|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARL-99-035, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld1999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld ML20217G0801999-10-0707 October 1999 Informs That on 990930,staff Conducted mid-cycle PPR of Farley & Did Not Identify Any Areas in Which Performance Warranted More than Core Insp Program.Nrc Will Conduct Regional Insps Associated with SG Removal & Installation ML20217P0661999-10-0606 October 1999 Requests Withholding of Proprietary Rept NSD-SAE-ESI-99-389, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20217B1891999-10-0404 October 1999 Submits Clarification Re Development of Basis for Determining Limiting Internal Pressure Loads Re Review of NRC SE for Cycle 16 Extension Request.Util Intends to Use Guidelines When Evaluating SG Tube Structural Integrity ML20212J8391999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards RAI Re Request for Amends to Ts.Addl Info Needed to Complete Review to Verify That Proposed TS Are Consistent with & Validate Design Basis Analysis.Request Discussed with H Mahan on 990930.Info Needed within 10 Days of This Ltr ML20212J8801999-09-30030 September 1999 Discusses GL 98-01,suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util 980731,990607 & 03 Ltrs Provided Requested Info in Subj Gl.Nrc Considers Subj GL to Be Closed for Unit 1 L-99-032, Responds to NRC Re Adequacy of Kaowool Fire Retardant Fire Barriers in Use at Jfnp,Units 1 & 21999-09-23023 September 1999 Responds to NRC Re Adequacy of Kaowool Fire Retardant Fire Barriers in Use at Jfnp,Units 1 & 2 L-99-034, Forwards Comments on Draft Current Tech Specs Discussion of Change Tables for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant.Units 1 & 21999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards Comments on Draft Current Tech Specs Discussion of Change Tables for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant.Units 1 & 2 ML20212F8861999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards Revised Relief Request Number 32 for NRC Approval. Approval Requested by 991231 to Support Activities to Be Performed During Unit 1 Refueling Outage Scheduled for Spring of 2000 ML20212E7031999-09-23023 September 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util Requested to Submit Plans & Schedules for Resolving Y2K-related Issues ML20212F1111999-09-21021 September 1999 Discusses Closeout of GL 97-06, Degradation of Steam Generator Internals ML20212C2351999-09-16016 September 1999 Submits Corrected Info Concerning Snoc Response to NRC GL 99-02, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal ML20212D0101999-09-15015 September 1999 Informs That Submittal of clean-typed Copy of ITS & ITS Bases Will Be Delayed.Delay Due to Need for Resolution of Two Issues Raised by NRC staff.Clean-typed Copy of ITS Will Be Submitted within 4 Wks Following Resolution of Issues ML20212C4641999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Info Requested in Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams L-99-031, Informs NRC That Review of MOV Testing Frequency & Changes Made to Frequency of MOV Testing Has Been Completed1999-09-13013 September 1999 Informs NRC That Review of MOV Testing Frequency & Changes Made to Frequency of MOV Testing Has Been Completed ML20212C8041999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun Requesting Review of J Sherman Re Y2K Compliance.Latest NRC Status Rept on Y2K Activities Encl ML20212D4581999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun,Requesting Review of J Sherman Expressing Concerns That Plant & Other Nuclear Plants Not Yet Y2K Compliant ML20212A6951999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20212A8341999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20211N8041999-09-0808 September 1999 Informs That on 990930 NRC Issued GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Condition, to Holders of Nuclear Plant Operating Licenses ML20211N4301999-09-0808 September 1999 Discusses Proposed Meeting to Discuss Kaowool Fire Barriers. Staff Requesting That Affected Licensees Take Issue on Voluntary Initative & Propose Approach for Resolving Issues ML20212C0071999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-05 & 50-364/99-05 on 990627- 0807.No Violations Noted.Licensee Conduct of Activities at Farley Plant Facilities Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations & Sound Engineering ML20211Q4801999-09-0101 September 1999 Informs That on 990812-13,Region II Hosted Training Managers Conference on Recent Changes to Operator Licensing Program. List of Attendees,Copy of Slide Presentations & List of Questions Received from Participants Encl ML20211K2131999-08-31031 August 1999 Informs That Snoc Has Conducted Review of Reactor Vessel Integrity Database,Version 2 (RVID2) & Conclude That Latest Data Submitted for Farley Units Has Not Been Incorporated Into RVID2 ML20211K4101999-08-31031 August 1999 Resubmits Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-5 & Q2P16-RR-V-5 That Seek to Group V661 Valves from Each Unit Into Sample Disassembly & Insp Group,Per 990525 Telcon with NRC L-99-030, Forwards SNC Review Comments on Draft SE & marked-up Copy of Draft SE Incorporating SNC Comments Re Proposed Conversion to ITS1999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards SNC Review Comments on Draft SE & marked-up Copy of Draft SE Incorporating SNC Comments Re Proposed Conversion to ITS ML20211G6851999-08-26026 August 1999 Informs That During Insp,Technical Issues Associated with Design,Installation & fire-resistive Performance of Kaowool Raceway fire-barriers Installed at Farley Nuclear Plant Were Identified L-99-029, Forwards Revised Response to Chapter 3.1 RAI Requested in 990726 Conference Call,Rai Response Related to Beyond Scope Issue for Chapter 3.5 Requested by Conference Call on 990805 & RAI Response to Chapter 3.8 Requested on 990615 & 07271999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Revised Response to Chapter 3.1 RAI Requested in 990726 Conference Call,Rai Response Related to Beyond Scope Issue for Chapter 3.5 Requested by Conference Call on 990805 & RAI Response to Chapter 3.8 Requested on 990615 & 0727 ML20211B9431999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for six-month Reporting Period 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Rept Covers Employees at Jm Farley Nuclear Plant & Southern Nuclear Corporate Headquarters ML20211B9211999-08-17017 August 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09.Corrective Actions:Security Response Plan Was Revised to Address Vulnerabilities Identified During NRC Insp ML20210R5101999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Revised Page 6 to 990430 LAR to Operate Farley Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Only,Based on risk- Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity,As Result of Staff Comments ML20212C8141999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards Correspondence Received from Jm Sherman.Requests Review of Info Re Established Policies & Procedures ML20210T2021999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Draft SE Accepting Licensee Proposed Conversion of Plant,Units 1 & 2 Current TSs to Its.Its Based on Listed Documents ML20210Q4641999-08-0505 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Authorized Representative of Facility Must Submit Ltr to La Reyes,As Listed,With List of Individuals to Take exam,30 Days Before Exam Date ML20210J8341999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Second Request for Addl Info Re Util 990430 Amend Request to Allow Util to Operate Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Based on risk-informed Probability of SG Tube Rupture & Nominal accident-induced primary-to-second Leakage ML20210G4901999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, Issued 990603.Ltr Contains NRC License Commitment to Utilize ASTM D3803-1989 with Efficiency Acceptance Criteria Utilizing Safety Factor of 2 L-99-028, Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines1999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-027, Addresses Clarifications to Selected Responses to Chapter 3.8 RAI Requested in NRC Conference Call on 990624, Resolution of Open Issue Related to Containment Purge in Chapter 3.6 & Response Related to Chapter 3.51999-07-27027 July 1999 Addresses Clarifications to Selected Responses to Chapter 3.8 RAI Requested in NRC Conference Call on 990624, Resolution of Open Issue Related to Containment Purge in Chapter 3.6 & Response Related to Chapter 3.5 ML20210G8181999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-04 & 50-364/99-04 on 990516- 0626.One Violation Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violation IR 05000348/19990091999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses Insp Repts 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09 on 990308- 10 & Forwards Notice of Violation Re Failure to Intercept Adversary During Drills,Contrary to 10CFR73 & Physical Security Plan Requirements ML20210E4071999-07-22022 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-026, Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments1999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments L-99-264, Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 20011999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 ML20209H4721999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 ML20196J6191999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards Final Dam Audit Rept of 981008 of Category 1 Cooling Water Storage Pond Dam.Requests Response within 120 Days of Date of Ltr 05000364/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed1999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed ML20196J7471999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re Cycle 16 Extension Request.Response Requested within 30 Days of Date of Ltr ML20196J5781999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re 981201 & s Requesting Amend to TS Associated with Replacing Existing Westinghouse Model 51 SG with Westinghouse Model 54F Generators.Respond within 30 Days of Ltr Date ML20196J6571999-07-0202 July 1999 Discusses Closure to TAC MA0543 & MA0544 Re GL 92-01 Rev 1, Suppl 1,RV Structural Integrity.Nrc Has Revised Rvid & Releasing It as Rvid,Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses ML20196J3591999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards SE of TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at Westinghouse 3-Loop Pwrs 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARL-99-035, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld1999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld ML20217P0661999-10-0606 October 1999 Requests Withholding of Proprietary Rept NSD-SAE-ESI-99-389, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20217B1891999-10-0404 October 1999 Submits Clarification Re Development of Basis for Determining Limiting Internal Pressure Loads Re Review of NRC SE for Cycle 16 Extension Request.Util Intends to Use Guidelines When Evaluating SG Tube Structural Integrity L-99-034, Forwards Comments on Draft Current Tech Specs Discussion of Change Tables for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant.Units 1 & 21999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards Comments on Draft Current Tech Specs Discussion of Change Tables for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant.Units 1 & 2 L-99-032, Responds to NRC Re Adequacy of Kaowool Fire Retardant Fire Barriers in Use at Jfnp,Units 1 & 21999-09-23023 September 1999 Responds to NRC Re Adequacy of Kaowool Fire Retardant Fire Barriers in Use at Jfnp,Units 1 & 2 ML20212F8861999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards Revised Relief Request Number 32 for NRC Approval. Approval Requested by 991231 to Support Activities to Be Performed During Unit 1 Refueling Outage Scheduled for Spring of 2000 ML20212C2351999-09-16016 September 1999 Submits Corrected Info Concerning Snoc Response to NRC GL 99-02, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal ML20212D0101999-09-15015 September 1999 Informs That Submittal of clean-typed Copy of ITS & ITS Bases Will Be Delayed.Delay Due to Need for Resolution of Two Issues Raised by NRC staff.Clean-typed Copy of ITS Will Be Submitted within 4 Wks Following Resolution of Issues L-99-031, Informs NRC That Review of MOV Testing Frequency & Changes Made to Frequency of MOV Testing Has Been Completed1999-09-13013 September 1999 Informs NRC That Review of MOV Testing Frequency & Changes Made to Frequency of MOV Testing Has Been Completed ML20212C4641999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Info Requested in Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams ML20211K2131999-08-31031 August 1999 Informs That Snoc Has Conducted Review of Reactor Vessel Integrity Database,Version 2 (RVID2) & Conclude That Latest Data Submitted for Farley Units Has Not Been Incorporated Into RVID2 ML20211K4101999-08-31031 August 1999 