ML20079N442
| ML20079N442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/11/1991 |
| From: | DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-1437 AR, S, WM, NUDOCS 9111110238 | |
| Download: ML20079N442 (30) | |
Text
.
-a UTILITY Yr6h h [ s n,s SITE
__\\ < r m#, 1 ENCLOSURES L.
. i_. > f rs. 4v q,,- (
t 9111110238 911111 PDR NUREG PDR 1437 C
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 8 AQUATIC RESOURCES
- 1. Question POST-LICENSING HODIFICATIONS AND/OR CHANCES IN OPERATIONS OF INTAKE AND/OR DISCHARGE SYSTEMS MAY HAVE ALTERED THE EFFECTS OF THE POWER PLANT ON AQUATIC RESOURCES, OR MAY HAVE BEEN MADE SPECIFICALLY TO MITIGATE IMPACTS THAT WERE NOT ANTICIPATED IN THE DESIGN OF THE PLANT.
DESCRIBE ANY SUCH MODIFICATIONS AND/OR OPERATIONAL CHANGES TO THE CONDENS",R COOLING WATER INTAKE AND DISCHARGE SYSTEMS SINCE THE ISSUANCE OF THE OPERATING LICENSE.
Response
There have been no m t-licensing modifications which have altered the effects of the. gwer plant on aquatic resources.
- 2. Question SUMMARIZE AND DESCRIBE (OR PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF) ANY KNOWN IMPACTS ON AQUATIC RESOURCES (E.G., FISH KILLS, VIOLATIONS OF DISCHARGE PERMIT CONDITIONS) OR NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS THAT HAVE OCCURRED SINCE ISSUANCE OF THE OPERATING LICENSE. HOW HAVE THESE BEEN RESOLVED OR CHANCED OVER TIME 7 (THE RESPONSE TO THIS QUESTION SHOULD INDICATE WHETHER IMPACTS iiRE ONGOING OR WERE THE RESULT OF START-UP PROBLEMS THAT WERE SUBSEQUENTLY RESOLVED.)
Response
There have been no known impacts on aquatic resources or NPDES enforcement actions that have occurred since issuance of the operating license.
- 3. Question CHANGES TO THE NPDES PERMIT DURING OPERATION OF THE PLANT COULD INDICATE WHETHER WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS WERE DETERMINED TO HAVE NO SIGNIFICAN'T IMPACTS (AND WERE DROPPED FROM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS) OR WERE SUBSEQUENTLY RAISED AS A WATER QUALITY ISSUE. PROVIDE A BRIEF
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES (AND WHEN THEY OCCURRED)
TO THE NPDES PERMIT FOR TP2 PLANT SINCE ISSUANCE OF THE OPERATING LICENSE.
~
o Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 9
Response
There have been no such changes to our NPDES permit as yet. Our NPDES permit reapplication was submitted October 16, 1989. The new permit has not yet been issued.
- 4. Question AN EXAMINATION OF TRENDS IN THE EFFECTS ON AQUATIC RESOURCES MONITORING CAN INDICATE WHETHER IMPACTS HAVE INCREASED, DECREASED, OR REMAINED RELATIVELY STABLE DURING OPERATION.
DESCRIBE AND SUMMARIZE (OR PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF) RESULTS OF MONITORING OF WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC BIOTA (E.G., RELATED TO NPDES PERMITS, ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, SITE-SPECIFIC HONITORING REQUIRED BY FEDERAL OR STATE AGENCIES). WHAT TRENDS ARE APPARENT OVER TIME 7
Response
We have nn data available at this time on the effects on aquatic resources. An impingement /entrainment study is currently planned to begin March 1991.
- 5. Question SUMMARIZE TYPES AND NUMBERS (OR PROVIDE DOL M ATION) 0F ORGANISKS ENTRAINED AND IMPINGED BY THE CONDENSER C0 CLING WATER SYSTEM SINCE ISSUANCE OF THE OPERATING LICENSE.
DESCRIBE ANY SEASONAL PATTERNS ASSOCIATED WITH ES"ZRAINHENT AND IMPINGEMENT. HOW HAS ENTRAINMENT AND IMPINCEMENT CHANGED OVER TIME 7
Response
Refer to response to Question 4.
- 6. Question AQUATIC HABITAT ENHANCEMENT OR RESTORATION EFFORTS (E.G.,
ANADROMOUS FISH RUNS) DURING OPERATION MAY HAVE ENHANCED THE BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE PLANT.
ALTERNATIVELY, DEGRADATION OF HABITAT OR WATER QUALITY MAY HAVE RESULTED IN LOSS OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES NEAR THE SITE. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES TO AQUATIC HABITATS (DOTH ENHANCEMENT AND DEGRADATION)
IN THE VICINITY OF THE POWER PLANT SINCE THE ISSUANCE OF THE OPERATING LICENSE INCLUDING THOSE INITIALLY PREDICTED.
. _ ~ _
a>
Enclosure to i-GP-90-0016 Page 10
--g
Response
There have been no habitat enhancement or restoration efforts
. undertaken at Fermi. Alternatively, there has been no observable degradation of habitat or water quality which has resulted in loss of biological resources near the site. The establishment of the zebra mussels in the Great Lakes region has been the only significant aquatic biological change since issuance of the operating license._ (Detroit Edison has taken steps on site to control the infiltration of zebra mussels to plant equipment).
- 7. Question PLANT OPERATIONS MAY HAVE HAD POSITIVE, NEGATIVE, OR NO IMPACT ON THE USE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES BY OTHERS. -HARVEST BY COMMERCIAL OR RECREATIONAL FISHERMEN MAY BE CONSTRAINED BY PLANT OPERATION.
ALTERNATIVELY COMMERCIAL HARVESTING MAY BE RELATIVELY LARGE COMPARED WITH FISH LOSSES CAUSED BY THE PLANT. DESCRIBE (OR PROVID2 DOCUMENTATION FOR) OTHER NEARBY USES OF WATERS AFFECTED BY COOLING WATER SYSTEM (E.G., SWIMMING, BOATING, ANNUAL HARVEST BY COMMERCIAL'AND RECREATIONAL FISHERIES) AND HOW THESE IMPACTS HAVE CHANGED SINCE ISSUANCE OF THE OPERATING LICENSE.
i
Response
Plant operation has had no impact on the use of aquatic resources by others in the plant vicinity. Lake Erie in the vicinity of the plant is utilized by swimmers (Sterling State Park) and for i
recreational _ fishing. Water _caelity has significantly. improved i
since-the plant's preoperation 1 period, however, this is not
(.
attributable to plant operation.
