28 1983 w '
Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory air Commission q,
%na mec
%f' Washington, D.C.
20555 vg< /
In the Matter of METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1)
Docket No. 50-289 SP (Restart)
Dear Chairman Edles and Judges Buck and Kohl:
On May 16, 1983, Licensee provided to the Appeal Board and interested parties, copies of two studies completed for Licensee by outside consulting firms.
Enclosed is a related document entitled " Responses to Recommendations of Basic
~
Energy Technology Associates, Inc. Set Forth in Their Report Dated February 28, 1983," dated July 15, 1983.
Sincerely, 8307290130 830726 PDR ADOCK 05000289
&M hdf, G
PDR Ernest L.
Blake, Jr.
Counsel for Licensee cc:
(w/ enclosure)
'\\p
d P
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board In the Matter of
)
)
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-289 SP
)
I 8 8 ~"#
I (Three Mile Island Nuclear
)
Station, Unit No. 1)
)
SERVICE. LIST I
Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Gary J.
Edles, Chairman Ivan W.
Smith, Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Appeal Board U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Walter H. Jordan John H. Buck Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Atomic Safety & Licensing 881 West Outer Drive
, Appeal Board Oak Ridge, TN 37830 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Administrative Judge Washington, D.C.
20555 Linda W. Little Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Administrative Judge 5000 Hermitage Drive Christine N. Kohl Raleigh, NC 27612 Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board Atomic Safety & Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Board Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20555 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Jack R. Goldberg, Esquire (4)
Office of the Executive Atomic Safety & Licensing Legal Director Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear. Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Docketing & Service Section (3)
Douglas R. Blazey, Esquire Office of the Secretary Chief Counsel U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Department of Environmental Commission Resources Washington, D.C.
20555 514 Executive House P. O. Box 2357 Harrisburg, PA 17120
a r John A. Levin, Esquire Ms. Gail Phelps ANGRY /TMI PIRC Assistant Counsel 1037 Maclay Street Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Harrisburg, PA 17103 Post Office Box 3265 Jordan D. Cunningham, Esquire Harrisburg, PA 17120 Fox, Farr & Cunningham Mr. Henry D. Hukill 2320 North Second Street-Vice President Harrisburg, PA 17110 GPU Nuclear Corporation Post Office Box 480
- Ellyn R. Weiss, Esquire (1)
Middletown, PA 17057 William S. Jordan, III, Esquire (1)
Harmon & Weiss Michael F. McBride, Esquire 1725 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 506 LeBouef, Lamb, Leiby"& MacRae Washington, D.C.
20006 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Suite 1100 Mr. Steven C. Sholly Washington, D.C.
20036 Union of Concerned Scientists 1346 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Ms. Louise Bradford Dupont Circle Bldg., Suite 1101 TMI ALERT Washington, D.C.
20036 1011 Green Street Harrisburg, PA 17102 Chauncey Kepford Judith H. Johnsrud Mr. Norman Aamodt Environmental Coalition on R. D.
5 Nuclear Power Coatesville, PA 19320 433 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16801 John Clewett, Esquire The Christic Institute David E. Cole, Esquire 1324 North Capitol Street Smith & Smith, P.C.
Washington, D.C.
20002 2931 Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Michael W. Maupin, Esquire Hunton & Williams Administrative Judge 707 East Main Street Gary L. Milhollin Post Office Box 1535 Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Richmond, VA 23212 4412 Greenwich Parkway, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20007 l
{
t
\\
,a c g.
1 I
l RESPONSES TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF l
BASIC ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIA ES, INC.
)
SET FORTH IN TFER REPORT DA ED TEBRUARY 28,1983 i
GPU NUCLEAR CORPORATION JULY 15,1983 1
e s
u 43 7
i s m e h
=7 l.
$S $
5 v
~7.._ 6
I 3
a Pre fa ce The review of current and projected expenditures and manpower utilisation for CPU Nuclear Corporation conducted by Basic Energy Technology Associates. Inc. (BETA) use issued in a report dated Feb. 28, 1983.
The focus of the review was on resources dowoted to Three Mile Island Unit 1 and Oyster Creek. A total of eighty-five (85) findinas resulted in one hundred fif ty six (156) separate recommendations.
This report represents the CPUNC Response. The 156 recosasendations (pe raphrased) have been assigned to one of five (5) broad categories:
1.
Organization - understanding and working within the functional CPUN structure.
11.
Manning - appropriate sta ffing levels.
111. Opera t i ng /Ma na gemen t E f fic i ency /Produc t i vi t y IV.
Personnel-Rela ted Ma tters personnel practices.
V.
Tra ining Within each of the above categories, responses have been placed into one of five classifications (STATUS CODE):
A.
Agree - Complete: agree with recosasendation action is complete.
B.
Agree - Action Underusy/Cos t: agree with recommendation, action is underway and/or action is a 1983 goal.
C.
Agree - Action to be Scheduled: agree with recosasendation, action to be taken in the future.
D.
Under - Evaluation: either recosasendation or appropriate action is under evaluation.
E.
Di sa gree disagree with recommendation.
This report is sorted by lead division and divided into two parts:
1 Pa rt 1.
Open items - Classifications B. C & D.
Part 11.
Complete Items - Classifications A & E.
Appendix A provides a listing of those CPUNC 1983 Corporate and/or Division Coals and Objectives referenced in recommendation responses contained in Parts 1 and 11 of this report.
The CPUNC Response Report (sorted by lead division) will be updated periodically.
I q
O
~
a 4
o t
i TA81E. OF CONTENTS PART I LEAD DIVISION PART 11 Pe se Pa se Office of the President 1-1 to 1-3 11-1 Oyster Creek 1-3 to 1-5 11-1 to 11-2 TM1-1 1-5 to 1-6 11-2 Technical Functione 1-6 to 1-8 11-2 to 11-5 Nuclear Assurance 1-9 to 1-11 11-5 to 11-6 Adninis t ra tion 1-11 to 1-15 11-6 to 11-8 Comnica tions 1-15 to 1-16 Radiological and Environnental Controls 1-16 to 1-17 11-8 to 11-9 Maintenance & Construction 1-18 11-9 Hunan Resources 1-19 to 1-20 11-10 o
O O
i I
BETA REPORT i
CATEGORIZATION 156 RECOMMENDATIONS l
I WAHHlHG 18.9E 17.0E O
GMT EFTICIDCf "
3.5%
TRANNHG 13.5M PEF.SONNEL-RELATED 12.25
GPUNC RESPONSE TO BETA REPORT i
RECOMMENDATION CLASSIFICATION h0. OF REconeeDsDATIONS 90 l
i So-70 -
I:i!!!!!i$!
- .i!
- i:!!:
!!!!!!!!!!b so-I So-
~
m-i I
30
)
j zo-
\\
l C3 PDtSOMP4EL 3o.
. f Es3 EFFICID4Cr 1
M htAHMNC 0'
- o#
s #*o#c#
e5
- c a
11
.Uf CNCG NNDN IN OI I
n M
SC Ha At F RD An TPNMo MQCMe 5
n 5
e S
w N
O 3
/,
g I
R T y
A OD S
F N YE TM E
ILM
]
BO I
I S C E
[
N R O
,9 PA S T E E R B
- !; j i s i g :. $!
... G i;.
i
- i ii ji$:: i:
eI;
.s:: !
- i!
- h: ;.:..;
N N
}
!!j!
1:::!Mls:
q }$
- 'f E
O P ISO MO DT AS 3 ' i //A DE r/gf/
k FN O
P S
m 1
I S D a
T E
I 0
R D P
O FO O
D M
s e
w m
,d 2
m o
l
- l!!
I
- i.
l)!i!
- i 1;;
4 m
A 2
2*
- 5
- a u J.S
.r "i
5 i
~ ~
5
- .' d ad s
.eo O
e e
4 e
)
__________.m-
e e
t t
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION kESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATb3 CAT.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPCNSE Q)DE CO M NTS I.
0/P III-A & (a) 21 &
Rec:
Of fice of the President foster understt ding R
IV-A-1 (a) 34 of how functional organization should operste.
Resp:
Continuing e f fort reflected in Corporate Objective 5.
In 1983 Corporate Coal 9 & Management Training Program respond directly.
1.
0/P III-A (b) 21 &
Rec:
Continue emphasis on support role of non plant divisions.
B IV-A-1 (b) 34 Resp Continuing effort reflected in Corporate Objective 5.
Added specific wording to Plant Division Functions Strengthened Plant Division role in Budget Process I.
0/P III-A (e) 22 &
Rec:
Encourage freer discussion among divisions.
B IV-A-1( e) 35 Resp:
1983 Corporate Goal 9 directly addresses issue.
1.
O/P.
III-C(c) 24 Rec:
Delay assignment of corrective maintenance C
function to M&C until after Unit I restart.
Resp Reevaluate in September 1983.
II.
O/P III-E 26 Rec:
Review number of site engineering groups and their D
direction with objective of reducing their number (all applicable divisions).
Resp:
Combination of Functional Organization and use of gen-eric titles (Engr. I, etc.) tends to give appearnace of large number of groups. Essentia!!y all positions identified require engineering background. Will review j
as part of manning review.
i j
II.
0/P IV-1 49 Rect Reduce on-site clerical and administrative positions.
D
( All divisions.) Office of the President set arbitrary number.
Resp Is being addressed in overall manning: Operations Analysis will study IQ'84.
I-1 O
s e
1 07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY IZAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATUS M. DIVISION RECOM".END.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COMMENTS 11.
0/P X11-E 115 Rec:
Each director review manpower staffing to reduce B
unnecessary small staff build ups.
Resp:
Staffing of all Divisions will be reviewed as part of '84 budget preparation. Est. Completion 3Q'83.
111.
0/P III-A (f) 22 &
Ree:
Encourage upward not downward corporate policy B
IV-A-1( f) 35 complaints.
Resp:
Continuing effort reflected in Corporate Objective 5.
1983 Corporate Goal 9 and management program respond directly.
111.
OP/ Gen.
X11-A (d) 109 Rect Spot, unannounced visits by all division directors 8
to work areas to evaluate effectiveness.
Resp; All Division Directors will visit each of their locations where they have personnel at least once per month starting 7/1/83. It will not be effi-cient to have very many unannounced visits to other locations from the Division Director's nor-mal location be unannounced. This will include inspecting or observing actual work areas.
III.
OP/ Gen.
XII-C 113 Rec:
All levels of management should review decision B
making in their groups to assure decisions are being made at the proper level commensurate with the need. De not unnecessarily force decisions upward.
Resp:
This issue will be covered in the meetings being held to meet Corporate coal 5.
1-2 e
d 1
0
s e
07/13/8)
BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS g.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COpetENTS IV.
OP/ Gen.
XII-A (f) 109 Re.c3 As forces stabilize, supervisors should spend more B
time in people matters.
Resp:
This issue will be addressed in the Corporate 1954 Coals.
IV.
OP/ Gen.
XII-A (g) 109 Rec:
Remove ill-suited supervisors or solve negative B
attitudes.
Resp:
Being addressed. Some changes already made. The-new performance evaluation system should improve effectiveness in identifying personnel ill suited for their present assignments. We will continue to focus on identifying and iesolving such problems.
IV.
OP/Cen.
XII-A (h) 109 Rec:
Senior management should be sensitive to evidence 5
of poor supervision wherever observed (system or contractor personnel).
Resp:
See response to NII-D(b).
IV.
OP/Cen.
XII-D (b) 114 Rec:
Each Division Director assure proper action is B
taken to correct performance where called for, or if unsatisfactory performance persists - discharge.
Resp:
This issue will be specifically addressed in both O/P and Division Director staf f meetings.
1.
O. C.
IV-A-1( d) 35 Rec:
Encourage support for and working within new B
organisation.
Resp:
0.C. Div. Staff meetings include Support Divisions and this issue is addressed directly and indirectly.
O.C. outage is being used to help emphasize proper roles.
1-3 O
e s
e 4
07/13/83 BETA REPOWT - CPUNC RESPONSES SY IIAD DIVIS10N RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATU3
- g. DIVISION RECO M ND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMNDATION & SIRetARY RESPONSE CODE C000ENTS 11.
O. C./
IV-F-1 44 Rect Provide lead site representative for each Division D
TM1-1 for nontechnical items.
Resp:
Will continue to evaluate but improved understanding of roles and Divisional intern.i guidance has largely achieved result.
II.
O. C.
IV-D-4 (c) 41 Rec :
Consider reducing Preventive Maintenance Manager's D
staff when program stabilizes.
Resp:
Will address in '85 budget based on first half
'84 experience.
111.
O. C.
IV-D-4 (a) 41 Rec:
Expedite loading preventive maintenance system 8
schedule in CMS.
Resp:
Oyster Creek Material Department Goal for '83 (O.C. 32)
III.
O. C.
IV-F-2 (a) 45 Rec:
Develop operating procedures to reduce dependence on 8
Core Management Group (Nuclear and Core Management).
Resp:
Implementation of power shape monitoring system will reduce dependence on Core Engineering.
O.C. Plant Engineering Department Objective 46.
III. O.C./M&C/
IV-C (c) 47 Rec:
Use radiological awareness committee similar to 8
RE&C that at THI-1 to help in accomplishing recommen-g dations IV-C-a and b.
Resp:
An O.C. Radiological Awareness Comaittee will be established and functioning by 7/30/83.
3 n
1-4 O
e I
l 1
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES SY 1.EAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS Cg. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
RE F.
PARAPHRASED RECODGENDATION & St99tARY RES80NSE CODE C000ENTS III.
O. C.
I'.'-H 48 Rec:
Review Tech. Specs to determine if present wording B
requires FORC to review documents beyond a scope considered appropriate. No rewrites by PORC of poorly written procedures.
