ML20077N025
| ML20077N025 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1991 |
| From: | Calhoun C, Graf K ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20077N032 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9108140186 | |
| Download: ML20077N025 (107) | |
Text
IP Nuclear Program Quality Assuranco Manual Revision 22 19.gf R50. 54 ( Ally _AluatioE IBintlaIY Revision 22 to the IP liuclosr Program Quality Assuranco Manual was initiated to:
Clurify the intent that IP's Quality Assuranco program for Clinton Power Station under 10CPR71 applies only to packagirg and shipping of radioactive materials and not to the f abrication of shipping casks.
IP has never performed and never intended to perform fabrication of shipping casku.
Added definition for " Scope" which was inadvertently doloted from Glossary of Torms section in Revision 21.
Evaluation The changes to the IP 11uclear Program QA Manual do not:
(1) change or affect authority, indopondonco, or management reporting levels previously established for organizations performing quality assuranco functions; or (2) reduce commitments or of fectivonoss of controls previously established over activition affecting quality of CPS structures, systems, or components.
/
kb/'//_
Performod:
Supervisor - Quality Systems
/Dato Rovioved
/
I T!F!?I Director - Quality An'surance
/Dato Approved:
DM)H GT
/
Manager - QualityCAssuranco
/Dato
+
e
i 4
10CFR50.59 SAFETY EVALUATION SCREENING 4
(Complete All Blocks) 1.0 Document Evaluated _ ?P lluclear Prograin Quality Assurance Manual
1.1 Number
flot _Applienble Revision:
22 Titie:
IP 11udcar Prefram OunlityAnuranen Mnnunt PDR/TCF/ACN (if applicable) yne ann 11 cabin for CPS Procedures, list documents, ' checklist, and other forms which are being revised in this package; include revision numbers, tiot Applicable This form -is used to document the justification for not performing a full 10CFR$0.59
- safety evaluation for design or document changes, tests, and experiments. Chapter 5 of the $afety Evaluation Manual should be used as guidance. If all the questions can be a answered "NO" with documented justification, then a full safety evaluation is not required.
. I i
SCREENING FOR FACILITY Cl!ANGES i
j 2.1 Is this a change to the facility as described in SAR (That is,
- Yes_d, does it result in any condition (including qualifications),
No j
operation, analysis result, or function contrary to the current l
i SAR descriptions)?
a.
Applies regardless of the safety classificacion of the item being changed.
b.
- Applies whether tLe specific item being changed is identified in the SliR or not.
c.
Applies even if no hardware is being changed, but the plant does not match the SAR description in some way.
(Psference Safety Evaluation Manual 5.D.2 l
and 4.C)
Affecred System (s)/ Component (s)/Tunstion(s):
11ot Applicable USAR/ Tech Spec References reviewed:
Tech Spec 6.0 Justification for answer to Question ?. 1 above:
Seu attached Justification t
i
. FORM SE.1 Rev. 2 11/90 Page 1 7
mea,e---
--en
.,,,g-.-..,-
- -,m,e
.w e
m..e-,.
..,,w...,,w..,.,,n w,w w,%,www wa.w m.m -.,. w-
-m,
,,.,%4.y.y
,.-r--w
.,w#
1 Document Evaluated IP Nuclear Progratu Quality Assurance Manual. Rev. 22 SCREENING FOR FROCEDURE CllANGES, TEST AND EXi'ERIMENTS l
2.2 is this a change to a proceduto as described in the SAR (That is, is Yes _
any system or cornponent operated or is any organization function No 1 perfortned in any way contrary to a description in the SAR or assumed l
in any SAR analysis)?
(Includes changes to acceptance criteria, setpoints or commitments described in the SAR)
(Reference Safety Evaluation Manual Articles 5.D.3 and 4.D) l
\\
2.3 Is this a test or experiment not described in the SAR (That is, is Yes _
any system or cornponent operated in any way contrary to a No _X description in the SAR or assumed in any SAR analysis)?
i (Reference Safety Evaluation Manual Articles 5.D.4 and 4.H)
Affected System (s)/Cornponent(s)/ Function (s):
Not Applicable i
I USAR/ Tech Spec References reviewed:
Tech Spec 6.0 Justification for answers to Questions 2.2 and 2.3 above:
{
See Attached Justification Qualified Originator R. S. Frantz 744Tn AIL B5/d8/9 /
Name SignatureO Date Qualified Reviewer: Agrees with determination that no safety evaluation is required.
/ b / @/
_h ?!Tl Qualified Reviewer.
K R. Graf i
Date Name Signature Upon completion, this screening form shall be vaulted with the document evaluated. A copy, with a copy of the document evaluated, shall be forwarded to Supervisor Technical Assessment, Licensing and Safety, V 920 t
PORM SE.1 Rev. 2 11/90 Page 2
i i
JUSTIJJ.QATlQN l
Revision 22 of the IP llu:loar Program. Quality Assuranco Manual clarifies the Illinois l'ower Company (IP) position for radioactivo material packaging at Clinton PoWor Station under the provisions of 10CPR71.
This revision clariflos the intent that IP's Quality Assuranco program under Part 71 applies only to packaging and chipping of radioactivo materials and not to tho l
f abricatibn of shipping canks which Ip has never performed and never intended to perform.
A doacription of each chango la provided in the attached matrix of QA manual changes.
Added definition for " Scope" which was inadvertently doloted from Glossary of Terms noction in Revision 21.
The changon to the QA Manual do not affect the design func-tions, characteristica, configuration, or analysis of componento, l
systems, or structures covered by the IP lluclear QA Program.
The basis is the IP Huclear QA Program providos the programmatic administrativo controls and ancociated departmental responsibili-tion for implomonting the QA Program at CPS.
i An ovaluation in accordanco with 10CPR50. 54 (a) datormined that the changos to the QA Manual do nott (1) change or affect authority, indopondonco, or management reporting levolo previous-ly established for organizations performing quality accurance functional or (2) reduce commitments or offectivonoso of controls provicusly established over activitics affecting quality of CPS structures, systems, or compononto.
This revision does not chango the intent of the Safety Analysis Report (SAR).
Administrativo coctions of the Technical
. oro reviewed and are not affected by this Specifications w
revision.
T 5
--,ec.,#,.
v--.,--wr,.----rww.v--+w~i.--,..,e--...---r
,-rw.-
-m-w.
,.,,-wyw-,,ww-w,,-%._,--.w-ev--w.v..--,,,.ww
.r,,-3
- -. - -,+- ' -
1
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QA MANUAL Revision 22 Chapter Glossary of Terms REVISION MATRIX l
Change Program l
Page Para.
Reason /Justificatiol.a For Change source Reduction i
V-7 N/A Added definition for " Scope" QA NO which was inadvertently deleted in Revision 21 of l
the QA Manual.
3 l
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QA MANUAL Chapter Introduction Revision __22 REVISION MATRIX Change Program Page Para.
Reason / Justification For Change Source Reduction 11-1 N/A Clarifies that under the provisions L&S NO of 10CFR71, Illinois Power's Quality Assurance progran applies only to packaging and shipping and not to the fabrication of shipping casks.
IP i
has never fabricated and never intended to fabricate shipping casks.
]
l
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QA MANUAL Revision 22 Chapter Appendix B REVISION MATRIX Change Program source Reduction Page Para.
Reason / Justification For Change Clarifies the process by which L&S NO B-2 N/A CPS packages and transports radioactive material in accord-ance with 10CFR71.
Regulatory Guide 7.10, Annex 2 provides guidance for users of radioactive material shipping packages.
This is consistent with actual practice at CPS to date.
L&S NO B-11 and N/A Incorporates guidelines of Reg.
Guide 7.10 Annex 2 as discussed B-12 above.
Ihese guidelines are consistent with actual practice at CPS to date.
IP NUCLEAR PRSORAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL TAnE Or c0NTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Chaater Chapter Number Title i
List of Effeetive Pages
~ l Ull 0 7,7 [ (;,7,,,;.
11 Introduction i
' 1!
iii Authorization d '. ; ;C v
Glossary of Terms i
305 1
Organization r.
- 4..
.n a
t 2
Quality Assurance Program I r <. r,, p
- 'o
~
3 Design Control 4
Procurement Document Control 5
Instructions, Procedures and Drawings j
6 Document Control 7
Control of Purchased Material, ",quipment and Services 8.
Identification and Control of' Materials, Parts and Components 9
Control of Special Processes 10 Inspection 11 Test Control 12 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 13 Handling', Storage and Shipping 14 Inspection Test and Operating Status 15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components 16 Corrective Action 17 Quality Assurance Records 18 Audits Appendix A Revicions to IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual Appendix B Supplemental Application - IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program PAGET of C i
REVISION:
14 DATE:
05/03/90 roRM N100-177 (10-88)
M,02172 w
an
<---e, r---
,..s,,
.,--,,-w.
--,n-
,,~,,r.,,,,,, -
, + ~
-r--
w,,,,-
~,w,,r-
IP NUCLEAR PROGR AM QUALITY AOSURANCE MANUAL LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Revision 22 The following pagos and their indicated revision and date of issuo are included in the IP llucioar Program Quality Accuranco Manual.
4 Paae flo.
Rqv.
DALD T of C 14 05/03/90 1-1 21 02/14/91 11 17 08/08/91 111 22 08/08/91 v v-10 18 08/08/91 1 1-13 21 02/14/91 2 2-6 20 02/14/91 3 3-5 17 05/03/90 4 4-3 16 05/03/90 5 5-2 16 02/14/09 6 6-4 17 05/03/90 7 7-5 17 02/14/91 0 8-3 14 02/14/89 9 9-4 17 05/03/90 10 10-3 15 02/14/89 11 11-3 15 05/03/90 12 12-3 15 02/14/89 13 13-2 15 05/03/90 14 14-3 15 05/03/90 15 15-5 16 02/14/89 16 16-3 15 02/14/89 17 17-3 18 05/03/90 18 18-3 17 05/03/90 A-1 14 02/14/89 D1 - D-12 15 08/08/91 l
i-1 of 1 22 PAGE REVISION:
DATE:
08/08/91 gigoo-177 (10-es)
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ACOURANCE MANUAL IliTRoDucTIort i
INTRODUCTION Illinois Power company (IP), as principal owner of Clinton Power Station (CPS), has ultimato responsibility for the quality assurance program which is applied to CPS.
The program is designed 'to moet the requirements of Title 10 of the Codo of Fodoral Regulations, Part 50, Appondix B,
" Quality Assuranco Critoria for Nuclear Power Plants;" Title 10 of the codo of Federal Regulations, Part 71, Subpart 11, " Quality Assuranco for s
Packaging and Transportation of Radioactivo Material" (with the exception of
- design, fabrication,
- assembly, and testing of packaging); and the American National Standard ANSI N10.7 (1976),
" Administrative Controls and Quality Ausurance for the operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants".
Tho IP Huclear Quality Assuranco Program applies to thoso activities associated with or affecting the ability of tho plant's structures,
- systems, and compononto to function in proventing,
.or mitigating the consequences of,_ postulated
- accidents which could cauco unduo risk to the health and-cafety of the public.
Those activition includo oporating, maintaining, repairing, refueling, modifying, and other associated activities such as radiological environmental monitoring, radioactive material packaging and shipping, firo protection, and security
't programs.
The structures, systems,-and compononto to which the
)
activities and programs apply are delineated in Table 3.2-1 of the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).
This manual is arranged in eightoon chapters which correspond with the eightoon critoria contained in 10CFR50 Appendix B and 10CFR71 subpart 11.
Each chaptor is further broken down into three main sections which describo the purpose and scope of that' chapter, a doacription of tho quality program, and the division of responsibilities.
The Quality Assurance organization approven the distribution and is responsible for the maintenance of this manual in accordanco with approved departmontal proceduros.
Each manual holder is responsible for maintaining his copy updated in accordance with Appendix A.
Appendix D
of this manual details tho-neope of its application with respect to activitics associated with Fire Protection, Security, Environmental, Radwaste/ Augmented-D Systems and Packaging and Transportation of Radioactivo Material.
F 11-1 of 1 17 PAGE REVISION:
08/08/M DATE:
g00-177 (10-88) w.
<e-,
i,e--e,
,- +.,.
.--.,--+-,-,-w
,,--c-r,
. - - - - ~ ~ - -
.--=+-m,--__
m
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ACOUR ANCE MANUAL AUTi!0RIZATIOli AUTitoRIZATION The IP 11uclear Quality Arr.(iMco Program applica to overy i y-itN related to CPS and covered member of the company perfor9,d.fr 4 < vGo chall be ansigned by IP by the Manual.
Specifto roshi management and supervision, W M dtsos with the requiremonto described in this Quality M qa W y.ual.
It is emphasized that the portion of the progW,x y' Bi d to the Quality Ascurance organization primarily concerni Ted/&uitian activition, such as inspection,
- auditing, survoillance, ova.aating and reporting offectiveness, and providing recommended solutions to noted problems.
The major portion of the Quality Assurance program is carried out by IP departments other than Quality Assuranco.
In recognition of those responsibilition, each Department Manager
,has concurred with the contents of this manual.
The offectivo date of revisions to this manual shall be thirty (30) calendar days from the dato of distribution to allow for proceduro changes and training.
Approved Hanager - Qual (Lty Assuranco i-1 1
22 PAGE REVISION.
DATE:
08/08/91 FORH N100-177 (10 88)
H.02172
IP NUCLE AR PROGR AM GU ALITY ACOUR ANCE M ANU AL cmSSARY Or TERMS GLOSSARY OF TERiiS Ag1cntance Criteria - Specified limits placed on characteristics of an item, prococo or service defined in codes, standards or other requiremont documents.
A documented activity performed in accordance with Audit written procedures or checklists to verify, by examination and evaluation of objective evidence, that applicable elements of the quality assuranco program have been developed, documented and offectively implomonted in accordance with speciflod requiro-mnts.
63JM;M - Any individual who performs any portion of an audit, including lead
- auditors, technical specialists, auditors-in-Raining and others, such as management representativos.
Anthorized Inspection Auqncy (AIA) - An agency designated as such by the appropriate legal authority of a State or Municipality or the United Sates or a Province of Canada or an insutanco company authorized to writo boiler and pressuro vessel insuranco in that jurisdiction.
An authorized Authorized liuclear Inservice Inspector ( Alil1) liuclear Inservico Inspector is an employco of an Authorized Inspection Agency who meets the requirements of AliSI 11626.1-1982 and the requirements of AllSI 11626.0-1982 for Authorized liuclear Inspector (Alii).
Certification - The act of dotormining, verifying and attesting in writing to the qualifications of personnel, processes, proco-dures or items in accordance with specified requirements.
A written statement signed by a Certificate of Compliance m
qualified party attenting that the items or services are in accordance with specified requirements and accompanied by addi-tional information to substantiate the statement.
A written statement signed by a C_9_rtificate of Conformance qualified party cortifying that items or services comply with specific requirements.
Certified Test Reqor_t - A written and signed document approved by a qualified party that contains sufficient data and information to verify the actual proporties of items and the actual results of all required tests.
PAGE
,,_1-of to 10 REVISION:
DE:
WMM g goo-177 (10-e8)
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GU ALITY ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL cLossARY or TERMS Characteristic - Any property or attributo of an item, process or service that is distinct, describable and measurablo, as conform-ing or nonconforming to specified quality requirements.
Quality characteristics are generally identified in specifications and drawings which describe the item, process or service.
Refors to the use of acids and cau.stic Chemical Cleaning substancos applied to material or product forms during manufac-ture, maintenance or repair.
Codes - Collectivo term used to describo all the published codes applicable to Clinton Power Station operations, such as the American Socloty Mechanical Enginocru (ASME) Doller and Prosauro Vossol Codo.
Items which aros (1) not Commercial Grade Classified Items subject to design or specification requirements unique to NRC licensed facilities or activitics; (2) used in applications other than HRC licensed facilitics or activities; and (3) able to bo ordered from the manufacturer / distributor on the basis of the manufacturer's published specifications or descriptions.
An all inclusive term used in Condition Adverse to cuality reference to any of the following:
- failuros, malfunctions, deficier. clos, deviations, defective items and nonconformancos.
Control Stamn - A stamp used to mark a unique identification of inspection or test status upon items, tags, labels, routing cards or records traccable to an item.
Control stamp impressions clearly identify the person who applied it such that traccability to their authorization is provided.
The process of bringing a nonconforming item into Correcti.QD conformity with an approved design, i.e.,
implomontation of a dispositioned nonconformance document.
Corrective Action The action required to correct or resolve adverso conditions in equipnont, material, processos, procedures or activities when noted.
Action taken may be remedial action to t
correct the specific condition, corrective action to preclude recurrences, or both.
CEE - Abbreviation for Clinton Power Station.
Denartment31 Procedures or Instructions - Procedures or instruc-l tions approved and issued within a department which provido
(
detailed direction to rersonnel, t
PAGE v->
of 10 REVISION:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H.02172 l
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL a wSSARY OF TERMS Deviation A nonconformanco or departure of a charactoristic from specified requirements.
Collective term used to doscribo all written or Documents pictorial information that directs or shows how an activity is to be accomplished.
Documents includo, but are not limited to, drawings, procedures, instructions and changos thoroto.
Documentation - Any written or pictorial information describing,
- defining, specifying, reporting or cortifying activitics, re-quirements, proceduros or results.
Examination - An olomont of inspection consisting of investiga-i tion of materials, components, supplies or services to determine conformance to those specified requirements which can be determined by such investigation.
Examination is usually nondo-structive and includes simplo physical manipulation, gaging and measuremont.
Egtended ouality Assurance Procram The selected uco of i
technical and management controls to improve the operational performance of equipment important to rollable station operation but not included in complianco based quality assurance programs.
Audits of thoso portions of contractors',
Externni Audits vendors' and suppliers' quality assurance program activities not retained under IP's direct control and not within the IP organizational structure.
An on-sito committoo whose Facility Review Groun
( FRG)-
Clinton Power Station on function is to advise the Manager matters related to nuclear safety.
Action involving direct communication with the Follow-up responsible organization to assure a timely written response to findings, adequacy of the response and corrective action accom-plishment as scheduled.
Ifold Point Doint in a procedure or work document at which the performer is toquired to stop and notify the Quality Verification section' (QV) of - the Quality Assuranco department to allow for planned inspections.
