ML20077E704

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-483/83-11.Corrective Actions:Craft & Supervision Advised That Severe Disciplinary Actions Will Be Taken Against Individuals Tampering W/Hardware Following Insp
ML20077E704
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 07/18/1983
From: Schnell D
UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To: Knop R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20077E688 List:
References
ULNRC-648, NUDOCS 8307280401
Download: ML20077E704 (3)


Text

.'

+

e union ELECTRIC COM PANY 1901 GRATIOT STREET ST. Louis, MISSOURI MasuMG ADDRESS:

CONALD F. SCMNELL P.O.SOM 949 m.......~'

July 18, 1983 1

Mr.

R.

C. Knop, Chief Projects Branch 1 US Nuclear Pegulatory Commission Region III 799 Rocsevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 ULNRC-648

Dear Mr. Knop:

INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-483/83-11 This reply is in responre to your letter of June 17, 1983 which transmitteci che report of the inspection conducted at Callaway Plant, Unit I during the period of April 16 through May 31, 1983.

Our response to the item of noncompliance is presented below.

None of tne material in the inspection report or in this response is considered proprietary by Union Electric Company.

_50-483/83-11-01) SEVERITY LEVEL V VIOLATION

(

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X, ctates "A program for inspection of activities affecting quality shall be established and executed 2

by or for the organization performing the activity to verify confor-mance with the documented instructions, procedures and drawings for accomplishing the activity."

Daniel International Procedure QCP-200, Exhibit BI " Component Support Inspection Checklist"Section III (f) requires, " Cotter pins installed correctly and are properly sized" and (g) " retaining rings fit snugly in the grooves."

Contrary to the above, inspections were not adequate to identify I

missing cotter pins, retaining rings and short pins in five safety-related pipe supports in the component cooling water and high pressure injection systems.

l i

Corrective Action Taken And The Results Achieved:

i l

Daniel Hanger Engineering investigated the five safety-related l

supports identified by the Inspector to be deficient.

The results l

of the investigation are as follows:

i JUL 221083 8307280401 330722 PDR ADOCK 05000483 0

pm

Mr.

R.

C. Knop July 18, 1983 EG08-C003/1510:

The Component Support Inspection Checklist documents that on February 2, 1983, the installation of this support was complete and acceptable.

On May 5, 1983, during the Pre 79-14 Walkdown, Hanger Engineer-ing discovered the conter pins to be missing and on May 18, 1983 initiated Deficiency Report 2SD-11026-H.

Rework was completed on June 10, 1983 and the Deficiency Report closed on June 14, 1983.

EG08-R010/1310:

This support was initially inspected on May 4, 1982.

The installation was found to be complete and accept-able.

On April 27, 1983, the Pre 79-14 Walkdown identified a sway strut out cf alignment.

inn support was reworked per Deficiency Report 283-110El-E ini-tiated on May 21, 1983.

Rework, including replace-ment of the micsing retaining ring was completed on June 16, 1983 and the Deficiency Report closed on June 20, 1983.

EF15-R003/3140:

The Component Support Inspection Checkxist documents that on January 13, 1983 the installation of this support was conplete and acceptable.

On March 25, 1983, during the Pre 79-14 Walkdown, Hanger Engineer-ing examined this support and as documented on the Pre 79-14 checklist, the cotter pins were found to be in place.

Subsequent to the Quality Inspection and Pre 79-14 Walkdown, the NRC Inspector discovered the cotter pins to be missing.

The support will be reworked to replace the cotter pins per Deficiency Report 2SD-ll376-H initiated July 1, 1983.

EM07-R505/1340:

These supports are in-process.

Prior to final inspection and acceptance these supports will be EG26-C017/1220 brought into compliance with the drawing requirements.

Though the actual cause of the deficiencies is indeterminate, the investigation confirms that the inspection procedure is adequate.

Verification of correct cotter pin and retaining ring installation is a requirement of Daniel Quality Control Procedure QCP-200 (Inspec-tion of Fabrication and Installation of Safety-Related Pipe Supports),

Exhibit BI.

The subject cotter pins and retaining rings were inspected by Quality Inspection as evidenced by the Inspectors' initials on the specific items on the checklists.

Corrective Action To Be Taken To Avoid Further Noncompliance:

The Deficiency Reports written to document the identified deficiencies state the cause to be indeterminate because inspection records indicated correct installation.

As corrective action to discourage the possibility of tampering with hardware following inspection, Project Management has advised craft and supervision of the severe disciplinary action that they will take against individuals who engage

a

=

Mr.

R. C. Knop July 18, 1983 in such activities.

In addition they were also notified such acts are a violation of federal law.

The Constructor Pre 79-14 Walkdown, followed by the actual 79-14 Walkdown performed by the Architect Engineer provides a means to identify deficiencies such as the inspector reported.

Additionally, though not intended to be a detailed inspection, the final walkdown prior to Release for Test provides another opportunity for identifi-cation of deficiencies.

The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved:

Full compliance will be achieved upon conpletion of the rework required for EF15-R003/314Q, scheduled to be complete by July 25, 1983.

If yoa have any questions regarding this responsc or if additional information is required, please let ma know.

Very truly yours, l

utb_ '

f/

Donald F.

Schnell NRI/CCW/jds cc:

Mr. H.

M.

Wescott, NRC Region III NRC Resident Inspector, Callaway Plant Missouri Public Service Commission l

4

-, -,