Respa Tech Spec Change Request has been submitted which will meet this recommendation. Equivalent issue under new review procedure will be addressed during implementation of new administrative procedures.
g III.
O. C.
IV-J-3 51 Rec:
Backlog in A/P should be promptly eliminated.
8 Resp:
Substantial progress made. E,xpect to reach nonsal level in 1983.
1.
TMI-8 III-A (d) 22 Rec:
Encourage support and working within new organization.
8 s
Resp:
Will be met by TML-1 Coal 2 for 1983: TML Div. Staff meetings include Support Divisions and this issue is addressed directly and indirectly.
I.
TMI-1 III-C(b) 24 Rec:
Assign system responsibility in Plant Er.gineering 8
for maintenance tasks.
Resp:
To be completed by 3Q '83.
I II.
TM1-1 111-8 23 Rec:
Better define role of five engineering positions D
reporting to Plant Operations.
Resp:
To be developed by 8/15/83.
1-5 O
07/13/23 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BT 12AD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS CE. DIVISION RECOpetEND.
RE F.
PARAPHRASED RECOletENDATION & SLBetARY RESPONSE CODE CO M NTS II. Del-1 111-1 31 Rec:
took to reduce on-site clerical / admin. support D
Resp Operations Analysis to complate 3Q'83.
III. THI-1 III-F (a) 28 Rec:
Increase efforts of manager and supervisors to achieve 8
excellent radiological performance by their workers on every job.
Resp:
DfE-1 Coals 5 and 8.
Pe. formance ca OTSC shows significant progress.
!!I. N1-1 III-C-3 30 Ree:
Plant Engineering prepare generic specs. for com-C sonly used materials and consumable stock items.
Resp: All Purchase Orders being reviewed. Will under-take general program after Restart.
IV.
21-1/
XII-A (1) 110 Rec:
Color-code hard hats at the site to distinguish D
Cen./O.C.
workers, foremen, of ficers, contractors.
Resp Color coding of hard hats has been revised at Oyster Creek. TM1-1 and O.C. Division Directors will review this itre and coordinate on desirable further revisions.
i 11.
T. F.
VI-C 69 Rec:
Effect reductions in the number of people assigned D
to L&RA.
Resp: Will be addressed in '84 & '85 budgets.
111.
T. F./
III-D 25 Rec:
Upgrade of chemistry program, key manager, standard-B TML-1 ise analytical procedures.
Resp:
TML-1 Coal & Objective 3.
i 1-6 e
O
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS CAT.
D_IVISION RECOMMEND.
RF F.
PARAPHRASED REColeENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COpetENTS 111.
T. F./
IV-E 43 Rect Continue upgrade of chem. program - designate key B
- 0. C.
manager, standardize analytical procedures.
Resp:
Progress is being made consistent with recommen-dation. Chemistry function has been transferred from Engineering to Operations and the Chemistry Manager is providing the required 1cadership.
Completion of Oyster Creek 1983 Objective 10 and related Operations Department objectives 21 to 25 will complete response.
111.
T. F.
VI-B-1 67 Rec:
Respond to requests for changes to Engineering 8
Procedures and Standards promptly.
Resp:
Initial issue of interface procedures complete.
a Timeliness improving.
111.
T. F.
VI-B-2 67 Rec:
Redirect the efforts of the Cost Analysis section 8
i away from cost reporting and toward cost estimating and analysis (the section's purpose).
Resp:
Unde rway. Assignment of Fiscal & Info. Management person to T.F. to provide cost reporting.
111.
T. F.
VI-a-3 68 Rec:
Revise drawings in D&D when Design Correction Notices 8
are received so that drawings are current as regards modifications so no DCN will be more than 6 months old.
Resp:
Engrg. Procedure EP-025 issued. Backlog being reduced.
III.
T. F.
VI-D 70 Rec:
Investigate means for having plant information and B
problems flow into the Engineering and Design organi-i sacion on a routine basis, not just when TF support is required.
3 Resp:
Improved flow evident. Will continue to monitor.
J 1-7
.l i
I
a e
I 07/1318h SETA REPORT - CPIINC RgSPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY SETA BETA I
FINDING FACE STATUS
- g. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECC40ENDAT10N &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE C000ENTS 111.
T. F.
VI-A (b) 66 Rect Review methods to improve the amnsgement of the D
large engineering group within TF.
Desp A number of possibilities identified. Fire plaa 4Q'83. Techaica1 Functions CoeIe 1 aad 2.
111.
T. F.
VI-A (c) 66 Rect Evaluate and procure outside assistance to D
train TF Management in supervising a large engineering group.
Resp A number of possibilities identified. Fire plan 4Q'83. Technical Functions Cos ts I and 2.
i 111.
T. F.
VI-E-4 74 Rect Do not develop an in-house licensed nuclear design D
capability unless CPUNC is willing to restrict fuel selections to proven technology and not attempt to 4
l incorporate advantages la performance until they have been thoroughly tested at other plants.
Resp:
Review and recommaendation by 4Q, '83.
V.
T.F./
VI-E-1 (d) 71 Rec:
Review responsibilities of the STA'I during normal 5
O.C./
and abnorzel situations with the STA's and with shif t TM1-1 supervisors.
4
]
Resp:
Responsibilities are defined. Procedure ES-OOS.
Division Directors will review with shift supervisore and STA during 3Q'83.
i V.
T. F.
VI-E-3 72 Rect Provide technical guidance to training programs, 5
especially operator training.
Resp:
1983 Coal 14 applies.
T. F. Procedure EP-015 j
developed and now being implemented.
1 l
l a
1-8 a
4 i
O i
Y
e l
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPCNSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS CAT. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
sEF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
PFSPtsNSE CODE C0001ENTS II.
N. A.
V-C-1 61 Rec:
Reduce the nunber of engineers assigned to QA D
Engineering as Technical Functions. Plant Engi-neering, and M&C mature.
l Resp:
Will be addressed in '84 or '85 Budget process.
II.
N. A.
V-C-2( c )
61 Rect Reduce number of QA monitors through attrition as D
work force stabilizes and natures.
Resp:
Will be addressed in '84 or '85 Budget process.
i 11.
N. A.
V-C-3 62 Rec:
Reduce size of Manufacturing Assurance section as D
manufacturing effort associated with large modifi-cations decreases.
Resp:
Will be addressed in '84 or '85 Budget process.
V.
N. A.
V-B-1 55 Rec:
Review Management Development courses and elimiste B
those which Jo not materially contribute to safe and ef ficient operation of the plants.
Resp: Ongoing action relating to T&E '83 Goal 5.
Courses offered are continually reviewed for applicability and relevance. An extensive review and revision of Management Development Program has been completed.
V.
N. A.
V-B-2 56 Rec:
Coordinate and oversee ef forts of the two site B
training groups.
1983 T&E C' al 1 addresses problem. New Director of Resp:
o T&E and Manager of Corporate Training will review and implement.
a 1-9 O
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITT BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS E. DIVISION RECONNEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOD9dENDATION & SUNNARY RESPONSE CDDE CODt4ENTS V.
