ML20077G176

Application to Amend Licenses DPR-33,DPR-52 & DPR-68, Changing Tech Specs to Update Curve of Pressure Vs Temp to Extend Applicability Through 6.0 Efpy.Approval Requested by 831019

ML20077G176
Person / Time
Site:	Browns Ferry
Issue date:	07/21/1983
From:	Kammer D TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20077G179	List: ML20077G176 ML20077G195
References
NUDOCS 8308030402
Download: ML20077G176 (2)

Text

o

,/ .

. o TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 374ot 400 Chestnut Street Tower II July 21, 1983 TVA BFNP TS 178 SUPPLEMENT 1 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

In the Matter of the ) Docket No. 50-259 Tennessee Valley Authority ) 50-260 50-296 In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR Parts 50.59 and 50.90 we are enclosing 40 copies of a requested amendment to licenses b?R-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 to change the technical specifications of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant units 1, 2, and 3 (enclosure 1). A description of the change and reason and justification is also enclosed (enclesure 2). This change updates the curve of pressure versus temperature to extend applicability through 6.0 Effective Full Power

-Years (EFPY). We request approval of this change by October 19, 1983 By letter from L. M. Mills to you dated September 23,1982 we submitted request TVA BFNP TS 178. That request proposed a revision to the curve for unit 1 to extend applicability through 5.0 EFPY.

Because this request applies to units 1, 2, and 3, TS 178 is superceded and is no longer needed.

This change is submitted by itself to allcw expeditious review by your staff.

This requested amendment has been evaluated pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92 and no significant hazards considerations are involved (enclosure 3).

In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 170.22, we have determined this proposed amendment to be Class II for unit 1 and Class I for units 2 and 3 These classifications are based on the fact that the proposed amendment is an administrative change that has no safety significance for unit 1 and the proposed amendments for units 2 and 3 are duplicates of the unit 1 proposed amendment.

The appropriate license review fees total $2,000 ($1,200 for unit 1 and $800 for units 2 and 3). $1,200 was forwarded for review of TS 178. Because no review of TS 178 has apparently started, we believe h

8308030402 830721 PDRADOCKOS0002g J1{f)I P l {

1983-TVA 50TH ANNIVERSARY An Equal Opportunity Employer

Mr. Harold R. Denton July 21, 1983 the $1,200 already forwarded can be used for review of this supplement. Therefore, the remittance for the additional amount of

$800 is being wired to the NRC, Attention: Licensing Fee Management Branch.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY o5 W D. S. Kammer Nuclear Engineer Subscribe an sworn to fo me t is / da /- 1983

( da 9 A 9 /y ofWLit Notary Public My Commission Expires Enclosures cc (Enclosures):

Mr. Charles R. Christopher Chairman, Limestone County Commission P.O. Box 188 Athens, Alabama 35611 Dr. Ira L. Myers State Health Officer State Department of Public Health State Office Building Montgomery, Alabama 36104 Mr. R. J. Clark Browns Ferry Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 i