ML20084G016

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-348/84-05 & 50-364/84-05.Corrective Actions: Procedure FNP-1-SOP-54.0 Revised to Provide Procedural Guidance for Transferring Water from Spent Fuel Pool
ML20084G016
Person / Time
Site: Farley  
Issue date: 04/17/1984
From: Clayton F
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To: Robert Lewis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20084F998 List:
References
NUDOCS 8405070035
Download: ML20084G016 (2)


Text

  • M;iling Addr:ts Alabama Power Company 600 North 18th Street Post Office Box 2641 Dirmingham, Alabama 35291 A

Telephone 205 783-6081 F. L Clayton, Jr.

SZ$3%7"'

Alabama Pbwer i

23 Pl2 : 2 5 April 17,1984 Docket No. 50-348 Docket No. 50-364 Mr. R. C. Lewis U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 3100 Atlanta, GA 30303

SUBJECT:

J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant NRC Inspection of February 6 - March 16,1984 RE:

Report aw ars 50-348/84-05 50-364/84-05

Dear Mr. Lewis:

This letter refers to the violation cited in the subject inspection reports which states:

"The following violations were identified during an inspection conducted on February 6 - March 16,1984. The Severity Levels were assigned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).

10 CFR 50.59 allows the licensee to make changes to the facility as described in the FSAR without prior Commission approval provided-that the change does not involve a change to the Technical Specifications or constitute an unreviewed safety question. The licensee is required to maintain records which include a written safety evaluation which provides the basis for determining that the change does not constitute an unreviewed safety question. The spent fuel pool design features are described in the FSAR, including design features to prevent dewatering.

Contrary to the above, the licensee did not perform a written safety evaluation prior to transferring water from the spent fuel pool to the transfer canal using a submersible pump. The submersible pump is a change to the spent fuel pool as described in the FSAR."

NOS?ohhhg PDR

Mr. R. C. Lewis April 17,1984 Page Two Admission or Denial The above violation occurred as described in the subject reports.

l Reason for Violation This violation was caused by personnel error in that this evolution was performed without procedural guidance.

Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved This error has been discussed with the personnel involved. Also, procedure FNP-1-SOP-54.0 (Spent Fuel Pit Cooling and Purification System) has been revised to provide procedural guidance for transferring water from the spent fuel pool to the transfer canal with appropriate precauti ons. A written safety evaluation was prepared and approved by the Plant Operations Review Committee.

Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Further Violations l

See above. All corrective action was completed by March 1,1984, i

i l

Date of Full Compliance i

March 1, 1984.

Affimation I affirm that this response is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

The information contained in this letter is not considered to be of a proprietary nature.

Yours very truly, Af N L. C ayto J r.

FLC/DSM: sam cc: File