ML20080A657
| ML20080A657 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/1994 |
| From: | Lamberski J TROUTMANSANDERS (FORMERLY TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMA |
| To: | Barth C NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080A639 | List: |
| References | |
| OLA-3, NUDOCS 9411010244 | |
| Download: ML20080A657 (2) | |
Text
__.
TROUTMAN SANDERS
.. T., T..?.". % ?. 7..S.....^..!... h.^."',
^
NATIONSBANK PLA7 A 600 PE ACHTRE E STREET. N E + $UITE S200 ATLANTA. GECAGIA 30308 2216 TE LE PHONE-404-885 3000 FAC$MLE 404 885-3200 JOHN LAVBERSKi CtRECT 404-885 3360 March 30,1994 VIA AIRBORNE EXPRESS Charles Barth, Esq.
Office of General Counsel One White Flint North Stop 15B18 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Charles:
la.st Monday, you asked me to identify certain documents which were referenced in Stipulation Nos. 56 and 57 of GPC's Proposed Stipulations Relating to the Allegations of Illegal License Transfer, attached to my February 3,1994 letter. Specifically, you asked (1) what was the tape on which Mr. Mosbaugh allegedly recorded "a comment by a former SONOPCO manager stating his belief that, in the event of a significant event at a GPC facility, the corporate duty manager would call Mr. Farley rather than Mr.
Dahlbqrg," and (2) what was the GPC procedure that stated, in the case of a significant event at Plant Vogtle, the on-call Project Manager was to notify both Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley.
With respect to your first question, the Mosbaugh tape apparently is Tape No. 260, see the NRC's transcript at pp. 8-11. To the extent helpful to the development of stipulations, we can review the tape and propose an edited NRC transcript, the same procedure used with the diesel generator transcripts.
With respect to your second question, Plant Vogtle Procedure No. VNS-EP-04, entitled " Duties of the On-Call Project Manager," describes the reporting of significant events by the corporate " duty manager." Section 4.2.1 of the procedure must be read in conjunction with Plant Vogtle Procedure No. VNS-EP- 05 and the " Telephone List - On-
&tt vsNa e hibit
]
,page I of z x
9411o1o244 941024 PDR ADOCK 05000424
/.-Q' N. 782 MVf'ddkQ a
T,,a,oU.T..M..AN SAN,,DERS u,
Charles Barth, Esq.
March 30,1994 Page 2 call Project Manager."I' Copies of the historic procedures and telephone list are attached. Personal phone numbers have been redacted for obvious reasons. In addition, see GPC's April 1,1991 response to the Hobby /Mosbaugh i 2.206 petition, Attach-ment I at p.12 and Exhibit 18 (a copy of the Exhibit is attached for easy reference).
Please feel free to call me should you have any questions related to the foregoing, or if I can provide additional information.
Very tndy yours,
/
John Lamberski Enclosures xc:
Michael D. Kohn, Esq.
(w/ encl.)
i i
+
i l'A similar telephone list for the On-Call Project Manager dated '4th Quarter 1989" was produced by Mr. Mosbaugh in this proceeding and forwarded to you by my letter of March 7,1994.
Exhibit
,page2-of
was ;J. :-
U:.aJ
....a
- to.
lu
.u Ma ung Adoress-AC Inwrms Cer>r %%s,
}
Post Clr.cs Scv 1295
@rmingham. A'eberra 3520t raketou 205 866-$$61 m s:w ewve smm
- w. o. H.,nio,,. m be.e v,ee pres,eem August 30, 1994
%e ope ee' LCV-0461 Docket Nos. 50-424 50 425 Mr. William T. Russell Director, OfIice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commision Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Russell:
The purpose of this letter is to correct a statement made to the NRC concerning the Vogtle Project Emergency Planning Procedures contained in an Apnl 1,1991 transmittal to your office. Specifically, on page 12 of attachment 1 of an April 1,1991 letter to Mr. Thomas E. Murley, Director, OfEce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation from Mr. R. P.
Mcdonald, Executive Vice President - Nuclear Operations of Georgia Power Cornpany concerning a 10 CFR 2.206 petition filed by Messrs. Hobby and Mosbaugh, the following statement was made regarding notification practices in 1990 at the corporate ofIices of the Vogtle Project in Birmingham, Alabama.