The work activity shall not proceed without the point being signed by QV, QV being present and _ authorizing the activity to proceed, or the point waived /roclassified.
Review completed by personnel not having Indenendent Review direct responsibility for the work functions under -review regardless of whether they operate as a part of an organizational unit or as individual staff members.
l l
PAGE v-3 of 10 18 REVISION:
1 08/08/91 DATE:
l'ORH N100-177 (10-88)
M,02172 i
U-
IP NUCLE AR PROGR AM GU ALITY ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL GLOSSARY OF TERMS A mandatory program of examinations, Inservice Inonection testing, inspections and control of repairs and replacements to ensure adequato safety in uaintaining the nuclear power plant and to return the plant to servico in a safo and expeditious manner in accordance with the CPS ISI Program Manual.
Insocction - A phaso of quality control which by means of exami-nation, obrervation or measurement dotorminos the conformance of materials, supplies, compe 9nts, parts, appurtenances, systems, procnssos or structures to prodotermined quality requirements.
Interfact - When two or more organizations have responsibilitics for accomplishing an activity, the functional relationship that one organization has to the others in completing the activity is called an " interface" relation.
Ono exampic of interface is when one organization must perform a step which is a prercquisite to another organization accomplishing its function.
Interface can also mean that soveral organizations accomplishing similar activities are under the coordination control of one organiza-tion.
Audits of those portions of Ip's Quality Internal Audits Assurance program activities retained under direct company control and within the IP organizational structure.
IE - Abbreviation for Illinois Power.
Item - Any level of unit assemb3y, including structure, system, sub-system, subassembly, component, part or material.
Lead Auditor - An individual qualified and certified to organize and direct an audit, report audit findings and evaluate correc-tive action.
Measurina and Test Eculement - Equipment used to quantitatively generate or measure physical parameters with a known degree of accuracy for the purpoco of calibration, inspection, test or repair of plant mechanical, electrical or instrument / control equipment.
(This does include permanently installed instrument and control devices.)
Modification - A planned change in plant design or operation and accomplished in accordance with the requirements and limitations of applicable codes, standards, specifications, licenses and prodotermined safety rostrictions.
A failure to comply with a regulatory require-Noncompliance ment.
PAGE v-4 of 10 REVISION:
DAE NM FORM NIDO-177 (10-88)
H.02l72
IP NUCLE AR PROGR AM QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL atossAny or TEnns lionconformanco
-A deficiency in characteristics, documentation or proceduro which rondors the quality of an item unacceptable or indotorminato.
Examplos of nonconformances includos physical defects; test failuros; incorrect or inadoquato docunentations or unauthorized deviations from prescribed processing, inspection or test procedures.
Nuclear Review and Audit Groun fliRAGL - A committoo responsible for the independent safety review function.
Any statomont of
- fact, information or Obiective Evidenca record, oither quantitative or qualitativo, portaining to the quality of an item or servico based on observations, measuromonts or tests which can be verified.
+
pnerable - Operability - A system, subsystem, train, component or l
devico chall be operable or have operability when it is capablo j
of performing its specified function (s) and when all necessary j
attendant instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or son 1 water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, subsystem, train, component or dovice to perform its function (s) are also capable of performing their related support function (s).
IlOTE:
Safo operation of the plant is datormined by CPS licensed operators.
Permanent 1v Installed Instrument and control Devices The installed plant equipment including computer points used in determining acceptance critoria of Technical Specification surveillancos (category A Instruments).
i Plant staff - That organization which is directly responsible for l
the operation of the Clinton Power Station.
The plant Staff includes operations, technical, maintenance, radiation protoc-tion, and support departments.
Proceduro - A document that specifica or describos how an activi-ty is to be performed.
It may includo methods to be employed, equipment or materials to be used and sequence of operations.
contractually binding coc aments that Procurement Documents identify and define the requirements which items or coevices must moet in order to be considered acceptable by thee purchasor.
Procuroment documents include such items as contracts, lotters of intent, purchase ordors or proposals and their acceptance which authorizon the soller to perform services or supply equipment, materials or facilitics on behalf of the purchasor.
PAGE v-5 of 10 REVISION:
{0 g oo-177 (f0-e8)
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL a wssARY or TERMS The characteristics or abilities Qualification (Personnel) gained through training or experience or both that onable an individual to perform a requirod function.
All those planned and systomatic actions ouality Assurance necessary to provide assurance that a
structure, system or component will perform satisfactorily in service.
Those delineated completed records ouality Assuranco Record which furnish documentary evidence of the quality of items and/or activities affecting quality within the scope of the IP Nuclear Quality Assuranco Program.
Quality control - Thoso quality assurance actions which provido a means to control and measure the characteristics of. an item, process or facility to established requirements.
ouality Related - Activities which alther do or could influence quality of safety-related items or work related to those systems, structures and components as identified in the USAR, Table 3.2-1,
- shipping, including design, purchasing, fabricating, handling, inspecting, installing, storing, cleaning, preserving, erecting, testing, operating, maintaining, repairing, refueling or modify-ing.
Receint Insnection - An inspection performed by Quality Assuranco Inspectors verifying that the items are in satisfactory condi-tion, that they match the purchase order requirements and that required documentation accurately reflects the item (s) received.
Visual and physical inspection will be performed as necessary to determine the acceptability of the item (s).
Roqu1ations
. Collective term used to describe the governing i
directives and laws applicable to the clinton Power Station operation, such as the code of Fodoral Regulations.
Renair - The process of restoring a nonconforming characteristic to a condition such that the capability of an item to function rollably and safely is unimpaired, even though that item-still may not conform to-the original requirement.
Resolution The process by which a
nonconforming item is corrected or determined to adequately perform its design function without adversely af fecting safety.
The resolution may contain controls or limitations that are to apply until the nonconformanco is fully corrected.
PAGE v-6 of 10 REVISION:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
(
H.02172 E
IP NUCLEAR PROGR AM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL cLons ay or TcRMS Hewsrh - The process by which a nonconforming item is made to conform to prior specified requirements by completion, romachin-ing, reassembling or other correctivo means.
Systems, structures and components which are Safety Related considered important to safoty because they perform safety actions required to avoid or mitigate the consequences of ab-normal operational transients or accidents.
In addition, design requirements are placed upon such equipment to assure the proper performanco of safety actions, when required.
Safety related items are thoso designated Soismic category 1, safoty class 1, 2,
3, "Othor" and Electrical class lE as identiflod in the USAR Section 3.2.
Scono - The area covered by a given activity or subject.
Soismic Classificati2D - Plant structures, systems and components important to safety which are designed to withstand the offects of a safo chutdown carthquake (SSE) and remain functional if they are necessary to assure:
a.
The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, or b.
The capability to shutdown the reactor and maintain it 2
in a safo condition, or c.
The capability to provent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential offsito exposures comparable to the guidelino exposures of 10CFR100.
Plant structures, systems and components, including their founda-tions and supports, which cro designed to remain functional in the event of an SSE are designated as Scismic Category I as indicated in Table 3.2-1 of the CPS USAR.
Sionificant condition Adverne to cuality and/or safety A
condition that affects or is likely to have an offect on, or influence, the safe operation of the plant, the capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condi-tion or the capability to provent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential off-sito exposures.
Source Insnectisom - An inspection performed at the location of item procuremont, supply or manufacture for the purpose of verifying that the item moots specified requirements.
PAGE v-7 of 10 REVISION:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H.02l12
IP NUCLE AR PROGR AM awSSARY OF TEMS QU ALITY ASSURANCE MANU AL
- Term used to describo thoso activitics or in which the und result or product quality either Snecial Processen is readily verified when the process is completo or it processos The not prudent to delay verification until process completion.
cannot be assuranco of quality is heavily dependent upon control of the process and the skills of the personnel who perform the process.
Standards - Term used to describe the results of standardization As ef forts which have been approved by recognized authorities.
used heroin, standards refer to either publications describing an acceptablo method of implomonting or performing an activity or an item of known alue used for comparison.
following throo Ston Work - Collective term used to describo the levels of stopping vork activitions (3) lho ucopping of a cirgle or specific work activity by a.
Quality Assurance personnel.
A hold imposed by a Department had on a department or b.
general work actj.vity.
A Stop Work Action initiated by the Manager - Quality c.
Assuranco.
Synn11er - Any individual or organization that furnishes items or servicco to IF under a procurement document.
Survoillallca - A review or observation of an activity, process or to verify that an action has boon or is being product accomplished in accordance with applicable requirements.
- A documented ovaluation of an organization's ability to perform activition as verified by a dotormination of the adequacy Su-Ney and by a review of the of the organization's quality program impiomontation of that program at the location of work.
Sveten Safety Clancificationn - Structures, systems and compo-aru classified as Safety Class 1,
Safety Class 2,
Safoty 1E in accordance with the nonts Class 3, Safety Class Other or Class Equipment is assigned a specific importance to Huelcar Safety. recognizing that components within a system may be of differing safety importanco.
Definitions of the various
- raf ety class, safety Classes are:
1 - Componentc of the reactor coolant pressure Safety Clann boundary or core support structure whose failure could cause in excess of the normal a loss of reactor coolant at a rato mako-up system.
PAGE v-8 of 10 REVISION:
OHOW DATE:
FORM Nt00-l?7 (10-88)
H.02172----
W
IP NUCLEAR PROGR AM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL GLOSSARY OF TERMS I
Safety Class 2 - Structures, systems and components, other I
than service water systems, that are not Safety class 1, but are necessary to accomplish the safety functions of:
Inserting negative reactivity to shut down the reactor, a.
b.
Preventing rapid insertion of positive reactivity, o.
Maintaining core geometry appropriate to all plant process conditions, d.
Providing emergency core cooling, Providing and maintaining contailunent, e.
f.
Removing residual heat from the reactor and reactor core, or g.
Storing spent fuel.
Safety Class 3 - Structures, systems and components that are not Safety class 1 or Safety class I, but whose function is to process radioactive fluids and whose postulated failure would result in conservatively calculated offsite doses that exceed 0.5 rem to the whole body or its equivalent to any part of the body in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.26.
Structures, systems and components Safety Class "Other" used in the power conversion or other portions of the facility which have no direct safety function, but which may be connected to or influenced by the equipment within the Safety classes 1, 2 or 3.
Class II - The safety classification of the electric equip-ment and systgms that are essential to emergency reactor shutdown, containment isolation, reactor core cooling and containment and reactor heat removal or otherwise are essential in preventing significant release of radioactive material to the environment.
(Structures, systems and component safety classifications and related Quality Assurcnce Program requirements classifi-cations are summarized in Table 3.2-1 of the USAR.)
Technical Snecificationn - Appendix A to the Operating License containing the design and performance criteria and operating limits and principles to be observed during critical testing, startup, power operations, refueling and maintenance operations.
PAGE v-9 of 10 18 REVISION:
i 08/08/M DATE:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H.02172
IP NUCLE AR PROGR AM GU ALITY ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL cIDSSARY OF TERMS TraceabJl Atv - The ability to identify the origins of a particu-lar item when required by adopted codes or standards.
ESAR - Abbreviation for the Updated safety Analysis Report, which is the document submitted by IP to the Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion in accordance with 10CFR50.71.
Use-An-Is -A disposition which may be imposed for a nonconfor-mance when it can be established that the discrepancy will result in no adverse conditions to safety and that the item under consideration will continue to moet al' engineering functional requirements including performanco, as
'ainability, fit and safety.
Verification - The act of confirming, substantiating or assuring that an activity or condition has boon implemented in conformance with the specified requirements.
A point in a procedure or work Verification /Innnection Point document at which the performer is required to notify Quality Verification (QV) in order to plan when they will perform the verification activity.
A Verification / Inspection Point shall be capable of being verified after work completion.
Point in a procedure or work document at which Witness Point the performer is required to stop and notify QV to allow for planned inspections, once notification has been accomplished and the agreed to time (or a reasonable amount of time) has passed, the work activity may continue.
PAGE v-10 of 3^
iEVISION:
I ME:
g egoo-i77 tio-ca)
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM M
QU ALITY ASSURANCE MANgLgin ggpg p y m gi [ m riy CHAPTER itb 2 /,. A.
\\
fb?f
~
ORGANIZATION CONIkfllli O NjPY C U li i B % T i i T W U N
~' l~ W (l Q
^
3 APPROVED BY, MANAGER-O'JALITY ASSURANCE l
{
~
1.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements for and to describe the establishment of an organizational structure, functional responsibilities and levels of authority concerning. the performance of activities which affect the safety-related functions of structures, systems, or components for the Clinton Power Station.
(
1.2 DESCRIPTION
1.2.1 General Organizational structuring and functional responsibility assign-ments are based on recognition of quality assurance as an inter-disciplinary function with quality-related activities being performed by many organizational components and individuals from top-level management to individual workers.
The authorities and responsibilities of persons and organizations performing quality-related activities are established, assigned and documented.
Those persons and organizations assigned quality asmirance functions are given appropriate and sufficient author-ity and organizational freedom from cost and scheduling considerations to:
identify quality problems; recommend solutions; verify implementation of the solutions; and control:
processing,
- delivery, installation, or utilization of nonconforming items until proper dispositioning has occurred.
Corporate Nuclear Policy Statements are formalized in Corporate Nuclear Procedures (CNP) as described in this manual.
Each CNP is reviewed and concurred with by the Manager - Quality Assurance for QA program requirements.
The CNPs are approved for use by the IP corporate officer (s) responsible for the activities covered by the CNP.
Corporate Nuclear Procedures require the development and use of departmental procedures or instructions to describe interfaces and accomplish the activities covered by the CNP.
1 f 13 PAGE REVISION:
FORM NIOO-176 (10-88)
M,02171
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL chapter 1 The organizational structure and functional-responsibility assignments are such that:
(1) attainment of quality objectives is by individuals assigned responsibility for specifying quality or performing work to specifications: (2) verification of con-formance to established quality requirements is by those who do not have direct responsibility for specifying, producing, or expediting products; and (3) personnel in key quality assurance functions have direct access to responsible management.
Specific Quality Assurance activities (job duties and responsi-bilities) have been identified for each section within the QA department and are based on the amount and type of activitias conducted.
Staffing levels are established so that the work o n be accomplished in a manner supportive of plant operations ano outages.
Further, once a year the QA department manning levels are reassessed and personnel levels are revised as necessary to assure adequate and timely coverage of QA activities.
This review permits recruiting and training activities to be carried out in such a manner as to provide trained Quality Assurance personnel necessary to assure the quality of the work.
Quality Assurance personnel are free from non-QA duties and provide full attention to assuring the effective implementation of the QA program.
Effectiveness of the program is assured by
,ality Assurance department participation in the work planning, t
ough surveillance and audits, by the authority of Quality Assurance personnel to stop specific work activities where it appears that quality may be jeopardized, and the authority of the Manager -
Quality Assurance to initiate a stop Work Action.
The Manager -
CPS has the authority to bypass a stop work to place the plant in a safe and stable condition.
Inspectors are provided with approved inspection procedures and instructions prior to performing inspection operations.
(During plant operations emergencies, inspections may be performed without written procedures.)
To further assure that inspections are done in a timely manner, the QA organization identifies specific inspection points in the work documents and makes provisions for notification of verification / inspection witness, and hold points.
In addition, designated QA personnel regularly attend and participate in
- planning, scheduling and status meetings during testing, operations and outages to assure (1) they are kept abreast of day-to-day projected work assignments throughout the plant and (2) that the necessary QA inspection controls, acceptance criteria, procedural controls and qualified QA staffing is available to properly carry out the assigned tasks.
PAGE 2 of 13 21 FORM NIDO-177 (10-88)
M,02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Chapter 1 l.2.2 Oraanization and Resnonsibilities This section describes the organizational structure and indivi-dual responsibilities within IP for managing and implementing the QA program for the operation of the. CPS.
Figure 1-1 shows the organizational structure and relationships of individuals and departments within IP with management responsibility for perform-ing quality-related. activities.-
1.2.2.1 President The President of IP has the overall responsibility for the l
engineering,
- design, procurement, modification,
- testing, operation - and qual.Lty assurance at CPS.
Execution of these responsibilities is delegated to a Vice President.
1.2.2.2 Vice President The Vice President is responsible for the overall effectiveness of the. Quality Assurance program and is responsible for establishing-the quality assurance policies, goals and objec-
- tives, as well as testing, maintenance, operations, nuclear support, and engineering.
The Vice President is also responsible for assuring that annual management reviews are conducted and documented on the status, adequacy and -effectiveness of the overall-QA program.
The Vice President is responsible for assuring that the authority and independence of Quality Assurance personnel are such that. they can effectively ascure the conformance to quality requirements and are independent of undue influences and responsibilities for schedule and costs.
1.2.2.3 Manager - Clinton Power Station The Manager - Clinton Power Station reports to the Vice President
-and is responsible for the safe, reliable and efficient operation of-the Clinton Power Station in - accordance with the operating license.
This includes ensuring that the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, as described in subsequent sections of this manual, is incorporated in plant ' procedures and implemented by the~Clinton Power Station organization.
1.2.2.4 Manager - Nuclear Station Engineering Nuclear Station Engineering reports to the Vice The Manager
-President and is responsible for the development, direction and overall coordination of power plant engineering activities per-formed by the Nuclear Station Engineering Department (NSED) for the Clinton Power Station.
These responsibilities include:
the 3
f 13 PAGE REVISICN:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172
l IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM
'QU ALIT.Y ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL Chaptor 1 preparation of specifications and drawings for the accomplishment of new designs, design changes and modifications; design inter-protation;- the conduct of design checks and reviews; technical evaluation of suppliers; ensure compliance with the ASME Code and other codes and standards; control of examination and inspection-of ASME components; and coordinate all interface with. the Authorized Inspection Agency (AIA), including provisions for the establishment of ANI hold / witness points and access to facilitics and records. -
The Manager - NSED ensures that those activities are performed in accordance with the requirements of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
1.2.2.5 Manager - Nuclear Planning and Support The Manager - Nuclear Planning and Support reports to the Vice President and is responsible for providing direction of nuclear plant services organizations for planning, budgeting and resource management, accounts payable and' payroll coordination, executive
- plans, fitness for
- duty, medical
- services, receiving and warehousing, records management, industrial
- safety, Nuclear Program staffing, compliance-to federal regulation of personnel activities, and for corporate and plant integrated in tbeso functional support disciplines.
