ML20083J241
| ML20083J241 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 01/05/1984 |
| From: | Tramm T COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 7924N, NUDOCS 8401160260 | |
| Download: ML20083J241 (7) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:77-
/D Commonwealth ECson
/
) One First N1tional Pirut, Chicago, Illinoj
.1:n;r=~- f r. z. :
=..~ : ~:x
=-;
2
====:. - - = - - :~= ~: a
.... t r
-- t =:
.: = = =d=u r:.:- cur rrn=- :n r a:= 1:.t x ;.r
+
n - =-
.; : =
=. rn r
.l
,,,.=.u
.r _._.
mr
- e. _ ;. +... _
_4 .. _... +. _._ _.._ _ _._...._ /.._._# g.__ f.. .._ r _ ~_. . L.__ 4...__ ._4-. .I i.. ._ _. L 2 - r..._ -a. _.. L. 4 .j b .._-_.p.._,.~_4.... ._.... q... _ _ _.g _.y .u.._.._.....y. a ._L _ n.._ 4__ _{. .t.._.. ._ q. 9. -.. , - -. _... -....-7 ll
- y..- n_.
n. -- ( r 73 2 i e r .t 5/ L ._+w i w 4 u. 7 7 ~ l; - t; rti 7 .L..t i.i -
- gj.. t t:
++ H Mr-r -. l. . hia : + i-! : - iA in _a ; 5-M- uf + i tM+ kit M='P~ il iuM=== ' E i;#== 4-L'E3 T ' i-i - -H k = i-t f i i b ' i t.1-.s.L.L L f~ i -
- i a
1 - g 2.. (j 4 - 1. y 3 3r 3 :_ s. 7 p p t + -s } .i +- : -. . :qp . ;= . f 3: v/. le 43 w: Eh -~i Y] g (( 'i j.i -} ((
- 1lM
-.' i { -- - 1 17 ] - p [' }:: 7 2 2 , -. g n
- E 2i mir r Einp _. Ef:1 L.. b
- nW J
If~'r! E fi :EE:f3:Ei.. -. .. C -. -- p. p. Phm.wf -, . - -. +. 6 4.
- a.-4 c
+-
- I r.h.- es.-
S q .m --$*g . M .-"-*b-4- is@p W4- . l p + .k. - _. ' -- __--.4 {--
- 4*
.a + j v.. .h-q ..p.. -.y-9- + .p-4.. dee.' -.. - - -. -. i ei.. & 6 - 6g .M en .1& -. ( 4 ,9 l .L.. pp. p rj._ ....a.-. -.. - + -, 1 +.. ++ e..r_.... + 4. k.. .j .. + f w g+ .. r L fl 3gp 3f8 3P8 336 326 3/6 360 L
f.F ~' r n [* Unit 1 HRSS Ion Chromatograph Chloride Analysis Initial Setup Data Sheet This performance verification dats is intended to fulfill the objectives for chloride analysis by the HRSS panel as stated in the following documents: a. . Attachment No. 1 to Post Accident Sampling System NUREG 0737, II.B.3, Evaluation Criteria Guidelines, Criteria No. 5 and No. 10. b. Letter dated October 26, 1982, from T. Tramm to H. R. Denton c. Byron FSAR, Question and Answer 281.7. d. LReg. Guide 1.97, Table 2. Instrument: Dionex Ion Chromatograph, Model 10 Criteria for ' Chloride Analysis: Imposed Criteria Document Requiring Analysis to be completed NUREG 0737, II.B.3, Criterion 5 ~1n 4 days For'0.5 to 20 ppm Chloride, NUREG 0737,-II.B.3, Criterion 10 +/- 10% accuracy; for below 0.5 ppm. Chloride, +/-0.05 ppm accuracy. Analysis range of 0 to 20 ppm Reg. Guide 1.97, Table 2 . Tests Performed: Time to complete analyses: a. Repeated timings of analyses indicate that performance of the chloride analysis by the inline ion chromatograph at the HRSS Sample Panel can easily be accomplished in less than 4 hours. b.- Analysis Range and Accuracy: Test #1: The first series of analyses were performed to test the overall range and accuracy of the instrument. A 1.0 ppm chloride standard (Byron QC #83-447) and a 1000 ppm chloride standard (#83-522) were prepared from which several other standards were prepared by dilution of the