N. A.
V-B-3 56 Ree:
Develop realistic training schedules on an annual basis.
B Resp:
Development in progress. T&E working with other Divi-sions to resolve scheduling problems on a case-by-case ba sis. This will be a specific part of the 1984 work plan which will be used in developing the 1984 budget.
V.
N. A.
V-B-4 (b) 58 Rec:
Concentrate on providing best training program, not 8
proving it.
Resp:
Development in progress. 1983 TEF Costs 3 to 6.
Efforts underuny to achieve ongoing comesunications with user groups.
V.
N. A./
V-B-4 (c) 58 Rect Make students more responsible for their own performance B
All Div.
in training.
Resp This is a cooperative ef fort of Training and the line organizations being trained. As training programs in-prove, it will be possible and proper to more clearly hold students responsible. Will include in 1984 Cos!s.
V.
N. A.
V-B-b (b) 60 Rect Headquarters Training mandate the coordination of 8
training programs et TM1 and Oyster Creek.
Resp:
Nuclear Assursace T&E Coal 1.
Complete 4Q '83.
V.
N. A./
Ill-A (b) 108 Rec:
Evaluate effectiveness of current supervisor B
OP/ Gen.
trsining course.
Resp:
A special task group headed by R. Coe with
- 0. Shalikashvili and J. Williams has reviewed this program, including feedback from past students. Recoussendations for changes, as well as the addition of suplemental skill modules, will be reviewed with experienced supervisors in the various user groups. Appropriate skill modules will begin 4Q '83 and the one-week supervisors course will be revised 1Q '84.
I-10 O
e e
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY IIAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITT BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS g. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
_ CODE CO M NTS V.
N. A./
XII-A (c) 108 Rec:
Managers should develop their supervisors by B
Gen.
obcerving them and instructing them.
Resp:
This issue will be addressed in conjuction with the response to Recommendation X11-A-f.
V.
N. A.
XII-A (a) 108 Rect Property train supervisory personnel.
8 Cen./0P Resp:
Responses to other recommendations address this problem directly. Their completion will close this' item also.
1.
Admin.
V!1-A(a) 80 Rect Continue to redirect efforts to provide an effective 8
service to other divisions.
1 Resp:
Admin. Division Coal 3 for 1983.
II.
Admin.
V11-E-4 87 Rec:
Upgrade THI-2 Processing Center including installation C
of metal monitors and explosive monitors. Offset is reduction in guards at THI-2.
Resp:
Item will again be reviewed during preparation of 1984 Budget. It is likely that it will still be a low prior-
{
ity on an economic basis; however management review will include other considerations in making a decision.
- 11. Admin.
VII-E-l 84 Rect TM1-1 access control clerk handle THI-2 workload re-D ducing staff by 1 control clerk. Additional savings would be achieved by TM1-l's clerk typist supporting E11-2.
Resp Ops. Analysis Study aidresses Est. Corpletion 3Q'83.
l 11.
Admin.
V11-E-6 88 Rec:
Determine times when security requirements peak and D
examine alternative shif ts to reduce overall manpower and overtime.
Resp:
Review and make recommendations by 4Q '83.
1-11 a
o e
a
o 1
07/13/s3 SETA REPORT
- CPUNC MESPONSES BY I.EAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS CAT.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED REcol0ENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE C0000ENTS II.
Admin.
VII-E-10 90 Rec:
Manpower assessments in security should include D
overtime usage. Recommended levels includinE over-time is Dyster Creek--62 and TMI-1--48.5.
Resp:
Evaluation and recommendations are part of '84 budget review.
III. Admin./
III-C-1 29 Rec:
Program to taprove nomenclature of inventory records.
8 THI-1/
Resp Physical inventory complete. Warehouse discrepancy M&C reports being used. Systematic program and schedule to be set 4Q'83.
Purge TMI stock of unnecessar'y material.
III. Admin.
III-C-2 30 Rec:
8 Resp:
Program underway. Admin Division Goal for 1984.
III. Admin./
IV-J-2 (b) 51 Rect Carefully plan disposal of on-hand direct turnover 8
O. C.
material not required for plant support.
Resp:
Oyster Creek is rewtewing carefully all material initially purchased for direct turnover but not subsequently required for task for which purchased to dif ferentiate between that to be placed in stock from that to be surplused.
=
III. Admin./
VI-F-3 76 Rec:
Devise reports that will permit having a running 8
O/P knowledge of cost and performance.
Resp:
Improved reports in place. Efforts will continue into 1984.
III. Admin.
VII-D (c) 82 Rec:
Monthly reports f rom major contractors identi-8 fying work progress by task and actual costs.
Quarterly reports from major contractors forecasting work progress and experditures.
Resp:
Procedures for accruing costs and earned value reporting being developed and implemented.
Estimated completion IQ,'84.
1-12 Q
S
- ~
07/13/03 BETA REPORT - GPUNC RESPONSES BY 1AAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA RETA FINDING PAGE STA1VS M. DIVISION REcosetEND.
REF.
PARAPNRASED RECOBSENDATION & SLSetARY RESPONSE CODE CopeENTS 111. Admin.
V11-E 83 Rect There needs to be an overall ivrovement in the B
Security Division in order to improve its efficiency.
(See V11-E-1 through V11-E-10).
Resp See V11-E-1 through E-10.
Nanning review for 1984 1
also applies.
III. Admin.
.VII-E-3(a) 86 Rect Provide adequate engineering and construction B
support for security operations.
Resps Responsibility clarified among Plant Divisions and Technical Functions support tras improved.
111. Admin.
V11-E-3(b) 86 Rec Develop procedures to require periodic review of 5
8 security systems where minor degradations are compensate for by stationing guards to meet NRC commoitsents Resp:
Procedure to be in ef fect 3Q. '83.
i j
III. Admin.
V11-E-8 89 Rec:
Have an engineering evaluation made on Vikonics' B
equipment, including proposed corrective action and input free other utilities using equipment.
Provide plan of action, including engineering and 4
legal alternatives.
4 Resp:
Technical solution identified. Will review ef fec-tiveness IQ, '84.
111. Admin.
XII-A (j) 109 Rect Trending of data to ascertain probles areas.
5 Gen./Or Resp:
The implementation of the Activity Indicator Display program will complete the aspects of this recommsendation with which we agree.
I 1-13 l
1 i
I 4
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATUS g. DIVISION RECOteqEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOIGIENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COD 90ENTS 111. Admin.
XII-B (a) 111 Rec:
Each division director should help ensure distri-5 Gen./0P bution is necessary.
Resp:
A specific ef fort has been initiated at the af ficer level to identify and use " case studies." Examples of inappropriate distribution of documents. Corpo-rate Coal 8 also addresses this issue. Operations Analysis study of paperwork at TM1 underway.
111. Admin.
X11-8 (b) 111 Rec:
Tighten signature authority; monitor for compliance.
5 Gen./0F Resp This issue is being (or has been) reviewed in each division to see whether more formal guidance is neeJed.