The Manager - Nuclear Planning and Support is responsible for controlling. the procedures governing the procurement activition in support of-the Nuclear Program.
The Manager - Nuclear Planning and Support ensures-that these activities are performed in accordance with the require-ments of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
1.2.2.6 Nuclear Review and Audit Group The Nuclear Review and Audit Group (NRAG)' reports to the Vice President - and is responsible - for the independent safety review function.
The NRAG functions in accordance with a written charter which - delineates committee composition, responsibility and authority, subjects to be reviewed, reporting requirements and administrative controls under which the group operates.
1.2.2.7 Facility Review Group An on-site committee whose function is to advise the Manager -
Clinton Power Station on matters related to nuclear safety.
1.2.2.8 Manager - Nuclear Training The Manager - Nuclear Training reports to the Vice President and is responsible for the direction and management of the Nuclear Training for Clinton Power Station.
Duties include developing training standards, providing centralized
- training, providing 4
f 13 21 PAGE FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M,02172
~.
l lP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANU AL Chapter 1 education support to Nuclear Managers / Directors and maintaining Nuclear Training operation of the simulator.
The Manager ensures that these activities are performed in accordance with the requirements of the IP Nuclear Quality Assuranco Program.
1.2.2.9 Manager - Quality Assurance The Manager - Quality Assurance reports to the Vice President and is responsiV T for IP's overall Quality Assurance program definition, 7 tion, evaluation and approval, including the IP Nuclear C-ssurance Program.
The Manager - Quality Assur-ance dd
.e Quality Assurance departmental activities design, procurement, maintenance, modification, related s
and operat.on of the Clinton Power Station.
The Manager Quality Assurance interfaces with the Nuclear Regulatory Commis-sion, and the Authorized Inspection Agency for the Quality Assur-ance Program.
The Manager - Quality Assurance or the designated alternate has the responcibility and authority to stop unsatis-factory work during plant operation, as well as during plant modification, maintenance and in-service inspection
- periods, provided and health and safety of the public, or impact on capability to safely operate or shut down the plant are not adversely affected.
Quality Assurance are at The qualifications of the Manager least equivalent to the education and experience requirements of Section 4.4.5 of ANSI /ANS 3.1-1978,
" Selection and Training of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel".
Specifically, the Manager Quality Assurance will meet at least one of the following:
1.
At the time of initial core loading, or assignment to the activo ponition, the responsible person shall have six years experience in the field of quality assurance, preferably at an operating nuclear power plant, or operations supervisory experience.
At least one year of this six yearc experience shall be nuclear power plant experience in the overall implementation of the quality assurance program.
(This experience shall be obtained within the quality assurance organiza-tion.)
A minimum of one year of this six years experience shall be related technical or academic training.
A maximum of four years of this six years experience may be fulfilled by related technical or academic training; or, 2.
EDUCATION:
Bachelor D gree in Engineering or related science.
PAGE 5 of 13 REVISION:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H 02172
IPc NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE -MANUAL Chapter 1 q
l
-)
EXPERIENCE:
At the time ~of initial core loading or appointment to the active-position, the responsible person shall have four (4) years j
experience in the field of quality assurance, or equivalent number of years of nuclear plant i
experience in a supervisory position, preferably at an operating nuclear plant, or a combination of the two.
At least one (1) year of this four years j
experience shall be nuclear-power plant experience.
in the implementation of the quality assurance program.
Six (6) months of the one-year experience shall be obtained within the quality assurance organization.
He must possess a
j thorough working knowledge of 10CFR50 Appendix B, 1
ANSI N45.2, ANSI N18.7, familiarity with the-ASME
-Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and other applicable regulations, codes hnd standards.
1.2.2.9.1 Director - Quality Assurance The Director - Quality Assurance reports to the Manager - Quality Assurance and is responsible for providing management and imple-mentation of the Operations Monitoring program that supports the safe and reliable operation of - CPS.
The Director Quality Assurance is also responsible for providing direction and admini-stration of the - Quality System and Audit staffs in defining,
+
establishing, and verifying compliance with the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.-
In addition, the Audit staff is responsible for verifying ~ the - qualification of suppliers and assuring procurement documentation is. acceptable.
1.2.2.10-Manager - Licensing and Safety The Manager - Licensing and Safety reports to the Vice President and is directly responsible for providing representation e.nd interface with regulatory agencies to maintain operating licenses and permits for CPS, management of the USAR, and the Environment-al Report (ER), including amendment submittals,--management of the resolution of licensing issues, conduct of licensing reviews and-
- studies, perform ' safety studies and
- analyses, conduct - of-l_
Independent Safety Evaluation Group (ISEG) efforts for signifi--
cant. operating. data, provide representation to safety groups, management of the Emergency Preparedness
- Program, and the administration of tracking program for 10CFR21 items.
The Manager - Licensing and Safety ensures that these activities are performed in accordance with the requirements of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
i l-6 of 13 21 PAGE REVISION:
DATE: 02/14/91 00-177 (10 88)
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM l
GUALITY ASSURANCE MANU AL Chapter 1 1.2.2.11 Manager - Scheduling and Outage Management Scheduling and Outage Management reports to the The Manager Vice President and is responsible for management of the Schedul-ing and Outage Management Department personnel and resources.
The Manager - Scheduling and Outage Management develops schedules as required to eupport Nuclear Program Departments.
He coordi-nates the planning, scheduling and preparations for plant outages and is respons; e for the execution of plant outages under the direction of tL rianager - Clinton Power Station.
He manages and directs the site contractor activities assigned to Scheduling and Outage Management.
The Manager - Scheduling and Outage Manage-ment ensures that these activities are performed in accordance with the requirements of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
1.2.2.12 Manager - Projects and Assessment Projects and Assessment reports to the Vice l
The Manager President and is directly responsible for conducting independent performance-based assessments of the Nuclear Program, conducting performance monitoring and analyses, coordinating Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO),
- programs, coordinating and administering selected special projects having interdepartmental responsibilities, and performing other special assignments from the Vice President.
The Projects and Assessment department is included in the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual only to identify its position in the Nuclear Program organizational structure.
1.2.3 Ouality Assurance Department The Quality Assurance organization structure is shown in Figure 1-2.
General responsibilities of the department with regard to the GA Program for the CPS include, but are not limited to, the following:
Prepare and control the IP Nuclear Program Quality a.
Assurance Manual, b.
Verify the implementation of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
c.
If significant quality problems are identified, QA personnel have the authority and responsibility to stop specific work activities pending satisfactory resolution of the identified problem, provided the health and safety of the public or impact on the capability to safely operate or shut down the plant are not adversely affected.
PAGE 7 of 13 21 REVISION:
FORM NI00-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Chapter 1 d.
Verify that quality-related training programs are developed and implemented for each company depart-ment that has responsibility for implementing the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
c.
Review quality-related procurement requisitions and, as specified, condition reports, procedures, instructions and other quality-related documents.
f.
Maintain awareness of QA requirements, practices and experiences throughout the nuclear power industry.
g.
Develop and implement an audit, surveillance and inspection progra.m for quality-related activities within the scope of the IP Nuclear Quality Assur-ance Program and routinely advise management of the status of program implementation.
Initiate and/or verify corrective action, as necessary, to resolve conditions adverse to quality, h.
Perform acceptance inspections related to activi-ties during operation and maintenance of CPS.
i.
Review the QA programs of suppliers for co,mpli-ance with regulatory requirements and the requirements of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program when a program is required to be submitted by the procurement document.
Ensure that supplier QA program deficiencies are corrected, j.
Review all changes to the USAR, with the exception of Chapter 16, Technical Specifications.
k.,
Perform trend analysis for detecting trends adverse to quality.
1.
Extend portions of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program to selected equipment important to reliable station operation but not included in the compliance based-quality assurance progran as directed by QA management.
1.2.3.1 Quality Engineering Section The Quality Engineering Section is supervised by the Supervisor -
Quality Engineering who reports to the Manager Quality Assurance.
The Quality Engineering Section assures documents, including on-site supplier documents, involving the following PAGE 8 of 13 21 REVISION:
FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
M,02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GU ALITY ASSUR ANCE MANU AL chapter 1 activities conform to the applicable QA program requirements of regulations, standards, codes and other specific commitments:
Operations, Maintenance, Plant support, Technical, Chemistry, Radioactive
- daste, Radiation Protection, Fire Protection, equipment included in the extended quality assurance program, Security, Modifications and Testing, Engineering activities, and USAR changes.
This section performs quality verification planning for these activities, as applicable.
If significant quality problems are identified that warrant immediate action, Quality Engineering Section personnel have the authority and responsibility to stop the specific work activity pending satisfactory resolution of the identified
- problem, provided the health and safety of the public or impact on the capability to safely operate or shut down the plant are not adversely affected.
1.2.3.2 Quality Verification Section The Quality Verification Section is supervised by the Supervisor Quality Quality verification who reports to the Manager Assurance.
The Quality Verification Section is responsible for scheduling, conducting and reporting the applicable inspection, verification, surveillance and nondestructive examination of quality-related
- items, processes, functions and activities associated with operations, testing, maintenance, modification, nuclear fuel, and plant support activities performed by IP which affect quality.
The Quality Verification Section is also responsible for initiating reports of nonconforming items or conditions discovered during inspection activities.
The section is responsible for advising management as to the effectiveness of quality assurance program implementation for those specific functions surveilled.
If significant quality problems are identified that warrant immediate action, Quality Verification Section personnel have the authority and responsibility to stop the specific work activity pending satisfactory resolution of the identified
- problem, provided the health and safety of the public or impact on the capability to safely operate or shut down the plant are not adversely affected.
1.2.3.3 Quality Systems Section The Quality Systems Section is supervised by the Supervisor -
Quality Systems who reports to the Director - Quality Assurance.
The Quality Systems Section is responsible for periodically assessing departmental effectiveness in implementing the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, trending of conditions adverse PAGE 9 of 13 21 REVISION:
I FORM Nt00-177 (10-88)
H.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL chapter 1 to
- quality, coordination of Quality Assurance reviews and 1
l approvals of QA program requirements associated with the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual and Corporate Nuclear Procedures, and advising management on matters related to establishment of quality programs and procedures for Clinton Power Station.
The section is also responsible for the coordination and administration of QA training programs for department personnel and development and control of documents associated with the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, such as.
{
the-IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance - Manual and QA depart-mental procedures.
The Quality Systems Section coordinates QA i
reviews and approvals of QA program requirements associated with the procedures of other Nuclear departments supporting Clinton Power Station,. including, but not limited to:
Nuclear Training Department, Nuclear Planning & Support Department, Licensing &
Safety Department, Scheduling & Outage Management Department,-and Projects and Assessment Department.
If significant quality problems are identified that warrant immoniate action, Quality Systems Section personnel have the authority and responsibility to stop the specific work activity pending satisfactory resolution of _the identified
- problem, provided the health and safety of the public or impact on the capability to safely operate or shut down the plant are not adversely affected.
1.2.3.4 Audit Section The Audit _ Section-is supervised by the Supervisor - Audits, who reports to the - Director Quality Assurance.
The Audit Section is responsible _ for the planning and performance of internal and external IP audits.
-The Audit section assures that-procurement documents contain ' the QA requirements of the USAR, evaluates suppliers' QA programs for meeting the USAR commitments, performs audits and surveys at suppliers' facilities, processes procure-mont related nonconformances, performs source surveillances and performs ' receipt inspections.
_The section ensures timely and responsive corrective action to-IP audit findings and advises management as to the effectiveness of Quality Assurance _ program implementation for those specific functions audited.
If significant quality ' problems _are identified that warrant inmediate action, -Quality Audits Section personnel have the authority and responsibility to stop the specific work activity pending satisfactory resolution of the identified
- problem, provided the health and safety of the public or impact on the capability to safely operate or shut down the plant are not adversely affected.
PAGE 10 of 13 21 j
REVISION:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H,02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGR AM GUALITY ASSURANCE M ANU AL Chapter 1 1.2.4 OrcanizatLonal Interfaces Activities affecting the quality of safety-related
- systems, structures and components are performed by, er under the cogni-zance of various IP organizations.
Other sections of QA may perform some of the functions of another QA section provided that personnel are adequately trained, qualified / certified, and these work activities are performed to the same (or similar) procedures and instructions.
Problems associated with meeting the require-monts of the Quality Assurance program, or disagreements and/or disputes between members of these organizations shall be brought to the attention of appropriate levels of management, including the Chairman and CEO as necessary to obtain resolution.
Work may be delegated to qualified outside organizations by contract for such activities as
- design, special processes, inspections, etc.
Selected work may be delegated to qualified outside organizations by Nuclear Program departments.
The responsibility for exercising engineering control rests with Nuclear Station Engineering, operational controls with CPS Plant Staff and quality assurance with the Quality Assurance depart-ment.
Prior to initiation of work, the qualified individual (s) or organizational elements within IP have their responsibilities identified for the control and quality of delegated work.
1.2.5 Nuclear Procram Orcanization FIGURE 1-1 illustrates Nuclear Program organizations having QA program responsibilities and interfaces.
FIGURE 1-2 illustrates the Quality Assurance Organizational Chart.
PAGE 11 f 13 21 g
FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IlVCLEAR PROGRAri GRGANIZAT10il AtlD INTERFACES 110TES: UP-TO-DATE DEPARTME!JTAL ORG Afi-IZATIOtt CIIARTS AtJD FUtJCTIOt1 AL DESCRIPTIOt1S SIIALL BE M Alt!T Alt 1ED AS PART OF DEPARTMEtJTAL DOCUMEti-PRESIDEt3T TATIO!L
?.:: x
- <[
- 3. >
La 7:
IP EM VICE PRESIDE 11T
{Oy zox mt X"
i 2
m 5
' !JUCLEAR E
REVIEW AllD 0
~ AUDIT GROUP MAriAGER PROJECTS A11D ASSESSMEt1T i
t L
I I
I 1
l l
MA13AGER MAf1AGER MA11AGER mat 1AGER 11UCLEAR-mat 3AGER MA11AGER 13UCLEAR CLIt1TOtJ '
SCIIEDULIllG &
MATIAGER PLAtitIIt!G QUALITY LICEt35111G &
n STATIOt3 POWER-OUTAGE
!!UCLE A R
& SUPPORT ASSURA11CE SAFETY EtJGItJEERIt1G STATIOtt MA11AGEMEtJT TR AIt!It2 G e
- I i
E2 Ed R 5 M.0ZISZA j
FIGURE 1-1 04-32-90
r ILLINDIS POWER QUALITY ASSURAflCE ORGANIZATION c :s c>Z' 4
Cn' Ng' PRESIDENT c 'O M %
.>O WCE O
PRESIDENT k>
g?
Zc MANAGER y
QUALITY ASSURANCE
?
5 0
DIRECTOR o
QUALITY ASSURANCE i
SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY AUDITS ENGINEERING VERIFICATION SYSTENTS ox F s' s5 2;
H 10 g
~
~=
t o
FIGURE 1-2 3
..n>,,,,,
1 IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM
[
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL o m p r g,a 4 CHAPTER M
y Gam 2
((3 p j 17)1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM tmahuutuC0!'L w p... ~ n.
bU b
APPROVED BY MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE 2.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE The IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program applies to those activities such as design, procurement, fabrication, installation, modification, maintenance,
- repair, refueling, operation, in-
- spection, and tests related to those systems, structures, and components as identified by the letter "B"
or "H"
in the Quality Assurance Requirements column in USAR Table 3.2-1.
This table of systems, structures, and components is kept current and is revised and distributed as a
controlled document in accordance with approved procedures.
Appendix "B"
to the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual describes and specifies a
graded application of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program to certain othen activities, systems and iters at the Clinton Power Station, such as the pressure boundaries of radwaste augmented D systems, portions of the fire protection system, security system, environ-mental monitoring, and package and transportation of radioactive material.
2.2 DESCRIPTION
2.2.1 General Illinois Power Company's Nuclear Quality Assurance Program is based upon 10CFR50, Appendix B,
" Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants." The requirements of
- 10CFR71, subpart H,
" Quality Assurance for Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material" are also included.
Additionally, in USAR section 1.8, Illinois Power is committed to carrying out the provisions of various NPC regulatory guides ~ and industry standards which further define Quality Assurance program requirements.
As used in this
- chapter,
" Quality Assurance" comprises all those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a Clinton Power Station structure,
- system, or component will perform satisfactorily in service.
Quality Assurance includes quality control which comprises those 1 of 6 20 PAGE REVISION:
FORM NIOO-676 (10-88)
H.02171
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Chapter 2 physical characteristics of a material, structure, component, or system which provide a means to control the quality of the materi-al, structure, component, or system to predetermined requirements.
2.2.2 Ouality Assurance Procrain Innlementation The IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program was implemented as systems, structures, and components were turned over or transferred to IP.
A Preoperational Test Program was established and implemented to assure that necessary inspection and testing of the transferred system, structure, or component was performed and properly evaluated, and to confirm that the system, structure or component will perform satisfactorily.
The program coverage was gradually expanded until all applicable systems, structures, and components for the unit were turned over and were encompassed within the scope of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
The program has been fully implemented and will be maintained throughout the operating life of the plant.
The program receives ongoing reviews and is revised in accordance with Appendix A as necessary to assure its continued effectiveness.
Changes made to the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual which: 1) change or affect authority, independence, or management reporting levels previously established for organizations performing quality assurance functions; or 2) reduce commitments or effectiveness of controls previously established over activities affecting quality of CPS structures, systems, or components shall be submitted and approved by the NRC prior to change implementation.
Quality Assurance Manual changes which do not reduce the Quality Assurance program's commitments shall be submitted to the NRC for review on an annual basis.
Editorial changes or personnel reassignments of a non-substantive nature do not require NRC notification.
Submittal to the NRC of a change to the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual shall be in accordance with 10CFR50.54(a).
The change submittal shall include all pages affected by that change and must be accompanied by a forwarding letter identifying the changes, the reason for the
- change, and the basis for concluding that the revised program incorporating the change continues to satisfy the criteria of 10CFR50 Appendix B and the Safety Analysis Report quality assurance program description commitments previously accepted by the NRC.
2.2.3 Ouality Assurance Procram Documentation The IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program is established and supported by three tiers of documents; each successive tier transmits requirements from a higher level of authority to the next successive lower document level.
2 of 6 20 PAGP REVISION:
)
DATE:
02/14/91 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M,02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Chapter 2 i
i a.
Ryclear Policy Statements are documents. Issued by Corporate Management to promulgate authoritative management directives establishing and defining Quality Assurance policies within the Illinois Power Company Nuclear Program.
b.1 IP Nuclear Procram Ougl.ity Assuratig_e Manual describes the objectives, requirements, interface relationships, and assignment of responsibilities for accomplishing activities which affect the safety-related functions of systems, structures, or components.
It contains the minimum requirements to be applied by IP and suppliers.
The manual is approved and maintained current by the Manager - Quality Assurance.
Managers and Directors of organizations performing activities within the scope of the program designate their acknowledgement of responsibilities and authorization for use within their organization by signature prior to approval of the manual by the Manager - Quality i
Assurance.
I b.2 Cornorate Nuclear Procedures (CNP) are documents developed, approved,-and issued to provide corporate direction and policy pertaining to-appropriate Nuclear Program Activities.
CNPs are reviewed by the Manager Quality. Assurance for compliance with quality assurance requirements and are approved by corporate level management.
b.3 CPS Records Manacement Standards provide direction in the areas of records identification,. preparation, collection / review, turnover / transfer, storage, preser-vation, and maintenance.
b.4 Inservice Inspection (ISI)
Procram Manual describes the ISI requirements for CPS and-serves as the site standard for all CPS ISI Program' activities.
c.
Denartmental Procedures or Instructions are developed,
- approved, and issued within each organization to further implement the requirements of Corporate Nuclear Procedures and the IP Nuclear Program Quality
-Assurance Manual.
These departmental procedures or-instructions provide more detailed direction to IP personnel engaged in Nuclear Program related activ-ities.
Table 2-1 identifies those IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance manual chapters that are applicable to the IP Nuclear Program Departments within their scope of responsibility.
3 f6 PAGE REVISION:
FORM N100-t77 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL-chapter 2 2.2.4 Trainina Each Manager or Director is responsible for the proper qualifica-tion of assigned personnel performing activities related to CPS.
This includes establishing and maintaining documented training programs to ensure that personnel performing activities affecting quality are appropriately trained in the principles and techniques of the activity being performed; are instructed as to purpose, scope, and implementation of governing documents; and that they maintain required proficiency.
Programs are formulated to provide training based on individual employee experience and position and fulfill regulatory requirements, where applicable.
Training records are maintained for each employee.
Departmental training procedures / instructions require that indoctrination and training programs. include oblectives, content of program, attendees, and date of-attendance.
Applicable departmental procedures and instructions require that the proficiency of personnel performing and verifying activities affecting quality is maintained by retraining, re-examining, and/or recertifying, as determined by management or program commitment.
2.2.5 IP Nuclear Ouality Assurance Procram Evaluations Regular management reviews of the IP Nuclear QA Program to assess tha scope, status, adequacy, compliance, and overall effectiveness are performed under the direction of the Vice - president.
This review function consists of meetings with key QA personnel, as well as review of QA department audit and status reports, and the performance of a IP Nuclear. QA Program assessment, which is preplanned and documented.- Corrective action required as a result of-adverse conditions identified during the assessment are documented,. tracked, and completion is verified and documented by IP Quality Assurance.
Independent audits of-other organizations performing activities-related to_ quality are accomplished regularly
- under the direction of the Manager - Quality Assurance.
Suppliers' Quality Assurance programs are reviewed, approved, and audited by the IP Quality Assurance organization for. compliance with applicable rules, regulatione, and IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual as set forth in the contract document.
Approval of such programs in activities related to CPS is documented.
2.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.3.1 Vice President a.
Directs reviews for overall offectiveness of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program on a regular basis.
4 f6 PAGE REVISION:
UE' g goo-i77
.tio-eal
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GU ALITY ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL Chapter 2 l
2.3.2 Nuclear Procram Denartments a.
Implement and comply with the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, b.
Train and qualify / certify, as required, personnel who perform quality activities associated with CPS.
2.3.3.
CPS Plant Staff a.
Operate and maintain CPS in a safe,
- reliable, and efficient mode of operation.
2.3.4 Nuclear Station Encineering a.
Establish and maintain a site document for implemont-ing the ASME Section XI Inservice Inspection Program.
2.3.5 Nuclear Trainina a.
Establish, maintain and implement a licensed operator training program and a
General Employee Training program.
2.3.6 Ouality Assurance a.
Develop, approve, and maintain the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual.
b.
Review, approve, and audit suppliers' quality assur-ance prograus for compliance with applicable rules, regulations, and this manual as set forth in the contract document.
c.
Review all changes to tne USAR, with the exception of Chapter 16, Technical Specifications.
d.
Evaluate the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual changes for commitment reduction.
e.
Submit IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual changes to the NRC as defined in Paragraph 2.2.2 of this chapter and in accordance with 10CFR50.54.
5 of 6 PAGE REVISION:
tg00-177 (10-88)
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 2 TABLE 2-1 TABLE 2-1 This table identifies the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance manual chapters that are applicable to the IP Nuclear Program Departments.
These organizations are responsible for developing and maintaining procedures / instructions to the extent and detail within the scope of their responsibilities.
The Quality Assurance Department shall review selected departmental procedures / instructions that implement the QA Program.
Nuclear Program Departments IP Nuclear Program GA Marwal Chapters 1 2 3 4 $ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 CPS Plant Staff x x x x x x x x x x n x x x x x x x Nuclear station Engineering x x x x x x x x x x x x
x x x x Nuclear Planning & Support x x x x x x x x x x x x x Nucles-Training a x x x x x x x x x x Scheduling & Outage Management x x x x x x x x x x x Licensing & Safety x x x x x x x x x x x x Quality Assurance x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Projects and Assestaent a
Nuclear lleview & Audit Gro@
x x
x 6 of 6 20 PAGE FORM NIOO-177 180-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PRODRAM "rm
.N: d..
nip
[
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL
- se CHAPTER 3
4C*: d p.,
pp.,
ii py
~
DESIGN CONTROL APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE hY 70
(
3.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To establish the requirements, resaonsibilities and control measures for assuring that design bases anc regulatory requirements are cor-rectly translated into design documents.
The scope of design control covers all phases of engineering design, including:
conceptual design j
selections identification of design inputa (criteria and bases):
identification and control of design interfaces production of design documents, calculations and analyses procurement-related engineering design verifications and installation engineering support.
3.2 DESCRIPTION
-Design control measures are established to assure modifications and design changes meet the appropriate performance and quality require-ments.
These design control measures are commensurate wuh those applicable to the original design and assure that modifications are designed and implemented in accordance with applicable codes, stan-dards and regulatory commitments.
The Nuclear Station Engineering Department has overall responsibility for design control activities at Clinton Power Stacion.
These design control activities are managed within the context of the Nuclear Program Configuration Management Program, which also includes provi-sions for controlling hardware and software items (procedures,
- training, etc.) which comprise the configuration of Clinton Power Station and final design approval of changes or modifications for incorporation into the plant.
Processing of a modification, and the associated design / design change documents under this program ensures a3propriate participation and awareness by CPS organizations t aroughout the design development and installation process.
Provisions of this program also ensure that each modification or design change receives a
thorough safety evaluation, that meets regulatory commitments or ensures that the basis for not performing the safety evaluation is documented.
If the change is determined to constitute "an unreviewed safety question", or to alter commitments contained in approved Safety Analysis Reports or the CPS Technical PAGE1 of 5-REVISION:
17 05/03/90 l
DATE8 l
FORM NIOO-176 (10-88) l M.02171 l
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CFMPTER 3 i
Specifications, it shall be evaluated by establi'shed safety review committees and submitted for regulatory approval prior to implementa-tion.
New design or design changes shall be defined by drawings, specifica-
- tions, change notices or other documents as prescribed in design control procedures.
The organization actually performing the design work, either Nuclear Station Engineering or a qualified consultant-engineer is required to include the following considerations in the design of each modification:
a.
Appropriate design bases, regulatory requirements, safety requirements, performance objectives, design
- margins, special processes, material and testing requirements, and operating objectives are adequately translated into the various design documents, b.
Appropriate design analysis (e.g.,
- physics, seismic, stress, thermal, hydraulic, radiation and accident) is part of the design process, c.
Accessibility requirements for, operation, testing, mainte-nance, in-service inspection and repair are included in the design.
d.
Necessary installation or modification inspection and test acceptance criteria are included in the design documents or modification packages.
An evaluation to determine if the proposed design change or e.
modification involves an "unreviewed safety question".
f.
Design control measures shall include criticality physics and radiation shielding for radioactive material shipments.
g.
Design control measures shall include provisions to assure that appropriate quality standards are specified and included in design documents and that deviations from such standards are controlled.
Additionally, the organization which produces and approves the design /
design change documents shall maintain detailed procedures to control and document performance of the following design activities:
a.
Identification and selection of design inpues.
17 REVISION:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 3 b.
Identification and control of interfaces between-organiza-tions required to make input to, review or approl'e final design products.
eel c.
Performance of calculations or analyses which demonstrate that design products satisfy the design inputs, indluding those performed-using computer codes, d.
Production,
- review, approval,
- release, distribution and revision of drawings, specifications, data sheets for other design output documents, e.
Classification and specification of technical requirements for equipment or material procurements associated with the design / design change, f.
Verification that the design inputs, interfaces, calcula.
tions and final design products are adequate and.co.rrect ;
and that the installation satisfies all specified ifesign requirements.
g The form and structure of the procedures and instructions.used to accomplish these activities may vary dependent upon the complswity of the design and the different organizations involved in the de s ign-development.
Design verification for the final design products will normally be done by an independent group or person within the organization actu -
ally producing the design.
When this is a consultant-engineer organ -
ization, Nuclear Station Engineering may choose to conduct, or direct,c additional independent design verifications.
This verification consists o'f a check of design adequacy ',by, such methods as design reviews, use of alternate calculations or usthods,.
or performance of verification or qualification testing.
The-4thod,-
or combination of methods, used to verify a design will be selected on; a case-by-case basis.
The selection will be based on consideration ofe such things as:
a) uniqueness of the design or application, b ).-
l complexity of the design, c) prior history of use, d) importance to safety, and e) consequences of failure.
CPS operating phase design.
verification other than qualification testing of prototype or lead-production unit will, where practical, be completed prior to instal _
1ation and operation.
In those cases where this timing cannot.be met,..
the. design verification may be deferred, providing the j us tification for this action is documented and the unverificd documents re,1.ated to..
the design are appropriately identified and controlled.
However,.
design verifiedtion shall be completed prior to the component., system or structure being released for operations.
p u.*
PAGE 3 of 5
[3 OV03M0 l
DATE:
FORM N100-177 (10-88) t-l M.02l72
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM G.UALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 3 Verf.fication by test will normally be included irt procurement docu-ments that require the supplier to perform the test and use the most severe design conditions as acceptance criterie.
The procurement documents shall require that the test procedure, including acceptance criteria, be submitted to Illinois Power or its designee for review and approval prior to performance of the test.
When a verification test cannot be performed prior to installation, proposed testing arograms shall be reviewed and approved by Illinois Power to ensure t ant the program is conducted within licensing limi-tations prior'to the point when the installation would become irre-versibic, and that no unresolved safety questions are involved.
The entire design control process shall be subject to audits conducted by IP Quality Assurance, to ensure that design activities are implemented in accordance with program requirements.
3.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 3.3.1 CPS Plant Staff a.
Initiate or concur with design change requests for CPS and 1
forward to Nuclear Station Engineering for review and
-- approval, b.
Incorporate a p roved design changes into CPS.
c.
Employ centrols which maintain the "as-built" and "as-modified" condition of the plant.
d.
Assure that the proposed design change.affecting nuclear safety and associated safety evaluation has been reviewed by the Facility Review Group.
3.3.2 Nuclear Station Engineering a.
Develop and implement the design control program for CPS, including design interface control activities.
b.
Perform or obtain design services, such as preparation and review of design technical documents for all modifications and design changes, c.
Review and approve design change requests and modification requests for incorporation into the plant.
PAGE 4 of 5 17 i
REVISION:
8 FORM NICO-177 (10-86)
H.02172 l
IP NUCLEAR PROCRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 3 1
d.
Providing "as built" information to the Nuclear Licensing and Safety Department for updating the USAR to current plant conditions.
e.
Determine if the proposed design change involves an "un-reviewed safety question".
f.
Coordinate the processing of plant modifications, assigning control noobers, recording progress, confirming procedural compliance,. recommending operational readiness of affected hardware and transmittal of completed design change pack-ages to Nuclear Planning and Support for processing, maintenance and retention in the Central File, j
1 g.
Issue or coordinate issuance of data and reports which provide status of design changes.
l 3.3.3 Licensing and Safety 1
a.
Review and evaluate Technical Specification changes and unreviewed safety questions identified during the modification process and obtain the necessary reviews and approvals.
3.3.4 Quality Assurance a.
Review the authorizing work documents for implementing design changes for systems, components and structures and ensure that the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program requirements are incorporated.
b.
Conduct periodic audits to determine.that the design control and verification activities meet the requirements of the design control program.
PAGE 5 of 5 17 REVISION:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172 m.
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM,in a, y;;; wenn
[
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUALi: y ha L
CHAPTER 9'
I 68 M DI r;; 9 p c r e e: t r'( ? ? ? ? ?.
4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL i
APPROVED BY MANAGER-0UALITY ASSURANCE bu 87A~
9#
I 4.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibili ies for the prepara-t
- tion, review,
- release, and revision of procurement specifi-cations, purchase orders, and associated documents to assure the procurement of items and services are properly controlled.
4.2 DESCRIPTION
Measures are established for the preparation, review, approval and grocessing of purchase requisitions, purchase specifications, purc aase orders and revisions to these documents to ensure that materials, parts, components and services for CPS are properly specified and procured.
Purchase requisitions for materials, parts, components or ser-vices for CPS are originated by the CPS organization having a need for the material, part, component or service for the oper-
- atton, maint.enance, refueling, repair or modification of the punt.
Purchase requisitions are prepared in accordance with documented procedures that require:
a.
Applicable specifications, drawings, quality control requirements, and related documents be included or referenced.
b.
Appropriate quality requirements, including supplier documents and records to be prepared, submitted or retained, and made available for purchaser review.or approval are included or referenced, c.
Appropriate quality assurance program requirements be included or referenced.
PAGO of 1 i
REVISION:
,c O^
8 FORN NIOO-176 (10-88)
M.02176
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY AS3yRArJCE MANUAL CHAPTER 4 d.
Provisions for the purchaser's righ't of access to supplier's facilities and records (including sub-tier suppliers) for source inspection and audit be speci-
- fled, e.
Provisions for supplier's reporting and disposition of nonconformances and requirements for hold points and release control are clearly identified, f.
Suppliers extend the applicable quality requirements, including purchaser's access to facilities and records for inspection and audit, to their sub-tier suppliers.
Technical and quality requirements for procurement of items and services a e specified by the Nuclear Station Engineering Depart-ment.
The Quality Assurance Department verifies appropriate quality requirements are specified.
Purchase requisitions are approved by the Manager or Director of the originating organization or his designec and forwarded to Nuclear Planning and Support for subsequent processing.
Based on the approved purchase requisition, Nuclear Planning and Support prepares the necessary purchase orders or contract documents.
Prior to release of the purchase order or contract, Quality Assurance performs a review to ensure the requirements
("a" through "f"
above) have been met.
Nuclear Planning and Support places orders or contracts only with suppliers determined to be capable of meeting the procurement requirements.
This determination is based on evaluations of the supplier's quality assurance program for placement on the Qualified Suppliers List by QA, the supplier's technical capabilities by the Nuclear Station Engineering Department and the srpplier's commercial ability by Nuclear Planning and Support.
Changes, revisions or amendments to requisitions and procurement documents, except as discussed below, are subject to the same requirements as was the original document.
The following changes, revisions or amendments require Nuclear Planning and Support departmetit approval only a) quantity, b) estimaced price, c) cost codes, d) taxes, e) format and editorial changes (such as spelling or typing errors) and commercial terms and conditions.
The IP Quality Assurance department conducts periodic audits to ensure that procurement activities are implemented in accordance with program requirements.
PAGE 2 of 3 REVISION:
1A FORM NICO-177 (10-88)
M.02172
t IP NUCLEAR PF13 CRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CilAPTER 4 4.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.3.1 Nuclear Program Departments a.
Initiate purchase requisitions for materials, parts, components or services for CPS.
4.3.2 Nuclear Planning and Support a.
Review purchase requisitions for completeness.
b.
Prepare purchase orders / contracts for award to quali-ficd suppliers.
4.3.3 Nuclear Station Engineering l
a.
Specify technical and, quality requirements for mater-ials, parts, components or services for CPS.
b.
Review and
'pprove design changes that result from j
procurement.
c.
Provide specif. cations for p'rocured materials, parts, components or services for CPS.
d.
Evaluate suppliers for technical ability to perform.
4.3.4 Quality Assurance a.
Verify ap?ropriate quality requirements are specified
'for mater:.als, parts, compcnents or services for CPS.
b.
Review and approve supplier quality assurance pro-grams.
c.
Conduct periodic audits of the procurement document control program to ensure compliance with the requirements of this-chapter.
l 1
REVISION:
1A DATE:
05/03/90 l
FORM N100 177 (10-88) l H.02V72 l
t
IP NUCLEAR PRCCRAM
[
QUALITY ACOURANCE MANUAL
^'
l CHAPTER Q
]
>{
5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES & DRAWINGS p0d' E
APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE
/Y 5.I PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for the generation and use of instructions, procedures, drawings, or related material to control activit.ies which affect quality.
5.2 DESCRIPTION
Each IP department is responsible for developing, reviewing, approv-
- ing, issuing and complying with formal instructions, procedures, drawings and related material for performing activities affecting the quality or functions of apalicable systems, structures, or omponents at CPS.- Requirements established are a.
Instructions, procedures, or drcwings shall include appropriate qualitetive and/or quentitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
b.
Instructions, procedures, or drawings for maintenance, modifications, testing and operation shall contain s tep-by-s tep. ins truc tions in the degree of detail neces-sary for a qualified individual to perform the required function or task.
Each Manager, Director ard Supervisor is responsibic for determining the need for issuing and revising instructions and procedures related to each organization's scope of activities.
Table 2-1 identifies those IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance manual chapters that are applicable to the IP Nuclear Program Departments within their scope of responsibility.
The IP Quality Assurance department conducts periodic surveillances and audits to determine that appropriate instructions, procedures, or drawings exist and to evaluate their adequacy and implementation.
PAGE 1 nf ?
REVISION:
3 FoRH N100-176 (10-89)
M.02171
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY AOCURANCE MANUAL CllAPTER 5 i
5.3
. 1PONSIBILITIES 5.3.1 Nuclear Program Departments a.
Develop. approve, issue and employ those instructions, l
procedures, or drawings necessary to accomplish its assigned tasks and responsibilities at CPS.
Each depart-ment is responsibic for developing, obtaining approvals and complying with instructions, procedures or drawings related to its scope of effort.
5.3.2 Quality Assurance a.
Conduct periodic surveillances and audits to verify that appropriate instructions, procedures and drawingt, exist and are being implemented in accordance with the require-monts of this chapter, b.
Review selected CPS departmental procedures and instruc-tions for QA program requirements.
i PAGE 2 of 2 REVISION:
y M4*
DAM:
rons wico-iv7 (no.sa)
M o2172
IP NUCLEAR PRGORAM M
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUALNS POWIP CDPW n m.,,-.
CHAPTER pg ; g 68 0
{'0HThillii b F. M DOCUMENT CONTROL CI d A IU$
l
[7 APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE 6.1 PURPOSE /FCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for review, approval, issue and distribution of controlled documents such as instructions, procedures or drawings and changes thereto.
l
6.2 DESCRIPTION
Controlled documents cuch as specifica.tions, procedures, instruc-tions, drawings, computer software for safety-related applications, and other related materials which prescribe activities affecting quality or safety-related functions of systems, structures or compo-nents at CPS shall be processed in accordance with the following criteria:
a.
Documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy by appropriately qualified personnel, approved for issue and use by authorized personnel, and distributed to and used where the prescribed activity is performed.
b.
The review and approval of changes which modify the intent of the document is performed by the same organizations that perfor.ned the original review and approval, unless other equivalent organizations are specifically desig-nated.
Reviewing organizations will have access to pertinent background information upon which to base approval and have adequ' ate understanding of the require-ments and intent of the original document.
c.
Tem >orary changes to CPS procedures required by the Technical Specifications which do not change the intent of the approved procedures shall, as a minimum, be approved by two members of the unit management staff who are knowledgeable in the areas affected by the procedures.
At least one of these individuals shall be the supervisor in PAGE 1 of 4 i
REVISION:
17 i
DATE:
05/03/90 FORN NICO-176 (10-88)
M.0217I
IP NUCLEAR PFiOORAM
)
GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CllAPTER 6 j
charge of the shift and hold a senior operator license.
Such changes shall be documented, reviewed and approved in accordance with the CPS Operating License Manual, and if appropriate, incorporated in the next revision of the affected procedure, d.
The document control system ensures that personnel or organizations are provided with current and approved documents.
e.
Documents and changes thereto are controlled by procedures, to preclude the use of outdated or inappropriate docu-ments.
f.
The CPS document control program provides for periodic reviews of plant procedures to determine if changes are necessary or desirable.
g.
Individuals or organizations responsible for preparing, reviewing, approving and issuing documents and changes thereto are identified.
h.
The proper documents to be used in an activity are iden-tified.
1.
Current distribution lists are established and used.
Types of documents to be controlled as described above include:
a.
IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual which contains the basic description, requirements and assignment of responsibilities for the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
The QA manual is developed, approved and maintained by the Manager - Quality Assurance, b.
Corporate Nuclear Procedures which provide corporate instruction and policies pertaining to Nuclear Program activities.
c.
CPS Operating License Manual contains the technical specifications that are an integral part of the Clinton Power Station operating license, d.
Station Operating Manual which contains procedures for the operation, maintenance and testing of the plant by the CPS organization.
These procedures are subject to a well-defined and documented preparation,
- review, approval, change control and distribution process.
PAGE 2 of 4 REVISION:
17 05/03/90 FORM Hl00-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PRSORAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 6 l
e.
CPS Records Management Standards whicli,rovide direction for records identification, preparat: on, collection /
l
- review, turnover / transfer,
- storage, preservation and maintenance, f.
Inservice Inspection Program Manual which describes the ISI requirements for GPS and serves as the site standard for all CPS ISI Program activities.
g.
Other controlled documents, such as:
the Nucicar Policy Statements, USAR, corrective action documents, as-built
- drawings, procedures and/or instructions used by IP Nuclear Program Departments.
Documents such as parts lists. vendor manuals and written correspon-dence used in the design, operation, maintenance or testing are controlled in accordance with departmental procedures which include the following:
a.
A method of verifying and documenting receipt of trans-mitted documents.
b.
A program for approving the receipted documents for use in activities associated with CPS by that organization, c.
A program for distribution and control.
Measures are established within each organization to assure that obsolete or superseded documents described in the paragraph above are replaced in a timely manner by updated document revisions.
The IP Quality Assurance department conducts periodic surveillances and audits of document control systems to ensure compliance with the specified requirements.
6.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 6.3.1 Nuclear Program Departments a.
- Review, approve and distribute controlled documents generated in accordance with appropriate procedures, b.
Employ appropriate measures to receive, record and re-distribute controlled documents from other organizations.
PAGE 3 of 4 REVISION:
17 l
O roRN N100-177 (10-68) 1 M.02172 l
l'
IP NUCLE AR PP.OGR AM QUALITY ASSUR ANCE MANUAL CllAPTER 6 6.3.2
!1uclear Planning and Support a.
Maintain a Document Control Program to control the issu-ance of documents, such as instructions, procedures and drawings, including changes thereto, which prescribe all activities affecting quality.
6.3.3 Quality Assurance a.
Conduct periodic curveillances and audits of document control systems to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
PAGE4 of 4 REVISION:
17 rar?M N100-177 (10-88)
M,02172
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM
'[
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUgg reygg tfyW
,_. m CHAPTER
,, n., 7 m tMWi!H i$.
Mi' CONTROL OF PURCl!ASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND S pV,ICEC APPROVED BY: MANAGER-0UALITY ASSURANCE N/
(
7.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for programs that assure purchased material, equipment, and services conform to procurement requirements.
7.2 DESCRIPTION
Measures have boon established to provido assurance that purchased material, equipment, and services conform to procurement document requirements.
This assurance is acconiplished by controlling both the selection of procurement sources and inspections of the product at the source and/or upon rocolpt at CPS.
IP procurement proceduros require a review of material, equipment and services requisitions for safety-related structures, systems, and components by the Nuclear Station Engineering Department.
This review will identify the applicable
- codes, standards, technical and quality requirements to assure that they are equivalent to the original requirements.
When alternate require-ments are imposed which are not equivalent to the original requirements, the alternate requirements will be fully evaluated and documented.
Nuclear Station Engineering is responsible for performing the necessary reviews and evaluations of the procurn-ment sourco's capability to meet the technical requirements of the procurement documents.
The Quality Assuranco department specifies the Quality Assurance program requirements that must be mot by suppliers.
Quality Assurance is responsible for performing the necessary reviews and evaluations of the procurement source's Quality Assurance program and ability to moot the quality assurance requirements of the procurement documents.
Whora necessary, the determination of a supplier's acceptability includes information obtained through audits of the supplier by the Quality Assuranco organization.
Such audits are performed in accordance with a written plan or 1 of 5 17 PAGE REVISION:
FORM N100-176 (10-88)
M.02171
l IP NUCLEAR PROGR AM GUALITY ASSUR ANCE M ANUAL Chapter 7 I
E checklist to determine the ability of suppliers to comply with Quality Assurance program requirements of the procurement docu-ment.
The determination of a supplier's acceptability may be made by means other than by audits of the supplier by Quality i
Assurance.
These means may includes a) review and evaluation of i
the supplier's quality assurance program description document, b) review and evaluation of historical supplier quality performance data, c) supplier facility surveys, d) review and evaluation of audits, surveys, and inspections conducted by other utilities, or American Society Mechanical Engineers (ASME),
or e) documented information from_ organizations, including architect-engineer, 2
Nuclear Steam Systems Supplier, and other utilities that indicates the su? plier has a program that coots applicable requirements of Appendnx B to 10CFR50.
When these means are either not available t
or do not permit complete evaluation of a supplier's quality capabilities, Quality Assurance will conduct a survey or an audit of the supplier.
The Quality Assurance depate.eent is responsible for mainte ning the Qualified Suppliers List.
In addition to reviewing a supplier's capability to meet the commercial requirements of - the procurement documents, Nuclear Planning and Support is assigned the responsibility of ascertain-ing-that the required technical and quality assurance reviews and evaluations have been completed satisfactorily prior to contract award or release of the purchase order.
The results of these reviews and evaluations are documented.
Following the award of the contract or placement of the purchase
- order, the Quality Assurance organization is responsible for performing periodic surveillances and evaluations at the suppli-er's facility, as necessary, to verify continued compliance with the quality assurance requirements = of the _ procurement documents.
The results of these surveillances and evaluations are docunented.
Where specified in the purchase order or
- contract, source inspections at the supplier's facility are accomplished by the Quality Assurance organization or qualified agent to verify that the procured item or service is being supplied in compliance with the _ requirements of the procurement documents.
Such inspections are accomplished in accordance with written procedures,
- plans, and/or checklists containing or referencing appropriate acceptance l
criteria.
Upon receipt at CPS, Nuclear Planning and Support is responsible for the control of safety-related materials, parts, and compo-nents.
Quality Assurance inspection personnel are responsible for inspecting, releasing, and identifying purchased material and equipment as to the inspection status as required by the purchase order.
1 REVISION:
FORM N100-I77 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLE AR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE M ANU AL Chapter 7 After receipt inspection, storeroom personnel of Nuclear Planning and Support are responsible for forwarding the purchased material to a controlled storage area or releasing it for installation or turther work.
Personnel from other departments also perform acceptance activities such as evaluation of content of technical documents required by the purchase order, and the conduct of special tests and measurements which are identified in the purchase order.
When these activities are accomplished, QA personnel verify that those acceptance activities were accomp-lished prior to final acceptance of an item.
Receipt inspections are accomplished in accordance with written procedures end/or plans containing or referencing appropriate acceptance criteria.
Documentary evidence of conformance to procurement requirements provided by the supplier in accordance with the procurement docu-monts is reviewed during source and/or roccipt inspections to verify compliance.
The validity of a supplier's certificate of conformance is ascertained through any of the following methodst source inspection, independent inspection agency, roccipt inspec-tions, surveillance, testing of hardware, Quality Assurance audits or surveillances.
Inspection and test activitiec verify that the hardware performs in accordance with applicable technical re-quirements and serve to demonstrate that the hardware meets the requirements stated in a certificate of conformance.
The results of the source and/or receipt inspections, the acceptability of supplier furnished documentation, and the resulting determination of conformance or nonconformance are documented.
Acceptance of contracted services such as inspection services, consultant services, installation, repair or maintenance services shall be based on one or all of the following methods, as re-quired:
a.
technical verifications.
b.
surveillance / inspections, c.
review of objective evidence such as certifications or technical reports.
The Quality Assurance department conducts periodic surveillances and audits of the control measures applied to purchased materials, equipment, and services to determine the offectiveness in meeting the specified requirements.
Quality Assurance audits of suppliers evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of suppliers' systems and procedures for preparing certificates of conformance, as well as the adequacy of supporting documentation and records.
REVISION:
02/14/91 j
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL chapter 7 7.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 7.3.1 Nuclear Procram Denartments a.
Ensure the control of purchased material, equipment, and services conform to procurement requirements.
I b.
Ensure that suppliers performing work at CPS utilize
)
control measures compatible with those of CPS Plant j
Staff.
7.3.2 Fuclear Station Enaineerina a.
Review purchase requisitions and specify the technical and quality requiremolits for the item (s) or services to be procured, b.
Perform technical reviews and evaluations of suppliers' capabilities to meet procurement technical requirements prior to release of the purchase order or contract, c.
Review and approve supplier furnished technical data specified by the procurement document, including such items or services as process and test procedures, performance and test' data, and heat treat charts prior to acceptance.
7.3.3 Nuclear Plannina and Sunnort a.
Review requisitions for completeness.
b.
Perform reviews of suppliers' capabilities to meet commercial terms and conditions prior to release of the purchase order or contract, c.
Verify the suppliers are listed on the Qualified suppliers List as required.
d.
Provide materials or. equipment requiring roccipt inspection to Quality Assurance for acceptance prior to issuing the material or equipment for operation.
c.
Develop and implement procedures for the receiving, storing, and issuing of purchased items, i
4 f5 17 PAGE
@E '
g goo-177 (1o-88)
-.~.
. - ~
P
- IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Chapter 7 7.3.4 Ouality Assuranga
- a.
Perform source evaluations and audits, as necessary, of j
suppliers' quality assurnnce programs prior to release of the initial purchase order or award of contract.
b.
Perform periodic surveillances and evaluations at suppliers' facilities, as necessary, to verify con-tinued compliance with quality requirements of pro-curement documents.
c.
Conduct-periodic surveillances and audits of the-control measures applied to purchased materials, equipment, and services to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
d.-: Perform and document. source inspections, as necessary, f
at the suppliers' facilities to verify that procured items or services are in compliance with the requirements of the procurement documents.
e.
Perform and document receipt inspection of purchased items,- including verifying the required documentary evidence of conformance to procurement requirements is available at CPS and verifying activities of other groups are accomplished prior to final acceptance of an item and release for use.
f.
Review purchase requisitions and specify the quality assurance program requirements for the item (s) to do
- procured, g.
Perform surveillances or inspections, as required,. on procured services prior to acceptance.
h.
Maintain the Qualified Suppliers List current based on the results of evaluations or audits.
5 of 5 PAGE REVISION:
02/u/91 DATE:
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172
~w----,
..,,-,-.%-.--,,.--,-ev---,-
--. -. m-
,,m ii-
.-.--ru-
,_m.,u,,,
,_-4.-_e.,e,m,---m- - - - -. ~
s s.,,-,r-y-se, mv----
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM
" m IM1 QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 8
.,,, n IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS AM#
2 9df APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUAt.ITY ASSURANCE 8.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for a program of identification and control of materials, parts, and components such j
that traceability is assured and the use of incorrect or defective items is prevented.
8.2 DESCRIPTION
1 Measures have been established which provide for the identification and control of materials, parts, and components to assure that trace-ability is provided and the use of incorrect or defective items is prevented.
These measures include the following:
a.
Procurement documents specify appropriate identification to be applied to items of purchase, b.
An inventory control system is employed for the receipt, storage or stocking, and issue of materials, parts, and components, c.
The identity of materials, parts, and com,onents is either on the items or on records traceable to taem.
When physi-cal marking in employed, the marking is clear, unambiguous, indelible, and applied in auch a manner as to not be detrimental to the intended function of the item.
d.
Markings are not obliterated or hidden by treatment or coatings unless other means of identification are substi-
- tuted, e.
When codes, standards, or specifications require trace-ability of materials,
- parts, or components to specific inspection or test records, the program is designed to provide such traceability.
PAGE 1 nf 3 REVISION:
3 O
8 FORM Hl00-176 (10-88)
H.02171
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM CHAPTER 8 QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL l
f.
When employed, identification is trahsferred to each part of an item prior to its being subdivided.
Materials, parts, and connonents shall have appropriate identifying designation (such as seria: number, part number, heat number, etc.) in order to provide traceability to each item to inspection and test records and/or reports.
Where physical identification of an item is either impractical or insuf ficient, physical separation or additional procedural controls are employed.
When installed material or equipment is removed for maintenance, repair, or modification, control measures are implemented to ensure proper identification markings and traceability throughout its pro-aessing.
During fabrication,
- assembly, installation, and shipping supplier's facility, the supplier is responsible for
.ctivities at a identification and control of materials,
- parts, and components in accordance with the requirements of the IP purchase order.
The CPS Plant Staff is responsible for identification and control of material, parts, and components during fabrication, maintenance and modification activities performed by at CPS.
Nuclear Planning and Support is responsible for identification and control of material,
- parts, and components during receipt and storage at CPS.
The IP department responsible for supplier work at CPS is responsible for insuring that identification and control of materials,
- parts, and components by the supplier are in accordance with applicable proce-dures.
The IP Quality Assurance Department conducts verification inspections and periodic surveillances and audits to assure that identification and control of materials, parts, and components are in compliance with program requirements.
8.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 8.3.1 Nuclear Program Departments a.
The Nuclear Program Departments responsible for supplier work at CPS are responsible for ensuring that identification and control of materials, parts and compo-nents by the supplier are in accordance with applicable procedures.
PAGE 2 of 3 REVISION:_,_,
14 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
N.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROCRAM CitApren a GUALITY ADOURANCE MANUAL 8.3.2 CPS Plant Staff a.
Develop and implement a program that provides for the identification and control of materials, parts and compo-nents used at CPS.
8.3.3 Nuclear Planning and Support a.
Develop and implement an inventory control system for the identification and control of materials, parts and compo-nents.
8.3.4
,uality Assurance Q
a.
Ensure that suppliers comply with approved procedures.
b.
Conduct verification inspections and perindic surveillances and audits of the identification and control of items to ensure compliance with the requirenents of this chapter.
i l
)
PAGE 3 of 3 REVISION:
1A I
FoRH N100-177 (10-86)
H.02172
- ~
IP NUCLEAR PR2'JRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL i
CHAPTER 1
d'h 9
1 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE MW
(
9.1 PURPOSE / SCOP!(
1 To define the requirements and responsibilities iur assuring that special processes such as welding, heat treating, che d al cleaning, j
nondestructive examination (NDE),
pe bending, and speciel coatings 1
are performed under proper contro a and that qualified pt xedures governing these processes are established in accordance with applicable codes and specifications, are implemented by qualified personnel, and results of special processes are properly documented and evaluated.
9.2 DESCRIPTION
For some processes the required level of quality defined in codes, standards, and specifications cannot be verified by inspection of the item only.
For these processes quality assurance.is obtained through a combination of inspection and reliance on personnel qualification and procedural control, as appropriate, for the process being con-ducted.