Resubmits Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-5 & Q2P16-RR-V-5 That Seek to Group V661 Valves from Each Unit Into Sample Disassembly & Insp Group,Per 990525 Telcon with NRC L-99-030, Forwards SNC Review Comments on Draft SE & marked-up Copy of Draft SE Incorporating SNC Comments Re Proposed Conversion to ITS1999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards SNC Review Comments on Draft SE & marked-up Copy of Draft SE Incorporating SNC Comments Re Proposed Conversion to ITS L-99-029, Forwards Revised Response to Chapter 3.1 RAI Requested in 990726 Conference Call,Rai Response Related to Beyond Scope Issue for Chapter 3.5 Requested by Conference Call on 990805 & RAI Response to Chapter 3.8 Requested on 990615 & 07271999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Revised Response to Chapter 3.1 RAI Requested in 990726 Conference Call,Rai Response Related to Beyond Scope Issue for Chapter 3.5 Requested by Conference Call on 990805 & RAI Response to Chapter 3.8 Requested on 990615 & 0727 ML20211B9431999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for six-month Reporting Period 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Rept Covers Employees at Jm Farley Nuclear Plant & Southern Nuclear Corporate Headquarters ML20211B9211999-08-17017 August 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09.Corrective Actions:Security Response Plan Was Revised to Address Vulnerabilities Identified During NRC Insp ML20210R5101999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Revised Page 6 to 990430 LAR to Operate Farley Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Only,Based on risk- Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity,As Result of Staff Comments ML20212C8141999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards Correspondence Received from Jm Sherman.Requests Review of Info Re Established Policies & Procedures ML20210G4901999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, Issued 990603.Ltr Contains NRC License Commitment to Utilize ASTM D3803-1989 with Efficiency Acceptance Criteria Utilizing Safety Factor of 2 L-99-028, Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines1999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-027, Addresses Clarifications to Selected Responses to Chapter 3.8 RAI Requested in NRC Conference Call on 990624, Resolution of Open Issue Related to Containment Purge in Chapter 3.6 & Response Related to Chapter 3.51999-07-27027 July 1999 Addresses Clarifications to Selected Responses to Chapter 3.8 RAI Requested in NRC Conference Call on 990624, Resolution of Open Issue Related to Containment Purge in Chapter 3.6 & Response Related to Chapter 3.5 ML20210E4071999-07-22022 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-026, Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments1999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments L-99-264, Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 20011999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 ML20209H4721999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 05000364/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed1999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed L-99-024, Responds to NRC RAI Re Conversion to ITS for Chapters 3.4, 3.5,3.6,3.7,3.9 & 5.0,per 990419-20 Meetings with NRC1999-06-30030 June 1999 Responds to NRC RAI Re Conversion to ITS for Chapters 3.4, 3.5,3.6,3.7,3.9 & 5.0,per 990419-20 Meetings with NRC L-99-025, Forwards Rev 2 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-0-M-99,IAW 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Attachment 1 Contains Summary of Changes & Amended Security Plan Pages.Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR73.211999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Rev 2 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-0-M-99,IAW 10CFR50.4(b)(4).Attachment 1 Contains Summary of Changes & Amended Security Plan Pages.Encl Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR73.21 ML20196J8631999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA L-99-249, Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA1999-06-30030 June 1999 Submits Correction to Errors Contained in to NRC Re TS Changes Re Control Room,Penetration Room & Containment Purge Filtration Systems & Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.Errors Do Not Require Rev of SA L-99-224, Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments1999-06-0707 June 1999 Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments ML20195F1731999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld L-99-217, Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld1999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Responses to NRC RAIs Re W TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs. W Proprietary Notice,Affidavit & Copyright Notice,Encl.Proprietary Info Withheld L-99-225, Responds to GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants1999-06-0707 June 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ML20195F0621999-06-0707 June 1999 Submits Rev to Unit 2 SG Tube voltage-based Repair Criteria Data Rept.Ltr Contains No Commitments ML20195E9581999-06-0707 June 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ML20195C6941999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program L-99-021, Forwards Response to RAI Re Conversion to ITSs for Chapter 3.3.Attachment II Includes Proposed Revs to Previously Submitted LAR Re Rais,Grouped by RAI number.Clean-typed Copies of Affected ITS Pages Not Included1999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards Response to RAI Re Conversion to ITSs for Chapter 3.3.Attachment II Includes Proposed Revs to Previously Submitted LAR Re Rais,Grouped by RAI number.Clean-typed Copies of Affected ITS Pages Not Included L-99-203, Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program1999-05-28028 May 1999 Forwards Response to NRC RAI Re GL 96-05 for Farley Nuclear Plant.Farley Is Committing to Implement Phase 3 of JOG Program ML20195F2101999-05-24024 May 1999 Requests That Farley Nuclear Plant Proprietary Responses to NRC RAI Re W WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at W 3-Loop Pwrs, Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790 L-99-180, Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapter 3.8 of Ts.Proposed Revs to TS Previously Submitted with LAR Related to RAI1999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapter 3.8 of Ts.Proposed Revs to TS Previously Submitted with LAR Related