ML20082M478
| ML20082M478 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom, Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1991 |
| From: | Beck G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9109050223 | |
| Download: ML20082M478 (19) | |
Text
f
.0 CFP 26.71(d) l'IllLADEI l' Illa El.ECTitIC COMi%NY NUCl. EAR GROllP llEADQUARTERS 955-65 CifESTERilROOK HIND.
WAYNE, PA 19087 569)
(215) 640-6000 NUC(EAR 1:NGINf1 RINO & si RVICIS DE PART MI:NT August 27, 1991 Docket Nos.
50-352 50-353 50-277 50-278 License Nos. NPF-39 NPF-85 OPR-44 OPR-56 Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Fitness-For. Duty Program Performance Data for the Period January 1991 Through June 1991
Dear Sir:
As required by 10 CFR 26.71(d), this letter submits the performance data for our fitness-for-duty program for the period January 1991 chrough June 1991.
The data for our Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, and Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2, sites are provided in Attachments 1 and 2, Data for our corporate office and Nuclear Group Headquarters specimen collection sites (i.e., 2301 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA and 955-65 Chesterbrook Boule,ard, Wayre PA respectively) are also provided in Attachment 3.
The data are reported on a form acceptable to the NRC as documented in the July 31, 1989 letter from J. M. Taylor (NRC) to J. F. Colvin (Nuclear Management and Resources Council), and include the following.
Drugt tested for and cut-off levels, including tests for other drugs (i.e., barbiturates and benzodiazepines).
Workforce population tested.
910905o223 910827 pf-7
- **u;7
e e
Qffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Page 2 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Numbers of tests and results by population and type of test (i.e., pre-I andging, random, for-cause, pre-employment, periodic post-accident, follow-up, and other types of tests).
Substances identified.
1 Attachments 1, 2, and 3 also include the following.
t Summary of management actions.
Analysis of the data and appropriate actions that have been or will be takeit.
A list of events reported. (Note that there was one event which was reportable in accordance with 10CFR26.73 during this period.)
Random testing rate, Note that the results of drug sweeps at our corporate office and Nuclear Group Headquarters are not available at this time and will be included in the next periodic report of performance data.
If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact us.
i Very truly yours, l
G. J. Beck Manager Licensing Section RMK:eas Attachments cc:
T. T. Martin, Administrator, Region I, USNRC w/ attacoments I
T. J. Kenny, USNRC Senior Resident inspector, LGS w/ attachments J. J. Lyash, US NRC Senior Resident inspector, PBAPS w/ attachments h
t F
T
.1 ATTACHMENT 1 l
FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM l
Performance Data Personne Subjectto :.0CFR26 l
Philadelphia Electric Company Junc 30. 199L_
co wANY 6 MONTHS [NDeNG
{
t Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station LOCATION N
D. M. Sarley (215) 841-5703 CONTACT NAME PHONE (INCLUDC AREA CODI) l CUTOFFS: SCREEN / CONFIRMATION (ng/ml) b APPENDIX A TO 10CFR 26 i
t 300 300,
turates MARIJUANA 100 / 15 AMPHETAMINES 1000 / 500
/
E COCAINE 300 /150 PHENCYCLlDINE 25 / 25 Benndiaz eoines 300/300 OPIATES 300 /300 ALCOHOL (% BAC) 0.04%BAC
/
f LONG TEiiM S'kORT. TERM CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL hihf[j$j$jk-AVERAGE NUMBER WITH UNESCO 3TED tt :i d.' 'v F;.
c m J-ACCESS 2931*
un 2543*
REFERRED ACCESS CATEGonlES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE PRE EMPLOYMEtn 20 1
4,n 1,208 14 j
~
m.,
PRE-BADGING 14 0
}{;,,
0 0
0 0
PERIODIC 18 0
sp,e.
FOR CAUSE 1
1
- d. p.
2 0
cw.
{
%[f[f,'
~
0 0
POST ACCIDEtn 0
O hif,[d,$ N:c 879 4
RANDOM 791 1
}ps 1:,wajyfjgy gf.f,.
