ML20083E376
| ML20083E376 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 12/10/1983 |
| From: | Wells D DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | Streeter J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083E375 | List: |
| References | |
| EF-2-66485, NUDOCS 8312290182 | |
| Download: ML20083E376 (5) | |
Text
=
Don
- 1 A. We:b yeakrO.wy A;, ee Detroit
" " " ' ~
2000 Seco j Ainse ISOn Detroit. MicNgan 48226
. Decmber 10, 198.1 (313) 237 8000 1I2-66485
,' s 8
Mr. J.F. Strccter,'Chier Engineerir.g - Branch 1,,
U.S. thiclear Regulatory Ormission Region III
/
799 Roosevelt Road
+
Glen Ellyn, Illinoic 60137
Subject:
Nonempliance at Enrico Fermi, Unit 2 '-- IE Report 50-341/83-22
Dear Mr. Streeter:
This letter responds to the item of nonc.u. ipliance de.Wribed in your IE Report No. 50-341/83-7.2. This inspect.icn ot the Enrice Forni Unit 2 conscniction site activf tics' was perfonrad oy Mr. S.G. DuPont on October 4 through 21, 1985.
The item of aonccrnpliance is discussed in this reply as required by Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules or Practice", Pcrt 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
'It.e enclosed rs sponse isgrrangcd to correcpond to the segaence of
, ' items cited in the bo&f,0f your report. The number for tha item of nonconpliance add the m plicable critofion is referenced.
We trust this letter satisfactorily anme s the concern raised in your report. If you have questions; please, centact Mr. G.M. Tiahey, Assistant Director - Project Quality Assurance.
Very truly yours, f
b 7 l'
/
0
^
J DAW /EHN/pn "
4 cc:
Mr. Richard DeYoud, Director 3
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear R%ulatcry Ccrimissic.t Warhington, D.C.
20555 Mr. Paul Byron, Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
6450 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 w
6 i '*
8312290182 831223 PDR ADOCK 05000341
/
O PDR
/
[EC 19
/
4 Mr. J.F. Streeter, Chief Decenber 10, 1983 EF2-66485 Page 2 bcc:
F.E. Agosti T.A. Alessi A. Alexiou-C.R. Bacon L.P. Bregni J.A.~ Cart 2 nil 1 W.F. Colbert O.K. Earle W.J. Fahrne D. Ference E.P. Griffing C.M. Heidel W.R. Holland Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)
W.H. Jens R.S. Lenart E. Lusis P.A. Marquardt/ Docket File (2)
W.E. Miller, Jr.
E.H. Newton S.H. Noetzel J.W. Nunley E.M. Page R.G. Rateick W.L. Reid J.D. Ryan L.E. Schuennan D. Spiers G.M. Trahey R.A. Vance/L.E. Eix A.E. Wegele Site Document Control NRC Follow-Up Book /NRC File Chron File
o L
s I
THE DEIROIT EDISON CQ4PANY FROJECT QUALITY ISSURAIG ENRICO FERMI 2 PROJECT Response to NRC Report No. 50-341/83-22 Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR-87 Inspection at: Fenni 2 Site, Newport, Michigan Inspection Conducted: October 4 through 21, 1983 Approved by:
Z db T.A. Alessi, Director Project Quality Assurance Date:
kk /d lVIb i
I 1
Response to NRC Inspection Report No. 50-341/83-22 (83-22-03)
Statment of Nonempliance, (81-22-03) 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, states in part, " Test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements hxve been satisfied." FSAR, Section 14.1.1.6.5, states in part, "The Preopera-tion 'Ibst Results Package is reviewed by the responsible Lead Startup Test Engineers and the Startup Director before being subnitted to the TRC for approval. This package consists of Preoperational Test data and results." Regulatory Guide 1.68, states in part, "Preoperational proce-dures should prescribe the data to be collected and the fonn in which it is to be recorded." Regulatory Guide 1.68, also states in part, "The completel procedurw along with the data collected, will be retained as part of the plant nL3torical record." 1EEE Standard 450-1975, states in part, " Read and record the temperature of battery electrolyte for an average temperature (suggested every sixth cell)."
Contrary to the above, the following preoperational test procedures did not collect or retain supportive test data.
a.
Preoperational Test Results Packages for Preoperational Tests, PRET R3201.001 130/260 VDC Systems and PRET R3202.00124/48 VDC Systems did not contain supportive preoperational test data and these test results were reviewed, approved, and accepted by the responsible Lead Startup Test Engineer, Startup Director, and the TRC.
b.
Preoperational Test, PRET R3201.001 130/260 VDC Systems did not prescribe collection and retaining of actual tesu durations during the battery service (duty low cycle) tests.
c.
Preoperational Tests, PRET R3201.001 130/260 VDC systms and PRET R3202.001 24/48 VDC Systems did not prescribe collection and retain-ing of battery electrolyte taperature for an average tm perature during the battery perfonunce (capacity 1 tests).
This is a Severity Level IV violation.
Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved Both PRET F3201.001 130/260 VDC System and PRET R3202.001 procedures are being revised to include all required rs,i data. After revision they will be re-subnitted to the review and approval process before being re-released. The entire revised procedures will be re-performed to ensure adequate data to provide assurance the acceptance criteria have been met and is available. This data will meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.68.
Startup Instruction 8.4.2.01 " PREOP /ACPT Procedure Preparation" was revised on November 14, 1983, to clarify the responsibilities of the procedure reviewers to ensure that procedures am adequately reviewed before approval. Startup Instruction 8.4.2.05 " Test Results Package Preparation / Review" was revised on November ", 1983 and included clarification of the responsibilities of the. ust results reviewers.
1
Response to NRC Inspection Report No. 50-341/83-22 (83-22-03)
Corrective Action Taken to Avoid Further Noncompliance All Startup Personnel have received training to ensure that they are cognizant of the requirements of S.I. 8.4.2.01-and S.I. 8.4.2.05.
The Date When Full Ccrnpliance will be Achieved Failure to have adequate control has been corrected by the issuing of
- S.I. 8.4.2.01 and S.I. 8.4.2.05, ~ and ccrupletion of subsequent training.
The inadequacies of PRET R3201.001 130/260 VDC Systen and PRET R3202.001 24/48 VDC System will be corrected and the testing repeated so that sufficient raw data is collected to provide assurance that acceptance criteria have been met, before June 1984.
L 6
_ - - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -