ML20077G259

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Request for Hearing Re Denial of Application to Amend Perry & Davis-Besse Operating Licenses to Suspend Antitrust Conditions Insofar as Conditions Apply to Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co & Toledo Edison Co.* W/Certificate of Svc
ML20077G259
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse, Perry  Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1991
From: Jerome Murphy
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., OHIO EDISON CO., SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20077G246 List:
References
A, NUDOCS 9106250108
Download: ML20077G259 (8)
v • d • e


Text

-. _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _

?

l

-y;;

x  ;

, _ . c,. ,, . q v'
  • ts-e.[
  • y t V II,\

'91 iMY 31 P3 28 ,

aPra . . . //v.!

i UNITED STATES OFiAMERICA< ,

.<, vgylh's

% t%# o. i ll i

/ <

NUCLEAR REGULATORYtCOMMISSION ,4 -

BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [

In the Matter of )

01110 EDISON COMPANY )

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1) ) Docket tios. 50-440A and CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) and 50-346A COMPANY, et al. (Perry Nuclear ) ,

Power Plant, Unit 1-and' Davis-Desse ) TAC Hos 66288, 68313 Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) ) and 68000

-REQUEST FOR A HEARING WITil RESPECT-TO THE DENIAL-OF  !

THE APPLICATION TO AMEND THE PERRY AND DAVIS-DESSE OPERATING LICENSES TO SUSPEND THE ANTITRUST CONDITIONS INSOFAR AS THEY APPLY TO Tile CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY AND TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY Pursuant to the Notice of. Denial of Applications for Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Opportunity for Hearing, 56 Fed. Reg. 20057 (May 1, 1991), The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) and Toledo Edison Company (TE) hereby ,

request a hearing with respect to the denial of their Application to amend the.. Perry and Davis-Besse operating licenses to suspend the antitrust conditions insofar as they apply to CEI and TE,.

dated May 2, 1988.

Specifically, CEI and TE request a hearing on the

'following three iscues: _

1 J

9106250108 910607 PDR ADOCK 05000346 G PDR

~ , _ _ . . . m.-- . _. _ ..__ _ _ . _ _ - , _ ,_ . - _ _ _. , - . . _ _ . . -, , _ , _ _ _ _ _-.... -,_

(1) Do the Perry and Davis-Desse Nuclear Power Plants afford CEI and TE a competitive advantage when their actual costs are auch that they do not provide a lower average cost of bulk power supply t han would non-nuclear generation options CEI and TE could have exercised in the same time frame (see 10 C.F.R. Part 50, App. L. SS 11.11, 11.12)?

(2) If the Perry and Davis-Desse Nuclear Power Plants do not afford CEI and TE a competitive advantage, can their ownership share of those plants " create" or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antf(rust laws" (Section 105(c)(5) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended) such that the NRC is authorized to impose or retain license conditions?

(3) If the Perry and Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plants do not afford CEI and TE a lower average cost of bulk power supply than would non-nuclear generation options they could have exercised in the same time frame, does imposition or retention of license conditions under Section 105c of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, deny CEI and TE equal protection and due procesa under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?

Respectfully submitted, Jewh A444fky/ew Jtmes P. Murphy .

SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY 1201 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 626-6793 Counsel for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company Date: May 31, 1991 t

~ . . - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n t CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ' bri

'91 PAY T. P 3 28 I hereby certify that on this 31st day of May, 1991, I caused a true copy of the Request for a Hearing with R'e$pect.tb. , ,

the Denial of the Application to Amend the Perry and Davis-Besse Operating Licenses to Suspend the Antitruct Conditions insofar as They Apply to the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company to be served upon the persons and in the manner indicated below:

Gerald Charnoff, Esquire Edwin Ries, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts Office of the General Counsel and Trowbridge U.S. Nuclear Regulatcry 2300 N Street, N.W. Commission Washington, D.C. 20037 1 White Flint North (by hand) 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 Samuel J. Murley, Director (by hand)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Mark C. Schechter, Chief Commission Transportation, Energy, and 1 White Flint North Agriculture Section 11555 Rockville Pike Antitrust Division Rockvi]3u, Maryland 20852 U.S. Department of Justice (by hand) 555 Fourth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001 '

(by hand)

{lnuas?Al MJ,)kh* h Jahes P. Murphy V Counsel for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company

-1% < - - - - -%. ,.y.. -

. . . - - , - - - -g..- -- - ----n

, v--- - , .r, e-,v- --~-,r- --- . - - - , - - - --+,y + - -

l  :

i

'i W C.