L8.-Question DESCRIBE OTHER SOURCES OF IMPACTS ON AQUATIC RESOURCES (E.G.,
l INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES, OTHER POWER PLANTS, AGRICULTURAL RUNOFF)
THAT COULD CONTRIBUTE TO CUMULATIVE' IMPACTS. WHAT ARE THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS DUE TO THE POWER PLANT, TO OVERALL WATER QUALITY DEGRADATION AND LOSSES OF. AQUATIC BIOTA 7 l
Response
Lake Erie current in the vicinity of the plant primarily follows the shoreline from north to south. The Detroit River empties into the lake approximately 10 to 12 miles north of the plant. Lake Erie water in the vicinity of the plant, therefore, could conceivably contain effluents from any industry located on the Detroit River or Lake Erie north of Fermi 2.
The plant's relative i
-- m.- -
m-
=*
w-V-
n Enclueure to GP-90-0016 Page 11 contribution to overall water quality degradation is negligible as compared to industry locate to the north.
- 9. Question PROVIDE A COPY OF YOUR SECTION 316(a) AND (b) DEMONSTRATION REPORT REQUIRED BY THE CLEAN WASTE ACT. WHAT SECTION 316(a) AND (b)
DETERMINATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE BY THE REGULATORY AUTHORITIES 7
Response
The Section 316(a) report is a variance provision to be filed for power plants which do not utilize closed cycle cooling.
As such, Fermi 2 was exempt since we are a closed cycle plant. Fermi was waived from the 316(b) report requirement because the intake and blowdown has the "best available technology" at the time the NPDES permit was written.
'l Enclosure to
- 1 GP-90-0016 Page 12'
~
SOCIOECONOMIC
- 1. Question TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PLANT AND THE DEGREE OF ITS-SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS ON THE LOCAL REGION, ESTIMATE THE NUMBER OF PERMANENT WORKERS ON-SITE FOR THE MOST RECENT YEAR FOR WHICH DATA ARE AVAILABLE.
4
Response
As of March 1990 there were 1161 permanant workers, as defined by NUMARC, on the Fermi 2 site.
- 2. Question.
.TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PLANT TO THE LOCAL REGION, AND LHOW THAT-HAS CHANGED 0VER TIME, ESTIMATE THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF-PERMANENT WORKERS ON SITE, IN FIVE-YEAR INCREMENTS STARTING WITH THE ISSUANCE OF THE PLANT'S OPERATING LICENSE.
IF POSSIBLE,.
PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION FOR EACH UNIT AT A PLANT SITE.
Essponse Fermi 2 received its operating-license in March 1985; the following data are available:
1985 1921 1986 1939 1987--
1850 1988 1493 1989 1208 1161 1990
- 3. Quest! 7 TO UhcERSTAND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF CONTINUED OPERATION FOR AN
. ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS BEYOND THE ORIGINAL LICENSING TERM, PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE FOLLOWING THREE CASES:-
A)~-A TYPICAL PLANNED OUTAGE; B) AN ISI'0UTAGE; AND C) THE LARGEST SINGLE OUTAGE (IN TERNS OF THE NUMBER OF WORKERS INVOLVED) THAT HAS OCCURRED TO DATE
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 13 AN ESTIMATE 07 ADDITIONAL WOPKERl' !NV01 1R THE EFTIRE OUTACE AND FOR EACH PRINCIPAL TALK), LENSTH
- T'
, HONTHS AND YEAR IN WHICH WORK OCCURRED, AND COST.
ALS(
0 '-
OCCUPATIONAL DOSES RECEIVED BY PERMANENT AND TEMP 0HARY L'.ERL sURING EACH PRINCIPAL TASK.
Response
Fermi 2 received its low power license in March 1985. Since that time, there has been only one refueling outage >n which to base any impact.
o The first refueling outage (RF01) began in September 1989 atrl was completed 103 days later in December 1989 o
Additional werker. - are additional 1538 personnel were issued dosim'try during.he outage. Data was not set up to determine the number for each principal task.
o Total cost of RF01 was approximately $41,000,000.
o Occupational Doses - RF01 resulted in 199 man-rem.
Major dose tasks: Hechanical. stress improvement process - 20 3 man-rem Drywell insulation removal
- 17.1 man-rem Refuel /Vassel ISI/ fuel inspection
- 15.8 man-rem o
Major Tasks -
Main Turbine Generator Overhaul Mechanical Stress Improvement Process Refueling Vessel ISI Fuel Inspection ATWS Modification ADS Modification Erosion / Corrosion Examination
- 4. Question TO UNDERSTAND THE PLANT's FISCAL IMPORTANCE TO SPECIFIC JURISDICTIONS, FOR 1980, 1985, AND THE LATEST YEAR FOR WHICH DATA ARE AVAILABLE, ESTIMATE THE ENTIRE PLANT'S TAXABLE ASSESSED VALUE AND THE AMOUNT OF TAXES PAID TO THE STATE AND TO EACH LOCAL FAXING JURISDICTION.
l 1
l-l l
l l
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 14 Responso TAX YEAR
_1980 1985 1989 Assessed Value
$63,473,710
$413 229,950
$849,552,055 Jefferson Schools
$ 1,884,534
$ 10,847,645
$ 18,477,760 Frenchtown Township 285,632 942,210 5,725,980 Monroe County 371,458 2,520,700 5,156,780
(
Intersediate School 161,395 950,350 2,463,700 Community College 16,2,789 1,012,190 t,962,865 Totals
$ 2,865,838
$ 16,273,095
$ 33,786,685 s
P
E) closure to i
GP-90-0016 l
Page 1 1
RESPONSES 'IO QUESTIONNAIRE 'N SUPP0!n PART 51 RULE CHANGE I
WASTE MANAGEMENT l
A. SPENT FUEL
- 1. Question WHICP OF THE FOLLOWING CURRENT TECIDi! QUES FOR AT-REACTOR STORAGE ARE YOU USING AND HOW7 A.
RE-RACKING OF SPENT FUEL.
B.
CONTROL ROD REPO3ITIONING.
C.
ABOVE GROUND DRY STORAGE.
D.
LONGLtt FUEL BURNUP.
E.
OTHER (PLEASE IDENTIFY)
Response
Fermi 2 is currently using high density spent fuel pool storage racks.
- 2. Question DO YOU PLAN ON CONTINUING THE USE OF THESE CURRENT TECHNIQUES FOR AT-PIACTOR STORAGE OF SPENT FUEL DURING THE REMAINING TIHE OF YOUR OPERATING LICENSE OR DO YOU EXPECT TO CHANGE OR MODIFY TIIEH IN SOME WAY7
Response
As presently configured, the spent fuel pool is expected to provide full core reserve capability throu,;h the fifteenth 3 ear of the operating license (2000 AD).