(Recommendations must be read in conjunction with relateJ comment in BETA report to be understood.)
III. Admin.
X11-8 (c) til Rec:
Correspondence control, action item tracking.
B Gen./0P Resp Correspondence action ites tracking system is being developed for implementation by 4Q '83.
We do not intend to develop a system which captures ALL correspondence.
III. Admin.
X11-5 (e)
!!2 Rec:
Limit required concurrences on documents / procedures.
5 Gen./0P Resp: O/P action on this issue will be continued.
III. Admin.
V11-E-5 87 Recs Upgrade perimeter alarm system to produce a C
system with a minimum number of false alarms.
Resp Will address capital project in setting 1984 Budgets for TH1 & 0.C. Interin upgrade at 0.C.
underway.
i 1-14 O
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSgS SY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS CAT. DIVISION REC 000 TEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RE0000ENDAT10N & SUtetARY RESPONSE (X)DE COMMENTS IV.
Admin./
Ill-A (i) 109 Rec:
Review provisions in contracts with major contractors a
Cen.(MM) to see what means esist for CPUNC to monitor, report.
and take action in cases of poor or insufficient supervision.
Resp:
" General Conditions" are included as part of all contracts for furnishing labor and/or supervision.
Article X-1X " Contractor Personnel" states in part that at any time during the course of the work, the owner has the right to terminate contractor personnel for cause and ask for replacements at expense of con-t rac tor. Will include discussion of this and its use in 0/P and Division staf f meetings.
V.
Admin.
V11-D (a) 82 Rec:
Continue training requistioners of materials and B
services and develop a means to measure success of training.
Resp:
Course developed. Being given Division by Division. Estimated completion 4Q'83.
11.
Cossoun.
XI(a) 105 Rec:
Review anticipated workload to determine if properly D
usened.
Resp:
During the 1984 budget preparation sequence, the staf fing and work load of Communications, especially the tour personnel, will be reviewed. Estimate completion 3Q'83.
11.
Commua.
11(b) 105 Rec:
Find useful tasks in other divisions for people when D
not needed for primary jobs.
Resp:
Some cross training complete. Will review again as pa rt of '84 budget review. See Rec XI(a). Estimated' completion 3Q '83.
1-15 o
O
s 07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES SY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATUS
- g. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION & SIDMARY RESPONSE CODE COMMENTS 111. Commun.
XI (c) 105 Rect Provide more effective supervision.
5 Resp Vice President. Consunications has been spending more time in the T&E Building where the potential problem of ef fective supervision is greater.
Ef forts are continuing to identify work which can be assigned to those personnel to work load them ef fectively during otherwise low work periods.
1.
R&EC IV-C (b) 46 Rec:
Improve Rad Con management and work force management B
O.C./M&C working relationships.
Resp:
Preparation for and initial work during outage have resulted in substantial improve ments in working rela-tionships. Will continue to address throughout 1983.
1.
R&EC/
11-A 100 Rec:
Develop eastl Radiological Engineering group in C
OP/T.F.
?a rsippa ny.
Resp Will review item with Technical Functions & R&EC and develop actica plan including organizational location of capability by 8/15/83. Meanwhile R&EC and Technical Functions capability at Headquarters is being strengthened.
11.
R&EC V11-F 93 Rec:
Employ a phyeiclan at 'Dil and aeaign medica 1 radio-B togical health responsibilities for TMI-1. TML-2, and Oyster Creek.
Resp:
Bos'rd of Directors has agreed. Recruiting underway.
11.
R&EC 111-F (e) 28 &
Rect Look to decrease number of rad. techs. a s work C
IV-G ;
47 force practices good rad. vork perforissace.
Resp:
Will be addressed in setting '84 & '85 authorized levels of manpower.
4 1-16 O
s 07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY RETA BETA FINDINC PACE STATUS 4
CAT.
DIVISION RECOPDIEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOpgE,NDATION & StRetARY RESPONSE CODE cot 0 GENTS 1
111. REEC 111-F (c) 28 Rec:
Upgrade red. technician performance by improv-B ing ability to identify and report deficiencies.
Resp:
TM1 Radiological Technicians are receiving rou-tine cyclic training including specific ef forts to improve "their ability to identify and report i
radiological deficiencies."
111. R&EC/
IV-C (a) 46 Rec:
Increase management ef forts to obtain esce11ent radio-B O.C./H&C logical performance by their workers routinely on jobs.
Resp: This is an ongoing effort which is supported by Oyster Creek, M&C and R&EC senior people. The Radiological Assessment program, plant tours by management and Radio-logical Deficiency Programs will be used to monitcr progress on this effort.
i 111. R&EC IV-C (d) 47 Rec :
Upgrade performance of rad. con. techs. by improving B
rad. deficiency identification and reporting.
Resp:
Oyster Creek Radiological Technicians are receiving routine cyclic training to include specific ef forts to improve "their ability to identify and report radiological deficiencies."
i j
111. R&EC/T.F.
IV-C (e) 47 Rect Accelerate correction of rad. deficiencies and B
O.C/M&C/
increase attention to problem solving.
j Resp:
The response to Recommendations IV-C a, e and d j
will help on this issue as well. Also, efforts are underusy to get assistance from Technical Functions on recurring problems that require engineered solutions.
].
111. R&EC 11-B 100 Rect Begin reducing unnecessary environmental monitoring.
B Resp:
Tech. Spec. change for TML submitted and approved Plan for Forked River developed.
1-17 1
=
i 4
i
+
07/13/93 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS M.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHSASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COMMENTS 1.
M&C IV-D-1(a) 39 Rect Senior M&C personnel increase involvement in B
organizational and divisional interface problems.
Resp Being addressed by M&C Div. participation in O.C.
outage meetings and M&C Div. meetings with M&C management at 0.C. down through area supervisors.
III. MLC/
IV-C 37 Rec:
Management to emphasize worker tidiness in job B
O.C.
performance.
Resp:
Oyster Creek Objective 4.
III. M&C/
IV-D-1 (c) 4D Rec:
Ensure familiarity and practice of new maintenance B
O.C.
procedures.
Resp:
Oyster Creek Objective 5.
Experience to date satis f ac to ry.
IV.
M&C/
IV-D-3 41 Rec:
Keep M&C contractor employees on job until end of 8
0.C.
working hours.
Resp:
Contractor employees administered in accordance with existing Building Trades Agreements. Frisking and computer controlled exits delay release.
Issue will continue to be pursued by M&C to maxi-mise ef ficiency.
IV.
M&C IV-D-5(a&b) 42 Rec:
Consider negotiating agreements with better utili-D sation of Mobile Maintenance. Consider making Mobile Maintenance employees who perform most of their work at Oyster Creek part of M&C Division.
Resp:
Will be considered for 1983 negotiations in conjunction with JCP&L.
I-18
~
O
07/13/83 EETA REPORT - GPUNC RESPONSES sY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS M. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COMMENTS III.