'91 tif,Y 31 P3 :29 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ry '/[.;

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

i BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )  !

01110 EDISON COMPANY ) '

(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1) ) Docket Nos. 50-440A and CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) and 50-346A COMPANY, et al..(Perry Nuclear

) l Power Plant, Unit 1 and Davis-Besse ) -TAC Nos. 66288, 68313 i Nuclear Power Station, Unit.1) ) and 68880 t REQUEST FOR A HEARING WITil RESPECT TO THE DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION TO AMEND THE PERRY.AND DAVIS-BESSE i OPERATING LICENSES TO SUSPEND THE ANTITRUST CONDITIONS '

INSOFAR AS T!!EY APPLY TO Tile CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY-AND TOLEDO-EDISON COMPANY Pursuant to the Notice of Denial of Applications for Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Opportunity for Hearing, 56. Fed. Reg. 20057---(Hay 1, 1991), The Cleveland Electric 4

Illuminating Company (CEI) and Toledo Edison Company-(TE)-hereby request a hearing with respect to the denial of their Application to amend the Perry and Davis-Desse operating licenses to suspend the antitrust conditions insofar as-they apply to CEI and TE,

-dated May 2, 1988. '

r Specifically, CEI and TE request a hearing on the  :

1 following-three-issues:-- -

l l

. - - - . - .. ._ - . - . - - . - - . ~ - . . . - . . - . - - . - ~ - ~ - . .

(1) Do the Perry and Davis-Desse Nuclear Power Plants afford CEI and TE a competitive advantage whon their actual costs are such that they do not provide a lower average cost of bulk power supply i than would non-nuclear generation options CEI and TE could have exercised in the come time frame (see .

i 10 C.P.R. Part 50, App. L. SS 11.11, 11.12)?

(2) If the Perry and Davis-Desse Nuclear Power Plants do not afford CEI and TE a competitive advantage, can their ownership share of those plants " create" or maintain a situation inconsistent with the antitrust laws" (section 105(c)(5) of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended) such that tho Nnc is authoris:ed to impose or retain license conditions?

5 (3) If the Perry and Davis-Desse Nuclear Power Plants t

do notLafford-CEI and TE a lower average cost of-bulk power supply than would non-nuclear generation options they could have exercised in-the same time-frame, does imposition or retention of license conditions under Section 105c of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, deny CEI and TE equal protection 4

i P

,. . , - n,-,n--nn-,--- .-,,,-__-,,..~~,-~,,--,,--._.n.-.- . - , - ..n

._ .. . . . -- -. - . _ . - . - - - . - - . - . . . - . . . . . . - .. -. - .. - - - .. ~ _-.

E and due process under the Fifth Amendment of the  :

U.S. Constitution?  ;

ucepectfully submitted, ,

L P A - e v /e w -

6mes P. Murphy

SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY 1201 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 626-6793 Counsel for The Cleveland Electric illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company Date: May 31, 1991 F

--3 -

ri .i-g CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE N' '

'91 tm 31 P3 79 I hereby certify that on this 31st day of May, 1991, I caused a true copy of the Request for a llearing with,Ruapect to= !

the Denial of the Application to Amend the Perry and Davis-Desse Operating Licenses to suspend the Antitrust Conditions insofar as They Apply to the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company to be served upon the persons and in the manner indicated below; Gerald Charnoff, Esquire Edwin Ries, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts Office of the General Counsel and Trowbridge U.S. 14uclear Regulatory 2300 11 Street, 14 . W . Commission Washington, D.C. 20037 1 White Flint tJorth (by hand) 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20052 Samuel J. Murley, Director (by hand)

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Mark C. Schechter, Chief Commission Transportation, Energy, and 1 White Flint North Agriculture Section 11555 Rockville Pike Antitrust Division Rockvil l e , Maryland 20852 U.S. Department of Justice (by hand) 555 Fourth Street, tJ.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001 (by hand)

M

)asu.lo f riI J @es P. Murphy f"lth*

Counsel for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and Toledo Edison Company l

__ __ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20077G259&oldid=3512143"