- 3. Question WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNIQUES FOR AT-REACTOR STORAGE DO YOU ANTICIPATE USING CITIL OFF-SITE SPENT FUEL STORAGE BECOMES AVAILABLE AND HOW?
i i
Enclosu e to GP-90-0016 Page 2 l
l A.
RE-RACKING OF SPENT FUEL.
i B.
ABOVE GROUND DRY STORAGE.
C.
LONGER FUEL BURNUP.
D.
OTHER (PLEASE IDENTIFY).
Response
No options have as yet been evaluated.
Above grout.d dry storage appears at this time to be the most likely technique.
- 4. Question WILL THE TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED ABOVE BE FOR CONTINUED AT-REACTOR STORAGE OF SPENT FUEL FOR THE OPERATING LIFETIME OF THE PLANT, INCLUDING A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF LICENSE RENEWAL, OR ARE YOU DEVELOPING OTHER PLANS 7
Response
Has not been assessed.
- 5. Question DO YO'J ANTICIPATE THE NEED TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL LAND FOR THE STORAGE OF SPENT-FUEL FOR THE OPERATING LIFETIME OF THE PLANT, INCLUDING A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF LICENSE RENE1AL7 IF SO, HOW HUCH LAND 7 WHEN WOULD THIS ACQUISITION OCCUR 7 WHERE7 (IF ANSWER IS "YES", 3-4 SENTENCES)
Response
Has not been assessed.
- 6. Question DO YOU ANTICIPATE ANY ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON-SITE, OR IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE POWER PLANT SITE, ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONTINUED AT-REACTOR STORAGE OF SPENT FUEL FOR THE OPERATING LIFETIHS OF THE PLANT, INCLUDING A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF LICENSE RENEWAL 7 (YES/NO)
Response
Yes.
i 4
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 3
- 7. Question IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTION 6, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., EXPANSION OF FUEL STORAGE POOL, BUILDING ABOVE GROUND DRY STORAGE FACILITIES).
Response
Construction associated with a dry storage facility.
B. LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGENENT
- 1. Question UNDER THE CURRENT SCHEME FOR LLRW DISPOSAL (1.E. LLRW POLICY AHENDHENTS ACT OF 1985 At:D REGIONAL COMPACTS) IS THERE CURRENTLY OR WILL SUFFTCTENT CAPACITY FOR WASTES GENERATED DURING THE LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD BE AVAILABLE TO YOUR PLANT (S)? IF SO, WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR THIS CONCLUSION?
Response
The position of the Midwest Compact is that member states will be selected to host low-level waste facilities for twenty-year periods with Michigan being the firct host state. There is currently no firm indication that the obligation of Michigan and the other compact states would not be met.
Based on this, Fermi 2 should have access to an offsite disposal facility through plant life
-including the license renewal period. However, due to the current status of the siting effort, Detroit Edison is evaluating onsite storage for the licensed life of the plant.
- 2. Question IF FOR ANY REASON YOUR PLANT (S) IS/ARE DENIED ACCESS TO A LICENSED DISPOSAL SITE FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, WHAT PLANS DO YOU HAVE FOR CONTINUED LLRW DISPOSAL 7
Response
Fermi 2 currently has a five-year licensed Onsite Storage Facility (OSSF) for temporary use if access to a disposal site were to be lost for a short period of time.
l Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 4
- 3. Question IN A COUPLE OF PAGES, PLEASE DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC HETHODS OF LLRW KANAGEMENT CURRENTLY UTILIZED BY YOUR PLANT. WHAT PERCENTAGE OF YOUR CURRENT LLRW (BY VOLUME) IS MANAGED BYt A.
WASTE C0liPACTION?
B.
WASTE SEGREGATION (THROUGH SPECIAL CONTROLS OR SEGREGATION AT RADIATION CHECK POIHT)?
C.
DECONTAMINATION OF WASTES?
D.
SORTidG OF WASTE PRIOR TO SHIPMENT 7 E.
OTHER (PLEASE IDENTIFY)
'..esponse LLRW generated at Fermi 2 consists of process waste, compactible dry active waste (DAW), and noncapactible DAW. Appropriate methods are used for each category.
Compactible DAW consists of trash generated within the radiologically controlled area (RCA) that can be compacted, such as paper and plastics. Examplcs are used protective clothing, waste paper, hoses, wire, and air filters. The first method of management is source control. An attenpt is made to keep all unnecessary material out of the RCA. For example, employes are discouraged from bringing packaging materials, excess components, and excess lubricants into the RCA. Employes are also encouraged to bring used items to the control point for survey and release, rather than throwing them out. The next method is sorting.
DAW generated in the RCA is transported to a sorting area, where an attempt is made to separate the clean items, items wnich are not acceptable for disposal, such as grease and liquids, are c.lso removed at this time. Clean items are placed into storage for later free-release. Contaminated, compactible items are thcn compacted in 55 gallon drums.
If dose rates permit, these drums are then shipped to an off-site supercompactor for further volume reduction prior to disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Noncompactible DAW consists of contaminated metals, wood, ceramics, etc., Benerated in the RCA. This includes piping and other plant components. This material is first surveyed, and, if clean, released for unrestricted use.
If contaminated material appears to be easily decontaminated (i.e., smooth and accessible surfaces, low contamination level) an attempt is made to decontaminate.
If unsuccessful or if not easily decontaminated, the material is packaged in 55 gallon drums, while larger items are placed in sea I
l
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 5 vans.
These items are then shipped to an offsite volume reduction facility. We presently use the Quadrex Recycle Center.
- There, material is either deconned and released or volume reduced for disposal. Advanced volume reduction techniques, such as supercompattion, baling, and melting metals into ingots, are employed.
Process radwaste consists of plant water purification medie This material is transformed into a form acceptable to LLRW dir,posal facilities through a dewatering process supplied by Chem-Nuclear.
This process also provides some volume reduction.
If the activity level requires stability, the material is dewatered in a polyethylene "High Integrity Container" (HIC).
If required, this HIC is placed into a concrete overpack at the disposal site.
Other waste forms which have not yet been encountered, but which are expected, include:
(1) water filters - these will be encapsulated for burial; (2) irradiated hardware such as control rod blades - these will be cut up or crushed and packaged underwater and will then be placed in a type B cask for shipment to a licensed disposal site; (3) contaminated waste oil - this will be incinerated or solidified for disposal. Also, please note that mixed waste is excluded from this response.
The quantitative portion of this question is difficult to answer, since waste is not considered as " generated" until it is packaged for shipment offsite. Thus, material which is released through segregation, decontamination, or sorting, or the volume saved through compaction is never generated. Also, since multiple processes are often used on the same aaterial, the total will be greater than 100%. Thus, the basis of our answer is the percent of each waste category by volume, if no volume reduction vere used, would be approximately compactible DAW, 60%; noncompactible DAW, 10%; prsccss waste. 30%. For compactible DAW, the techniques employed are compaction, segregation, and sorting. For noncompactible DAW, the techniques employed are segregation, sorting, decontamination, and compaction (at a supercompactor or through selting). For process waste, the technique employed is dewatering. Thus, the responses would be:
A.
