ML20083M234
| ML20083M234 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 01/06/1983 |
| From: | James Smith LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083M240 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-36, REF-GTECI-SF, RTR-NUREG-0612, RTR-NUREG-612, TASK-A-36, TASK-OR SNRC-817, NUDOCS 8302010100 | |
| Download: ML20083M234 (2) | |
Text
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY g3 gg
(_)
aae aM/mW SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION P.O. BOX 618 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD e WADING RIVER N.Y.11792 January 6, 1983 SNRC-817 Mr. Harold R.
Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Submittal of the Phase II Report SER Issue No. 59, " Control of Heavy Loads" Docket No. 50-322
References:
1.
NRC Letter (D.G. Eisenhut), dated December 22, 1980
())
2.
NRC Generic Letter, 81-07, dated February 3, 1981 x_
3.
LILCO Letter, SNRC-596 (B.R. McCaffrey) to the NRC (H.R. Denton), dated July 17, 1981 4.
LILCO Letter, SNRC-782 (J.L. Smith) to the NRC (H.R. Denton), dated October 28, 1982
Dear Mr. Denton:
As requested in references 1 and 2, LILCO has conducted a review of the shoreham Nuclear Power Station controls of the handling of heavy loads and the level of compliance with NUREG-0612.
The initial phase of this evaluation was submitted to the NRC via references 3 and 4.
This letter transmits the second phase of the study which ad-dresses enclosure 3, sections 2.2 and 2.3 of reference 1.
The enclosed report documents the review and has determined that in the event of a postulated load drop, from any lifting device capable of carrying a heavy load, sufficient redundancy exists to assure a safe, cold shutdown.
Although no design or equipment modifications are required, LILCO is evaluating the feasibility of providing a single failure-proof capability for the polar crane auxiliary hoist.
A study 7y is being conducted to determine if this modification will optimize
(,)
the operational capability of the auxiliary hoist, which is 8302010100 930106 ID PDR ADOCK 05000322 I C A
(
January 6, 1983 Mr. Denton Page Two currently limited by procedural requirements designed to limit damage due to a postulated load drop.
In addition, to provide further assurances regarding the safe handling of heavy loads, LILCO has:
reduced the auxiliary hook rating from 30 tons to 15 tons instituted procedures that require all auxiliary hook lifts to be double slung With the exception of the ongoing effort on "Special Lifting Devices" (reference 4), LILCO believes that this letter, in conjunction with earlier submittals, should enable the NRC to close this confirmatory issue (SER Issue No. 59) on the Shoreham docket.
Very truly yours, J.
L.
Smith Manager, Special Projects Shoreham Nuclear Power Station l
RJT/jm Enclosure cc:
J.
Higgins All parties l
l l
O l
l l
l l
CONTROL l
OF HEAVY LOADS O
l 1
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY January 1983 O
a
- -