0 0
- c. s.
FOLLOW-UP 23 0
OTHER 18 0,
h.;b uu.; :
$ '.2 j
20 0
L
~? o j
TOTAL 885 3
2 1
2109 18
- Includesindivibualswithdual-siteaccessatPBAPSandLCS fn ues
. wis T '
l l
Il.
1jlll!lIil
.=
5
- )I 4g 4
3k _
,c.
~
~
C R
B B
A P
A O
C M
O
%G TI A
E N e
a L
H M
P O
A N
?' R P
P SD N
n r
C E
P A
C R
F OP A
O O
TM D
z b
O N
H T
A U
I o
i H
C E
E U
R I H S
S E
O S
A N
V F V
N T
T I
U M
d t
O h
T S
E A
M O
I V
A T
I i
u L
a r
J'
,M A
E E
E E
L I
D S
E z
a D
e t
I N
S p
e N
E P
T i
s E
S O
I T
N n
S ES G
e I
s T
T
-- R 1 2 3 4 5 E
P IV D
O E
TE n
GR S
A 1
1 T
1 0
1 1
o 1
5 S
1 4
M 0
1 2
1 F
1 1
R O
5 E
R 9
1 S
- - =
9 U
S 8
L P
E
- =
l
/
9 T
1 S
C 0
0 I
0 0
0 0
2 o
9 7
F 1
I 7
3 C
I 3
7 S
1 U
B
-1I t
i 0
ST 1
iI 5
A 3
0 0
2 0
1 1
5 1
N 8
1 C
3 E
0 7
1 S
9 9
0 ii 0
1I 1
0 0
1 0
1 o
5 3
0 9
1 1
5 5
~
0 5
1 1
1 3
0 1
3 4
2 3
0 1
6 7
0 1
991
~
1 9
9 2
1
- 1 9
9 3
7
/
.t 31/
89 9
~
' '; j i i'
"i ]
lIl!i
'l, 1,
f t
25 ng/ml.
The contractor identified the problem on February 22, 1991 and immediately ceased PCP screening until the correct calibrator was received from the manufacturer (i.e.,
Syva).
Contact with PECo's certified laboratory (i.e., DrugScan, Inc.) indicated that Drug Scan was using the preper screen.
Investigation revealed that the contractor began using the Emit d.a.u. calibrator at our Limerick Generating Station (LGS) on August 21, 1990, and at PBAPS on October 24, 1990, in an attempt to ensure consistency between the on-site lab ard the certified lab.
Investigation revealed that the on-site lab supervisors failed to recognize the different calibration levels indicated within the literature accompanying the calibration reagents.
[
During the period, the on-site testing facility had correctly identified all blind proficiency operimens submitted.
We also noted that one of the quality control specimens (i.e.,
10% of negative screens) submitted to the certified lab was identified as a falso negative.
All on-site testing technicians were retrained in the proper methods of calibration reagent preparation and in following instructions contained in the accompanying literature.
IV.
Random Testing Rate PEco conducts random testing at the annualized rate of 100%.
The
" average number with unescorted access" includes personnel badged at both LGS and PBAPS.
PECo maintains separate testing " pools" for employees and contractors.
V.
Policy Revision on April 1, 1991, the company revised its separate Drug and Alcohol Policies into a single combined Drug and Alcohol Policy and Program.
1 V1.
Action Taken to Improve Program A.
The PECo Human Resources D9partment is being reorganized.
As part of this process, the position of FFD Program Manager is being established.
The FFD Program Manager will have clear responsibility for the FFD Program and will report to the Director, occupational Health and Safety.
B.
All collection sito personnel have been retrained with additional emphasis placed on attention to details.
C.
A separate secured access area has been established to ensure access to test results and random testing lists is restricted.
f l
~
K.
June 13, 1991 - Ran ',<. search of private vehicles parked near the "A" cooling towers.
Re sulte no activations.
L.
June 26, 1991 - Random team search of the Site Management Building and various rooms in Unita 2 and 3.