Processes which meet the following criteria are controlled as special processes:
a.
The process is highly dependent upon operator skill and/or process control, b.
The specified quality cannot be readily determined by direct inspection or test of the final product.
Special processes include welding,' heat treatment, nondestructive examination (testing), chemical cleaning, pipe bending, and sp.ecial coatings.
Special process procedures shall specify: arerequisite conditions, processing steps, conditions to be maintainec during the steps of the process, inspection and test requirements, personnel qualifi. cation requirements and record requirements.
Technical portions of the j
special process controls are delineated or referenced in the design or technical documents by the organization preparing the document.
l REVISION:
17 i
- DATE, 05/03/90 FORM N100-176 (10 88)
H.02171
IP NUCLEAR Pn3 ORAM CHAPTER 9 GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Special process procedures s!.all be submitted to Nuclear Station Engineering for review and approval to assure technical adequacy.
Supplier process control procedures specify the methods of verifying the adequacy of processing materials, solutions, and equipment, including definitions of their associated control parameters.
The control and approval of sub-supplier special process procedures are the responsibility of the specific suppliers involved.
Special process requirements are promulgated to suppliers by the procurement and/or design documents.
Nuclear Station Engineering specifies special processes in technical documents and procurement requd.sitions.
The control of scheduled 151 examinations and inspections is the responsibility of the. Nuclear Station Engineering Department.
The control of other special processes is the responsibility of cps Tiant Staff.
The control of NDE to support plant operations is the n s p nsibility of the QA department.
Control measures and requirements that have been established include l
a.
The need for special processes and the codes or standards applicable are identified during design or preparation of technical documents associated with an activity.
b.
Special processes are performed in accordance with ap-proved written procedures apalicable to the specific process and qualified in accorc ance with applicable codes and standards, c..
Personnel performing special processes are qualified, as required in accordance with applicable codes and stan-
~
- dards, d.
Special processes are accomplished under suitable con-trolled conditions which include the use of qualified equipment, adequate control of the environment, and estab-lishment of proper prerequisites related to the process, e..
Application of special process procedures and personnel qualifications is verified by IP' Quality Assurance person-nel through audits and surveillances.
f.
Records which show that special processes were performed in compliance with qualified or approved procedures and by qualified personnel and equipment are maintained.
PAGE 2 of 4 REVISION:
17 FoRN Hl00-177 (10-68)
N.02172
_ _ _.,... _ _. _. _ _. ~
IP NUCLEA.9 PROORAM CnAPTER 9 GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL The Quality Assurance department conducts inspecti'ons, surveillances, and audits of special processes, including qualification of process-es, equipment, and personnel to ensure compliance with appropriate
- codes, standards, specifications, procedures, and the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual.
9.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 9.3.1 CPS Plant Staff a.
Establish and maintain a
program to qualify special process procedures and equipment, except NDE required for plant operations, b.
Establish and maintain a to perform special processes, program to qualify personnel except NDE required for plant operations, c.
Incorporate into Plant Staff documents the requirement for special processes and their controls and references to the applicable codes or standards.
9.3.2 Nuclear Station Engineering a.
Specify special processes in technical documents and procurement requisitions, b.
Support CPS Plant Staff in the preparation, revision and qualification of special process procedures and personnel.
c.
Review and approve special process procedures used at CPS or specified in procurement documents to verify technical adequacy.
d.
Review and approve special process personnel qualification procedures and verify technical adequacy, e.
Contracts with an Authorized Inspection Agency to provide inspection services for ISI.
f.
Perform scheduled ISI examinations and inspections.
g.
Contracts with a
supplier to perform scheduled ISI examinations and inspections as required, j
9.3.3, Quality Assurance a.
Review NDE procedures, including those of suppliers.
4 PAGE 3 of_4 REVISION:
17 05/03/90 DATE:
FORM N100-177 (10 88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PRSCRAM CilAPTER 9 EUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL b.- Establish and maintain a program to (jualify procedures, equipment, and personnel for NDE.
c.
Perform NDE to support plant operations, including HDE for repairs, replacements and modifications.
d.
If radiography is performed by IP, maintain the required NRC license for radioactive source material, e.
Contracts with a supplier
- o perform NDE or inspection services as required.
f.
Conduct periodic survoillances and audits of special processes and controls, including qualification of pro-cess, equipment, and personnel, whether performed by CPS Plant Staff or suppliers to ensure compliance with ap-proved procedures, PAGE 4 of 4 REVISION:
17 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PRO'] RAM
~
M1 QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL '[
%"v 1
CHAPTER
)5 10
,o w
INSPECTION
,# M
/987 APPROVED DY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE..
10.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for a program of inspection which provides assurance that the fabrication, instal-j lation, modification, and repair activities affecting safety-related components, systems, and structures conform to the applicabic speci-fications, instructions, procedures,
- drawings, or other pertinent technical requirements.
The independent inspections performed are not intended to diminish or replace the clear responsibility of first line supervisors for the quality of work performed under their supervision.
10.2 DESCRIPTION
In order to assure safe and reliabic operation, programs of inspec-tions are established at CPS uhich includes the following provisions:
a.
The requirements for inspections are identified and documented based on procedures, instructions, drawings, and other documents for an activity prior to the start of the activity.
b.
Inspections are accomplished in accordance with a com-bination of approved written inspection procedures and documented instructions which contain or reference, as a minimum:
1.
A description of the rec uired inspection (type, method, etc.), the responsibility for performing the inspection, and, where applicable, any sampling plan to be used.
Hold / Witness pointa, where required, will be indicated in the appropriate documents:
2.
The discrete identity of the activity, process, or item to be inspected:
3.
Applicable documents,
- drawings, and specifications pertaining to the activity or item under inspection:
PAGE 1_nf__3 REVISION: _
35 2-14-89 DATE:
rCRM NIOO-176 (10-88)
M.02171
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 10 1
l I
4 Verification of the proper type,' range, and accuracy of inspection instrument (s) used for each operation:
5.
Appropriate quantitative or qualitative criteria for acceptance / rejection:
6.
Qualification requirements of inspection personnels and f
7.
Provisions for recording inspection data and results, c.
Inspection personnel are qualified and certified in accordance with the requirements of applicabic codes or standards and are persons other than those who performed or directly supervised that activity being inspected.
The qualifications and certifications of inspection personnel are maintained current, d.
Where direct inspection or testing is impossible or disadvantageous, indirect control by monitoring process
- methods, equipment, or personnel is employed.
When necessary to provide an adequate level of product quality assurance, both direct control (inspection and testing) and indirect control (process monitoring) are utilized.
When sampling plans are used, their applicability is evaluated and justified in writing, e.
Measuring and test equipment used to obtain quantitative data for acceptance criteria shall have an accuracy equal to, or greater
- than, the required tolerances of the measurement being taken.
The Quality Assurance department is responsible' for inspection of plant structures,
- systems, and components.
The Nuclear Station Engineering department is responsible for scheduled ISI Program examinations and inspections.
Inspections conducted includes maintenance and modification inspection, receipt inspection, new fuel inspection, inspections of surveillance tests, inspections of func-tional and preoperational tests, ISI examinations and inspections,l i
and housch ' ping inspection.
The Quality Assurance department is responsible for evaluating and determining the acceptability of inspection results in accordance with specified inspect:.on criteria.
The Nuclear Station Engineering department is responsible for evaluating and determining the acceptability of scheduled ISI Program examination and inspection results.
The Quality Assurance department and the Nuclear Station Engineering department may use the services of otner IP department personnel or may engage the scrvices of external organications to accomplish any inspectLonc, evaluations or reviews of inspection and test results.
REVISION:
1s NU rorm moo-n?
(10-88)
M 02172
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM GUALITY AOCURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 10 Suppliers A responsible for establishing and ' implementing inspec-tion progrc:s necessary to meet the recuirementa specified in the arocurement documents.
The need to invo'<e the requirements of ANSI N45.2.6 on suppliers is evaluated by the Quality Assurance department and the Nuclear Station Engineering department during the review of procurement documents for items and services.
The complexity of the item and the extent of source and receipt inspection are factors which are considered when determining whether or not to invoke ANSI N45.2.6.
IPQA conducts periodic surveillances and audits of the various esta-blished inspection programs and their im,lementation to ensure com-pliance with the provisions described in
.tems "a" through "e" above.
10.3 RESPONSIBILITIES t
10.3,1 CPS Plant Staff a.
Develop and itnolement a program that provides for in-spection of wor'< operations performed at CPS.
10.3.2 Nuclear Station Engineering Specify inspection criteria and requirements in technical a.
documents and procurement requisitions.
b.
Specify inspection and acceptance criteria for nonde-structive examination in work documents.
Develop and itnplement an inspection program for scheduled c.
ISI Program examinations and inspections.
d.
Maintain qualif.ied and certified inspection personnel in accordance with appropriate standards.
10.3.3 Quality Assurance n.
Develop and implement an inspection program for CPS.
b.
Maintain qualified and certified inspection personnel in accordance with appropriate standards, c.
Verify through surveillances and audits that suppliers performing work at CPS are in compliance with the ap-proved inspection program.
d.
Conduct periodic surveillances and audits of-inspection programs to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
PAGE 3 of 3 REVISION:
1s 2-14-89 DATE8 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H.02172
1 IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM
[
GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL '
CHAPTER g
11 TEST CONTROL N
SW 6
APPROVED BY MANAGER-0UALITY ASSURANCE i
11.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for the control of a test program which will assure that the safety-related structures, systems or components being tested meet specified performance criteria.
11.2 DESCRIPTION
The IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program addresses requirements and responsibilities for establishing and conducting test programs for the following:
.a.
Verification testa prior to installation, b.
Surveillance testing.
c.
Tests essociated with plant maintenance, modifica-tions, repairs or procedural changes.
Test programs are developed to assure that the required tests are performed in accordance with approved written procedures which incorporate or reference the design requirements and acceptance criteria and provide for the following, as required:
a.
Statement of test objective (s):
b.
Test prerequisites, to be fulfilled prior to the test, including requirements for calibrated instru-ments, suitable environmental conditions, appropriate equipment and personnel availability: and condition of the item to be tested and condition of the test equipmenti P A G E '1 o f 3 REVISION:
15 DATE:
05/03/90 roRM NIOO-176 (10-85)
M.02171
IP NUCLEAR P. 0 GRAM 9
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANU4L CHAPTER 11 c.
Precautions to be taken in the breparation and performance of the test, including limits of parame-ters if variations outside the normal ranges are prescribed:
d.
Mandatory inspection hold points for witness by inspection personnels c.
Instructions for performance of the test, including the use of appropriate instruments, equipment and personnels f.
Data to be acquiredi and g.
Acceptanec/ rejection criteria.
Test schedules are provided and maintained in order to assure that ecessary testing is performed and proactly evaluated on a time.
basis and that the safety of the p:. ant is dependent on performance of systems which have satisfactorily passed required tests.
Testing is conducted by appropriately trained and qual-ified personnel.
Test results are documented to facilitate evaluation and to provide a permanent record.
Test evaluations are performed to assure that performance characteristics conform to design.
Repair, rework and/or retesting are scheduled for accomplishment as identified by the test evaluation.
11.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 11.3.1 CPS Plant Staff f
a.
Develop and implement programs that specify and control the testing of structures, components and
- systems, b.
Develcp and implement test schedules to ensure that tests are performed on a timely basis, n
c.
Ensure that test personnel are qualified and trained to perform their function.
d.
Perform the required tests.
e.
Review and approve test procedures and results for surveillance testing.
i f.
Review and approve post-maintenance test results.
e PAGE2 of 3 REVISION:
in 1
FORM N100-177 (10-68)
N.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROCRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CilAPTER 11 g.
Review and approve post-modification ' test results.
11.3.2 Nuclear Station Engineering a.
Establish test requirements and acceptance criteria for post-mod.ficat:.on testing.
b.
Review and approve aost-modification and/or special test results as deta:. led in approved procedures.
c.
Review and evaluate test results as required by the ISI Program.
11.3.3 Quality Assurance a.
Review and approve test procedures to assure that QA-requirements are included.
l b.
Approve test results as specified in the implementing procedures.
c.
Conduct periodic surveillances and audits of the test program and to ensure the test program complies with the requirements of this chapter.
l l
l l
PAGE 3 of 3 i_
REVISION:
13 l
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H.02l72
- - - _ ~
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM lWl E
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL
+.,,
+ m,a
.s e nu CHAPTER 4
1 12
(
CONTROL OF MEASURINC 4'iD TEST EQUIPMENT
[
n y1 b M,d#
MMM APPROVED BY: MANAGER-0UALITY ASSURANCE 12.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE
\\
To define the measures and responsibilities to assure tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devicea (M&TE) used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits.
Measures shall also be defined for the control of perma-nently installed instrument and control devices.
12.2 DESCRIPTION
M&TE is procedurally defined as equipment used to quantitatively generate or measure physical parameters with a known degree of accuracy for the purpose of calibration, inspection, test, or repair of plant mechanical, electrical or instrument / control equipment.
In order to assure the accuracy of measuring and test equipment and installed instrument and control devices which recuire calibration or calibration check is maintained within specified limits, a written program for the control and calibration of such devices is provided.
This program includes the following provisions:
a.
For M&TE, the reference standards have an accuracy of at least four.(4) times the required accuracy of the equip-ment being calibrated, or when this is not aossible, have an accuracy that assures the equipment be:.ng calibrated will be within the required tolerance and that the basis of acceptance is documented and authorized by super-l
- visors, b.
The reference standarde used for calibrations are required to be traceabic to nationally recognized stan-dards or accepted values of natural physical v=nstants to the extent oossible.
When this is not possible, the basis for ca:.ibration of a reference standard is required to be documented, t
l PAGE 1 nr 9 REVISION:
3 O
8 FoRH Hl00-176 (10 88) l M.02i7:
l
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL-CitAPTER 12 i
l c.
Calibration intervals for M&TE and' installed instrument and control devices are based upon the type of equipment, stability, reliability characteristics, required accuracy and other conditions affecting calibration.
d.
Calibrations are performed by comparison with valid standards and using approved written procedures.
e.
Calibration standards are maintained and used in a
controlled environment which does not adversely affect the calibration procedure or standard.
f.
The calibration status, including the due date of next calibration of each item of M&TE, is visible through use of tags, labels or decals attached to the equipment or a i
statusing system, g.
M&TE and installed instrument ant control devices requir-ing calibration are assigned identification numbers traceable to the calibration records which includes the calibration "AS FOUND" and "AS LEFT" data for the equimment calibrated at the plant.
If the equipment is calibrated by an outside service organization, a
certificate of calibration complete with AS FOUND" and "AS LEFT" calibration data is required.
Such certificates and da n sheets bear the aasigned equipment e
identification numbers and the identification of the calibration standard used and are traceable to the individual calibration records, h.
M&TE is not used past the expiration of the calibration period.
i.
If selected installed instrument and control devices are found to be out of calibration,. an evaluation concerning the validity of previous inspection and test results is performed and documented.
If M&TE is found to be out of calibration, an evaluation concerning the validity of previous inspection and test results and the acceptability of items previously inspected or tested since the time of the last calibration check is made and documented.
Correctivo action is taken in accordance with Chapter 16 when such evaluations invalidate a
' previous acceptance.
j.
A calibration tracking system is established to ensure that recalibration is performed in accordance with pre-established calibration frequencies.
PAGE 2 of 3 REVISION:
1t FORM N100-177 (10 88)
M,02172
IP NUCLEAR PR00 RAM QUALITY AOCURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 12
)
CPS Plant Staff is assigned the responsibility' for establishing and implementing the program for the control of M&TE and installed instrument ar.d control devices used in operation, maintenance, test and/or inspection activities which fall within the scope of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
Suppliers performing services or providing products to CPS are required to have comparable control programs in effect for items affecting
- systems, structures and components within the scope of the QA program.
The IP Quality Assurance organization conducts periodic surveillances and audits of the controls applied to measuring and test equipment to determine compliance with the provisions described in items "a"
through "j" above.
12.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 12.3.1 CPS Plant Staff a.
Develop w.7d implement programs to control the use of M&TE used at CPS.
b.
Develop and implement programs to calibrate and recall f
Ensure the appropriate requirements for the control of c.
M&TE are included in Plant Staff initiated technical i
documents and procurement requisitions, d.
Develop and implement programs to control the use of installed instrument and control devices.
12.3.2 Quality Assurance a.
Review the M&TE control program of suppliers performing work at CPS.
b.
Conduct periodic surveillances and audits of the controls applied to M&TE and installed instrument and control devices to determine compliance with the requirements of this manual.
i PAGE 3 of 3
(
REVISION:
35 DATE:
2-14-89 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172
_ _ _. _. - - -. _ _.. ~.., _.
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM h
GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER bh 13 HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING APPROVED BY: W "AGER-OUALITY AGSURANCE M
k 0
l 13.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requi.rements and responsibilities for the control of handling, storage, shipping, packaging, cleaning and preservation of materials aad equipment to prevent damage or deterioration.
13.2 DESCRIPTION
The IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program includes procedures which assure special
- handling, preservation,
- storage, cleaning, packaging and shipping requirements are accomplished by trained individuals in accordance with plant procedures to prevent damage or deterioration.
The procedures will p'rovide for the control of heavy loads and safe load paths to protect safety systems and radioactive material from damage.
In addition to the handling, storage and shipping requirements imposed on suppliers by IP through appropriate technical and procurement documents, suppliers may also be required to provide information to Nuclear Planning &
Support related to the proper handling, storage and shipping of furnished material s, parts and components.
Nuclear Planning &
Support uses this information for the development of the e'.orage and handling procedures and instructions to be applied to an item.
The procedures.md instructions will provide for the preservation of special ite.as that are subject to deterioration or damage through exposure to air, moisture, temperature, or other environ-ments and use of special hcndling tools and equipment.
Consumable materials such as chemicals, reagents and lubricants maintained in storerooms and warehouses are controlled procedur-ally by an inventory control system which includes provisions for identifying storage requirements by commodity and identifying shelf life by commodity, when applicable.
Disposal of commodities whose shelf life has expired is addressed and controlled by procedures.
The Quality Assurance department conducts periodic surveillances, audits and document reviews to determine if appropriate procedures and controls are being applied regarding handling, storage and shipping of materials and equipment.
