ML20081D619

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion for Correction of 830817-19,23 & 31 Testimony Transcripts
ML20081D619
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/26/1983
From: Shotwell J
MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20081D621 List:
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8311010272
Download: ML20081D619 (4)


Text

.

s.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 00, TED g

Before Administrative Judges: l Helen F. Hoyt, Chairperson

'83 OCT 31 All :18 Emmeth A. Luebke Jerry Harbour [0C A

SILh'rjs rb' BRANCH

)

In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-443-OL

) 50-444-OL PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY )

! 0F NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al.

).

) October 26, 1983 (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) )

)

)

ATTORNEY GENERAL BELLOTTI'S MOTION FOR CORRECTION OF TRANSCRIPT Attorney General Francis X. Bellotti hereby moves that the transcripts of the August hearings be corrected to accurately reflect statements and testimony made, as follows:

August 17, 1983 Page 944, line 18 -- Should be corrected to insert "Jo Ann Shotwell," before line as it reads in transcript.

Page 950, line 21 -- Should be corrected to read " based on conversations with the Massachusetts Civil Defense" Page 962,_line 25 -- Should be new entry

, following line 25 as follows, "Mr. Dignan:

That's correct. "

Page 1012, line 16 -- Should be corrected to read "Again meaning editorial revisions?"

Page 1038, line 6 - "18..." should read "I-3...".

8311010272 831026 PDR ADOCK 05000443 T PDR

1 August 17, 1983 -- continued l

Page 1038, line 10 -

"so..." should read l

" Sir, ... . I Post Tr. ,1016 -- Exhibit 2 to the' Applicants' Direct Testimony is missing and must be inserted in the record. A version of Appendix C to the FSAR was inserted instead in error.

Page 1058, line 6 - ".EPC" should read "EPZ".

Page 1063, line 17 -- Line should be corrected to read "I believe we're into adverse weather '

affects..."

Page 1075, line 5 - "in" should read "and" Page 1083, line 19 -- Should read ". . . with a lot of daily transients. . . " not ". . .

without a lot of daily transients. . .".

Page 1090, line 11 - "instention" should read "in ten tion" .

Page 1091, line 11 - "advese" should read

" adverse".

Page 1094, line 20 -- " load" should read " low".

Page 1132, line 24 - ". . . on the position. . .

should read ". . . and the position. . .".

Page 1140, line 21 - "They are update." should read "They .are not up-to-date. "

Page 1141, line 11 - ". . . in other case. . .

should read ". . . in other cases . . .".

Page 1142, line 5 - ". . . or solely. . ."

chould read ". . . are solely. . .".

~

Page 1143, line 6 -- last word should be "a" not "our".

Page 1144, line 6 -- Beginning of line should read " order on NECNP's contentions."

Page 1144, lines 13 - should read

" contentions on'off-site emergency planning, which included concerns about evacuation time estimates, and specifically". .

Page 1145, line 3 -- should read " binds us.

It's a much narrower point than that we have free reiga."

-E- 1 I

August 17, 1983 -- continued Page 1145, line 18 -- shculd read

" conversely, though, Miss shotwell, you".

% ,e Page 1147,,line 23 - ". . . the filed . . .

should read ". .. . they filed. . . . "

Page 1153,- line 18 - ". . . thc.t advisability. . ."

.should ' read " . . . the advisability. . .".

Page 1159, line 21 - " cross-examination status" a should read " cross-examination strategy".

1 August 18, 1983 s

Page 1165, line 7 -- should read "That .'

have been made to date; no."

Page 1175, line 25 - "their testimony" should read "that testimony" Page 1176, line 1 - " bee" should read "been"

.W w

Page 1178, line 4 - " form" should read "former" Page 1180, line 9 -- should read "That[s '

what I sam offering, then , now. " (

\

'g Page 1184, line 20 - "in admissible" shbuld read " inadmissible" 5s%

Page 1190, line 6 - " refiled" should read s s x

s. )

i "prefiled"

-l q

Page 1216, line 20 -- should read " parking. ,

I live-parked." l i

Page 1246,.' lines 5 and 6 -- ~should r'ead "Yes, with some frequency -- meteorological phenomena, in particular as they relate to '

j storm warning, are" Page 1248, line 5 -- should' read'"okay. I'll try one more time." - t Page 1261, line 9 - "any" should read "many" Page 1264, lines 10 and 11 -- should read " rely upon traffic controls, which rely on areawide '

power. To 'the degree that it does, it needs to d

?

anticipate the" . }s $

N k n

{ 3 am

, c

- s . . me Q<  %- s

.s D g,

a

\% -m-

. .. s '\ 3 August 18, 19 8 3 - _ continued s s Page 1267, line { - "no" should read "or"

s Page 1277, line 14 -- beginning of line should

~

read "as they did" .

Page 1292, line 25 - "on agreement should read "in agreement" s

Page 1295, line 13 - bhould read " belated, but for these purposes perhaps the stipulation could" .

I Page 1316, line 10 -- the word "in" should be inserted between the words " efficiency" and

" utilization" Page 13 71, linc 20 - "EPC" should read "EPZ" sm  %

August 19, 1983's g s

's.

Page 1350,'line 12 -- "amid" should read " omit" PAge,1353,[}ine 4 - " contract should read " contractor" Page 1471, line 7 - "no" should read "not" August 23, 1983 Page 1685, line 24 -- should read "for the intervenors, the Commonwealth, and New Hampshire."

Page 1771, line 19 - " plants" should read " plans" August 31, 1983 Page 1840, line 23 - " send" should read "sent" Pagegl841, line 4 - "is office" should read "his office" s! 2 Page 1851, line 11 - " safety" should read " safely"

-t, Respectfully submitted, FRANCIS X. BELLOTTI ATTORNEY GENERAL is By:  %

Jp h,nn Shotwell Ass 3stant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division One Ashburton Place Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617) 727-2265

, l- $_