ML20077K523
| ML20077K523 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/1982 |
| From: | Jordan R JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. |
| To: | Jay Collins NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, SCD-52, NUDOCS 8301130095 | |
| Download: ML20077K523 (2) | |
Text
Associated Piping & Engineering Corp.
1707 West Compton Boulevard Post Office Box 4309 Compton, CA 90224 Tel 213/537 7200
$0 - $ $1 United States Nuclear
\\
\\
Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive W\\-
D Suite 1000 Pove & Rocess Pipig Arlington, Texas 76012 Division December 21, 1982 k
Attn:
John T. Collins-Regional Administrator 1
Region IV d
f 030l982 [
i Subj: OUR LETTER DATED JULY 23, 1982 IN RESPONSE TO g
10 CFR50.55E NOTIFICATION t
REF :
Interim Report of Significant Construction Deficiency No. 52 from Louisiana Power & Light-Waterford No. 3
Dear Sir:
This letter is to advise you that the corrective action on the penetrations identified in the subject interim report has been completed.
The field heat treatment, attempted by Louisiana Power & Light /Ebasco site contractors, was not successful due to malfunctioning heat treat equipment.
As a result of this, the two (2) penetrations were removed from the system and we supplied new, properly heat treated, penetrations to the site for installation. This installation was completed about the third week of No-vember.
Based on the above actions, we therefore consider this to be a closed subject with no further action required by our organization.
In addition, as referenced in Item 3 of the subject letter, we have completed our review and investigation of similar assemblies supplied to other customers and nuclear sites.
It was determined from this investigation that renotely similar penetrations have been supplied to only one (1) other customer. The customer was Duke Power Co., McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2.
7- )
SEPo?!fggf, PDR
f~
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Page 2 RESP 0flSE TO 10 CFR50-55E NOTIFICATIO!I R. L. Jordan J. T. Collins We notified Duke Power and requested that they investigate and advise us of their conclusions.
As a result of their investigation, Duke Power has advised us that the installed penetrations have been found to be in compliance with the intent of the code and require no further action from us.
Based on the utilities conclusion, we therefore consider this investigation closed with no further action or notification required.
Very truly yours, ASSOCIATED PIPING & ENGINEERISG CORP.
!!anasc./cf Quality Assurance RLJ/eg