Waste compaction - 70%
B.
Waste segregation - 70%
C.
Decontamination - 10%
D.
Sorting - 70%
E.
Other - dewatering - 30%
Note - the irradiated hardware and water filter volumes are insignificant compared to other waste types.
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 6
~
- 4. Question IN A COUPLE OF PAGES, PLEASE DESCRIBE THE ANTICIPATED PLANS FOR LLRW MANAGEMENT TO BE UTILIZED BY YOUR PLANT DURING THE REMAINDER OF THE OPERATING LICEWSE AUD THROUGH THE LICENSE RENEWAL TERM.
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF YOUR ANTICIPATED WASTE (BY VOLUME) WILL BE MANAGED BY:
WASTE COHPACTION, WASTE SEGREGATION, DECONTAH1 NATION OF WASTE, SORTING OF WASTE PRIOR TO SHIPHENT, AND OTHER?
Response
LLRW management is expected to remain largely the same for compactible and noncompactible DAW. Thus, the description for these categories would be the same as above, although other techniques may become available. We may also use cff-site incineration. Also, poll' ical developments may render some off-site volume reduction facilities unavailable. For process waste, we may change over to solidification if long-term storage is required, and other advanced techniques, such as bacterial digestion, may become available. Thus, the quantitative responses would be the same, except that the "other" category may involve a different technique.
- 5. Question DO YLU ANTICIPATE THE NEED TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL LAND FOR THE STORAGE OF LLRW FOR THE OPERATING LIFETIME OF THE PLANT, INCLUDING A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF LICENSE RENEWAL 7 IF SO, HOW HUCH LAND? WHEN WOULD THIS ACQUISITION OCCUR 7 WHERE7 (IF ANSWER IS "YES", 3-4 SENTENCES)
Response
Fermi 2 has enough existing property to provice for the storage of LLRW for both the operating lifetime of the plant and a 20-year period of license renewal.
- 6. Question TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE TIMING OF FUTURE LOW-LEVEL WASTE STREAMS, IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO OUESTION #5, OVER WHAT PERIODS OF TIME ARE THESE ACTIVITIES CONTEMPLATED?
Response
None required.
O Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 7
- 7. Question-DO YOU ANTICIPATE ANY ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ON-SITE, OR IMMEDIATELY AP;.' CENT TO THE POWER PLANT SITE. ASSOCIATED WITH TEMPORARY LLR" JTORAGE FOR THE OPERATING LIFETIME OF THE PLANT, INCLUDING A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF LICENSE RENEWAL 7 (YES/NO)
Response
Yes construction activity on-site would be necessary to extend the storage capability for the above indicated period.
- 8. Question IF YOU ANSWERED YES TO QUESTION 7, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., STORAGE AREAS FOR STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS OR OTHER MATERIALS EXPOSED TO REACTOR ENVIRONhENY).
Response
The construction activity would primarily result from the need to construct additional facilities to handle DAW and resin sludge.
It would also be necessary to construct a facility to handle such in-core items as control rod blades, TIP's, sources, etc.
- 9. Question TO PPnVIDE INFORMATION ON FUTURE LOW-LEVEL WASTE STREAMS WHICH HAY EFFEf 5tKFORCE LEVELS, EXPOSURE, AND WASTE COMPACT PLANNING, DO YOU
,IPATE ANY MAJOR PLANT MODIFICATIONS OR REFURBISHMENT THAT ARE
.dLY TO GENERATE UNUSUAL VOLUMES OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTL PRIOR TO, OR DURING, THE RELICENSING PERIOD FOR THE PLANT 7 IF SO, PLEASE DESCRIBd THESE ACTIVITIES.
AL30, 16AT TYPES OF
- MODIFICATIONS DO YOU ANTICIPATE TO BE NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE LICENSE RENEWAL OPERATION THROUGH A 20-YEAR LICENSE RENEWAL TEllM7 Response-Fermi 2 has thirty five years tomaining on the operating license.
This, plus the twenty year license renewal period, would require projection of waste generated up to fifty five years from now.
Fermi 2 has not evalueted waste projections that far into the future.
c' t--
me v-
---ec,
->-mw.em.-w k
+--,g+
wal---ma
,w giw..
v.
,a..y-e.-e--c.g--
--eq q
y-6-'
-p--
,a+---wwWyu-Tw-r-Tw6tw o w'-
A+ ver--i-y--
ir-----g.y-y 7 -9 w w -a-ew4'y'
f V
D kt h rUi E (k \\ b D 9 UTILITY SITE Y41JLW 4 ENCLOSURES d%A\\KNA. k (11AkbNO s
7-~_.__._.._._
/
, JLA.-06-1990 '12813 FROM tu' L1C EF2 342 TOC TO 912027651999 P.03
/A; Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 1 RESrcsE5 %0 QUC5710 MAIM 10 SUFF0fff FAHR 51 RUIA GIANGE k'
A. 3FMT FUEL
- 1. g gggg
. WHICE W THE FMING M, TECmfl0055 FOR.47-RhCTOR SIORAGE l
AM IIII IISING AND 3Dff A.
M-RACKING W SP W T FUEL.
B.
CONTROL ROD REPOSITIONING.
C.
ABOVE GROUND DRY S10 RAGE.
D.
IANGER FUEL BUiUFJP.
E.
OPEJIEF. (FLEASE IIWtfIFY)
Rasmoen Fermi 2 is currently using high density spent fuel pool storage raoks.
- 2. Question
- DO YOU PLAN ON CONTINUING THE USE OF THEst CURADfT TECMIQUES FOR l
AT-MACTOR STORADE OF SPENT FUEL DURING TEMGING TIME OF YOUR OPERATING LICENSE OR Do YOU EXPECT 'IO CHANGE OR MODIFY TERN IN SOME WAY7 l
l
Response
As presently configuret, the spent fuel pool is capected to provide full core reserve capability through the fifteenth year of the operating license (2000 AD).
- 3. Question-WHICH OF THE FOLIDlING TECIDlIQVCS FOR-AT. REACTOR STORACE DO YOU i.
l ANTICIPATE USING UNTIL OFF-SITE SPfEr FUEL STORAGE BECOMES XVAILABLE AND H3W7
_.,m e--
.-._,~r.,.
,..y, r
...y
-w
m m_--..___.m_---,
JUL-06-1990 12:13 FROt1 TOC L1C EF2 342 TOC 10 912027851098 P. CL1
/.
