ML20084F519
| ML20084F519 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 02/17/1984 |
| From: | Edelman M CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | Knop R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8405040216 | |
| Download: ML20084F519 (2) | |
Text
& b ni "t
an T., r+-
b ; e i r-sP' tU rjc u L b ! ;i. b i:
rnrn
> t l. 3. J :a i n 9 3 5 u n v i el nn:sr;!!nY
- uw n? 'No buNr h
P.O. BOX 5000 - CLEVELAND. oHlo 44101 - TELEPHONE (216) 622-9800 - lLLUMINATING BLDG.
- 55 PUBLICSOUARE Serving The Best Location in the Nation MURRAY R. EDELMAN February 17, 1984 VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR Mr. R. C. Knop, Chief Projects Branch 1 Division of Project and Resident Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 RE: Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 ff Response to I.E. Report 50-44//
83-27; 50-441/83-26 Transmitted October 21, 1983
Dear Mr. Knop:
This letter is to provide you with additional information regarding the one (1) Severity Level V Violation described in the Notice of Violation dated
^ Sep tember 28, 1983, appended to the referenced inspection report.
In our original response, dated October 21, 1983, under Item 4 we stated that a PNPP procedure had been developed to provide for preliminary engineering review of Identified design discrepancies when clarification was necessary to determine whether a possibly reportable deficiency had been discovered. This would then f eed into our Deviation Analysis Report System if further action was required.
We also stated that full compliance would be achieved by November 30, 1983.
The intent of the above commitment was met with the issue of Instruction 35-1501, Revision 0, on November 30, 1983. When engineering personnel first attempted to implement this procedure in January 1984, it was determined that procedural interface problems existed. This led to a procedure revision which expanded the scope of the procedure to provide for the identification, evalua-t ion, and follow-up of design-related discrepancies (i.e., not just those that were apparently reportable). The revision created the Engineering Design Deficiency Report (EDDR) which is intended to provide for corrective action and preliminary reportability evaluations on design-related discrepancies.
The EDDR, when necessary, will feed into our Deviation Analysis Report system.
e405040216 g
- goI s
i[6 FEB21 G84
s Mr. R.
C'.. Knop February 17, 1984 As of the date of this letter, the revised procedure has been issued and full compliance has now been achieved.
If there are additional questions, please do not hesitate to call, j
Very truly yours, L^^^J '
Murray R. Edelman Vice President Nuclear Group MRE:pab cc:
Mr. M. L. Gildner USNRC Site
- Mr. R. L. Spessard,' Director Division of Engineering-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Reglon III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 U.S. Nucisce Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch Washington, D.C..
20555 "x
o 4
.