ML20081J586

FOIA Request for All Documents Between Us Fish & Wildlife Svc Employees Before ASLB &/Or Us District Court Re Util OL Application

ML20081J586
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	07/22/1983
From:	Sugarman R SUGARMAN & ASSOCIATES
To:	NRC
References
FOIA-83-425 NUDOCS 8311090034
Download: ML20081J586 (2)

Text

'

SUGARMAN & DENWORTP AT TORN EYS AT LAW sul,c mos ROB ERT J. SUG AR M AN suait s to. NORTH AM E RIC AN BUILDING JOANNE R.DENWORTH 128 SOUTH DROAD STREET

'8088'* ****

PH ILAD E LPH IA. P EN N SYLVAN I A 19807 MARYB.COC ROBIN T. LOCKC U t S) 54 6 016 3 ROBERT RAYMON D CLLIOTT, P. C,*

CouMSEL CERTIFIED MAIL

..,, ~..,,,,,,,,,

~

July 22, 1983 FREW OF INFORMAT Freedom of Information Officer ACT REQUEST U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Q

4 43-4 elf Washington, DC 20sss b W 7-AF-P3 RE:

Freedom of Information Act

Dear Sir:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, I request copies of all memoranda, analysis, and correspondence between the staff of the NRC and any other federal agency, including, without limitation, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, regarding the testimony of U.S. Fish and Wildlife employees before the Operating License Board and/or the U.S. District Court, regarding the Application of Philadelphia Electric Company for the Limerick generating sta-tion, Application and Docket Nos. 50-352, 50-353.

This request specifically includes but is not limited to correspondence and analyses between the legal staff, including but not limited to Ann Hodgdon, Esquire, and all other agencies, created between October 1982 and June 1983.

It is anticipated that it may be contended that this material is related or comes within an exemption to FOIA relating to litigation.

In responbe, and anticipating such response, I hereby assert that the litigation matters to which the documents may have been relevant were complete, with respect to the testi-mony involved, at the time the correspondence and other documents were created, and therefore do not qualify as being within the scope of such comments or documents.

In view of the urgent nature of this transaction, it is requested that the time limits of FOIA be complied with, and that a response be furnished within ten days hereof.

8311090034 830722 PDR FOIA SUCARMAB3-425 PDR

Freedom of Information Officer 2

July 22, 1983 Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

! \\,

\\

s

\\

- ~ ~.

Robert J.Sugarman PJS/eb cc:

Ann liodgdon, Esquire i

i l

.b M. a =; 2d.a. ~..a

... - v

.c..

w

s. -

k. 6 M & M, t %.:m.MhaacEk,kMia.n,,.n&dw:

a m

. u.4

-+

.A 1

o c-fgwpg%

. p.. 3, gy,.,.g..

mene Acency.. n

~. p

• k

.p y.

[QW Federal Emergency Ma;na,ge;gz 4

. %.V ? G,gggf.Egpllg "} Q.. U {,'

[n. G,~.{'.p ;fi y 1.: p y :k; Ia 3 H y1 5 \\ ll ' ; -- ' y.Q f. J. 'Q.Q'.,; ..R

Q $.4~

r . 9. t' ~~

n. s.,,,.

.n . 8, Me; 6J @7i y ,y. .w ?,.. 3:. a s l n~.- 1 ,o ps, > ; _ s J - z ., %.e. .? M ' [ ' H a L N."" DR; Edwrd L. Jordan l'in ctor, Divir. ion of Eu:rrency r : c p u he t. s and E.;yinec t i g Ees pohs e of fice of In getion cad Enforecant ', 7 E b ~p. b 'u l U.S. f.ucle - E rul atory Ca:nission. *g,,, m y . :,. i.; '. ': y e tw Q. 4 '. d ' M, : ' 'h- ~ 'W. 4 s FROM: {hard W. Kr ir:= s-s Assistent Associr.te ' Director,N ' t .C U7 2 .k-* Of fice, of Netural' and Tochnoldi;ical'liaiards)i h ~

7..;,

, 'a, ' 2 ~ . ~. :.t .q..s nf c ..a

n..m.J y,.

.t Findings on the LIlr0 Tranaition Plan As Requested by, g, r SL'BJECT: ~ the. NRC as Part ' of.. NRC Licensing' of t.he. S. h..oreha:a

c...