4 f
Enolcaure to CP-90-0016 l
Page 2 l
l l
A.
PE-RACKING OF SPENT FUEL.
B.
ABOYE GMXIND DRY SMRAGE.
C.
LudGER FUCL BW0iUP.
D.
OTER (P! EASE IDENTITY).
wm No options have as yet been evaluated. Above ground dry stcrete appears at' this time to be the seat likely technique.
al. Question WILL THE 1TOctI7JE5 DESCRIBED ABOVE BE FOR CONTIFJED AT-EACTOR STORACT, OF SPDfT FUEL FOR TE OPERATING LIFETIM5 OF TFE PLANT, INCLUDING A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF LICFX5E RENEWAL, CR ARE YOU DEVELOPING OTHER FLAM57
Response
lits not been ascessed.
- 5. Question DO YOU ANTICIPATE TE NEED TO ACQUIRE ADDITIOGAl LAND FOR THE STORAGE OF SPf"NT-FUEL FOR TE OPERATING LIFETIE OF TE PLANT.
INCLUDING A 20.-YEAR FERIOD OF LICDtSil: RENEWAL? IF So, BOW WJCH LAND 7 WHEN WOULD THIS ACQUISI'fION OCCUR 7 WICRET (IF ANSWER IS
- YES", 3-4 SENTENCES)
Ramponse Has not been assessed.
- 6. Question DO YOU ANTICITATE ANT AEDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON-SITE, CR IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT % THE POWER PLANT SITE, ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONTINUED AT-PIACMR STORAGE OF SPEL*T FUEL FOR THE OPERATING LIFETIME OF THE ?LANT, IN2,UDING A EO-TfAR PERICD OF LICENSE RD.'EWAL7 (YES/NO)
Response
Yes.
[
JUL-Orv.1990 12: 13 FPON ifJC llc EF2 342 TOC 3
912027051890 P.6D r
Enclosure to CP-90-0016
~
Page 3
- 7. Question IF YOU ANSWERED YES M QUESTION 6, NIIEFLY DESCRIBE THIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., EIPANSION OF FDtL~SiCRAGE POOL, BUILDING ADOVE GTIOUND DRI STORAGE FACILITIES).
Basponse Construction associated with a dry storage facility.
B. IDU-LETEL RADIDACTITE VASTE NAMACEMENT
- 1. Question UNDTR TE CURRENT SCHEME FOR LLRW DISPOSAL (I.E. LLRW POLICT AMENDENTS ACT OF 1985 AND PSGICKAL COMPACTS) IS TERE CURRENTLY OR VILL SUFFICIENT CAPACITT FOR WASTES GEERATED 00 RING TE LICENSE RENEWAL PERIOD BE AVAILABLE TO.7JR PLANT (S)? IF SO, WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR 11115 C0h0LUSION?
D The position of the Midwest Capact is that seaber states will be selected to host low-level waste facilitles for twenty-year periods with Michigan being the first host state. There is currently no firm indication that the obligation of Michigan and the other compact states would not be met. Based OL this, Fermi 2 should havo access to an offsite dispcaal facility thicugh plant life including the license renewal period. Howevtr, due to the current status of the riting effort, Detroit Edison is evaluating onsite ttorage for the licensed life of the plant.
1
- 2. Question IF FOR ANY FRA30N YOUR PLANT (S) IS/ARE DENIED ACCESS to A LICENSED DISPOSAL SITE FOR A SHOR: 'FERIOD OF TIME, WHAT FLANS DO YOU HAVE FOR CONTIWUED LLRW D.T.SPOSAL1 Responso Fermi 2 currently has a five-year licensed Onsite Storat,e :'acility (OSSF) for temporary use if access to a disposal sito were to bc lost for a short pariad of time.,
JUL-06-1990 12824 FROt1 IOC llc EF2 342 IOC TO 912027852099 P.06 s
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 4
- 3. Question IN A C0tiPLE OF PACES, PLEASE DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC METPOD3 OF LLRW MANA'.iENENT CURRENTLT UTILIIED BT TOUR PLANT. WHAT PEPEENTAGE 0?
YOUR CURRENT LLRW (BY TOLUME) IS MANAGED BYt A.
WASTE 03NPACT10N?
E.
VASTE SEGREGATION (THROU21 SPECIAL CONTROLS OR SEGFIGATION AT RADIATIost QIECK Po1ET)?
C.
DECONTAXINATION M VASTES?
D.
SORTINGbFWASTEPRIORTO59IPMENTT E.
OTHER (PLEASE 2DENTIFY)
. hse!!BE LLRV generated at ferai 2 consists of process waete, ocepactible dry active waste (DAV), and r,ancapactible DAW. Appropriate methods w e w ed (Or e6ch category.
Compactible DAW consists of trash generated within the radiologically controlled area (RCA) that can be ocapacted, such as paper and plastics. Examples are used protective clothing, waste paper, hoses, wire, and air filters. The first method of managtment is source control. An attempt is made to keep all unnecessary amaterial out of the PCA. For exampis, emplojes are discouraged from bringing packaging materials, excess components, and excess lubrioants into the RCA. tuployes are also encouraged to bring used items to the control point for survey cod release, rather Man throwing them out. The next method is sorting. DAW genera'. 4 in the RCA is transported to a sorting area, where an attempt is ande to separate the clean items. Items ubich are not acceptable for cisposal, such as grease and liquida, are also recoved at this time. Cinan items are placed into storage for later free-releese. Contaminated, compactible items are then oonpacted in 55 gallon crums. If dose rates permit, these drums are then shippe3 to an off-tite supercompacter for further volume reduction prior to disposal at a licensed LLRW disposal facility.
Nonoompactible DAV consists of contaminated metals, wood, oeramics, etc., generated in the RCA. This includes piping and other plant components. This asterial is first surveyed, and, if clean, released for unrestricted use. If contaminated material appears to be easily decontaminated (i.e., smooth and accessible surfaces, low contamination level) an attempt is made to decontaminate. If unsuccessful or if not easily decontaminated, the material is packaged in 55 gallon drums, vbile larger items are placed in sea
JU -o6-1990 12:14 FFoi tar LIC EF2 342 IO' TO 912027051890 P.07 i
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 5 These items are then shipped to an offsite volume reduction vans.
facility. We presently use the Quadrex Recycle Center. There, anterial is either decor, red and released or volume reduoed for e
disposal. Advanoed volume reduction techniques, such as supercompaction, baling, and netting metals into ingots, are employed.
Process redwaste consists of plant ster purification media. This material is transformed into a fore acceptable to iLRW disposal F
I facilities through a dewatering process supplied by Chen-Wuolear.