to RAI ML20206F4321999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapter 3.8 of Ts.Proposed Revs to TS Previously Submitted with LAR Related to RAI L-99-017, Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapters 3.1, 3.2,3.5,3.7 & 3.9 of Ts.Attached Pages Include Proposed Revs Previously Submitted LAR to Rais,Grouped by Chapters & RAI Numbers1999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Responses to NRC RAI Questions for Chapters 3.1, 3.2,3.5,3.7 & 3.9 of Ts.Attached Pages Include Proposed Revs Previously Submitted LAR to Rais,Grouped by Chapters & RAI Numbers ML20206C8021999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Rept, for Alabama Power Co.Encls Contain Financial Statements for 1998,unaudited Financial Statements for Quarter Ending 990331 & Cash Flow Projections for 990101-991231 05000348/LER-1998-007, Forwards SG-99-04-001, Farley-1:Final Cycle 16 Freespan ODSCC Operational Assessment, as Committed to in Licensee & LER 98-007-00.Util Is Revising Plant Administrative SG Operating Leakage Requirements as Listed1999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards SG-99-04-001, Farley-1:Final Cycle 16 Freespan ODSCC Operational Assessment, as Committed to in Licensee & LER 98-007-00.Util Is Revising Plant Administrative SG Operating Leakage Requirements as Listed L-99-015, Forwards Rev 1 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-O-M-99,resulting from Implementation of Biometrics Sys.Changes Incorporate Changes Previously Submitted to NRC as Rev 28 by Licensee .Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR73.211999-04-21021 April 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to Jfnp Security plan,FNP-O-M-99,resulting from Implementation of Biometrics Sys.Changes Incorporate Changes Previously Submitted to NRC as Rev 28 by Licensee .Encl Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21 ML20206B4391999-04-21021 April 1999 Forwards Corrected ITS Markup Pages to Replace Pages in 981201 License Amend Requests for SG Replacement L-99-172, Forwards FNP Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998, IAW TSs Sections 6.9.1.8 & 6.9.1.9.Changes to ODCM Revs 16,17 & 18 Are Encl,Iaw TS Section 6.14.21999-04-21021 April 1999 Forwards FNP Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998, IAW TSs Sections 6.9.1.8 & 6.9.1.9.Changes to ODCM Revs 16,17 & 18 Are Encl,Iaw TS Section 6.14.2 ML20205S9501999-04-21021 April 1999 Forwards FNP Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 1998, IAW TSs Sections 6.9.1.8 & 6.9.1.9.Changes to ODCM Revs 16,17 & 18 Are Encl,Iaw TS Section 6.14.2 ML20205R0431999-04-13013 April 1999 Forwards Correction to 960212 GL 95-07 180 Day Response. Level 3 Evaluation for Pressure Locking Utilized Analytical Models.Encl Page Has Been Amended to Correct Error 1999-09-23
[Table view] |
Text
M ><
4 Southern Nuclear' Operating Company J.t . Farley Nucleur Piarit p-. P. . Drawer 470 i' Ashford Alabama 36312 g: Telephone 205 8945156 e
F Southem Nucleai Operating Company the southem electuc system March 13, 1995 US Nuc: lear Regulatory Commission AT;W: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 205555
Dear Sir:
Attached is revison 28 to the Emergency Plan. Please change out pages per your list of effective pages.
If you have any questions please contact me at extension 4530, (334) 899-5156.
Sincerely, kLw <
oey B- , Hudspeth Do ehtControlp/upervisor cc: L. Enfinger B. Vanderbye Committment Tracking File P. S. Also, please find attached your new revisions to the EIP's.
(
I
[
r
! 170000 t 9503170023 950313 PDR F
ADOCK 05000349 -
. 4ni ir,, PDR '
? FNP 0-AP-4 i FIGURE 5 !
A CENTRAL FILE l-(j Document Transminal Form Farley Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Document Control b6 Cam cJr- foA6 0 b6'SP "'* 9505 l'b l bt
~
VRR/N/Mlf !)PDAf/Me 00M1AOLLED DoenmEN16 TRANSMITTED RETURN
, REQ'STED l No. Rev. Copy No. I Rev. Copy REMARKS ,
Title and/or Number Cps. No. No. Cps. No. No.
$ b' AeeoRDANCE lA /TN 0A/EAlo /AnD ORie A/od AtrRGHED I612AMfM(r (Nn1/$A'EtowkEW6&
i '
Evrnu Codmourv Documear a ob s:nas -
/ loa 'Ans 'fb KrAn fif Arrnearv'AxoiPern/s/2'r -
fDR $H1/MS $2ffAGNOS.
- far deaED bNsmirrnt 0x14 ice Aen'scewr6
<o TNnt LAa l-l AVE SfRD Axo t/s'osess a_iiit t IO Arrnobro ha&% fi13cAbuenb l _ldu (WEv.. 9/n/95) '/b A/ggr #r /nlogx Duf
.Db126 0I'fl/c 0A/2. -
ff /Joa //AVC Ada /hE61/0NS ONrA0 f '
bff kf Ex-r. I45.BO. , 'A .
/ W Ib 'llA Ay1 N~ '
] '~~ - ) / /
1 INSTRUCTIONS TO ADDRESSEE
- 1. Wrify the documents received agree with the above description.
- 2. Incorporate the transmitted documents into your files.
- 3. Documents or portions thereof presently in your possession which are superseded by the documents hereby transmitted must be clearly marked " VOID' or discarded. If return of superseded documents is requested in the above " Returned Requested" column, attach the superseded documents to this form prior to returning it.
- 4. Sign in the space indicating that you have completed these instmetions and return this form to the address below.
-- WHITE-ROITTING COPY Scuthern Nuclear Operating Company YELI OV. - SUSPENSE COPY P. O. Drawer 470 Ashford, Alabama 36312 Signature of Addressee / Date Received Attention: Document Control Supervisor Revision 16 s-
INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS FOR CONTROLLED DOCU~ MENT COPYHOLDERS & USERS--IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAR 2101 CAR 2104 I
NOTE: "IF YOUHA VE A OURSTION CONCERNING i
YOUR CONTROLLED .
DOCUMENTSALWAYS CONTACT DOCUMENT CONTROL!"
RETAIN THIS AfA TERIAL FOR FUTURE USE.
i 1
E
4 INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY HOLDERS:
- BE SURE YOU ARE WORKING FROM THE MOST :
CURRENT REVISION OF YOUR CONTROLLED ,
DOCUMENT.
- UPON THE RECEIPT OF A DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL VERIFY THE INFORMATION ON THE TRANSMITTAL -
AGREES WITH THE CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS !
ATTACHED. READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY ON THE TRANSMITTAL AND FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS.
AFTER YOU HAVE ACCOMPLISHED THIS, SIGN THE TRANSMITTAL AND RETURN IT TO DOCUMENT CONTROL. NOTE: TO EXPEDITE THE SIGNED TRANSMITTAL, PLACE IT IN AN ENVELOPE, ADDRESS SATELLITE TRANSMITTALS TO SATELLITE DOCUMENT CONTROL AND CENTRAL FILE TRANSMITTALS TO l SERVICE BUILDING DOCUMENT CONTROL. ,
i
- TRANSMITTAL NOT RECEIVED BY DOCUMENT CONTROL WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE ;
TRANSMITTAL WILL BE REFERRED TO YOUR MANAGER FOR DISPOSITION.
