ML20079D680
| ML20079D680 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 07/22/1991 |
| From: | Bardin D ARENT, FOX, KINTNER, PLOTKIN & KAHN |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9107240043 | |
| Download: ML20079D680 (3) | |
Text
.-
C.
Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin &Kahn Daid J. Itanhn 20vs'a li(*v
,luly 22,1991 U.S. Nuclent llegulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555 Attm Chief, l'olicy Development and Technical Support liranch, Office of Nucient Iteactor llegulation lle: l'ublic Service Cornpany of New llampchire Docket No. 50 443
Dear Commission:
The letter dated July 9,1991, herein from the Connecticut l'ower & l.ight Company and Public Service Company of New linmpshire (collectively
" Applicants") is almost entirely repetitive (except for some ad homin.em remarks about the City of Ilolyoke Gas & Electric Department ("IIG&E")).
Nonetheless, out of an abundance of caution, two clarifications are in order to avoid confusion that Applicants' letter may engender.
First, the F ral Energy llegulatory Commission ("FEllC") itself has not decided much less " rejected... as groundless" (as Applicants' letter states at page 4) 11G&E's arguments as to the New llampshire Corridor; these arguments are pending before the FEllC cn exceptions to an initial decision rendered Inte last year by its Administrative 1.aw Judge ("Al.l")
(to which Applicants elsewhere refer).
Second, IIG&E has not requested " redundant proceedings" before this Commission. In fact, ilG&E believes it perfectly appropriate for this to300,nnectitu Avenu,,sw Commission to take advantage of evidence already accumulated by the ra.hinpon, r>c 20036 5339 FEitC: nor does llG&'] object to this Commission's cornidering the FEltC's forthcoming evaluation of the evidence before it in reaching this Commission's independent conclusions, llG&E merely asserts that this Telephone:202/t J oooo Cak ARFOX Commission has an independent statutory responsibility under the Atomic l
Teles.UU a92672 Energy Act which IIG&E is confident will be exercised as efficiently and rrr 4+0266 fairly as possible, he.imh 202/as7 c.39s Finally, NU's observation (at page 11) as tr IIG&E's interest or lack of interest "in taking advantage of NU's compret.ensive offering" improperly 7475 7teconsin.tvenue fledweda, Maryland 20814 3413 Booolowere Crescent Drive Vienna,Virpma 22182 2733 9107240043 910722 9 h-PDR ADOCK 05000443 iW U
l.b P
PDR l
l
Arrlit 1'o3 Kiiitlici I'lotkin & Kalin U.S. Nuclear llegulatory Commissen July 22,1991 l' age 2 addresses the subject of confidential settlenient negotiations as to which IIG&E has been nwniting NU response for quite some time.
Itespectfully submitted, I
r
< t ~~/
w)3 ~, [..
David,1. Ilarpit Steven it. Miles Arent Fox Kintner 1lothm & Kahn 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 5339 (202) 857 6089 cc: Chief Docketing and Service Section U.S. Nuclear Itegulntory Commission Joseph Itutberg, Esq.
Deputy Aksistant General Counsel U.S. Nuclear lleguintory Commission Mr. Thomas T. Martin Itegional Administration U.S. Nuclear llegulatory Commission Itegion i Senior l>roject Manager l'roject Directorate 13 Division of llenctor l'rojects U.S. Nuclear llegulatory Commission Mr. Noel Dudley NitC Senior llesident Inspector Seabrook, New llampshire Mr. Georgo 1. Iverron, Director Office of Emergency Management Concord. New llampshire 03301 Douglas G. Green, Esq.
Ilichard 1,. Itoberts, Esq.
Newman & lloltzinger I'.C.
o d11111t EO"' Nillliter }'lOlklH N NH!!H U.S. Nuclear llegulatory Corninission July 22,19111 l' age 3 Itobert C. McDinrruid,1084 Daniel 1. Davidson, Esq.
Spiegel & McDiarinid Alan J.110th, Esq.
Scott 11. Strauss, l'sq.
Spk~ el & McDiarruid g
Mr.11. Iluchrner, Manager Light and l'ower Departrnent Town of Iludson, Massachusette Mr. Joseph M. Illnin, General Manager Taunton Municipal Lighting I'lant
.c-
-.-n
.--- -, --., - - - - -, -.. -_, - - -, - -, -.-.,, -.,- _-- - - ~
-.. -