% 5 ".c 7 i: L,1/ <' - ->+ 3 *.,, s c .e ....n, -Nucle,ar Po.wer Stat. ion. a-y.

q y&

.) u ~- s .+ > .~ ...,.,.,.m,,... A y v. .; c. .,.:~. s. if ?.g. p- ' t. ,Q &. /.. ~ .e ./ ,s.9.. ;..' 3 ocmorandum~in which* you invokedf jC..,,1., y 11 1983, ,s This, is in response to^your. June Section 11.4 of the Novesber 1.91980s:NRC/ FEMA Me=orandus of; Understanding. J g w.- by riquesting the Federalf EmergescyfinMementi.'Agescy.(FEMA) to: provide L 'd c hW T the Nuclear. Regulatory Commission (NRC)?vich 'fiddings;' add' de,t' rminatio'ds e 7. @.4 'D* 'N ' 56nty. pla_s.fahdjoF.. the, ' in..teri(. piQoM. theement ati~o t.,C..,,., % ~ . a's' t.o"whcchii,t : the L 40.-C ~ ~ are-a. dequate.andg>e.np.ab.le.. of.jimpl - e, '6-p.w. +.. a 4 .x. -shorehas Nuclear, Stati. on'. a',rcsult of an Atocic. Eafe..ty.and Licensing Board..(ASLBl._orde.x.. .. f ' 1,

m. u s

p,K C,o(your.0.r.t .r .c r M. first, M, ((p k,7.. .} vi.de.W. 7+ F: 'tindi::gs and _ determinations'on the L.837t. equeHe.datha. : t. E - a stibs eque nt[memor andum of, J.'unE.1,7,3,,,.9 I J f. = I[CO:. Transition 4 se.I'il40h Qf. i -, pIidirity.; ~ This, Plan (de'velip%d~ wfio,117)Y,LT116j'[pypo'oesh c.ase.. of an. M. %r.= w ,7 r .pl.an- (t.o. ; r w*# s'- of.i . pers.o.nnel to carry out* t.he of.f.si.tet prepare.d,ne.ss...,-)es.pec..t,he.r m.. . L4 's. .,,in.clude the' to. t al,di.r. e. c.t, ion.an.d con,'t,ro.,13"f.uncti.on 'i.n t, Tower St ation.i.-f.c..w s. . i. pC' an:. accident at. the. Shoreh. -l Nuclear '~ .. ~ ezergeocy ] involving %f, ', - iYf.b d'Q ) ',Q KQ Q.l :.' ' - {.k.W:.& ~ am 7 ~ .'. N >1m.3..J.P. 9 . Tra=sicion Plan differed 'trom thec usualP350t.... Evar p. ~Fi. rs paow,',usder Moraal ' processing,'.theSlany~, r appr rocess.." As cyou - f d M ]'b ,~ ~. request by the Covernor of the -Statenin which' the tsciear':f acility'is D.".p.L,( ', [.. d,' plans' submitted' by;.thet. S 3 i.? '1bcal? governments in.the energent'yfplanning zone surr$uoding*the4 + p C 4 7.' ' 'i. ; l _3ocated ' af ter he/shihi.s., receividf.and cana yze s qfacility. The requeat(ineludes th's.Stata plan'which As,aitchpecifIc to 35(-[f. * ~ E f. . the applicable ' power.f acility, apprdpriate local plans ( and"a[s tatement. n ' by.lthe.Covernor. that' the State plan', together with the local". plans, are. h 4 'T~r public' he alth,[an,d's af ety 'of the..i.c'i.'tize, n.s,living ' v #..1 'within the emergency planning zones for, the nuclear, powegf ac .'adequa. te to. prot ect

. 7,..

Nincluded 'in.the submission.by - providing. reasonable -assur ance,that, appropriate.~ _. s. f.jro.tective. acasuras' can..aridiill b'd' tiskip. in' de ede,n.'t..o. f,1.a' f, ad.iol.o.gi +

1. [emergeney (or! the site.':iThgryEMA)rdcas'sidg'Jof aJCovernor aysuha 4

j i l T g R, y .~.9 e-relovaqt. ~. Cinclude,s extena ive,re. v..$ew'by -ths,%ppresntly,",a drilligt;;exerc{sa,"ine di ngt ' ;.-e..' c. 1, a public meeting;.,nd most a s .MRAC)[.

• all appropriate goverdiment's, to tYst'whether t.he' plan *fc an...be"#.t =pletsent ed.2

2.,. ' -

3

,].. F k.,n p., '

~ v' .? ,-.f--

s. n

- p, b. i f3 3 "... g :. . ;,, y.. ~Q. a , a. ' u ..j-M @, -

g. <

w t' s e r., U' ..r ..C, r.. \\ - . 3 1.,. - t ? >o 4,. _. :p s c w-.

g ~, : s. s s 4 . n. 3 W 3 n. s. .; t - m... .s ' '.:..' {f [ ..c. [;.,. d[*.j[, $'n r, ', - ${.,:,. I -f. 7, ' c'- T . g l,g/ d $ k.fh. .q. . c N. ,f,., : .m,....,