PAGE 1 of ?
REVISION:
15 DATE:
05/03/90
)
rORM NIOO-176 (10-88)
M.02171
1 l
IP NUCLEAR PRCORAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 13 13.3 RESPONSIBILITIES l
13.3.1 CPS Plant f,ta f f j
a'.
Develop and implement programs to provide fnr the use of special handling tools and equipment.
b.
Develop and implement programs to control the han-dling, storage and shipping of radioactive materials.
13.3.2 Nuclear Station Engineering a.
Ensure that appropriate handling, storage and shipping requirements are identified in technical documents that are prepared or reviewed by the department.
b.
Specify in procurement documents that suppliers furnishing materials and equipment within the scope of this program implerant appropriate controls for l
handling, shipping and storage of such items.
13.3.3 Nuclear Planning and Support a.
Ensure that suppliers furnish the required information relating to the proper handling, storage and shipping of procured items.
b.
Develop and implement programs to control the han-dling, storage and shipping of items to be used in CPS, including radioactive materials.
c.
Develop and implement programs to provide for the preservation of items in storage that are subject to deterioration or damage through exposure o harsh t
environmental elements or conditions, d.
Ensure that appropriate handling, storage and shipping requirements are identified in procuremant requisi-tions.
13.3.4 Quality Assuranc_e a.
Conduct periodic surveillances, audits and document reviews to verify that appropriate procedures and controls are being implemented in accordance with the requirements of this chapter.
a I
PAGE 2 of 2 REVISION:
15 05/03/90 D E. :
i FORM NI00-177 (10-68)
M 02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM
['
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL '
n'. '.
CHAPTER 6,8 14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS b
HdY b
APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE
(
14.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for identifying the inspection, testing and operational status of materials, parts, components and assemblies to assure that only items which have passed the required inspections and tests are installed or operated.
14.2 DESCRIPTION
The IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.includee procedures which assure the inspection, test and operating stacus of materials, parts and components are identified during the receiving, installation and operating processes.
These procedures provide for:
a.
Clear indication of the status of inspection and tests performed upon individual items by the use of markings such as a) stamps applied directly to the item, tags, or labels attached to the item, b) routing cards that accompany the item, or c) identification numbers which are traceable to records of the status of inspections and tests.
If control stamps are used, a record of t'he assignment of the control stamp is maintainedi however, if a stamp is lost or if the stamp holder no longer requires the stamp, that stamp number is retired.
When impression stamping is used, it conforms to the requirements of codes and applic-able specifications and standards.
When markings are applied directly to items, consideration is given to ensure the markings have no deleterious effects on the
- items, b.
Assurance that required inspections or tests are not inadvertently bypassed.
In cases where required documenting evidence is not available, the associated equipment or materials must be considered nonconforming in accordance with Chapter 15 of the QA PAGE 1 of 3 REVISION:_3 DATE:
05/03/90 FORM Nt00-176 (l0-88)
H.02t71
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASOURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 14 Manual.
Until suitable documenting evidence is available to show the equipment or material is in conformance, affected systems shall be concidered to be inoperable and reliance shall not be placed on such systems to fulfill their intended safety functions.
c.
Clear indication, by the use of a tag and/or statusing
- system, of the operational status of structures, systems and components when in any status other than a normal operable status to prevent inadvertent opera-tion.
CPS Plant Staff is responsible for indicating the test and operat-ing status of materials, parts, components and assemblies at CPS.
Nuclear Planning and Support is responsible for maintaining inspection and test status of items in storage.
Quality Assurance is responsible for the identification of the inspection status on materials, parts and components.
As imposed by the contract documents, suppliers performing activities at CPS or furnishing materials, parts, components or assemblies for use at CPS also have responsibilities for the identification of inspection, test and operating status of items under their control.
CPS Plant Staff and the QA department review and approve the programs of suppliers performing work at CPS to ensure compatibility with the CPS status indication system.
The Quality Assurance department conducts periodic surveillances and audits to determine implementation and adequacy - '
measures used to indicate inspection, test and operating status to meet the lequirements of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
14.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 14.3.1 CPS Plant Staff a.
Develop and implement programs to indicate inspection, test and operating status of materials, parts, compo-
- nents, sub-systems and. systems during installation, modification, repair, testing and operation of CPS.
b.
Review and approve the programs of suppliers performing work at CPS to ensure compatibility with the CPS status indication system.
c.
Establish and implement procedures and control the status of radiological samples.
i S
PAGE 2 of 3 REVISION:
15 DATE:
05/03/90 F MM NIOo-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ACOURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 14 14.3.2 Nuclear Planning and Support a.
Establish and implement procedures to control the inspection and test status of items in storage.
14.3.3 Quality Assurance a.
Review and approve the programs of suppliers performing work at CPS to ensure compatibility with the various status indicating systems.
b.
Develop and implement programs to indicate receipt inspection status of materials, parts and components.
c.
Develop and implement programs to indicate status of nonconforming items.
d.
Conduct periodic surveillances and audits of the implementation and adequacy of programs used to indicate inspection, test and operating status to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
PAGE 3 of 3 REVISION:
1_ c FORM hloo-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM
[1 QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL
" 7"L[,""j,['"
CHAPTER e
a 15 7 ~ JUdC (
f
.a ec..u sw NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE M
M/MM 15.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To describe the measures established and implemented to control items, services or activities which do not conform to require-l ments, and the measures to control further processing, delivery or installation of nonconforming or defective items.
l l
15.2 DESCRIPTION
The following measures have been established and implemented at CPS:
a.
Control of nonconformances is accomplished in accor-l dance with documented procedures.
1 b.
Nonconformances are documented by means which also ensure that affected organizations are no'tified.
c.
Nonconforming items are identified and controlled.
Except for installed items, they are placed in a segregated storage area when practical.
Such i
storage areas are identified as containing only nonconforming items.
When segregation is impossible or impractical, the nonconforming item shall be identified and controlled by tagging, marking or documentation traceable to the
- item, including normally ins talled items or those removed from the normally installed location.
l d.
Further use or installation of nonconforming items is controlled in accordance with written procedures and/or instructions.
The responsibility and authority for the disposition e.
of nonconformances is defined.
PAGE 1 of 5 REVISION:
7g DAM:
2 M FORM N100-176 (10-88)
H.02171
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 15 f.
Permissible dispositions are:
a )' "use as is",
b)
" rework" to drawing or specification requirements, c) " repair" to an acceptable level, d) " reject" for that particular use, or e) "other" for non-hardware nonconformances, g.
" Repair" and " rework" dispositions are implemented into the affected item in accordance with documented procedures and/or instructions, h.
The disposition, along with its engineering analysis and any resultant reinspection and/or acceptance verification, are documented.
1,
" Rework" and " repair" actions are described, depend-ing on complexity by individual procedures or by in-structions contained in the corresponding work control document.
Each procedure or instruction details required inspections and tests.
Specified inspections and tests are equivalent to original requirements.
Acceptable alternatives to original inspection or test requirements may be used provided they are assessed for adequacy and' the rationale documented and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Department.
j.
Reports documenting nonconforming items are reviewed by the Quality Assurance department prior to close-out to verify that the nonconformances were properly documented, dispositioned, corrected and inspection and/or acceptance verification is completed.
Inservice items that are, found to be nonconforming shall be reviewed to determine equipment operability as defined by the Technical Specifications.
For items that represent significant conditions adverse to quality or safety, or require a repair or use-as-is disposition, an engineering evaluation shall be performed.
The engineering evaluation shall provide support for the initial operability decision and provide the correction or resolution for the identified nonconformance.
These items shall be controlled in accordance with approved procedures.
Installed items not inservice that are nonconforming or become nonconforming as a result of maintenance shall be corrected or resolved prior to operational reliance.
These items shall be controlled in accordance with approved procedures.
PAGE 2 of 5 REVISION:
1 rs 3
FORM NIDO-177 (10-88)
H.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 15 i
A nonconforming item may be conditionally released for fabrication, installation or testing followit.g an engineering evaluation to determine if such a conditional release is not detrimental to other components or systems.
Conditional released items are controlled in accordance with approved procedures.
The nonconformance for the conditionally released item shall be corrected or resolved prior to operational reliance.
The Manager - Clinton Power Station has t.he authority to condi-tionally release any item for installation or operations if needed to place the plant in a safe and stable condition.
Procurement documents require that suppliers have similar mea-sures established for the identification, control, and disposi-tioning of nonconformances and that recommended dispositions of "use-as-is" or " repair" must be reported to IP for approval.
The IP Quality Assurance department conducts periodic surveil-lances and audits of the programs instituted for the identifica-tion and control of nonconformances to ensure compliance with the requirements of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
15.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 15,3.1 All Nuclear Program Personnel a.
All Nuclear Program personnel are responsibic for s
identifying and reporting nonconforming materials, parts, cCmponents, services and activities.
15.3.2 Nuclear Program Departments a.
All Nuclear Program Departments are responsible for establishing and implementing effective procedure (s) for identifying, documenting and controlling noncon-formances within the scope of their departments activities as described in this chapter of the QA manual.
15.3.3 CPS Plant Staff a.
Authorice the conditional release of items.
l b.
Evaluate and
- document, together with
- NSED, the safety significance of nonconforming items.
REVISION:
1A
}
FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02l72
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 15 l
c.
Develop and implement procedures, instructions or work control documents for the correction of noncon-forming items with repair or rework dispositions.
15.3.4 Nuclear Planning & Support a.
Establish and implement an effective program for processing supplier nonconformance reports.
15.3.5 Nuclear Station Engineering Establish and implement a program for dispositioning a.
nonconforming items that ensure "use-as-is" or
" repair" dispositions are approved by the appropri-ate design organization, b.
Evaluate and document, together with Plant Staff, the safety significance of nonconforming items, c.
Perform engineering evaluati;ns for conditionally releaced items, d.
Determine acceptable alternatives to original inspection or test requirements for
" rework" or
" repair" dispositions, e.
Document engineering analyses that support the disposition of nonconforming items.
15.3.6 Quality Assurance a.
Establish and implement a program for verifying acceptable disposition implementation as required by the disposition of nonconformances, b.
Establish and implement programs for the review of nonconformances to verify effectiveness in meeting the requirements of this chapter.
c.
Perform review of conditional release justifications, d.
Ensure that procurement documents require suppliers to establish a nonconformance program consistent with this chapter.
PAGE 4 of 5 REVISION:
y FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 15 Conduct periodic surveillances/ audits of the Noncon-e.
formance Program at CPS to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter, 15.3.7 Facility Review Group a.
Review documented safety evaluation for condition-ally released items in accordance with the require-ments of 10CFR50,59.
PAGE 5 of 5 REVISION:
Ig -
^
FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
M,02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM
~ r01Z"
[.
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER kr-bs=g 16 nw a,
CORRECTIVE ACTION
- #>b FN APPROVED BY MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE j
16.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To describe the measures established and implemented to assure that conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality are promptly identified and corrected; and that significant conditions are identified, evaluated, documented, corrected, reported and independently reviewed.
16.2 DESCRIPTION
Each IP organization and supplier _ performing activities or supplying services, materials, parts or components applicable to this program is required to establish and implement a documented corrective action procedure (s) which assures that conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality are promptly identified, reported to supervisory personnel, analyzed for significance and corrected, Personnel or organizations identifying conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality have the responsibility to report such conditions to the appropriate functional organization who will promptly correct the condition.
Conditions adverse to plant safety will be reported to Plant Operations personnel for assessment of operational
- impact, Reporting may be accomplished through various reporting documents as defined in documented procedures.
An analysis of the significance of conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality is performed by personnel cognizant of the condition and its resultant effects on plant safety or operability.
The IP Quality Assurance Department performs trend analysis on conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality to determine if a trend representing a significant condition adverse to plant. safety and/or quality exists.
Nuclear Station Engineering performs trend analysis of conditions documented on maintenance work documents to identify equipment failure and reliability concerns.
The results of these trend analyses are documented and reported to appropriate management of the area in which the trends are identified.
Reports to management include a history and analysis of the adveree condi-tions and trends identified.
PAGE 1 of 3 REVISION:
75 DATE:
2-14-89 j
FORM N100-I76 (10-88) l M,02171
~ -
=.
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM QUALITY ACOURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 16 In the case of significant conditions adverse to' plant safety and/or quality, including significant adverse trends, the functional organi-zation responsible for the significant condition will analyze the condition for causes, take appronriate and timely action to preclude recurrence and implement follow-up action as appropriate to verify implementat. ion of corrective action.
The actions taken will be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management.
Corrective action is evaluated by the Quality Assurance Department to determine its effectiveness, including steps taken to identify the cause of significant conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality and action taken to preclude recurrence.
Documented correc-tive action for significant conditions adverse to plant safety is also reviewed by the Nuclear Review and Audit Group.
These reviews are documented and are carried out in accordance with a documented program.
16.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 16.3.1 All Nuclear Program Fersonnel a.
All Nuclear Program personnel are responsible for identi-fying and reporting condicions adverse to plant safety and/or quality.
16.3.2 Nuclear Program Departments a.
Establish and implement a corrective action procedure (s) which assures that conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality a re promptly identified, reported, anal-yzed for significance and corrected.
In the case of significant conditions, the-procedure (s) requires an analysis.for causes, action to preciide recurrence, and followup to verify implementation of cerrective action.
16.3.3 Plant Staff a.
Assess conditions adverse to plant safety for operational impact.
16.3.4 Quality Assurance a.
Establish and administer a trend analysis program for l
conditions adverse to plant safety and/or quality.
I PAGE 2 of 3 f
REVISION:
15 DATE:
2-14-89 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H.02l72 l
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ACCURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 16 1
b.
Evaluate corrective action to detchnine its effective-ness.
c.
Conduct periodic surveillances and audits of the correc-tive action program to ensure compliance with the re-quirements of this chapter.
16.3.5 Nuclear Station Engineering
-a.
_ Perform trend analysis of conditions documented on-Main-tenance Work Requests to identify equipment failure and reliability.
16.3.6 Nuclear Review and Audit Group a.
Review significant conciitions adverse to plant safety in accordance with a documented program.
PAGE 3 of 3 REVISION:
15 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172
l IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM y' e
[
QUALITY ACSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 66 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS b
N APPROVED BY: MANAGER-0UALITY ASSURANCE 17.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for collection, compilation, storage and retrieval of records necessary to provide evidence of quality in the design, fabrication, installation, inspection, testing and operating activities related to the Clinton Power Station.
17.2 DESCRIPTION
Sufficient records, identifiable to the item or activity to which they apply, filed in an orderly manner and retrievable are main-tained by Nuclear Planning and Support Department, Records Manage-ment Group, in the records storage facilities.
l Test and inspection records shall contain the following information:
a.
Identity of the inspector or data recorder; b.
Type of observationi c.
Date and-results of the test or inspection (quantita-tive and qualitative);
d.
Acceptability of the test or inspection results; and e.
Action taken and rationale to resolve any problems noted.
Departments generating records or departments receiving records from other departments or suppliers transfer them to Nuclear Planning and Support, Records Management Group, f oi-retention.
The Records Management Group processes (indexes, microfilms, etc.)
and maintains the records for retention in the records storage facilities.
The preparation, collection,
- review, acceptance, turnover / transfer, processing, transmittal, retention and retrieval of records is accomplished in accordance with documented standards and procedures.
Some quality assurance records may be PAGEl nf 1 REVISION:
ig DATE:
05/03/90 rORM NIOO-176 (10-88)
M.0217I
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM OUALITY ACCURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 17 kept by suppliers and maintained on an available basis for a specified period of time.
Such records are required to be offered to IP after the suppliers no longer plan to keep them.
The retention times for the various quality assurance records are in accordance with applicable requirements including
- 10CFR50, Technical Specifications and nationally recogniced standards and codes.
Records are maintained in the records storage facilities that provides controlled access and protection against
- fire, flooding, vermin and decay.
Nuclear Planning and Support is responsible for the definition and implementation of activities related to records.
The Quality Assurance department conducts periodic audits of records systems to ensure compliance in meeting the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program requirements.
17.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 17.3.1 Nuclear Program Departments a.
Develop and implement departmental procedures or instructions for records preparation, collection, r e' view, turnover / transfer,
- receipt, retention and retrieval which implement the Records Management Program and Standards, b.
Transfer completed Quality Assurance records to Nuclear Planning and Support Records Management Group for processing, maintenance and retention.
17.3.2 Nuclear Planning and. Support a.
Establish, maintain and implement a Records Manage-ment Program including Standerds covering the prepa-
- ration, collection,
- review, turnover / transfer, processing, retention and retrieval of records generated in performing activities within the scope of this program.
b.
Receive, process (index, microfilm, etc.), maintain and retain QA records in the records storage facilities.
c.
Maintain the CPS records storage facilities such that completed quality assurance records are kept in accordance~with the requirements of this manual.
~
PAGE 2 of 3 REVISION:
1e FORM NIDO-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PR2 CRAM OUALITY ACCURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 17 17.3.3 Quality Assurance a,
. Conduct periodic audits of records systems to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
PAGE 3 of 3 REVISION:
1A
- DATE, 05/03/90 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M 02172
i IP NUCLEAR PRO' DRAM M1 QUALITY AOCURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 18
]
AUDITS APPROVED BY: MANAGER-OUALITY ASSURANCE
_b MsY 0
l 18.1 PURPOSE / SCOPE To define the requirements and responsibilities for implementing the program of planned and periodic audits which shall verify compliance with the quality assurance program and determine the effectiveness in meeting program objectives.
18.2 DESCRIPTION
IP's Quality Assurance -3rogram includes provisions for planned and periodic audits designec to verify comp.liance with the requirements of the IP Nuclear Quality. Assurance Program and. to determine the effectiveness in implementing the program objectives..
The IP Quality-Assurance organization has the responsibility for implement-ing the QA audit program.
The audit. program provides for the frllowing:
a.
Provisions are made for both internal and external audits.
b.
Audits include the full range. of activities within the
., m m
' ' ' q" g scope of the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
,, ' L'
. Additionally, QA program audits include indoctrination and training programs interface control between IP, the audited organizations and other affected organizationsi USAR commitments: and Technical Specification require-y.g ments.
c.
Provisions are made for regularly scheduling audits i1 i
- i based upon the status and importance of the activities, d.
A qualification system is established for auditing personnel.
