ML20084M645
| ML20084M645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 04/25/1984 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20084M643 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8405150468 | |
| Download: ML20084M645 (2) | |
Text
-
gR MGgb UNITED STATES
+["
"k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 s.,
/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT N0. 24 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF-12 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY _
I.
INTRODUCTION By letter dated August 26, 1983, South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE&G) requested a change to the Technical Specifications pertaining to the control room ventilation system air flow. The requested amendment would change the control room ventilation system air flow from 20,000 CFM 10% to 21,270 CFM 10% in accordance with the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).
II.
EVALUATION The flow of 21,270 CFM was proposed by SCE&G in FSAR Amendment 32, June 1932. This proposal was evaluated by the staff before license issuance and found acceptable in Safety Evaluation Report Supplement No. 4 for the Virg!1 C. Summer Nuclear Station. The Technical Specifications issued shouid have reflected, but through inadvertence did not, the correct, properly approved control room ventilation system air flow of 21,270 CFM 10%. Therefore, the staff concludes that the requested amendment is acceptable.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION We have determined that the amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact. Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendment involves an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR Q51.5(d)(4), that an environmental impact state-ment or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
IV.
CONCLUSION The Commission made a proposed detennination that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration which was published in the Federal Register (49 FR 7041) on February 24, 1984, and consulted with the state of South Carolina. No public comme-ts were received, and the state of South Carolina did not have any comments.
1 8405150468 840425 PDR ADOCK 05000395 P
! We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor:
ilon B. Hopkins, Licensing Branch No. 4, CL Dated: April 25, 1984 i
1
\\
-