• y;.

g c - ~ %s y e,, s,,.

s. g:.

w . ",a. s ,5 y - . y.y, '% g, .~ ~ 1..e - r< A L .9 ..w...- . e, m, a,a ( ,,c .e s. r f a e .v s. rp.. .,,,, ;, ;,p.. ,3,; 4 ,.g r l ,g.. r.. ~< T contrast to t he pracc cs de r cribed abovt., the Ll!.CJ Transit ion. Flan vsa %.ittel, c' tMu t Suf falk Cou-ty or New Yc ri: S t e.it e cahrs cu rt, b em ly to FDU. He rL,uart e re t hr o.y;n !.he I.T.C for rtvi ci c:1 der the te r.s c: the NP.C/ FEMA Nctoranduc of ' Cr.derstandi ng," -Because Ibc Plen was not sticiered , ~; under 44 CFR 350,' n RAC review was not"Onder' aken.s. Fef this reason. S,, t coupled with the fect -that' the NRC needed 's FEMA finii:g within-three: a uceksi it.was:cehessary to obtal'n th siipport ' f Argbene Nacidnel Lab'oratord ec 'lc' I-', o to assisti cad' perform ;a-technical review of the. pla6 asainst.the 16 f <,.: . ' ': l 3 ' planning etc6dards~and driteria (A-P) lieted'in NUREC-0654/FD{A-REP-1 7 ~ 7"' Rev. -1. TEMA Hem!q.uatters, assisted bv FDIA's Region U Regional Director ' ' ", 1~ and staf f. directed this technical review., 4.: ',~ =, u. N.s.. A '.4..e.. . 'r c.' - s .. s. v. FEftA finds that the LIlf0 Transition Plan has 34. An,aiguacies ~ in tetua .C. .. m of NUREG-0654/FDiA-REP -1, Rev.1. Our: analysis rel ting these inadeq'uacies. .;7 . to the.yvarious critefia.is at.tached.. M.... .>.4.. M '}.'. ", ' i / 4.Ci.i ! 4 .,. s. z. s. ~ There are two 'precodditions, identkfiedibelow,ltha't need toi be isEt foI 5'- ~ .. s,M. FEMA fisfing 'as to whether the plan ;is:. capable of, beir.g 11 plemented fad I'..L Weth'erILILC0"has 'the ' ability' to impleas'nt.ths' plan.F 2 G W ',i$.* i k. M /" t 3.J. y~ (p &, [.'ff J j l,(.',.;h)oth' r..Lil40!h'as.t.h^e rapp p :

f%

IT JA determination of. w _(. 'l &.'Q3 W. (, ). d:R g S'- - ,1 e <<'y ..b :q matherity.t'o assdme.. ~ manage ment i and.[impleturnt at io:C of, an..offe.ite %. t ; #g 1. .g ^ 'emeg:ency < response ' plan.C I ~ G+N4I' ?. $h p*ib >.. k@

• V4' z

J . 2( 2).'r A ~de. cons t ration. t.hrou. gh i,i....,A+s. s: ~ ,;.,:, J. ',',*..n. A. -:. t.,p'. .. ~. ~,- n.?. w f. u. # .. e:o m. i WL. i.W ~ .s p e, e 't *;;. t a. . a; -. f4..? as ~., ability to implement an':offsite ipla.s.. exerci.s.e;4 L e.n that ha r r. q *. - s.. .L a ful'l-scal t a .s M. 2.to c p. r,,..v,f ;n. m.

n. f 9,.s c,ou:

..w

• . abe sicquate.

...g.g.. n n.

7,. z;'93;a.

m. ~. r. h,< u .W -,s. ..s w , :w. FDiA will. continue to " review the. 'ot her,e r ...'y re<;uest 'in anticipation that. the ASLE, plans;' associated with you,rf ene 1 , 3 ', ', J f will.'. require FE. HA., findings o. n these 4

• c/F, -

. plans st:a later date. i .E th. >. T 'T. G.. j ; s r. .. p:. -, .,..w e s cy., Att achmen t .<s J., As stated .e Y i, ..c - < 4, 'c. ' W.,. 2, t, 7-g - ',k , ?. l ] t s .p 6 9 j g h. ?,t .:.. ~ '.!*. {, ' U ' fe.

• ~ * -

L }r q ..'.e,' s ,,'.-w s.' ,,..K. . i . '4 .4 -4,- l$ 4.-i ; f,. ' 6,,c ~" ^ i N> * *' * + I .; r -, .l s se s- .-[ t,,,. ' '* t.. w., ; 5 %, ** ,. =.- e p-i ,,'m ,s t j.g . j. e i. -- ..... +- g-y... 3 t ..I J 44 e = ).. .}}