This process also provides some volume reduction. If the activity isvel requires stability, the material is deuntered in a polyethylene.*High Integrity Container" (Ric). It required, this HIC is placed into a concrete overpaok at'the disposal site.
Other waste forms which have not yet been encountered, but which are expected, ine',udet (1) water filters - these will be encapsulated for burialt (2) Irradiated hardware such as control rod blades - these will be cut up or crushed and pa$ aged underwater and will then be placed in a type 8 oask for shipment to a licensed disposal sitol (3) contaminated waste oil - this will be incinereted or solidified for disposal. Also, please note that' mixed waste is excluded from this responas.
Ibe quantitative portion of this question is difficult to anstrer, since waste is ret considered as " generated" until it is packaged for shipment offsite, Thus, material which is released throurb segregation, dnoontamination, or sorting, or the volume ar.*d through compaction is never generated. Also,sincemultigt processes are often used on the same material, the total,11 greater than 100%. Thus, the basis of our answer is the y n' sf each waste category by volume, if no volume reduction were wte would be approziantely compactible DAW, 605; noncompactible M.,
10%; process wasta, 30%. For compactible DAV, the techniques employed are compaction, segre5ation, and sorting. For ncncompactible DaV, the techniques esployed are segregation, sorting, decontamination, and ocapaction (at a sepercrapactor or through meltin8). Fct process waste, the technique esployed is dewatering. Thus, the responses would be:
A.
Vaste compaction - 70%
B.
Vaste segregation - 70%
C.
Dooontamination - 10%
D.
Sortirs - 70%
E.
Other - devatering - 30%
Note - the irradiate'l hardware aus water filt ses are ins 15nificant oospcred to other waste type:2.
I
a
, JUL-06-19tC 12115 FR0ri 100 LIC EF2 342 f0C TO 922027053050 P re3 l
I Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Pago 6
- 4. Qtanstion IN A 0)UPLE OF PAGES, FLEASE DESCRIIE THE ANTICIPATED PLANS FOR LLRW MANAGEMENT TD BE UTILIIED BY YOOH PLLWT DURING 'INE RtMAINDER OF THE OPERATING LICENSE AND TH OUGH THE LICENSE RENnlAL TERN.
MHAT PERCERTAGE OF YOUR ANTICIPATED WAsn (BY ?0LUME) WIIL BE MANAGED 3I WASN 0000' ACTION, WA5M 58CREGATION, DEKONT&MIXATION OF WASTE, SORTING OF WASTE PRIOR ID 3HIPNL1rt, AND OTHER?
hesponse ILRW manapaent is espected to remain largely the asse for compactible and noncompactible DAW. Thus, the description fer thase categories would be the same as above, although other techniques may become available. We say also use off-site incineration. Also, political developments may render some off-site volume reduction facilities unavailable. For process waste, we may change over to solidification if long-tors storage is required, and other advanced techniques, such as bacterial digestion, any beocee evallable. Thus, the quantitative responses muld be the anne, exoept that the 'other' ottegory may involve a different technique.
- 5. Question DO YOC' ANTICIPATE TE NEED 19 ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL LAND FOR TE STORAGE OF LLRW POR THE OPERATING LIftTIE OF THE PLANT, INCLUDING A 20-TEAR PERIOD OF LICEWSP RENEWAL 7 Ir $0,15 MUCR LAND? WHCH WOULD THIS ACQUISITIM OCCvR7 VERET (Ir ANSWER IS 'TES", 3 4 SENTENCES)
Response
Forni 2 has enough existing property to provide for the storage of 11RV for b3th the operating lifetime of the plant and a 20-year period or license renewal.
- 6. Question TO PROVIDE INFORK4 TION ON THE TIMING OF PVIURE LOW-LEVEL WASTE STREAMS, IF YOU ANSWERED YES 70 QULsTION #5, OVER VHAT PERIODS OF TIE ARE THESE ACTIVITIES 00NTEMPLATEDt Responna Kone required.
j
JUL-06-1990 12:15 FR0f1 ffX LIC EF2 342100
_10 920027851693 P.09 l
Enclosure to QP-90 0016 t
Page 7 t
- 7. Ossetion DO YOU ANTICITATE Ally ADDITICEAL CollSTIIUCTICII ACT!?ITT, CRf-SITT, OR IlesDIATELY ADJACBff to TE routR PLANT stTE Ass 0CIATED WITN TDFORARY LLRW 319 RAW POR TE OPERATIII0 LIFET!!E OF 113 PLANT, IICLUDIII0 A 20-YEAR PERIOD OF LICBISE IENEWALT (TES/IID) i Reenoese Yes construction activity on-site would be necessary o extrad the storsge onpability for the above indicated period.
- 8. gggg -
IF YOU AllSWERED YE5 TO 90F*TICII 7 BRIEFLY DESC../BS !!iT3 COIISTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., STORAW AREAS F0lt STE8M QFERATOR 00100I15N75 0110FIER NdTERIAIA EIPOED to REAC10h ENfiME"*7).
M
-the construction activity would primarily result from the need to construct additional facilities to handle DAW and resin sludge. It would also be neoessary to construct a facility to handle such
-in-oore items as control rod blades, TIP's, sources, etc.
- 9. Questaan 10 PROVIDE IllF0llMATION Oil FUTURE LOW-12TEL VASTE S11tEANS WilICH MAY RFFECT W0ltEFoltCE 12 VEL 5,-EIPOSURE, AND WASTE COMPACT PLANIIIBG, D0 f00 A:ITICIPATE alif IIAJOR P! ANT ICDIFICA710ES OR REFURRISIBENT TIUT DE LIIELY 10 GBERATE UlfUSUAL-7004455 t' LOW. LEVEL RADICACTIVE WA8TE PRIOR TO, OR DURIIIO, TIIE RELICENSIIIQ PERIOD FOR TIIB PLANT?
IF 30 PL8AFE DESCRIM TIESE ACTIY! TIES'. ALSO, VilAT TYPES CF
= ElDIFICAT1018S DO YOU ANTICIFATE 10 E WBCESSARY TO ACHIEVE LICDISE RDEWAL OPERATICII MIR00GE A 20-YEAR LICENSE RDIEWAL TERN?
Ilesponse Forsi 2 has thirty five years remaining on the o'erating license.
l This, plus the twenty year license renewal period.would require i
projection of waste generated up to fifty five years from riow.
Feral 2 has not evaluated waste projections that far into.the future.
~ - - -
,a..