- WHEN FILING CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS IN YOUR AREA AND YOU DISCOVER A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT IS MISSING FROM YOUR FILES OR THERE IS A DISCREPANCY CONTACT DOCUMENT CONTROL IMMEDIATELY.
2 i
^
- DO NOT REQUES'i A REPLACEMENT COPY OF A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT WITHOUT A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION. A LOST DOCUMENT COULD APPEAR LATER, OUT OF DATE. YOUR MANAGER WILL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY REPLACEMENT COPIES ISSUED.
- IF YOU ARE WORKING FROM A RESTRICTED PROCEDURE OR DRAWING, BE SURE THE EXPIRATION DATE HAS NOT BEEN EXCEEDED.
- CONTROLLED COPIES OF PROCEDURES AND TEMPORARY CHANGES ARE TO BE IN THE UNIT .
SPECIFIC COLOR. (UNIT 2 GREEN) -
(UNIT 1 YELLOW, SHARED WHITE) FOR TCN'S (UNIT 2 BLUE, UNIT 1 PINK AND SHARED PINK)
- IF YOU WISH TO BE REMOVED FROM CONTROLLED DISTRIBUTION FOR A CATEGORY OF CONTROLLED PROCEDURES WITH A COPY NUMBER, YOU ARE TO SEND A MEMO TO THE DOCUMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR OR (E-MAIL) AND RETURN YOUR DOCUMENTS TO DOCUMENT CONTROL. LIST THE LOST DOCUMENT ON THE MEMO.
- IF YOU WISH TO TRANSFER YOUR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS FROM YOUR NAME TO ANOTHER, YOU ARE TO SEND A MEMO TO THE DOCUMENT CONTROL SUPV. OR (E-MAIL) AND RETURN THE DOCUMENTS TO DOCUMENT CONTROL. THE DOCUMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND RE-ISSUED TO THE NEW COPYHOLDER.
3
1 :
- IF YOU HAVE CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS CHECKED OUT AND YOU ARE AWAY FROM THE JOB FOR A PERIOD OF TIME, YOU SHOULD DESIGNATE SOMEONE TO PERFORM YOUR FILING. (THIS PERSON 3HOULD BE SOMEONE WHO HAS RECEIVED TRAINING ON PROPER METHODS OF FILING CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS.)
- WHEN PERFORMING THE ANNUAL PROCEDURE VERIFICATION ON CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS BE SURE OF THE FOLLOWING:
-THE REV. OF THE DOCUMENTS IN YOUR FILES AND COPY NUMBER OF THE DOCUM'2NTS IN YOUR FILES MATCH WHAT IS ON THE ATTACHED PRINTOUT.
N THE ATTACH P N OUT, RE VE E AND '
BRING THEM TO DOCUMENT CONTROL.
-IF AN INCORRECT REVISION IS IN YOUR FILES REMOVE THE OLD REVISION IMMEDIATELY AND j DISCARD IT. RECORD THE DISCREPANCY AND NOTIFY l DOCUMENT CONTROL. l
-IF A DOCUMENT APPEARS ON THE ATTACHED i PRINTOUT BUT IS NOT IN YOUR FILES, INVESTIGATE i AND TRY TO DETERMINE WHERE THE DOCUMENT IS.
DOCUMENT THE MISSING DOCUMENT NUMBER AND !
NOTIFY DOCUMENT CONTROL.
-YOU ARE NOT TO SIGN THE VERIFICATION UNTIL ALL DISCREPANCIES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED. ONCE THE DISCREPANCIES HAVE BEEN RESOLVED OR IF THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES, THEN SIGN THE 4
'l i
- VERIFICATION AND RETURN IT TO DOCUMENT l h' CONTROL BY THE DATE SPECIFIED.
- LEGIBILITY IS VERY IMPORTANT. BE SURE TO 3 ALWAYS WRITE YOUR NAME LEGIBLY ON I TRANSMITTALS AND VERIFICATIONS. ENSURE !
ANYTHING WHICH YOU RECORD ON TRANSMITTALS OR VERIFICATIONS IS LEGIBLE.
l
- IF YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING )
CONTROLLED PROCEDURES THAT ARE ACCESSED FREQUENTLY , YOU NEED TO ESTABLISH A CHECKOUT 1 SYSTEM SO THAT PROCEDURES THAT ARE REMOVED FROM YOUR FILES CAN BE REPLACED AND NOT END UP "
BEING REPORTED AS LOST. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT ,
THAT YOU ESTABLISH A CHECK OUT SYSTEM. IF YOU NEED HELP WITH THIS CONTACT ME AND I WILL BE GLAD TO ASSIST YOU.
EXT. 4530. (D.C. SUPV.)
- ON THE NEXT CDD VERIFICATION YOU WILL BE ASKED TO VERIFY PLANT CURVES. AN EXAMPLE OF A CURVE NUMBER AS IT WILL APPEAR ON THE VERIFICATIONIS AS FOLLOWS: FNP-1-VOL1-CRV64A.
- WHEN FILING ONE TIME ONLY TEMPORARY CHANGES .
< WHICH HAVE AN EXPIRATION DATE, YOU ARE TO I INCORPORATE THESE TCN'S INTO YOUR CONTROLLED COPIES OF PROCEDURES. DOCUMENT CONTROL WILL NOTIFY YOU AS TO WHEN TO REMOVE THE EXPIRED TCN AND WILL SEND YOU NEW PAGES TO REPLACE i THE EXPIRED ONES.