H. R.
Xil-A (k) 109 Rec:
Corrective action for cases of personal appearance.
B Cen./0P deseanor, etc. - considered outside the norm.
Resp:
Day-to-day actions are addressing. Policies will be issued and stressed by management on expected behavior and demeanor.
IV.
H. R.
Vill-2 96 Rec:
Evaluate top managerial positions and determine if B
work matches grade level.
Resp; CPU System recorrelation underway. Some changes at Vice Presidents. Director and managerial levels made.
IV.
H. R./
XII-A (e) 109 Rec:
Improve senior management use if GPUNC performance 8
General evaluation system relating to supervisory parformance.
Resp Improvements made in 1982 and identified for 1983 provide more ef fective system. Will emphasize in guidance for 1983 review.
IV.
H. R./
XII-D (a) 114 Rec:
Review for practical usefulness. GPUNC procedure B
General addressing poor performers.
Resps Progressive discipline procedure developed. TM1 supervision have been trained. Oyster Creek and 1
Headquarters underway. JCF&L has instructed essentially all managers and supv. at 0.C. re:
bargsining unit.
IV.
H. R./
IV-D-2 (b) 40 Rec:
Eliminate p.m. break or allow management to C
- 0. C.
determine timing.
Resp Management has ability to set whether break is allowed and if so, the timing. Management rights identified to all managers and supervisors by JCP&L in training programs. Will review ef fec-tiveness 4Q'83.
I I-19
e e
l 07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES SY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS CAT.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REP.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COMMENTS IV.
H. R.
v!!I-3 97 Ree:
Conduct review of bargaining agreements to deter-C mine impact on work ef ficiency.
Resp Will be done for oyster Creek 4Q'83 TMI 1Q'84.
Major emphasis has been on enforcing management rights in current agreement.
i 4
4 1
1-20 s
e k
e
L 4
E S"
>wO tal 4
rn 2
me O.
f g
M O
fl.
5 C
- M
- 3u e
8 a
O 1
9
e i
1 07/13/83 i
BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY 1
BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS yC DIVISION RECOMMEND.
RE F.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COpetENTS 1.
O/P III-A (c) 21 Rec:
Emphasize elimination of jurisdictional disputes.
A IV-A-1 (c) 34 Resp:
Covered in Corporate & Divisional Staff Meetings &
during Inter-divisional work progress / status meetings.
Substantial improvement achieved.
3 I.
0/P VII-C 82 Rec:
Efforts of Operations Analysis group should be a
directed by the Office of the President.
A Resp:
O/P met with Ops. Analysis management to define role and priorities. This will conttnue.
III. O/P V-C-5 (b) 63 Rec:
Division Vice Presidents encourage staf f personnel A
to support and assist in the
- execution of the Corporation's Operational Quality Assurance Plan.
Resp Support has been made clear by all Directors to their staff. Results evident.
1 1.
O. C.
IV-A-2 (b) 36 Rec:
Use O.C. Plans and Programs section as service A
not line authority organization - coordinator Resp:
Role has been clarified - Ref: PRC meno of 2/11/83.
II.
O. C.
IV-A-2 (a) 36 Rec:
Hold section to current size (Plans & Programs).
A Resp:
Size has been held.
l 11.
O. C.
IV-J-1 50 Rec:
Consider reassigning under utilized clerical personnel A
to Purchasing to support processing of requisitions.
Resp:
Additional personnel assigned to purchasing. Routine requisitions sent to Parsippany to handle. Aspect of recommendation pertaining to under utilized personnel will be covered in response to IV-1.
J 11-1 1
l i
i;*
I
e e
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATUS C T.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION & SLSOIARY RESPONSE CODE COMMENTS II.
O. C.
IV-F-2 (c) 45 Rec:
Re-evaluate and look to reduce staf fing level of Core E
Management Group.
Resp:
Evaluation of requirements indicates a staf fing of six engineers and a manager / supervisor is required.
III.
O. C.
IV-D-4 (b) 41 Rec:
Learn f rom THI-l preventive maintenance program.
A Resp:
Direct P.M. liaison established and functioning.
III.
O. C.
IV-J-2 ( a) 51 Rec:
Expedite installation of CRT's in plant to give A
l direct access to inventory records.
Resp:
CRT's at site can be used to gain access to Inventory Control System.
V.
O. C.
IV-B 36 Rec:
Ensure Operations involvement in Oyster Creek A
training programs.
Resp:
Steps to increase Operations Department involvement in operator training have been taken.
O.C. Objectives 7 and 10.
III. THI-l III-C (a) 24 Rec:
Schedule more day shif t maintenance work and ensure A
stronger supervisory support.
Resp:
Personnel changes have been implemented to ensure strong supervisory support on day shif t.
Complete but will monitor for praper implementation.
I 1.
T. F./
IV-F-2 (b) 45 Rect Assure no duplicate ef forts with TF Nuclear Analysis A
O. C.
and f uels section (O.C. Nuclear & Core Management)
Resp:
Review shows no overlap. Improved coordination has developed.
i 11-2 e
O 9
l
e i.
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY 12AD DIVISION RESPONSitILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATUS i
CAT.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED REC 000ENDATION & SLRetARY RESPONSE CODE COIOfENTS I
i I.
T. F.
VI-C 69 Rec:
Redefine the role of Licensing and Regulatory Af fairs A
]
(L&RA) to ensure that it acts as en interface between GPUNC and regulatory bodies.
Resp:
Role is defined adequately as interface: Recognition by other substantially improved.
i 1.
T. F.
VI-E-1 (b) 71 Rec:
Consider eliminating the requirement that STA's A
obtain an SRO license.
Resp:
Have completed evaluation. License requirement will be continued.
I.
T. F.
VI-C 77 Rec:
Consider reassigning the Headquarters Start-Up and A
Test group into the Systems Engineering group. Assign site personnel in this group to Plant Engineering.
Resp:
Ras been considered. No change to be made at this time.
Believe SU6T should be within Tech. Functions, not-Plent Engineering. Work load for next year is high and critical.
Any possible gain by reassignment within Tech Functions would be of fset now by disruption due to change.
1.
T. F.
VI-H (a-2) 78 Rect Provide T.F./ System Laboratory leadership to plant A
Chemistry improvement.
Resp:
New TF Chemistry Director has been directed to get actively involved in improving the site chemistry programs. This has been implemented ef fectively.
I.
T. F.
VI-H (a-1) 77 Rect Remove System Laboratory from CPUN af ter the Chemistry E
I Programs at TMI-1 and Oyster Creek have been improved.
-Resp:
Disagree. Management of activity to benefit both nuclear and fossil activities best served by present location.
11-3 i
5 1
I 9
4
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - GPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATUS CE. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COMMENTS II.
T. F.
VI-A (a) 66 Rect Maintain present manning levels within Tech Functions.
A Resp Authorized level for 1983 was same as 1982. 1984 vill be slightly lower.
11.
T. F.
VI-E-2 71 Rect Eliminate position of Systems Analysia Director.