Results:
one activation in the Cable Spreading Room, one activation in the Medical Room Elevation 135.
No drugs or forensic samples taken.
II.
Management Actions During the period, two (2) PEco employees (1 Random /1 For-eause) and one (1) applicant tested positive at PDAPS.
The two (2) employees were referred to the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) and treatment provided as necessary.
Unescorted access was subsequently reinstated for the employee testing positive on the random test after evelaation by the Medical Review Officer.
The employee tested for cause has not at this time oeon reinstated.
During the period, eighteen (18) contractors tested positive (14 pre-employment. 4 random).
In accordance with PECo's Pitnesa-f or-Duty (FFL) Specification for cos ;ractor's, unescorted access was denied for the fourteen (14) pre-employments.
Unescorted access was tern._ tated for the four (4) contractors who tested positive on the random tests.
III. Events Reported under 10CFR26.73 A.
There were no events which required reporting in accordance with 10CFR26.73 at PBAPS during the reporting period.
B.
During the period, the following potentially reportable events were evaluated as not reportable.
1.
During a routine check of training records on January 22, 1991, PEco identified that a number of individuals, listed as supervisors, may not have completed either the initial FFD Supervisory Training within three months of assignment, or the annual refresher training.
Immediate notification was made to the Site Support Managers, security Coordinator, and the Nuclear Support Manager.
Resolution of the issue was accomplished through the following actions:
supervisory designation was removed from those not actually performing supervisory duties; access was temporarily suspended for those actually involved in supervisory duties until training was completed; and in some cases, posting completed training to the tracking system.
2.
On February 26, 1991, the contractor performing on-site immunoassay screening notified the FFD Coordinator that screening for the chemical "PCF," had not been completed properly.
The contractor had been using a PCP screen (i.e., Emit-d.a.u.) calibrated at 75 ng/ml as opposed to
T e
ATTACHMINT 8 a
l Summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station January - June 1991 i
I.
Initiatives Taken Thu sollowing summarireo the results of sweepe conducteo by the Philadelphia Electric Company's (PECo's) drug sniffing canine teams at 3 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PDAPS) during the period.
A.
January 18, 1991 - For-cause team search of a private vehicle.
Results: multiple activations.
Discovery of 50 mg. of suspect substance. Laboratory analysis revealed substance to be marijuana.
Plant access revoked.
D.
January 28, 1991 - Random team search of vehicles entering the Protected Area (PA).
Results:
no activationo.
C.
January 29, 1991 - Random team sweep of Plant Services Building, Hodification Building (second floor), Access control Center, Installation Tool Room and Security Management Building.
Results:
six responses in the too) room; no drugs found ot forensic samples taken.
l D.
February 1, 1991 - For-cauce team nearch of a private vehicle.
Reaultot tuo activations.
No drugs found or forensic samples taken.
Follow-up investigation verified previous off-site drug involvement, as well as the present abuse of alcohol.
Plant access revoked.
E.
February 1, 1991 - For-cause team nearch of a private vehicle.
Results:
two activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.
Follow-up investigation verified the individual used drugs off-uite from 1974 through 1990.
Plant access revoked.
F.
February 28, 1991 - Random Team search of vehicles entering the PA.
Reesults:
no activations.
G.
March 28, 1991 - Random team cearch of vehicles entering the l
PA.
Results:
no activations.
i H.
March 28, 1991 - Random team nearch of the first and fourth floors of the Administration Building within the PA, Installation Tool Room, Maintenance offices adjacent to the river, and six PECo vehicles.
Results:
one activation to PECo vehicle outside the PA.
No drugs found or forensic samples taken.
I.
April 30, 1991 - Random team search of the Maintenance Shop and all vehicles inside the PA.
Results:
no activations.
J.
June 12, 1991 - Random team search of vehicles entering the PA.
Results no activations.