.e.,,,,,,
,,,e
AA +06-1990 12:10 FRCri 10C Llc EF2 342 TOC TO 9120270510?8 P.01 1
I Enclosure to i
GP-90-0016 Page 3 AQUATIC RES00R23
- 1. Question POST-LICENSING HODIPICATIONS AND/OR CHANGCS IN OFCP4TIONS OF IKTAEE AND/OR DISCHARGE SYSTEMS MAT HAfB ALTERED THE EFFSCTS OF THE POWER PLAN */ ON AQUATIC Rt30URCf3, OR HAT MAYE NtEN MADE SP3CITICALLT TO MITICATE: IMPACT 3 THAT VERE W3T ANTICIPATED IN T1E DESIGN OF THE PLANT.
D' SCRIBE ANT SUCN WJDIFICATIONS AND/OR OPERATIONAL CHANGES TO THE CONDENSER COOLING WATER IMTAEE AND DI5CHAME SYSTEMS $1NCE THE 1350ANCE.0F THE OPERATING LICENSE.
$ #09EE There have been no post.116ensing modifications Wtich have altere:1 the errects of the power plant on aquatic ressuroes.
- 2. Question
$UMMARIEE AND IESCRIBE (OR PROVIDE DOCV4ENTATICat CF) ANT ENOWN IMPACIS ON AQUATIC RESOURCE 5 (E.G., FISH EILLS, VIOLATIOKS Or DISCHARGE PERMIT CONDITIONS) OR NATIONAL POLLU7.NT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SISTEM (NPDES) ENFORCEMENT ?CTIONS DIAT HAVE OCCURHED SINCE ISSUANCE OF THE OPERATING LICENSE. HOW HAVE DGtSE BEEN RESOLYt.2 On CHANGED OVER TIME's (THE RES#0NSE TO TH1$ QUESTION SP9ULD INDICn N WHETHER IMPACTS ARE ONGOING OR V3RE THE RESULT OF START-UP PROBLERS THAT VER8 SUBSI@UENTLT RESOLVED.)
Response
There have been no known ispacts on aquatic resources or XPDES cnforcesent actions that have occurred pinoe isruanoa of the operatins 1toenec.
- 3. Question CHANGES TO THE WFDES PERHIT DURING OPERATION OF THE PLANT COULD INDICATE WHEDIER VATER QUALITY PARAMETERS WERE DETEPMINED TO RAVE NO SIGNIFICtXI IMPACTS (AND WERE DfCPPED FROM ENITORING REQUIREMENTS) OR VERE SUBSEQUENTLY RAISED AS A WATER QUALITT ISSUE. PROVIDE A BRIEF
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES (AND WHEN TEET OF. CURRED)
TO THE NPDES PERMIT 00R THE PLANT SINCE ISSUANCE CP THE OPEMTING LICENSE.
1
e JtA.-06-8990 12818 FROM I E L1C EF2 342 NOC TO 912027851399 P.02 Enclosure to r
GP-90-0016 Page 9
Response
There Imve been rio such changes to our NPDES permit as yet. Our NPDES persit reapplication was submitted Oc*.ober 16, 1989. The new permit has not yet been issued.
- 4. QueeMce f
AN REAKINATION OF TRENDS IN TNE EFFECTS ON AQUATIC N 900RCES MOKITORINO CAN INDICAM NEETER INPACT3 HAVE INCREAM DECREASL'D, OR REMAINED RELATIVELT STABLE DURIW OPERATION. DESCfdSE AND SU W ARIZE (08 JROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF) RESULTS OF MONIIVRING Or WATER QUALITY AND AQUATIC BIOTA (E.0., RELATED TO NPDES PERMITS, ENVIROWGNTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICA' IONS, SITE SPECIFIC ENIT0 RING REQUIRRD NY FEDERAL OR STATE Af2NCIE5). WRAT TRENDS ARE APPARENT OVER TIIET hospor.as Ve have no data available at this time on the effects on aquatic resources. An impingement /entrainment study is currently planned to begin March 1991.
- 5. Question SU W ARIZE TYPES AND MUMNERS (OR PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION) OF ORGANISMS ENTRAINED AND IMPINGED NY THE CONDENSER COOLING VATER SYSTEM SINCE ISCUAh0E OF THE OPERATING LICENSE. DESCRIBE ANY SEASONAL PATTERX!
ASSOCIAED WITH ENTRAIMIENT AND IMPINCDENT. HOV HAS ENTRAINNENT AND Ile1NCEMENT CHAN2D OVER TIME 7 h
h Refer to response to Question 4
- 6. Question AQUATIC HABITAT ENHANCDENT OR RE3TORATI0t: EFFORTS (E.G.,
l AWADROHOUS PISH RVNS) DURING OPERATION MAY HAVE ENHANCED TEE j
BIOLOGICAL CO M UNITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE PLANT.
ALTERNATITELY, DEGRADATION OF HABITAT OR WATER QUALITY MAT HAVE t
RESULTED IN LOSS OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES WEAR THE SITE.- DESCRIBE l
ANY CHANGES TO AQUATIC HABITATS (BOTH ENHANCEMENT AND IfLRADATION)
IN THE YICINITT OF 11E POWER PLANT SINCE THE ISSUANCE OF TEE OPERATING LICENSE IKOLUDING THOSE INITIALLT PPEDICTE9.
l
JUL-06-1990 1019 FROM tilC L1c EF2 342 l(X TO 912027031099 P.03 Encicaure to GP-90-0016 Page 10 J
There have been no habitat enhancement or restoration efforts i
undertaken at Fermi. Alternatively, there has been no observable degradation of habitat or water quality which has resulted in loss of biological resources near the site. The estoblishment of the zebra aussels in the Great takes region has been the only signifloant aquatlo biological change sinoe issuanoe of the operating license. (Detroit Edison has taken steps on site to control the infiltration of nobra mussels to plant equipment).
l
- 7. Question PLANT OPERATIONS WAY HAVE RAD TOSITIVE, NEGATITE, OR NO IMPACT ON THE USE Of AQUATIC RESOURCES BY OTHERS. MARTEltf BY C0tMERCIAL OR i
MCMATIONAL FIERRMDI NA1 SE CONSTRAINED BY PLANT OPSATION.
ALMBIATITELY 00MG3CIAL MARTESTING MAY 88 RELATITELY LARGB l
00MPARED WITE FISE 1453E3 CAUSED BY T E PLANT. DESCRIN (OR PROVIDE DOCUKENTATION FOR) 7INER NEARBY U$ES OF WATERS AFFBCTED BY COOLING WATER SYSTIN (5.0., SWI RING, 30ATING, AiolUAL HARVBST BY COMERCIAL AND itECREATiOllAL FISHERIES) AND HOW TE.tB IMPACTS RAYE l
CHANrMD SINCE ISSUANCZ OF THE OPERATING LICENSE.
Desporn Plant operation has hmd no imptet on the use of aquatic resouroes by others in the plant vicinity. Lake Erie in the vicinity of the plant is utilised by swimmers (Sterling St2te Park) and for recrastional fishing. Water quality has significantly improved l
since the plapt's ic + istional period, however, this is not l
attributable to plant operation.