A Resp Action already taken on this ites at the time of BETA report.
111.
T. F.
VI-B-4 68 Rect Conduct design reviews before work is started to A
decrease need for Field Change Notices during const ruction, operation, or maintenance.
Resp:
Procedures now require design reviews. This has been implemented since Fall '82.
111.
T. F.
VI-F-1 75 Rec:
Evaluate functions currently performed in A
Engineering Projects and reassign those that detract f rom project management capability.
Resp:
This had been underway. Situation resulted f rom JCP&L combined engineering for O.C.
Reassignments complete.
V.
T. F.
VI-E-1 (a) 71 Rec:
In the process of developing the Shif t Technical A
Advisor (STA) training program, place a greater emphasis on providing the trainee with a firm technical foundation and less on making him a qualified operator.
Resp:
STA program has been revised to provide technical emphasis in addition to operating information.
V.
T. F.
VI-E-1 (c) 71 Rec:
Ensure that sufficient STA's are in the training A
program to compensate for attrition and to satisty promised rotation at the same time.
Resp:
TMI and O.C. have adequate numbers.
11-4 e
9
'S P
a e
07/13/83 f
BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS
]
M.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE C049 TENTS V.
T. F.
VI-F-2 76 Rec:
Provide training to Project Engineers in CPUNC A
organisational structure, methods, and policies.
Resp Training program conducted late '82, early '83.
I.
N. A.
V-A 53 Rec:
Reassign budgeting and administrative functions A
from Reading to Parsippany.
Resp:
D. Hetrick no longer with CPUN: Function assigned in Parsippany under R. Hedges.
1 i
III.
N. A.
V-C-4 62 Rec:
The QA Director remain actively involved during the A
implementation of the new Operational QA Plan.
Resp QA Director has remained involved. Implementation complete.
III.
N. A.
V-C-5 (a) 63 Rect The Director Quality Assurance, take necessary A
positive steps to improve perception of the QA Department among senior management.
Resp:
Director. QA has specifically addressed this with his staff - significant improvement noted.
III.
N. A.
V-B-5 (b) 59 Rec:
Manager, THI Training, improve accessibility to staff E
by relocating office.
Resp Office is in Training Building. Accessibility has been emphasized. Relocation not needed.
2 v.
N. A.
V-B-4 (a) 58 Rec:
Minimize use of outside personnel to review training A
program, utilise in-house personnel instead.
Resp:
Will follow except for ASLB mandated audit and 1NPO.
11-5
e s
1 1
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES SY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS CAT.
DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOlelENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CX)DE Cope 1ENTS V.
N. A.
V-B-5 (a) 59 Rect Review supervisory responsibilities with those A
assigned as supervisors of training instructors.
Resp:
T&E Supervisors attend appropriate supervisory and management development courses. The forest instructor evalua tion programs assure tha t super-visors observe their own instructors as well as those from other sections at the Training Dept.
V.
N. A.
V-B-5 (c) 59 Rect Assign responsibility for monitoring activities in A
Training Building in the absence of Manager, TML Training and Operator Training Manager.
Resp:
Individus1 supervisors and lead instructors are alunye held responsible for monitoring the acti- ~
vities of persons reporting to them. During sustained periods of absences (e.g. vaca tion, simulator training), an acting manager or super-visor is designated by memorandum.
V.
N. A.
V-B-6 (a) 59 Rec:
Apply recounsendations for TM1 Training to training A
program at Oyster Creek.
Resp:
Headquarters and Oyster Creek Training Departments have reviewed SETA TML training reconsendations.
The responses in this report are applicable to all three training locations.
1.
Admin./
VII-A (b) 80
. Rec:
Change impression that Administration Division A
O/P determines how corporate policy is to be carried out in administrative matters.
Resp:
Direction proivided by O/P & Director. Admin. Div.
through such items as Admin. Div. Coal 3.
11-6 O
O
e e
07/13/83 BEfA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PACE STATUS g. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECOleENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COleENTS 1.
Admin.
V11-A (c) 80 Rec:
Adopt the motto "We serve the plants."
A Resp:
Effectively adopted by Admin. Coal 3.
11.
Adrain.
V11-E-2 85 Rec:
Combine response force espebility at TML to reduce E
response force total. Nagotiate with NRC to reduce force to six to eight guards.
]
Resp:
Disagree - Separation cosmaitted to in Restart hearings and potential for demonstrations make i
further reductions impractical.
11.
Admin.
V11-E-3 (c) 86 Rec:
Ac tiva te a la rma a t fuel handling bay doors 73 and 74 A
and reduce guard force a t TMi-1.
Resp:
Complete.
11.
Admin.
V11-E-3 (d) 86 Rec:
Activate alarms at doors 11 and 16 and reduce TML-2 A
guard force.
Resp:
Complete.
11.
Admin.
V11-E-7 89 Rec:
Evaluate security at TMI Training / Visitors Centers.
A Forked River, and TMI South Ga te.
Possible reduction of 8.5 to 9 man years.
1 Resp:
Traising center alare installed and security coverage dropped. South gate now open only 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> / day, 5 days a week. Forked River has minins t coverage. Total reduction of more then 25 achieved in Security since early '82.
111. Admin.
V11-D (b) 82 Rec :
Cseater emphasis on Cost Plus incentive Fee-A type contracts.
Resp:
Emphasis has been applied. Results tracked monthly.
i 11-7 O
l
e s
8 1
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES SY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY RETA RETA FINDING PACE STATUS
- g. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PARAPHRASED RECateENDATION & SLSetARY RESPONSE CODE C0petENTS III. Admin.
XII-5 (d) 112 Rec:
Control iseum.ca of administrative procedures.
A j
Cen./0P Resp:
CPUN Policy Plans and Procedure System has been issued and has been implemented for control of j
Administrative procedures.
IV.
Admin.
VII-8 81
' Rec:
Increase scope of work assigned to senior manager A
(Mar.ager of Management Services) or delete the position.
I Resp:
Organization restructured.
J
]
IV.
Admin.
VII-E-9 90 Rec:
If lieutenant position is established in Security, A
the number of managers should not increase.
Resp:
Implemented with no increase.
III. R&EC/
III-F (d) 28 Rec:
Speed correction and problem solving of rad.
A TMI-1 deficiencies.
f Resp:
Response to III-F-c will help on this. Efforts underway to provide T. F. assistance on recurring i
items requiring engineered solution.
1 III. R&EC/
III-F (f) 28 Rect Achieve recommendations III-F(a) through III-F(e)
A TMI-l re: radiological practices without new systems and gimmicks.
Resp:
No new systems or gimmicks have been used.
j See resp nses to III-F(a) through III-F(e).
a i
III. R&EC/
IV-C (h) 47 Rec:
Utilse exi. ting management systems to achieve A
O.C./M&C improvement in radiological practices.
1 Resp:
All related reco:amendations are being carried out using the present management systems.
i I
s 11-8 i
i; E
I i*
1
4 s
e s
I 07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION DESPONSIBILITY i
BETA BETA FINDINC PAGE STATUS M. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
REF.
PACAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION & SLDetARY RESPONSE CODE CODDEENTS IV.
R&EC/
III-F (b) 28 Rect improve Rad Con management and work force A
TM1-1 management working relationships.
i Resp:
Experience with OTSC and other work shows current organization and personnel working well together.
V.
R&EC/
IV-C (g) 47 Rec:
Commence rad technician training to handle unusual A
O. C.
situations not covered by written procedures (Rad. Con.)
Resp:
Emergency drills and seminare initiated and being held on a recurring basis. Each session is documented.
1.
M&C/O.C./
IV-L, (b) 39 Rec:
Other site management must i*ncrease involvement A
R&EC/N.A.
in resolving interface problems resulting from maintenance realismsent.
Resp:
Efforts by Division Directors including Staff meetings. Outage coordination, etc., have sub-stantially reduced interf ace problems.
f III. M&C/0.C./
IV-J-2 (c) 51 Rec:
Coasider staging of material on a job basis.
A Admin.
Resp:
Review conducted. Proceeding to " stage" in data base, tag stock material for specific jobs and stage major jobs for outage.
I Ill. M&C X-A 104 Rec:
Evaluate functions within M&C and assure no A
duplication of other divisions in CPUNC.
y Resp; Review and experience at Oyster Creek with re-aligned maintenance function shows no remaining duplication.
f 11-9 l
1 i
e
3 e e
e s
07/13/83 BETA REPORT - CPUNC RESPONSES BY LEAD DIVISION RESPONSIBILITY BETA BETA FINDING PAGE STATUS
- g. DIVISION RECOMMEND.
RE F.
PARAPHRASED RECOMMENDATION &
SUMMARY
RESPONSE
CODE COMMENTS II.
H. R.
III-H 31 Rec:
Review manning and effectiveness of Human Resources A
support of TMI-1 Resp:
Ef fectiveness substantially improved. Hanning will be addressed as part of XII-E (156).
IV.
H. R.
VIII-1 94 Rec:
All levels of management understand quick action A
required for personnel matters. Human Resources keep track of status and identify delays.
Resp:
Has been re-emphasized throughout GPUNC. Response improved.
H. R. tracking.
IV.
H. R./
IV-D-2 (a) 40 Rect Negotiate morning cof fee break out of union agreement.
E O. C.
Resp:
Not a priority issue perhape never worth trying.
11-10 O
-a
e 4
Q9 C
S 2o a
e hM4 Us b YO 84
=-
x.
h F*
E N.
g
>a 5=
0S N=W 2w 2 b.
8 i
i C
i a
9
a O
b
- O 1983 CORPORATE GOALS & OBJECTIVES Corporate Objectives 5.
Improve CPU Nuclear's functional capabilities within the authorized manning levels.
Corpora t e Cos t s 5.
Provide an initial five year corporate plan with defined milestones and objectives by June 1,1983, to use for budget planning for I;84 and beyond.
8.
Have mechanisms in place by June 1,1983, for identifying and stimulating abolishment of unnecessary paperwork, Jocumentation, or procedural complexity.
9.
Conduct at least two hour discussion sessions with a sinimum of 300 exempt employees below the department head level on the functions, responsibilities, and interactions of the various elements of the organisation by July 1,1983.
1983 DIVISION COALS & OBJECTIVES Oyster Creek Division
]
4.
Improve working conditions and station appearance by: (a) reducing contaminated areas by 201: (b) reducing areas requiring respiratory protection by 25%; (c) painting and refurbishing 100,000 sq. f t. of a rea.
5.
Substantially improve the material condition of the Oyster Creek Plant by accomplishing a high percentage of the maintenance work scheduled during the 1983 outage.
7.
Establish six operating shif ts each with two Senior Reactor Operators (SROs).
i 10.
Complete upgraded training programs for all chemistry technicians; initiate forest training programs for all Equipment Opera tors, and formalise all on-the-job training.
21.
Completely revise the plant Chemistry procedures (800 series) by: (a) award contract; (b) begin rewrite; and (c) complete project.
22.
Improve Chemistry Technician job performance proficiency by: (a) improve information flow; (b) complete Chemistry parameter trending; (c) increase supervisory oversight; and (d) upgrade documentation.
A-1
- b e
- O o
i
- 23. Expand Chemical Laboratory facilites by: (a) place temporary facilities in operation; (b) start construction of permanent facility; (c) complete construction of permanent facility; and (d) obtain all laboratory instrumentation.
24.
Implement 24-hour Chemistry support of plant activities, i
25.
Upgrade Chemistry Technicians' training and complete training.
i 32.
In conjunction with MEC Division, develop a CMS program for computerised equipment history, trending, and Preventive Maintenance scheduling.
46.
Revise Plant Engineering organisation to provide increased responsiveness in problem solution. Review engineering sta f fing at Oyster Creek in company with Technical Functions.
TMI-1 Division 2.
Each Department Head / Manager discuss the CPU Nuclear Organization Struction and the role, responsibilities, interrelations and gosle of the various divisions with all members of his staf f by May 1,1983. Vice President.
TMI-1 to discoes this subject with all employees by July 1,1983.
3.
Develop a plan for all TM1-1 procedures to review, revise, update (as required) and achieve compliance with corporate Procedure 1218.01 by June 1, 1983.
5.
Achieve a monthly radunste generation rate of 1000 f t.3 or below and establish plans and schedules for reducing contaminated areas in the plant by March 1,1903.
Prepare monthly progress status reports for the Director TML-1.
i 8.
Goals of 192 man-rem maximum total exposure, not including exposure associated with the OTSC repairs, and 0.0002 skin contaminations per RWP man-hour are established for the plant (includes all personnel, including personnel from other i
divisions and contractors).
Technical Functions Division 1.
Develop a system for work load management in support of Technical Functions Departments.
j I
2.
Refine, expand and formalize the earned value performance measurement approach to include both Capital and OEM work.
i Support projects with engineering contractors.
I 14.
Hire 12 new engineers for the Engineer Training Program. Transfer five Trainees to Oyster Creek and five to TM1-1 from the 1982 Trainee Group.
4 i
i A-2 i'.
-4
., - a a
i I
Nuclear Assurance Division - Trainina & Education Department f
1.
Develop and implement a plan for coordination of training activities at the three sites.
1 3.
Increase use of behavioral Isarning objectives and criterion-referenced instruction to provide demonstration of knowledge and understanding by student.
4.
Develop a method for test preparation and validation to improve the quality and results of testing in areas such as quiz and test grade evaluation and test question preparation and validation.
5.
Complete implementation of instructor qualification and evaluation procedure.
6.
Develop and present instructional modules utilizing the Basic Principles Trainer AT TMI.
1 Administration Division 3.
Ensure and improve division and department responsive ese and visibility to plant and support divisions through (a) regular visitations (1-2 per month) per department and (b) supe' rvisory communication meetings at each site.
1 4
1 1
?
i i
A-3 l
I e