ATTACllMENT 2 FTTNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM Performance Data Personne: Subject to 10CR 26 Philadelphia Elcetrice June _.30 J 11___
e uomis at:omo cowam Limerick Generatin L tation S
f tocAfbN D. H. SARLEY (215) 841-5703 Chn A01 NAM (
PHONt pNCWDC ARLA COD ()
CUT 0FFS: SCREEN /CONFIRMAll0N (ng/ml) O APeEN0ix A TO iOC7R 2e r
MARIJUANA 100 / 15 AMPHETAMINES 1000 / $00 P>arbitu u ten 300 / 300 COCAINE 300 /150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25 / 25
.lenzodi nepines 300 / 300 i
OPIATES 300 /300 ALCOHOL (% BAC) 0.04%BAC
/
LONG-T ERM SHORT TERM CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL N
+ k. '
AVERAGE NUMBER hi.,(-}
'h2. 3-[
J
)
4
\\VT ESCORTED 2931*
/5J a
. 7.
REFERRED ACCESS CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POS111VE
&;j.)X'(i@ ~
Q,;sl;$.!*, J h MC
. P 4:
968 13 PRE EMPLOYMENT S
0 g
l, h'
, h kN.
0 0
PRE BADGING 49 0
Lys p,, :,.
PERIODIC 0
0
$M.;. :..M/^ f 0
0 (4ay2, v $p,!f ;-
3 0
o.
.j3pj,Q FOR CAUSE 1
1 f3Q.yf "O:
.cs.c a POST ACCIDENT 01 0
gqd
.#4% F 2
0 ingp ;g 1.~
a.
RANDOM 704 2
@)yyVi3 Ok;.;Rd #
646 3
FOLI.0W UP 13 0
p$;
O O
m 9.. c a:4[W J T
@yjp cp {r.%
o o
OTHER
.T2
.o TOTAL 777 3
3
~ 3 1619 16
i u.
IiIl!!lL ll l'
h t
+ !
l t
g
~
j 1
5
~
C R
A P
A O
C M
O
%G TI A
I R
EN E
B L
H M
P O
A N
P P-P SD N
e a
C E
P A
C R
F OA O
O TIV D
n r
O N
H T
A U
I P
SiH S
S EI O
z b
H C
E E
!N U
R o
i O
Y T
S E
A M
I C I
T DD T
I I
M T
U d
t L
C A
N V F V
V A
T i
u U
M A
E E
E E
L a
r D
S E
z a
D IN S
e t
IN E
P T
p e
E S
O T
N I
i s
S m
m n
G e
P s
^4 2 3 4 5 V
m R
E O
T G
E R
S T
0 1
A 5
M 4
3 S
i!
7 2
4 0
0 O
5 2
3 8
F 3
0 R
O I
2 2
6 E
R 1
S 9
U S
- 7 8
L P
4_
9 T
S E
1 C
3 0
1 8
I 0
0 0
O 0
1 4
F
_ +
C 7
1 I
9 6
S c..
4 6
gy UB S
4 T
0 0
1 1
O 0
1 2
5 A
'tI 3
N 2
1 C
2 E
4 1
S 9
9 l
90 0
2 1
1 2
0 1
0 1
0 2
1 1
1 9
0 3
7 iI
~
5 0
0 4
0 0
0 8
7
{i, 0
4 1
3
[
5 0
1991 1
' 9 9
7 2
l i
i' 1
99 3
7
/
2 2/
I' 89 l.
e I;
b\\
ll j
1I ll' j
Jl il1lIlll1
ATTACHMENT 3 b
s summary of Data Analysis and Management Actions
{
Limerick Generating Station January - June 1991 r
1.
Initiatives Taken f
The following summarizes the results of sweeps conducted by the i
Philadelphie Electric company's (PEco's) drug sniffing canine teams f
at the Limerick Gb. Terr. ting Station (LGS) during the period.
i h.
February 5, 4,
- For cause team search of a contractor's vehicle.
Results:
three activations.
A field test of l
suspected controlled substance was negative.
l B.
February 28, 1991 - Random team sweep of LGS Personnel Processing Center.
Results:
ten activations.