- \
l w -
- UPON RECEIPT OF A MEMORANDUM THAT IS TO BE INSERTED INTO YOUR CONTROLLED COPY OF YOUR PROCEDURE, YOU ARE TO FILE THE MEMORANDUM
~
BEHIND THE COVERSHEET OF YOUR PROCEDURE. THE MEMO CONTAINS THE SAME COPY NUMBER AS THE COPY NUMBER OF THE PROCEDURE. ONCE THE MEMO IS FILED BEHIND THE COVER SHEET IT BECOMES PART OF THAT PROCEDURE. IT IS TO STAY WITH THAT REV.
OF THAT PROCEDURE AND IF THAT PROCEDURE IS REVISED THE MEMO IS TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE NEW REV.
IF A MEMO COMES OUT THAT UPDATES THE MEMO IN YOUR FILE,1 -U ARE TO REMOVE AND DISCARD THE -
MEMO IN YOUR FILE AND REPLACE IT WITH THE NEW ,
MEMO.
- AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED TWELVE MONTHS, PLANT G'ENERATED MANUALS AND THE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE PAGE CHECKED TO ENSURE EACH PAGE IS CURRENT. THE ADDRESSEE SHALL USE THE LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES FILED IN EACH DOCUMENT TO PERFORM HIS PAGE CHECK. DOCUMENT CONTROL SHALL NOTIFY EACH COPYHOLDER BY MEMO OF THIS REQUIREMENT ALONG WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
- BLUELINES , LAMINATED DRAWINGS AND i RESTRICTED USE DRAWINGS ARE DISTRIBUTED BY SATELLITE DOCUMENT CONTROL AND ARE TO BE MAINTAINED CURRENT WITH THE LATEST DESIGN CHANGES. ADHESIVE LABELS CONTAINING DESIGN CHANGE INFORMATION ARE TO BE APPLIED TO CONTROLLED DRAWINGS WHICH HAVE 6
OUTSTANDING DESIGN INFORMATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AS TO WHAT TO POST OR IF YOU HAVE THE CORRECT INFORMATION CONTACT SATELLIE DOCUMENT CONTROL EXT. 3476.
- VENDOR MANUALS ARE CONTROLLED BY THE SERVICE BUILDING DOCUMENT CONTROL AND MAY ALSO HAVE DESIGN CHANGE INFORMATION TO BE ANNOTATED TO THEM. DOCUMENT CONTROL UPDATES VENDOR MANUALS BY RECALLING THEM FROM THE CONTROLLED COPYHOLDER, HOWEVER IF A DESIGN CHANGE LABEL IS TRANSMITTED TO YOU WHILE YOU HAVE A VENDOR MANUAL IN YOUR POSSESSION, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPLYING -
THAT LABEL TO YOUR CONTROLLED MANUAL.
l l
7 i
l
- NOTE: THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT l MAINTAINING YOUR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS PROPERLY CAN CAUSE PERSONAL INJURY, DAMAGE TO PLANT EQUIPMENT, PLANT TRIPS, SAER, NRC AND PLANT PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS AND CAN RESULT IN DISCIPLINARY ACTION. YOUR SIGNATURE ON A DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL OF A VERIFICATION SIGNIFIES YOU HAVE ACCOMPLISHED ALL THE :
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS AND THAT YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISPOSITION OF THE DOCUMENTS LISTED. '
REMEMBER,IF YOU ARE NOT SURE ABOUT HOW TO HANDLE YOUR CONTROLLED DOCUMENT OR YOU DON'T FEEL CONFIDENT YOUR DOCUMENT IS UP TO DATE, CONTACT DOCUMENT CONTROL.**** ;
h e
l l
i 8
L ;
a s .
- 'y ;6 i
DEFINITIONS: ,
4 i
~!
CONTROI I FD DOCUMENT A DOCUMENT THAT IS CONTROLLED {
MEANS THAT THE MOST CURRENT REVISION OF A DOCUMENT IS j ISSUED AND TRACKED BY FNP DOCUMENT CONTROL. THE l
INDIVIDUAL OR LOCATION THAT IS SHOWN HAVING THE ;
CONTROLLED DOCUMENT CHECKED OUT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR i ENSURING THAT ANY UPDATES ARE FILED PROPERLY. i CONTROI I FD COPYHODER THE INDIVIDUAL OR LOCATION TO :
WHICH A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT IS CHECKED OUT TO.
l
~
CONTROI I FD PROCEDURE A CONTROLLED PROCEDURE MAY BE ,
ISSUED AS ANY OF THE FOLLOWING (A CONTROLLED PROCEDURE l WITH COPY NUMBER),(OFFICIAL TEST COPY), OR RESTRICTED USE '
COPY. ~
A CONTROI I FD PROCEDURE WITH COPY NUMBER THIS TYPE OF j CONTROLLED PROCEDURE IS ' NED FROM THE MASTER COPY IN !
DOCUMENT CONTROL. IT IS CG. ~0 IN THE UNIT SPECIFIC COLOR, .
(GREEN FOR UNIT 2, YELLOW FOR UNIT 1. BLUE FOR UNIT 2 TCN'S AND '
PINK FOR UNIT 1 TCN'S. SHARED ARE COPIED IN WHITE WITH PINK ,
TCN'S). DOCUMENT CONTROL STAMPS TliE COPIES (IN RED INK) WITH A STAMP THAT READS : " DOCUMENT CONTROL CONTROLLED COPY DO NOT REPRODUCE, COPY NUMBER :" THESE PROCEDURES ARE -
ENTERED AN TRACKED IN THE FNPIMS CONTROLLED DOCUMENT i DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (CDD). INDIVIDUALS OR LOCATIONS THAT HAVE THESE TYPE OF PROCEDURES NORMALLY WISH TO MAINTAIN THEM PERMANENTLY, SUCH AS (THE CONTROL ROOM OR THE LABS). '
OFFICIAL TEST COPY i THIS TYPE OF CONTROLLED PROCEDURE IS ISSUED FROM THE MASTER COPY IN DOCUMENT CONTROL. IT IS COPIED IN THE UNIT SPECIFIC COLOR AND STAMPED (IN RED INK)
WITH A STAMP THAT READS: " OFFICIAL TEST COPY" AND ABOVE THESE WORDS IS THE DATE THE PROCEDURE WAS ISSUED WITH A DASH FOR THE NUMBER OF COPIES OF THAT PARTICULAR PROCEDURE ISSUED ON THAT DATE. EXAMPLE: 950501-1. IN ADDITION, j THE STAMP HAS'AN AREA TO CHECK " VOID" IF THE PROCEDURE IS NO j .