' i,- original 2 solutions. The various. standards were analyzed at the Sample Panel with the Dionex Ion Chromatograph. Three series of the analyses were performed, each using a'different range on the ion chromatograph conductivity meter. Then, the same standards were analyzed in the laboratory by a Dionex Model 20201 Ion Chromatograph and a Graphic' Controls Company model PHI-91100 Ultra Sensitive Chloride Electrode. The laboratory unalyses were performed primarily to verify that the standards were accurate and to demonstrate the capability of the Sample Panel instrument as compared to other available methods. The instrument readings were as follows: Chloride Sample Panel Ion Chromat. Laboratory Laboratory Concentration Series A Series B Series C Ion Chrom. Probe -0.10 ppm .0.16 ppm 0.21 ppm N/A 0.22 ppm 0.14 ppm 0.20 ppm 0.19 ppin 0.21 ppm N/A 0.38 ppm 0.12 ppm 0.50 ppm 0.50 ppm 0.50 ppm N/A 0.71 ppm 0.47 ppm 1.0 ppm N/A 1.0 ppm 1.0 ppm 0.97 ppm 0.98 ppm 2.0 ppm N/A 2.0 ppm 2.0 ppm 2.8 ppn 1.9 ppm 5.0' ppm N/A 5.2 ppm 5.0 ppm 5.8 ppm 5.0 ppm 10.0 ppm N/A N/A 9.8 ppm 15 ppm 9.8 ppm 20.0 ppm N/A N/A 18 ppm N/A N/A
== Conclusion:== The results of the analyses performed at the Sample Panel utilizing the ion chromatograph were within the specified criteria for range and accuracy. '~ w w ,,,--s~ ,w, e,,,, ,sn-m, --r,,'r-, ,ne r,,,- 4,
b L. a ~ -Unit 1 - HRSS Baseline Gas Chromatograph Hydrogen Analysis Initial Setup Data Sheet INTEN1:. This performance verification data is intended to fulfill the requirements for hydrogen analysis at the HRSS sample 9 panel-as stated in: 1) Reg. Guide'l.97 -2) Criteria-#10 of Attachment No. 1 to Post Accident Sampl. Sys., NUREG~0737, II.B.3 Evaluation Criteria Guidelines INSTRUMENT: Baseline Model 1030A Gas Chromatograph with Leeds and Northrup Soeedomax M Mark 111 Recorder. CRITERIA FOR HYDROGEN ANALYSIS: An accuracy of +20% shall be demonstrated in the range of 50 to 2000 cc/kg and +5% in the range below 50 cc/kg hydrogen for.the reactor coolant stripped gas analysis. TEST PERFORMED: Calibration curves were genersted for Hydrogen Concentration verses' Peak Height as described in Sentry Equipment Manual, Volume.I, Section N.. High and Low-standards were analyzed and plotted'for attenuation factors of 100 and 500. Intermediate concentrations were then analyzed and plotted for their respective attenuation settings. Actual analyses and resultant percentage of error are as -follows: ATTENTUATION 100 99.9% H2 ACTUAL PEAK CALCULATED % of ERROR cc/ks HEIGHT cc/ks 11.0 cc 31.0 7.0 31.0 0.0 11.5 cc 46.5 13.5 45.5 -2.1 4.0 cc-124.2 52.0 142.0 12.5 5.0 cc 155.3 58.0 155.3 0.0 ATTENT ATION 500 99.9%'H2 ACTUAL PEAK CALCULATED % of ERROR cc/ks HEIGHT cc/ks 30.0 cc 931.7 160 931.7 0.0 40.0 cc 1242.0 165 1437.5 13.6 50.0 cc 1553.0 170 1662.5 1.0 60.0 cc 1863.0 172 1863.0 0.0
[- NOTE: Calculated cc/kg' values-are determined from Sentry Manual by the following: g- .(cc of H2) x 273-273+20 = cc/kg 0.030 NOTE: 0.030 = RCS (reactor coolant system) volume that is depressurized. CONCLUSION: This instrument is operational for accuracy within the criteria listed above. 4 e 17924N 4 w c~-. ,.,.r,,,,,- .g,,..,, ,-,.3 -, -,. _m -}}