One activation I
resulted in the location of a prescription drug. No other l
drugs were found or forensic samples taken.
_l r
C.
March 27, 1991 - Random team sweep of-Receiving Warehouse, f
Results:
twelve activations.
No drugs found or forensic samples-taken.
l I
D.
April 9, 1991 - For cause team search of bathroom in the Protected Area (PA) where a plastic bag was found taped to the inside of a stall.
Results no activations or forensic I
samples taken..
[
E.
April 29, 1991 - For cause team search of a leased vehicle brought onto site property.
Results:
three activations.
A field test of ash residue was negative.
L F.
May 25, 1991 - Random team sweep of the first floor of the LGS i
Site Support Building. Results:
ten activations. No drugs found or forensic samples taken.
G-June 14, 1991 - For cause team search of a contractor's i
vehicle.
Results three activations.
No drugs found or forensic samples taken.
II, Management Actions During the period, three (3) PEco employees tested positive at LGS.
Two (2) of the engloyees tested positive as a result of random testing.
The third was the. result of a "For cause" test.
[
As this was the first occurrence for each of these employees, their unescorted access was suspended for the fourteen (14) days required.
They were referred to PECo's Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for assessment and treatment, as necessary.- Following treatment, the individuals were evaluated by the Medical Review Officer (MRO) for return tc nuclear work.
All subsequently passed drug and alcohol testingil and were cleared by the MRO.
They subsequently obtained management approval and unoscorted access was regranted.
j i
h m
During the period a total of sixteen enntractors tested positive (13 preemployment/3 random).
In accordance wit h PEco's Fitnese-f or-Duty (FFD) opecification for contractors, unescorted access was denied for the thirteen individuale seeking uneocorted access.
Access was terminated for the three individuals testing poultive through the random testing process.
III. Events Reported under 10CFR26.73 A.
There was one event reported to the NRC under 10CFR26.73 during the first six months of 1991.
on April 5, 1991, a contractor supervisor working in our Training Division randonly tested positive on an alcohol breathalizer.
Blood test confirmed on April 9, 1991, that alcohol levela exceeded acceptable limits. On April 5,
- 1991, access was denied to the protected area of the plant. On April 9,
1991, the contractor employee was denied access to any PECo property and remains forbidden to do work for PECo.
i' D.
During the period, the following potentially reportable eventa were evaluated as not re port able.
1.
During a routine check of training recordo on January 22, 1991, PEco identified that a number of individuale, listed as supervisors, may not have completed either the initial FFD Supervisory Training within three months of assignment, or the annual refresher training.
Immediate notification was made to the Site Support Managere, Security Coordinators, and the Nuclear Support Manager.
Resolution of the issue was accomplished through the following actions supervisory designation was removed from those not actually performing supervisory duties; acceus was temporarily suspended for thoso actually involved in supervisory duties until training was completed: and in some cases, posting completed training to the tracking system.
2.
On February 26, 1991, the contractor performing on-site immunoassay screening notified the FFD Coordinater that
[
nereening for the chemical "PCP," had not been completed properly.
The contractor had been using a PCP ocreen t
(i.e.,
Emit-d.a.u.) calibrated at 75 ng/ml as opposed to 25 ng/nl. The contractor identified the problem on February 22, 1991, and immediately ceased acreening until i
tuo correct calibrator was received from the manufacturer l
(i.e.,
Syva).
Contact with PECo's certified laboratory I
(i.e.,
Drugscan, Inc.) indicated that Drug Scan was uning the proper screen.
[
1
/*
c.
4 e
Investigation revealed that the contractor began using the Emit d.a.u. calibrator at LOS on August 21, 1990, and at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PDAPS) on October 24, 1990, in an attempt to ensure consistency between the on-site tecting facility and the certified lab.
Investigation revealed that the lab supervisors failed to recognize the different calibration levels indicated within the literature accompanying the calibration reagents.
During the period, the *in-site testing faciltty had correctly identified all blind proficiency specimens
-submitted.