-- LONGER NEEDED AND AN AREA TO CHECK " VOID PARTIALLY-PERFORMED"IF THE TEST WAS PARTIALLY PERFORMED AND WORK HAD TO BE TERMINATED FO.R SOME REASON. THERE IS ALFO AN AREA ON THE STAMP TO PUT THE REASON.
NOTE: THERE PROCEDURES A RF USED ONL Y TO DOCUMFVT THE REXUL TS OF TEST. FOR THEM4INTENANCE AP),*dS (IAC. MM. EM) A WORK ORDER NUMBER IS ARROCIA TED WITH 1HF OFFICIAL TEST. AS LONG AS THE WORK ORDER IS OPEN DOCUMEYY CONTROL IS RFRPONSIBLF FOR SENDING RFVISIONS AND TEMPORAR Y CHANGE NOTICES TO CHE HOLDERR OF THE OFFICI4L l'EST COPIES ARKOCT4 TED WITH TH4 T WORK ORDER.
FOR OPER4 TIONS OFFICL4L TESTCQPIEX WEEKT YLJSTS ARE PROVIDED TO DOCUMENTCONTROL REOUESTING WHA TISNEG)ED FOR UPCOMING SURVIELI 4NCE TEST. V4L VE LINEUPS ETC. DOCUMENf CONTROL PERSONNEL AND THE FNP OPS-SHIFTCLERK9 WORK CI,fM TOGETHER TO ENSURE THE CONTROL ROO%f H4S ON FILE WHA TIS RFOUIRED.
\ THE REMAINING GROUPS EITHER VERRAIT YREOUEST THE OFFICIAL TESTCOPY THEYNEED OVER THEPHONEOR BYCOMING TOTHE SERVICE BUILDINGSUPPORTCOUNTER.
k OFFICIAL TEST COPYINFORM4 TIONIS M41NT4INED B Y DOCE! MENT
. CONTROL IN THE OFFICI4L TESTCOPYCHECKOUTLOGS.
RFETRICTED USE COPY PROCEDURE THIS TYPE OF CONTROLLED PROCEDURE IS ISSUED FROM THE MASTER COPY BY DOCUMENT CONTROL IT IS COPIED IN THE UNIT SPECIFIC COLOR AND STAMPED (IN RED INK) WITH A STAMP WHICH READS " RESTRICTED USE COPY, .
ISSUE DATE, EXPIRATION DATE, WORK ORDER NO. AND A STATEMENT '
WHICH SAYS (DO NOT USE IF CURRENT DATE EXCEEDS EXPIRATION DATE). THESE TYPE PROCEDURES ARE CONTROLLED BY DOCUMENT CONTROL FOR A CERTAIN NUMBER OF b.' YS AND ONCE THAT DATE HAS EXPIRED THEN IT IS NO LONGER TRACKED. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO BE AWARE OF THE EXPIRATION DATE OF YOUR RESTRICTED USE COPY. IF THE DATE HAS EXPIRED OR IS ABOUT TO EXPIRE YOU SHOULD COME TO DOCUMENT CONTROL A.ND REQUEST 1
THAT YOUR PROCEDURE BE EXTENDED UNTIL YOUR JOB IS FINISHED.
A RESTRICTED USE PROCEDURES ARE TRACKED WITHIN THE FNPIMS i
CDD PROGRAM.
L --- -- - --
e n
NOTE: IF A PROCEDURE H4S PL4CES WITHIN THE BOD Y THA T REOUIR DA TA TO BE FILIED OUTAND THE PROCEDURF IS USED TO PERFORM A -
WORK A CIIVITYITSHOULD BE REQUESTED FROM DOCUMENT CONTROL AS ANOFFICIAL TESTCOPYNOTRFSTRICIED USE. OFFICI4L TEST COPIES ARF M4fNT4INED RETRIEVABLEINDOCUMENTCONTROL AFTER THE TESTS ARE COMPLETED. ANYPROCEDURF USED TO RFCORD DA RFOUIRED TO BE KFPTON FILE AS A OU4LITYASXURANCE RECORD.
NOTE:
IF YOU NEED A COPYOFA PROCEDUM FOR RFFERFNCE ONL Y.
WHICH MEANS THA T YOU WISH TO RFAD OR REVIEW THE PROCEDURE AND NOT USEITINA WORKACTIViTY. YOUMA Y COME TO DOCUMENT CONTROL AND MAKFA COPYFROM THE MASTER PROCEDURF. -
THIS COPYDOES NOTHA VE TO BE COPIED INA PARTICULAR COLOR.
HOWEVER ITMUSTBESTAMPED (INRFD INK) WITHA ST4MP THE READS -
"UNCONTROLLFD COPY CA UTION: THIS COPYIS NOTMAINT4INED CURRFNT. DO NOT USEINA SAFETYRFLA TED At 11VITY. "
a SATEI I ITE DOCUMFNT CONTROL A BRANCH LOCATION OF THE SERVICE BUILDING DOCUMENT CONTROL LOCATED IN THE SUPPORT BUILDING (NORTH).
VENDOR MANUAf
- MANUALS PRODUCED BY EQUIPMENT VENDORS.
