ML20080A579

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Expresses Gpc Willingness at Any Time to Participate in Discussions That Might Lead to Fair & Reasonable Settlement of Proceeding Re Gpc License Amend for Transfer to Southern Nuclear Operating Co.Related Correspondence
ML20080A579
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 10/20/1994
From: Joiner J
TROUTMANSANDERS (FORMERLY TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMA
To: Kohn M
KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, P.C. (FORMERLY KOHN & ASSOCIA
References
CON-#494-15843 OLA-3, NUDOCS 9411010192
Download: ML20080A579 (3)


Text

'

TROUTMAN SANDERS -men

e. u..a v. =.:..s,,,:..u.a. =

tt u c' NATIONSBANK PLAJA 600 PE ACHTREE STREET 4 E SUITE 5200

  • g { M k M ATLANTA GEOF4GIA 30308 2216 TEL E PHONE 404 685 3000 FACSMILE 404 886 3900 AMES E. JOINER PC.

RECT 404 885 3168 0FF.!Li uc

.s 1

DOCF1 tin.

October 20,1994 m.

VIA FACSIMILE Michael D. Kohn, Esq.

Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto 517 Florida Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20001-1850 Re:

Georgia Power Company (Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units I and 2) NRC Docket Nos. 50-424-OLA-3, 50-425 OLA-3; License Amendment for Transfer 3

to Southern Nuclear Operating Company

Dear Michael:

Following up your reference to the possibility of settlement during the October 17 Status Conference (Tr. 665), I wanted to express Georgia Power's willingness at any time to participate in discussions that might lead to fair and reasonable settlement of this proceeding.

As we previously have told the Board and parties and I am reconfirming to you, we are always ready to entertain a proposal to resoive the issues that have been raised by Mr.

Mosbaugh. Settlement is both consistent with FMC policy and precedent and of interest to our i

client as a means of avoiding protracted litigation and the attendant distraction of personnel. Of course, we strongly believe that Southern Nuclear is entitled unconditionally to become the licensed operator; and we stand behind our request for a license amendment. Recognizing that Mr. Mosbaugh may differ with our thoughts on the proper disposition of this case, it may be that he is able to fashion a proposal for us to evaluate along the lines suggested earlier by the l

I Board at the August 12 Conference (Tr. 572).

We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely, James E. Joiner JEI:pcw Enclosures cc: Service List j

9411010192 941020 PDR ADOCK 05000424 3

C

- PDR y.T -

l

_. - - ~

572 1

I also don't see any intentional unprofessional 2

conduct or really sloppy unprofessional conduct that was in 3

a continuing course.

And if I'm right, then the remedy in 4

this case at the end is likely to be something along the 5

lines of what Georgia Power has recommended in its response 6

to the NOV, which is serious attention to management issues, 7

possibly reorganizational questions, possibly training 8

questions.

9 But it really -- unless there's more, and Mr.

10 Mosbaugh may be able to demonstrate more, it seems unlikely 11 that the proof really goes to stopping the transfer to 12 Southern Nuclear.

13 I just want the parties to think about where they 14 really stand on the big picture, because if, in fact, it's 15 true that Mr. Mosbaugh or the staff is able to prove 16 something worse than what we've seen so far, it could 17 conceivably make sense to go through all of the trouble that i

18 we're going to go through to try this case, to stipulate to 19 tapes, to have a hearing, to have findings.

20 It's enormously expensive and time-consuming and 21 it may be worth of it if we really are talking about serious l

22 misconduct here.

And if we're not, it seems to me that it 23 would be far more valuable to stop at this point and look at 24 what we're doing and see if we can't devise a remedy for 25 what's likely to be the worst case, without providing ANN RILEY & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

Court Reporters 1250 I Street, N.W.,

Suite 300 Washington, D.C.

20005 (202) 842-0034

e 665 I

scrutiny regardless of the outcome of the illegal

)

license transfer, and from a public policy perspective 2

3 and the pro bono reasons our firm is doing that, we believe that the' illegal license transfer proceeding 4

5 may not.

Therefore, we believe the illegal license 6

transfer proceeding may, in fact, from a public policy 7

perspective, be more important than the diesel 8

generator issues.

9 Ultimately, you know, it's not impossible 10 to bel} e$ /e that the parties could resolve the diesel 11 generator issues with some form of settlement.

I do

]

12 not believe that is really too practical with respect 13 to the illegal license transfer.

i 14 And, therefore, Intervenor would propose 15 to remain on schedule and go forward with the hearing 16 as planned.

17 JUDGE BLOCH:

Georgia Power?

18 MR. BLAKE:

We would second and hope that i

19 the Board would notice our agreement with the 20 Intervenors, at least on that one topic.

?

21 (Laughter. )

22 The Intervenor's position that we try to 23 retain the schedule, not only on this topic, but on 24 each of the issues you're going to hear a recurring 25 theme from us today and as we go forward, trying very NEAL R. GROSS COUAT AEPOATERS ANO TAANSCA:8Ers

' 373 A HOOE LLLAND A w E NUE. N

  • 6202) 2 9 4433
  • 4SMtNGTON D C 20005 Z2) 2M 4433

-