Vogtle Project e:nergency planning procedures require the duty manager to notify senior corporate management, including both Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley, in the event of a significant event at Vogtle. The actual practice regarding notification is that the On-Ca!I Project Manager or the Director of Corporate Response contacts Mr. Hairston or Mr. Mcdonald and then Mr. Hairston or Mr. Mcdonald contacts Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley....Of course, if such an event triggers the foregoing emergency notihcation procedures, then Mr. Faricy would also be notified...
The first part of the first sentence is correct in describing the procedures' requirements to contact " senior corporate managemerrt'" in sigidficant events However, the procedures did not specifically aquia notification of both Mr. DahTberg and Mr. Farley. The second sentence accurately describes the sequence of calls: the On-Call project Manager or Director of Corporate Response notified the on-duty senior corporate executive (which was required by procedure) and the senior corporate executive made further notifications (which was not addressed specifically by procedure).
' The actual procedures refer to " Senior Corporate Management." "GPC Corporate Managenent" and the
" Duty Execunve' deperxhng ca the type of signi6 cant event.
/
7 Exhibit 2,page /
Of 2
....m.~
- ... m a c., ;..
,u L
.c.
m..
Georgia Power al Mr. William T. Russell Page 2 We apologize for any inconvenience caused by the inaccuracy. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
_i.
- .
- b &
W. George Hairston, III WGH,UVgmb cc:
Geornia Power Comong i
Mr. C. K. McCoy 1
Mr. J. B. Beasley, Jr.
Mr. M. Sheibani NORMS t
U S Nuclear Regulatorv Commission Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrative Mr. D. S. Hood. Licensing Project Manager, NRR Mr. B. R. Bomer, Senior Resident Inspector, Vogtle Charles Barth, Esq., Office of General Counsel Document Control Desk i
tevws
. g paged 05 TOTR P.03
TROUTMAN SANDERS
. 7..,3.R.".F N..i...,^ T o.h.^ "'
^
NAflONSBANK PL AZA 600 PE ACHTREE STREET N E SUITE 5200 ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30308 2216 TELEPHONE 404 885-3000 FACS M LE 404 865 3900 JOHN LAMBE A$m CSECT 404 885 3360 September 2,1994 i
Charles Barth, Esquire Office of General Counsel One White Flint North Stop 15B18
)
U.S. Nuclear Regult. tory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Re:
Georgia Power Company (Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2)
NRC Docket Nos. 50-424-OLA-3,50-425-OLA-3; License Amendment for Transfer to Southern Nuclear Operating Company
Dear Charles:
On h! arch 30, 1994 I wrote you in response to two questions you asked. One of your questions was "what was the GPC procedure that stated, in case of a significant event at Plant Vogtle, the on-call. Project hianager was to notify both hir. Dahlberg and hir. Farley."
In response to that question, I stated that Plant Vogtle Procedure No. VNS-EP4)4, entitled " Duties of the On-Call Project Manager," describes the reporting of significant events by the corporate " duty manager." Section 4.2.1 of the procedure must be read in conjunction with Plant Vogtle Procedure No. VNS-EP-05 and the
- Telephone List - On-call Project hianager." (footnote omitted)
In addition, I referred you to GPC's April 1,1991 response to the Section 2.206 petition of hiessrs. hfarvin Hobby and Allen hiosbaugh, Attachment 1, p.12 and Exhibit 18.
GPC recently corrected that portion of GPC's April 1,1991 response referenced in my hfarch 30 letter. Ssc letter from GPC's Mr. George Hairston to Mr. William Russell of the NRC, dated August 30,1994, a copy of which is attached. In 1990, the " Telephone List
- On-call Project hianager" was a subset of the Corporate Emergency Telephone Directory.
Although that telephone list was used in conjunction with Procedures VNS-EP-04 and 05, it
}
did not require the On-call Project hianager to contact each of the individuals listed under the heading " Georgia Power Company Corporate Afanagement." As stated in the attached Exhibit 1,page / of 1 v// ~q ^ nW 7,lf '
.L na I vu b -
I
~'
TROUTMAN $ANDERS r:..:.e. = u,, uma.=
Charles Barth, Esquire September 2,1994 Page 2 August 30 letter, the paxniure required only that the On-call Project Manager contact the on-duty senior corporate executive. The procedure did not require that Mr. Dahlberg or Mr.
Farley be contacted, although, as stated in GPC's April 1,1991 response, they would have been contacted by Mr. Mcdonald or Mr. Hairston.
Very tru yours, John Larnberski cc:
Service List 9
Exhibit 3,page - of 2
~
2
-,-