THE DOCUMENT NUMBER FOR VENDOR MANUALS BEGINS WITH THE
' LETTER (U) FOLLOWED BY(6) NUMERICS. (EXAMPLE U214443)
PLANT MANUAI
- MANUALS GENERATED BY FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT. THE DOCUMENT NUMBER FOR PLANT MANUALS FOLLOWS THE SAME FORMAT AS FOR PROCEDURES. (EXAMPLE: FNP-0-M-043) c.
b-
.'~,4
< s TECH.- SPECS. :-UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 STANDARD TECHNICAL 1 SPECIFICATIONS.
COMPUTER DISKE- =A MEDIA FOR STORING COMPUTER INFORMATION. THE COMPUTER DISKS THAT DOCUMENT CONTROL MAINTAIN AS CONTROLLED ALSO CARRY A PROCEDURE NUMBER FORMAT. (EXAMPLE: FNP-9-MAC-6)
PLANT CURVV A GRAPH GR TABLE WHICH DISPLAYS A MEASUREMENT OF THE CHARACTERIZATION OF A COMPONENT. A PLANT CURVE CARRIES A DOCUMENT NUMBER OF NUMERICS WITH ALPHA CHARACTERS. (EXAMPLE: 64, 31B ETC.)
INOUIRY A DOCUMENT GENERATED BY SOUTHERN COMPANY
' SERVICES OR BECHTEL CORPORATION WHICH INCLUDES SPECIFICATIONS FOR VARIOUS PLANT SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS.
AN INQUIRY CARRIES A DOCUMENT NUMBER AS SHOWN IN THIS EXAMPLE (SS1102-9) .
REM. AN ACRONYM FOR REFERENCE FILE MANAGER, AN ELECTRONIC DRAWING RETRIEVAL PROGRAM. DRAWINGS OBTAINED FROM RFM AND COPIED FROM A PLOTTER ARE TO BE CONTROLLED PRIOR TO BEING USED IN A WORK ACTIVITY.
BLUEPRINTS DOMESTIC AND VENDOR DRAWINGS REPRODUCED FROM MYLAR FILM OR SEPIA.
1 I
- LAMINATED PRINTE DOMESTIC AND VENDOR DRAWINGS REPRODUCED IN PAPER FORM FROM 35MM APERTURE CARDS AND THEN LAMINATED. (EX: USED HEAVILY IN THE CONTROL ROOM. MAY-l BE MARKED ON WITH GREASE PENS AND WIPED AWAY. OFTEN REFERRED TO AS WASH OFFS.)
L.-
e.
DRAWING TAB-AN ADHESIVE LABEL THAT IS APPLIED TO CONTROLLED COPIES OF VENDOR MANUALS, VENDOR DRAWINGS, i DOMESTIC DRAWINGS OR INQUIRES WHICH SHOWS THE DOCUMENT NUMBER OF ANY DESIGN CHANGES THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT DOCUMENT BUT HAVE NOT BEEN INCORPORATED. THIS LABEL IS GENERATED IN SATELLITE DOCUMENT CONTROL AND IS SENT TO CONTROLLED COPY HOLDERS OF THE DOCUMENTS MENTIONED AS g NEEDED FOR THEM TO APPLY TO THEIR CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS.
DONfFRTIC DRAWINCE DRAWINGS PRODUCED BY ALABAMA POWER OR ITS CONTRACTED OR SUBCONTRACTED ARCHITECT / ENGINEERING t ORGANIZATIONS. (THESE DRAWING NUMBERS BEGIN WITH A,B,C,D,E OR F FOLLOWED BY (6) NUMERICS.) (EXAMPLE: - D175003 SHEET I)
VENDOR DRAWINGE DRAWINGS PRODUCED BY EQUIPMENT VENDORS. THE DOCUMENT NUMBER FORMAT IS THE SAME AS VENDOR MANUALS, BEGINNING WITH A (U) FOLLOWED BY (6) NUMERICS.
(EXAMPLE: UI64164)
~
I l
9
- w. - - . .
.e.
'k' tr.truomeeny c.tr.. 4.ne.
, Scuttwyn Nudear Operating Company d !
DATE: January 18,1995
)
RE: Procedure Management . !
1 I
FROM: Daw Morey h#
TO: As Castrosed Copy Hoddes i At the very beginning of this letter, I want to emplusias that ! Imow each ofyou has a strong personal commitment to sf ng your Tarley Nuclear Plant activities using ,
current, approved procedures and drawir ga. i However, we recendy received an NRC violation which points out the foBowing: -
2
. We had number ofcontrouad procedures and i drawings not complete, not up to dato :
There wereover 200 overdue docanent
\
l transmittal nodcas to contro6ed copy holders j
, (like yourssivus) not returned. (Many were she !
months overdus.)
- Several annual reviews wars not bains eompkted. (m report siae.d,"...is a timely manner...,* 1st if an annual review is overdue by a year, is it timeliness orjust not being dom orbeing done but not reported 7)-
Agths, I emphasian that I am con 6 dent that asch ofyou are casunned to using current, approved procedsat But, we seem to be faz in the perfbransce ofour procedure F actMdet La documenting- is a thnely manner-that the procedures and drawings we are using are current and gvo.1 i
l
,~, i I
CBa a;.a ~ 15E%89850C:CN '?J. hfCdd A3%tu CI P9860 Es.-t.1-533
r.
(
s.
=
e F.m"-17 '95 29:05 ID:F R EY N J CT tie. NO:2250605629 ::522 #23 Preande Managenwar
, Page 2 -
4 There could be many explanations for having such a hig work by proper procedures, but not foDowing procedures for do procedures and drawings are current and approved. Each indi or her situation; however, no one canjustify aHowing this doub Each of us desires to be part ofa world class organizatio is world class. But, to be truly world class, we must stay stop responsibDities.
Your suppon in obtaining world class procedure management is a DNM:mgd -
m l
Q e
6 o
_ 9. e . _. ---