ML20080R337
| ML20080R337 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie, Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/1994 |
| From: | Saporito T SAPORITO, T.J. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| FOIA-94-373 2.206, NUDOCS 9503090263 | |
| Download: ML20080R337 (4) | |
Text
'W.'
i e
' Florida Energy Consultants, Inc.
H 1620 North U.S. Hwy.1, Suite 6. Jupiter, Florida 33469-3241 Telephone and Facsimile: (407) 745-1186 Toll Free Hot-Linefor Safety Concerns and Assistance: (800) 328-3222 August 13, 1994 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUl5i
- Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
~9Y-8 73 White Flint Building
@p_c./g f.jg 9 Washington, D.C.
20500 Re:
Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act
("FOIA"),
5 U.S.C.
Part
- 552, el seq.,
Florida Energy Consultants, Inc.
("FEC") by and through the undersigned, hereby request copies of any and all U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") records and information regarding NRC licensee, Florida Power & Light Company ("FPL"), Docket Hos. 50-335; 50-389; 50-250; and 50-251 and directly or indirectly related to the NRC's response and/or notification to the licensee of actions sought by individuals and/or organizations from the NRC against the licensee.
Specifically, FEC requests a copy of the following:
1.
All NRC responses and/or director's decisions regarding petitions filed under 10 C.F.R. 2.206 seeking action by the NRC against FPL during the time period of January, 1988, until and including August, 1994; 2.
All NRC responses, determinations, and/or rulings regarding NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board decisions, rulings, and/or determinations concerning FPL during the time period of January, 1988, until and including August, 1994; 9503090263 940813 PDR FDIA SAPORIT94--373 PDR
Executiva Dircctor for Operations
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissich August 13, 1994 Page No. 2 3.
All NRC responses, determinations, decisions, and/or
. rulings concerning any action sought by any individual and/or organization from the NRC regarding FPL during the time period of-January, 1988, until and including August, 1994.
This FOIA request. seeks information as described above and includes-but is not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts,
- minutes, diaries,
- logs, procedures, instructions, engineering
- analyses, drawings,
- files, graphs,
- charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, interim and/or final reports, status reports, and any and all other records relevant to and/or generated in connection with the three enumerated paragraphs above.
FEE WATVER REOUEST In accordance with 10 C.F.R.
- 9. 41 (a) (2) an (b), FEC hereby requests that all fees be waived because:
Purnose:
1.
The information sought will contribute significantly to the public's understanding of the operations of the government and/or is primarily in the public interest. This FOIA request seeks information relevant to a Department of' Labor
(" DOL")
discrimination complaint filed under the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 as amended 42 U.S.C.
58',1
(" ERA")
concerning the undersigned and FPL. The Secretary o'.
Labor has determined that cases under 29 C.F.R.
Part 24 involve the litigation of " health and safety hazards to the public'. not merely " private harms."
See. Polizzi v.
Gibbs & Hill, Int, Case No. 87-ERA-38, slip op.
of SOL at pp.2-3 (July 18, 1989).
j EYtent:
2.
FEC will diligently extract and analyze the substantive content of the agency record.
l l
g_,
-q 4
l
~
' Executsive Director for Operctions -
j
- i
'UIS. Nuclear l Regulatory Commission j
tXugusti 13,11994-f.
JPage No. 3
{.:
0
?
l Nature'L'Oualifications:
,{
~ FEC's activity and research will support and. provide.'a l
basis for litigation under the ERA as described above.
The f
3.
j undersigned.is an experienced worker in the nuclear industry with l
over 10-years of knowledge about the agency's regulations and the decision l
the. undersigned won a favorable DOL process. Moreover, in: ERA Case No. 92-ERA-30 as a prn ae. litigant. There in that l
PPL et.
a l'_, similar procedures Gre' l
case'as here in Saporito' v.
followed in presenting a prima facie case.
,l on the Public's Understanding of the subject.
Likelv_ I m n_ a c t 4.
The information and subsequent actions by FEC will be" widely disseminated to the public through press releases and 1
environmental organizations and through FEC.
l
. through grassroots and understanding of the agency's
]
Thus, the public's awareness behavior and performance and that of the DOL and NRC's licensee as well as the adverse consequences born by whistleblowers like the undersigned will be' greatly enhanced.
4 Size and Nature of the Public:
i f
5.
Nationwide distribution of materials across the l
j continental United States of America.
-t l
Means of Distribution:
.i
.l 6.
Via the media; news releases; FEC publications; pub)ic
.f
.l etc.
school lectures; television and radio programs;
- l 1
Public Access to information:
information will be provided free of 7.
Public access to charge.
1 i
i 1
C t
ii
N Executive Director for. Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
August 13, 1994,.
i i
Page No. 4 Interest:
Rec _uester's Commercial or Private
-i
[
The requester has no commercial or private interest.
8.
r For any documents or portions of documents that you deny due to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide an index itemizing
-l and. describing the documents or portions of documents withheld.
l The index should provide a detailed justification.of your grounds-i for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is relevant to the document or portion of the document. withheld.
l v.
Rosen (T),
484 F.2d 820 This index is required under yaughn (D.C. Cir. 1973). Cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).
I look forward to.your timely response to this FOIA request within 10-days as the law provides.
very truly yours, i
t Thomas J. Sapor [to, Jr.
v v
President and CEO cc:
file i
t L