)
- 8. ggf*fon l
W231BE OTHER 300RCE3 0F IMPACT 3 ON AQUATIC RESOURCES (E.O.,
INDU3Tf,IAL DISCHARGES, OTHER POWER FIAf73, AGRICULTURAL RUNOIT)
THAT Cl.GD CONTRIBUTE TO CUHULATIVE IMPACT 3.
VEAT ARE THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS DUE TO TMS EbWER PLANT, TO OVERALL WATER QUALITI DEGRADATION AND 1I N 4 OF A00AT11 BIOTAT Resocm e Lake Erie current in the vicinity of the plant p:'imarily follows the shoreline from nnrth to south. The Detroit River empties into the lake approximatelf 10 to 12 miles north of the plant. Lake Erie water in the vicinity of the plant, therefore, could conceivably contain effluents from any industry located on the Detroit River or Lake Erie north of Fermi 2.
The plant's relative
JUL-05-1990 12:19 FROM IAC llc EF2 342 tCO TO 9120270*,1890-P.04 Enclosure to GP-90-0016 Page 11 oontribution to overall water quality degradation is negligible as compared to industry located to the north.
- 9. Question PROVIDE A COPY OF YOUR SECT!0tl 316(a) AND (b) DEMONSTRATION REPORT RBQUIRED Rt THE CLEL9 WA3TE ACT. VEAT SECTION 316(a) AND (b)
DETERMINATIONS HATE BT.EN NADE BY THE REGLATORY AUTHORITIES?
M the Section 316(a) report is a variance provision to be flied for power plants W11oh do not utilise closed cycle cooling. As such, Forni 2 was exempt ainoe we are a closed cycle plant. Terni was waived from the $16(b) report requirement because the intake and blowdown has the best available technology" at the time the MMES permit uns written.
e l
l 1
l l
,.a.
AL-06-1990 13:19 FROM IE Llc EF2 342 toc
'TO 912627853098 P. tyJ 1
Enclosure to GP-90-0016 a
Page 12 30CInsumentIC
- 1. QuepMgg M UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF TIE PLANT AND THE DEGRBE Of ITS 30CIOE0050NIC IPPAf73 ON TEE LOCAL H2010N, ESTIMAN 'plE NUN 3RR OF PDMANENT NOREERS OW-51M FOR THE MOST RECENT"TEllfFOR WHICH DATA AM AVAILABLE.
Agescase As of March 1990 there were M peruanant workers, as defined try NUMARC, on the Fermi 2 nite,
- 2. Question M UNDERSTAND TKE IMPORTANCE Of THE PL1? M TEE LOCAL REGION, AND HOW NAT MAS CHAN'ZD OVER TIME, R$711% 2 ATERAGE IRRIB8R 0F PERNAMENT WOREERS ON SITH, IN FIVE~EUf; 'TEhENTS STARTING WITH THE ISSUANCE OF THE PLOrt's OPERATING L!C St. IF POSSIBLE, PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION FOR RACll UNIT Ai ILANT SIN.
unsponse Feral 2 received its operating licerme in March 196$; the following data are available:
1985 1921 1986 1939 1850 1957 1988 1493 1208 1969 1161 1990 t
E _Q.u.plp,,t,jpg M UNDERSTAND TE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 00NTINUED OPERATION FOR AN AD;)!TIONAL 20 TEARS BEYOND THE ORIGINAL LICENSING TERN, FLEASE FROVIDE FOR TE FOLLONING THREE CASESt A) A L PICAL PLANNED OUTAGE; B) AN ISI OUTAGE; AND C) 11E LARGEST SINGE OUTAGE (IU TERHS OF THE NUMBER OF WOREERS INVOLVED) THAT HAS OCCURRED it) DATE
JUL.~06-1990 12:20 FRCri IU: L.lC EF2 342 IOC TO 912027051098 P.06 s
i Enclosure to W-90 0016 Page 13 i
t t
AN OF ADDITIONAL WOREkR5 INVOLVED (POR THE DrTIRE DUTAOS AND PRIllCIPAL TASE),1. Demi 0F OUTAGE, OlmtS AND TEAR IN 181101 WORE 00COIulED, AND COST. AL90, I TE OOCUPATICIIAL DOSt$~
IWCB3VED BY PER!a418f! AND TEMPORARY ING EACII PRINCIPAL TAR.
humunce Perui a received its low power license in llaroh 1985. sanoi that time, there has been anIy one rerveling outage on which to base any i
impact.
the 'first safueltag outage (RF01) began in September 1989 and o
uns osapleted 103 days later in Deoesber 1989.
t o
Additienti sorkere - an additional 15)$ personnel were lassed
' dosimetry during the outage. Data uns not met up to detereine the number for enah principal task.
o Total cost of 3r01 une approriantely $311,000,000..
o-Oooupational Doses - IIP 01 resulted in 199 man res.
~IIn,)or dose tasks: Noahanical strese improvement process - 20 3 aan-rea Drywell insulation renoval
- 17 1 man-res hersel/ Vessel ISI/tvel inspection
- 15.8 man-res o.Ma,jor Tasks -
Main Turbina Generator Overhaul Nechanical Stress Improvement Process nefueling Tessel ISI -. -
r L
Puol Inspection AtitS Modifloation ADS Modifloation Erosion /0errosioa Raamination l
Ma MW i
'r0 UNDERSTAllD THE PLAlff'S FISCAL IMPORTAICC TO $PECIFIC JURISDICTIONS, FOR 1980. 1985, AND Tile LATEST YtAR FOR VEICH DATA ARE ATA1LABLE, BSTIMATE THE RWTIRE PLAlff'S 7A1ABI4 A33333ED TALUE AND 71E AMOUNT OF TAXBS PA10 'JV THE STATE AND 10 RACE LOCAL TA11NG JURI5DICTIOW.
t e
l' l
k I
.s-. -
na.-06-2990 - azaro rros loc Ltc r.r2 342 to:
TO 922027052890 P.07 Enclosure to I
GP.90-0016 Page 14 3kepoema NH M 1992 1111 1989
' Assessed falue
$03,473,710
$413,229,950
$649,552,055 Jetterson Schools 6 1,884,534
$ 10,847,645
$ 18,477,760 Frenohtown Township 285,632 942,210 5,a25,980 Monroe County 371,488 2.520,700 5,156,780 Intermediate licbool 161,395 950,350 2,463,700 Come. unity College 162,789 1.012.190
_1.962.465 Tetals
( 2,865,838
$ 16,273,095 4 33,786,685 b
l I
I w
4 L
,. _ _ _ -... _ _. _ _ _. _.