We also noted that one of the quality coritrol specimena (i.e., 10% of negative screens) submitted to the certified lab was identified as a falso negative.
All on-site testing technicians were tetrained in the proper methods of calibration reagent preparation and in following instructions contained in the accompanying literature.
IV.
Random Testing Rate PECo conducts random testing at the annualized rate of 1001.
The
" average r. umber with unescorted _ access" includes personnel badged at both
't and PDAPS.
PECo maintains separate testing " pools" for empivjz a and contractors.
V.
Policy Revision On April 1, 1991, the company revised its ceparate Drug and Alcohol Policies into a single combined-Drug and Alcohol Policy and Program.
VI.
Action Taken to Improve Program A.
The PEco Human Resources Department is being reorganized. As I
part of this process, the position of FFD Program Manager.is
{
being established. The FFD program Manager will have clear responsibility for the FFD Program and will report to the Director, Occupational Health and Safety.
D.
All' collection site personnel have been retrained with additional emphacio placed'on attention to details.
C.
A separate secured access area has been established to ensure
. access to test results and' random testing lists is restricted.
ATTACilMENT 3 i
1 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM Performance Data Personne: Subjec" to 10CFR 26 i
Philadelphia Electrice Company June 30, 1991 COMPA/4y 6 MON 1HS INDING Corporate and Nuclear Group lleadquarters toCAtl0N D. H. SARLEY (215) 841-5703 cout Act NAvt PHONE UNCLvet Antacooti 4
CUTOFFS: SCREEN / CONFIRMATION (ng/ml) b APPENDIX A TO 10CFR 26 MARUUANA 100 / 15 AMPPETAMINEL 1000
/ 500 Barbiturates 300/ 300, Ben Manpines 300 300 COCAINE 300 / 150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25
/ 25 j
OPIATES 300 / 300 ALCOHOL (% DAC) 0.04%BAC
/
LONG TERM SHORT TERM CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENGEE EMPLOYFES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL l
fhkh.:aAIE!7.[h4h AVERAGE NUMBER WITH UNESCORTED 931*
i e.l 2543*
i ACCESS
- b' r
REFERRED ACCESS CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE g.
e.,-
hpD
i2
,8 2
PRE EMPLOYMENT 49 1
/
j
.e
$e:- f,,
0 0
~
f4 L
PRE BADGING 18 0
l PERIODIC 1
0
$7",.
0 0
m(v.4 [ 'i, 0
0 l
K FOR CAUSE O
O POS'. ACCIDENT 0
0
(.p' S ;
1 0
0 h,fh'[fb h,_,.
RANDOM 268 0
11 0
gg.'fuuo.
':1., x)
FOLLOW UP 15 1
g #p.,
.g..
0 0
Y,, '.
- e
$,ff,
}
0 0
f OTHER 10 0
TOTAL l
361 2
1 0
19
'2
[
t i
+
,,,,. g.g-i 1
,.s t.
_i o
O h'
O 45 W
Y N
}e" B
B 3
Gy l
R a
s o
R z
?
j Bo H
C O
m o
c h
U h
M e
E 3
n a
w r M W 4 U1 h
u W
H C
O O
f4 ts Y
m u
7--
ti a>
D d
l e c'
E O
l u
tD U
U u
o o
o N
m v
W H
lh b
M O
CD C
W G
O N
H LA W
p O
8 O
Y Y
O O
Z~
O O
M N
tt M
N e
o o
O O
W O
O O
N N
O r
8-a 6>
--meeis 8w
>Gn.
8 I
w f
... ~..... _ _ _ _.,
...... ~,,. -. _.,, _ ~.. -,.,.
-..m.
~....
ATTACKMENT 3 r
Summary of Data Analysis and Hanagement Actions Corporate Office and Nuclear Group Headquarters January - June 1991 1.
Initiatives Taken Sweepn by drug sniffing canines were conducted at the Philadelphia Electric Company's (PECo's) corporate office and Nuclear Group Headquarters during the period.
Reports of these sweeps are not available at this time and will be included in the next periodic report of performanco data.