Independent certifying agencies may be used for the development and administration of lead auditor examinations.
c.
Personnel conducting audits do not have 'any direct responsibilities for the activities being audited.
PAGE1 nf 1 REVISION:
DATE:
05/03/90 FORM M 00- 176 (10 68)
M.02171 1
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM l
QUALITY AOSURANCE MANUAL CHAPTER 18 l
l f.
The audit team leader is charged with instructing the other members during audit preparation and performance.
Personnel conducting audits shall have training and/or experience with the activities being audited, g.
Written audit plans are developed which identify the scope, requirements, activities to be audited, organiza-tions
- involved, applicable documents, schedule and written procedures or checklists to be used for each audit.
h.
Audit results are documented, reports are generated and retained.
i.
Audit reports are distributed to responsible management of the auditing organization and to the appropriate managerial level of the organization having responsibil-ity for the area or activity audited, j.
Appropriate corrective action is developed, k.
Followup action (including re-audits) is taken to verify that corrective action has been completed and the resolution documented.
Within the Quality Assurance organization, the Supervisor Audits has the responsibility for maintaining and implementing an audit plan which verifies that applicable elements of the Quality Assurance program have been developed, documented, and implemented in accordance with the requirements of this manual.
Audits will be initiated as early in the life of the activity as practicable consistent with the schedule for accomplishing the activity to assure timely implementation of the quality assurance requirements.
The plan is reviewed periodically to insure that it is current and may be augmented at any time based on recorumendations from the Nuclear Review and Audit Group, or Nuclear Program personnel as the scope of work and other requirements for auditing.an activity change.
Audited organizations are required to review and provide timely written response to audit reports stating corrective action taken or planned to correct deficient areas and prevent recurrence.
Audit program requirements are imposed on suppliers by appropriate con-tract or procurement documents.
Reports of internal audits are forwarded to the Nuclear Review and Audit Group and the Independent Safety Engineering Group for program PAGE2 of 3 REVISION:
p FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PRSORAM G.UALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL CllAPTER 18 evaluation.
IP Management obtains an independent audit of the IP Quality Assurance organization on an annual basis.
18.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 18.3.1 Nuclear Program Departments a.
Maintain a program for determining and implementing corrective actions to audits.
18.3.2 Licensing and Safety a.
Independent Safety Engineering Group review reports of internal oudits for program evaluation.
18.3.3 Nuclear Review and Audit Group a.
Review reports of internal audits for program evaluation.
18.3.4 Quality Assurance a.
Inplement an internal audit program and audit each IP organization performing activities within the scope of the QA program to verify that the requirements of this manual are being met, b.
Implement an external audit program and audit suppliers performing activities within the scope of the IPQA
~
program to verify compliance with the suppliers' re-spective quality assurance programs,
- contract, spect-fications and requirements.
c.
Coordinate for the Vice President the performance of independent audits of the QA organization.
d.
Implement-a program for evaluating the adequacy of corrective actions to audits.
PAGE 3 of 3 REVISION:
17 FORM NIOo-177 (10-88)
N.02l72
~
IP NUCLEAR PROORAM APPENDIX A QUALITY ACOURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX A REVISIONS TO THE IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM i
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL Revisions to the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual may be issued by either, or a combination of two ways :
whole page l
replacements, or directions to manual holders to make pen and ink changes.
Revisions are noted by a
sequential number (the original issue is designated REVISION 0 with subsequent issues as REVISIONS'1, 2,
3, etc.) and by the DATE of issue in the lower right hand corner of the page.
The Quality Aesurance department shall approve distribution of the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual and all revisions thereto.
Manuals may be distributed as either controlled or uncontrolled copies.
Controlled manual holders will receive-all revisions ' to the taanual.
Revisions will not be routinely sent to holders of - uncontrolled manuals.
Persons assigned custody of controlled copies of the manual are responsible for maintaining the manual in accordance with the following:
1.
For each revision
- issued, the manual holder will roccive the revised
- material, an updated List of Effective Pages and an accompanying transmittal letter providing instructions for the recipient to follow in updating the manual and reporting receipt and compli-ance with. updating instructions.
2.
When revised material is provided, the, obsolete materi-al shall be removed and destroyed by the manual holder.
3.
Requests for copies of the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance Manual or recommendations for revisions or corrections should be directed to the Manager - Quality Assurance in writing from the manager of the requesting organization.
The precise change or revision and the reason / justification for the recommendation should be addressed.
Proposed revisions to the IP Nuclear Program Quality Assurance
[
Manual will be sent to affected department managers and/or directors for their review prior to issuance by the Manager Quality Assurance.
I PAGE A-1 of 1 1
REVISION:
1A 2-14-89 DATE:
I FORM N100 177 (10-88)
H.02l72 l
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX B l
APPENDIX B l
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION l
IP NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM i
This __ appendix - details in matrix form the chapters of this manual e,
which are applicable in full or in part to:
Fire Protection Security Environmental Radwaste/ Augmented D Systems Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material 10CFR50 Appendix _ B requires that a quality assurance program be established in writing and executed for activities affecting the safety-related function of designated structures, systems _and compo-nonts to an extent consistent with their importance to safety.
Table 3.2-1 in the Clinton Power Station USAR identifies specifically those structures, systems and components that are important to safety.
gr Fire Protection,
- Security, Environmental and Radwaste/ Augmented D systems.are specifically identified in Table 3.2-1 of the CPS USAR and/or highlighted in several Regulatory Guides that define and clarify their importance to the plant.
! Regulatory Guide 1.120, " Fire' Protection Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1-(November ~1977) states that, "A quality assurance (QA) program is needed to identify and rectify errors in. ' design, construction and operation (of a fire. protection system) and is an essential part of defense in depth".
Regulatory Guide 4.15, " Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Normal Operations)
Effluent - Streams and the Environment," Revision 1 (February 1979),
states that, "The'need of quality assurance is implicit in all re-quirements for effluent and environmental monitoring."
Regulatory
"...to ensure that Guide _1.143, Revision 0 (July 1978) states that, systems will perform their -intended function a quality _ assurance program sufficient to ensure that all design, construction and testing provisions are met should be established and documented."
Regulatory' Guide 1.17,
" Protection of Nuclear Power Plants Against Industrial Sabotage," Revision 1 (June 1973), requires programmatic controls over the design, construction, testing and operation of the security system at nuclear power plants.
B-1 of 12 15 PAGE REVISION:
DATE: 08/08/91 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL APPEND'.h B 10CFR Part 71
" Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive
' Material," Section 71.101, " Quality Assurance Requirements," requires-that licensees have a quality assurance program that has been submit-ted to and approved by the NRC as satisfying the provisions of Subpart H of Part 71. - Subpart H requires, in part, that licensees' quality assurance programs satisfy each-of the applicable criteria specified in Section 71.101 to an extent consistent with their importance-to safety.
" Establishing Quality -
Assurance Programs-for Packaging Used in the Transport of Radioactive Material", Annex 2, provides quality assurance programs applicable to Procurement,
- Use, Maintenance, and Repair of Packaging Used in Transport of' Radioactive Material.
The extent to which the IP Nuclear Quality Assurance Program applies to each of the four areas varies as_ defined further under subsequent sections of this appendix.
The attached matrix outlines which chap-ters of this manual apply to Fire Protection, Security, Environmental and Radwasto/ Augmented D systems and Packaging and Transportation -of Radioactive Material.
a r
B-2 of 12 15 PAGE REVISION:
DATE:
08/08/91 FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
H,02l72
-.m++
.y, e--
y
- m
-e
IP NUCLEAR mROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANU AL APPENDIX B MATRIX CHAPTERS OF THE IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL APPLICABLE TO FIRE PROTECTION, SECURITY, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND RADWASTE/ AUGMENTED D, AND PACKAGE AND TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL PACKAGE AND OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVE TRANSPORTATION QA MANUAL FIRE WASTE /
OF RADIOACTIVE CHAPTER PROTECTION SECURITY ENVIRONMENTAL AUGMENTED D MATERIAL 1.
YES NO YES YES YES 2.
YES NO YES YES YES 3.
YES NO NO YES YES 4.
YES NO YES YES YES 5.
YES NO YES YES YES 6.
YES NO YES YES YES 7,
YES NO YES YES YES
?
8.
NO NO YES NO YES 9.
NO NO NO YES YES 10.
YES NO NO YES YES 11.
YES NO-YES YES YES 12.
NO NO YES NO YES 13.
NO NO YES YES YES 14.
YES NO YES YES YES 15.
YES NO YES YES YES 16.
YES YES YES YES YES 17.
YES YES YES YES YES 18.
YES YES YES YES YES NOTE:
Structures, systems and components subject to the above re-quirements are described by USAR Table 3.2-1 and further i
defined by engineering cpecifications, drawings, procedures, instructions, other documents, etc.
-3 12 15 PAGE REVISION:
i FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
H 02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX B PIRE PROTECTION Chapter 1-Applicable Chapter 2-Applicable Chapter 3-Applicable Applicable.
Specification of quality assurance program Chapter 4
requirements for suppliers of fire protection materials, equipment and services shall be on a case-by-case basis.
Commercial grade or off-the-shelf items may provide an acceptable level of quality based on the the nature of the item.
This determination shall be made jointly by Engineering and Quality Assurance personnel prior to issuance of procurement documents.
Chapter 5-Applicable Chapter 6-Applicable Chapter 7-Applicable.
Suppliers providing material, equipment and services -for fire protection shall be subject to source evaluation and surveillance.
The extent of imposition of these requirements shall be determined on a
case-by-case basis by the design and quality assurance organizations responsible for review and approval of the procurement specifications.
Measures shall be established, as appropriate, for examination of products upon delivery.
Chapter _
8-Not Applicable Chapter 9-Not Applicable Chapter 10 -
Applicable only to inspection of those items and activities affecting the fire protection system within the quality assurance boundarios as specified in the
- USAR, Table 3.2-1 and further amplified by the appropriate design drawings.
Chapter 11 -
Applicable Chapter 12 -
Not Applicable Chapter 13 -
Not Applicable Chapter 14 -
Applicable PAGE REVISION:
FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
M.02172
IP -NUCLEAR PROGRAM-QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX B' Chapter 15 -
Applicable Chapter 16 -
Applicable ~
_l i
Chapter 17 -
Applicable to documents designated-as Quality Assurance Records generated in the implementation of the Fire Protection program and consistent with the requirements
' identified in Chapter 10 above.
Records are prepared
_and maintained to furnish evidence.that the applicable 4-criteria discussed herein are being met for activities affecting the Fire Protection program.
Chapter 18 -
Applicable._
Audits shall be performed and documented to verify compliance with the Fire Protection program, including design and procurement documents, instruc-procedu es and drawings and inspection and test
- tions, e
activities.
i l
W l
l l
B-5 of 12 15 PAGE REVISION:
08/08/M DATE:
FORM NIOO-177 (10-88)
H.02172
IP NUCLE AR: PROGR AM -
GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL APPErioIx a SECURITY l
Chapter 1-Hot Applicable Chapter 2-Not Applicable i
Chapter 3-Not Applicable Chapter 4 - -Not Applicable Chapter 5-Not Applicable Chapter 6-Not Applicable Chapter 7-Not Applicable Chapter 8-Not Applicable chapter 9-Not Applicable Chapter 10 -
Not Applicable Chapter 11 -
Not Applicable Chapter 12 -- Not Applicable Chapter 13 -
Not Applicable Not Applicable Chapter 14 Chapter 15 -
Not Applicable Chapter.16 -
Applicable Chapter 17 -
Applicable to those records required-by the CPS' Physical Security Plan.
Chapter 18 -
Applicable to the physical security of CPS and.desig-nated records.
B-6 of 12 15 PAGE REVISION:
FORM NICO-177 (10-88)
N 02172
l i
IP NUCLEAR ~ PROGRAM l
GUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX B ENVIRONMENTAL Chapter Applicable Chapter 2-Applicable Chapter 3-Not Applicable Applicable to procuroment of monitoring services to be Chapter 4
performed 'by contractors providing services dealing.
-with radiological data and to radionuclide reference
(
standards used for calibration of radic. tion measurement systems.
Chapter-S-
Applicable to all activities related to, carrying out the radiological monitoring program-including:
sample collection; packaging, shipment and receipt of samples I
for off-site.
analysis; procurement, maintenance, storage and use of radioactivity reference standards; calibration and checks of radiation and radioactivity measurement systems; and reduction, evaluation and reporting of data.
Chapter 6-Applicable to procedures and instructicns required by Chapter 5.
Chapter ~
7-Applicable to radionuclide reference standards used for
-calibration of radiation measurement systems and to radiological monitoring -activities.(services) provided by contractors.
Chapter 8-Applicable only to radiological sample collection, identification, packaging, shipping, receiving, storage and analysis.-.
Chapter 9-Not Applicable Chapter ?.0
- Not Applicable
. Chapter 11 -
Applicable to radioactivity measurements of samples,-
instrument backgrounds, replicate sampics and analyti-cal blanks; data reduction and verification;. computer program documentation and verification.
Chapter 12--
Applicable to laboratory instruments for radiation and radioactivity measurement, continuous radiological offluent monitoring systems and flow-rate measuring B-7 of 12 PAGE REVISION:
DATE:
08/08/91 g44joo-i77 (1o-88)
b,.
'IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM QUALITY-ASSUR ANCE M ANU AL APPE!iDIX B devices-associated with radiological effluent monitor-ing systems.
Chapter:13 - -Applicable to radiological samples only, j
Chapter 14 -
Applicable to continuous radiological effluent monitor-
.)
ing systems equipment only.
Chapter 15 -
Applicable
-Chapter 16 -
Applicable Chaptar 17 -
Applicable to personnel training and qualification; field and in-plant collection of samples; continuous
(
effluent-monitoring; sample receipt and laboratory identification; sample preparation and radiochemical processing; radioactivity-measurements of
- samples, instrument backgrounds and analytical blanks; data
-reduction and verification; instrument calibration and calibration standards;. computer program documentation; audits; and corrective action.
Chapter 18 -
Applicable-B-8 of 12 PAGE REVISION:
^
FORM NICO-177 (10-88)
H,02l72
- ~.
_ _ _ ~ _.
IP NUCJAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASCURANCE MANUAL APPENDIX n 4
t
~~
RADIOACTIVE WASTE / AUGMENTED "D" i
Chapter 1-Applicable Chapter 2-Applicablo Chaptor 3-Applicable Chapter 4-Applicable.
Spocification of, quality assuranco program requirements for suppliers of radioactive wasto/
3 augmented D materials, equipment and services shall be on a case-by-case basis.
Commercial grado or off-the-sholf items may provido an acceptablo level of quality based on the naturo of tho itom.
This datormination shall be mado jointly by Engir. coring and Quality Assur-ance personnel prior to issuance of procuromont docu-monto.
Chaptor 5-Applicable Chaptor 6-Applicablo Chapter 7-Applicable.
Suppliers providing material, equipmont and servicos for radioactive wasto/ augmented D shall bo
~,
subject to source evaluation and surveillance.
The extent of imposition of those requirements shall be determined on a case-by-case basis by the design and quality assurance organizations responsible for review and approval of the procuroment specifications.
Moa-sures shall be.ostablished, as appropriato, for examination of products upon delivery.
s Chapter 8-Not Applicable Chaptor 9-Applicable to the qualification of wolders and wolding procedures (ASME Section IX) for Radwasto/ Augmented "D" system.
(p1 assure boundarios only).
Chaptor 10 - ' Applicable only to inopoction *f thoso items and activ-ities affecting Radwasto/ Augmented D systems within the quality assuranco boundarios as specified in the USAR, Table 3.2-1, and further amplified by the appropriato design drawings.
Chaptor 11 -
Applicable Chapter 12 -
Net Applicable B-9 f 12 PAGE REVISION:
DATE:
08/08/91
{0 g oo-177 (io-as)
~... - -.
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE M ANUAL Appritorx n Chapter 13 - i.pplicabic Chapter 14 -
Applicablo chaptor 15 -
Applicabic Chaptor 16 -
Applicablu Chaptor 17 -
Applicablo Chapter la -
Applicablo 4
J D-10 of 12 PAGE REVISION:
^
FORM N100-177 (10-80)
N.02172
[
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM GUALITY ASSURANCE M ANUAL APPENDIX n PACKAGING AND TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL Chapter 1-Appilcablo Chapter 2-Applicablo Chapter 3-Applicablo, design activitics are not normally performed by Clinton Power Station for radioactivo material packaging however, audits of cuppliers establish that the design was acccmplished under control of an NRC approved QA program.
Chapter 4-Applicable Chaptor.
5-Applicable Chaptor 6-Applicablo
{
chaptor 7-Applicable, monsures such as source curvoillanco and t
audits of records should be taken as appropriate to ensure that the design and fabrication of packaging woro performed _ under the control of an NRC-approved QA 1
program.
Chaptor.
8-Applicablo 1
Chaptor 9-Applicable, special processou such as volding or nondoctructive testing are not normally performed by Clinton Power Station.~ However, if packaging requires o
major repairs necessitating use of special procoscos, e.g., wolding or heat treating, measures shall be established to ensure that the special proconses are controlled.
Chapter 10 -
Applicable, visual inspections shall be performed upon receipt of packaging to ensure compliance with cortificates of complianco.
Chaptor 11 -
Applicable Chapter 12'-
Applicable Chapter 13--
Applicable, all conditions identified in a cortificate of compliance when using packages shall be adhered to.
Chaptor 14 -
Applicable l
Chaptor 15 -
Applicablo l
~
PAGE REVISION:
FORM NICO-177 (10-88)
H.02172
IP NUCLEAR PROGRAM l
QUAllTY ASSURANCE M ANUAL APPritoIx n i
Chaptor 16 -
Applicablo, measures are established for obtaining j
correctivo actions from suppliers and for ensuring that followup is documented to verify that correctivo actions were implemented and offective.
Chaptor 17 -
Applicablo, records showing evidenco of delivory of packages to a carrior and proof that all NRC and DOT requirements have boon satisfied shall also be retained.
Chaptor is -
Applicablo, audits are performed'on the supplier of packaging to ensure compliance with the cortificato of compliance.
l l
i B-12 of 12 15 PAGE I
REVISION:
DATE:
08/08/91 FORM N100-177 (10-88)
H 02172
.