ML20083L764
| ML20083L764 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Neely Research Reactor |
| Issue date: | 05/11/1995 |
| From: | Gunnells E, Nordin R Neely Research Reactor, ATLANTA, GA |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083L767 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#295-16712 95-704-01-REN, 95-704-1-REN, REN, NUDOCS 9505180597 | |
| Download: ML20083L764 (2) | |
Text
.-
/& 7't&
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKETED NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION USNRC o
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD
'95 MY 15 Pl2:19 In the Matter of
)
DocketNo.50-160-Ren OFFICE OF SECRETARY
)
00CKETING & SERVICE 8 RANCH GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF
)
TECHNOLOGY,
)
Atlanta, Georgia
)
ASLBP No. 95-704-01-Ren
)
Georgia Tech Research Reactor
)
)
(Renewal of Facility License
)
No. R-97)
)
May 11,1995 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY'S NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE ASLB'S MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DATED APRIL 26,1995 AND REOUEST TO STAY DISCOVERY The Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) hereby notices its appeal from the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Memorandum & Order dated April 26, 1995. In accordance with 10 C.F.R. g 2.714a, Georgia Tech submits the accompanying supporting brieffor this appeal.
Georgia Tech requests that this Board enter a stay of discovery pending the resolution of this appeal. The need for a stay of discovery is exigent here, because in a l
teleconference on May 8,1995, Judge Bechhoefer stated his intent to permit the petitioner to discover the security arrangements for the GTRR, including the plans i
developed for the Olympic Games in Atlanta in 1996. This discovery relates to the petitioner's contention that security for the GTRR during the Olympics is inadequate - a contention that the Board admitted over the cogent dissent by Judge Kline. The 9505100597 950511 PDR ADOCK 05000160 g)
O PDR
' Comrnission's regulations (10 C.F.R. l 50.13), its recent decision in 59 Fed. Reg. 38889 (Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles ' "aclear Power Plants), common sense, and indeed the safety of the GTRR in 11... tecent events in Oklahoma indicate that discovery should be stayed until this Board has had an opportunity to consider this appeal.
/
Respectfully Submitted, 4
al sor Georgia Institute ofTechnology
$ YY E. Gail Gunnells Deputy ChiefLegal Advisor GeorgiaInstitute ofTechnology Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 11th day of May,1995 l
l l
M
_