5 on February 19, 1991, a collection site was established at the Nuclear Group Headquarters in Wayne, Pennsylvania. This facility was established to reduce the lost-time impact for individuale aelected to participate in the random testing program.
II.
Management Actions
[
During the period, one (1) PEco employes (follow-up) and one (1) j applicant tested positive. The applicant who tested positive was not hired.
The employee testing positive was in the follow-up r
program as a result of two (2) previous positive tests.
Unescorted access for the individual had previously been denied.
The employee was subsequently terminated.
I Two (2) contractor applicants also tested positive and were not hired or granted acceec.
III. Events Reported under 10CFR26.73 A.
No events occurred during the period that require reporting under 10CFR26.73.
B.
During the period, the following potentially reportable events were evaluated as not reportable.
1.
During a routine check of training records on January 22, 1991, PECo identified that a number of individuals, listed as supervisors, may not have completed either the initial Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) Supervisory Training within three montha o( assignment, or the annual refresher training.
Immediate notification was made to the Site Support Managers, Secucity coordinators, and the Nuclear Support Manager.
Resolution of the issue was accomplished thrcugh the following actions:
supervisory designation was removed from those not actually performing supervisory duties; access was temporarily suspended for those i
actually involved in supervisory duties until training was
. completed; and in some cases, posting completed training to toe tracking system.
i e
- w e
e.
.p.w.
v....
1 1
I 2.
On February 26, 1991, the contractor performing on-site immunoassay screening notified the FFD Coordinator that screening the chemical "PCP," had not been completed properly. The contractor had been using a PCP screen (i.e., Emit-d.a.u.) calibrated at 75 ng/ml as opposed to 25 ng/ml. The contractor identified the problem on j
February 22, 1991 and immediately ceased PCP screening i
until the correct calibrator was received from the manufacturer (i.e., Syva).
Contact with PEco's certified h
laboratory (i.e., DrugScan, Inc.) indicated that Drug Scan
{
was using the proper scroon.
l Investigation revealed that the contractor began using the Emit d.a.u. calibrator at the Limerick Generating Station (LGS) on August 21, 1990, and at the-Peach Bottom Atomic j
Power-Station (PBAPS) on October 24, 1990, in an attempt to ensure consistency between the on-site testing facility and the certified lab.
Investigation revealed that the l
lab supervisors f ailed to recognize the dif ferent calibration levels indicated within the literature "secompanying the calibration reagents.
[
I
.During the period,- the on-site testing facility had i
correctly identified all blind proficiency specimens l
aubmitted. We also noted that one of the quality control j
specimens (i.e., 10% of negative screens) submitted to the f
certified lab'was ider.tified as a falso negative.
t All on-site testing technicians were retrained in the j
' proper methods of calibration reagent preparation and in j
following instructions contained in the accompanying j
literature.
j
_IV..
Random Testing Rate f
.PEco conducts random testing at the annualized ~ rate of-100%.
The
" average number with unetcorted acceus" includes personnel badged at
[
both LOS and PBAPS.
PEco maintains menarate testing " pools" for i
employees.nnd contractors.
I
-l V.
Policy Revision
[
On April 1, 1991, the company revised its separate Drug and Alcohol Policies into a single combined Drug and Alcohol Policy and Program.
I i
?t
_ VI. - Action Taken to Improve Program A.
The PEco Human Resources Department is being reorganized.
As part of this process, the position of FFD Program Manager is being established. The FFD Program Manager will have clear
)
responsibility for the FFD Program and will report to the
[
Director, occapctional Health and Safety.
[
l-
[
I
s a
D.-
All collection site personnsi have been retrained with additional emphasis placed on attention to details.
C.
A separate secured access area has boon established to ensure access to test results and random testing lists is restricted.
I f
i i
1
(
f 8
i t
I i
i t
i i
i f
r I
t t
i i
I t
i E
I I
i
?
Y t
1 T
r i
--....-s-
. ~..
. ~
.__,...--_.__--_...__________________.-.-~..-______-..-_.~--.!