ML20077D199

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Util to NRR Providing Estimated Schedule & Number of Operator License & Instructor Certification Exams Necessary Between Present & Dec 1985 Per Generic Ltr 83-01
ML20077D199
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/21/1983
From: Maurin L
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Jay Collins
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
GL-83-01, GL-83-1, W3I83-0133, W3I83-133, NUDOCS 8307260422
Download: ML20077D199 (1)


Text

r ----

p --

1 fs P

L Louisiana / INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDE POWER & LIGHT Ulfu $SysYdd April 21, 1983 W3I83-0133 Mr. John T. Collins, Regional Administrator, Region IV U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

j l

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

!f '

APR z 5198 1

Arlington, Texas 76012

{

i L

SUBJECT:

Waterford SES Unit No. 3 E

- - +

a Docket No. 50-382 Generic Letter No. 83-01

REFERENCE:

LP&L letter W3P83-1072, L. V. Maurin to Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, dated April 11, 1983

Dear Mr. Collins,

Attached is a copy of the above referenced letter which provided the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation with estimates of the schedule and number of operator license and instructor certification examinations necessary for Waterford 3 between now and December 1985.

We are forwarding this information to you for Region IV Office planning and scheduling considerations.

If you require additional information or wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sin erely, V}

,h hMi&vD L. V. Maurin LVM/WAC:keh Attachment cc: Jim Wilson (NRC), E. L. Blake, W. M. Stevenson

-f EO/

/

llI 8307260422 830421 PDR ADOCK 05000382 V

PDR

s,

,LOUISI AFC Aa w e a e, u o a r/ ~... e.-c~e....,

. anocx.cc.

m c _..~.

,o,.

cc.

.c.,..

mus L.V. MAURIN Vice President Nuclear Operations April 11 1983 W3P83-1072 Q-3-A20.02.02 3-A1.01.04 L.02 4

Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. G. W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch Number 3 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-383 Generic Letter 83-01 Operator Licensing Frs=4 nation Site Visit

Dear Mr. Knighton:

The purpose of this letter is to submit the Louisiana Power and Light Company (LP&L) response to the subject Generic Letter which requested an estimate of the schedule and number of operator licensing and instructor certification aw==4 nations that will be necessary between now and December 1985.

The categories into which this information has been divided will be enumerated here with the Louisiana Power and Light Company response below.

(1)

Initial (cold) license av==4 nations for units applying for operating licenses.

Approximately 40 candidates July 11, 1983 (2)

Initial licensa avaminations to extend licenses to a second, identical unit after initial licensing.

None (3)

Framinations to support certification of utility employees as instructors.

Approximately 8 candidates September, 1984 (4)

Frm=inations to support certification of individuals who are not utility enployees but who are under contract to instruct licensed operators.

Approximately 3 candidates September, 1984 A b ll0 f

()

~

A

1 Pcgo 2 U3P83-1072 (5) 5'-==4 nations for initial licensing of personnel at operating facilities or for upgrading a license from the Reactor Operator to the Senior Operator level.

Approximately 10-12 candidates September, 1984 Approximately 10-12 candidates October, 1985 Only the Cold License (1) estina'tes may considered firm. The dates and numbers given above are rough escinates only and should be created as such. Not facluded in these estimates is the fact that re-avm=fnations90-120 days after the scheduled====4=+ tion would be requested for any unsuccessful candidates.

We trust the above inforastion is adequate for its intended purpose. If you have further inquiries, please advise.

You a.vq q truly, L.V. Maurin LVM/SMJ/ssd cc: Jim Wilson (NRC), E. L. Blake, W. M. Stevenson l-l

i-Before the UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Docket No. 50-382 In the Matter of LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY GENERIC LETTER 83-01 Louisiana Power & Light Company, Applicant in the above captioned proceeding, hereby files a response to Generic Letter 83-01.

Respectfully' submitted, LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY By:

4,, n l L. V. Maur'id

' ' ' - ~ ~ - '-

Vice President Nuclear Operations 3

g y

y, g

- - -,, -m

,,.y-

,,,, emw-.e t---r.-

-ye--.,

v.w,-,,c,,,

-wa--,-

,-er,,--

3m--

y

,,,. - --.w-

i STATE OF LCUISIANA)

) SS PARISH OF ORLEANS )

L. V. Maurin, being duly sworn, states that he is Vice President - Nuclear Operations of Louisiana Power & Light Company and that he is authorized on the part of said company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Cosmission this report.

/hunii L. V. Maurin

~~~ ~ ~ '

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to 1)pf9re me, a Not p Pub]/c, in and for the Parish and State above named, this /,,LE day of X /, r //

, 1983.

T I

t

.A2 M f/

s Jotstf Lic'

/

/

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

r l

eg 9

e

l TASE REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION (TRAC) FORM

'.f.L <

pong,

TO:

R.W. Prados

REFERENCES:

Accuhm nc 1 3 ATE:

3-29-83 TASK DESCRIPTION:

Respond to Generic Letter 83-01 n.

n DESCRIPTION BY:

DATE:

1-29-81 V'

risinator)

RESPONSE REQUIRED:

YES / NO DATE RESPONSE DUE:

4-19-83

.............. Top S,8CC,1,0n Filled Out By Originator,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

4 VERIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that I have performed an independent (2nd party) review of the task described, that I as qualified to perform this review, and as a result of this review I further certify that (Choose one or both.)

/~/ the present material status / conditions described above presently exists

~ ~ '

i and that verification was ande by direct observation on my part.

l

/[/ the report, analysis, information, or action taken described above is t

in fact true and valid to the best of my knowledge and belief.

b Date: 3 b M'85 Signature:

N2te: Verification shall be performed by a First Line Supervisor, Engineer, Section or Department Head, or Manager; the verifying individual shall be independent, i.e., someone other than the individual who initially performed the task, and will be qualified, i.e., have at least equivalent gum 11fications as the initial preparer in the area of review involved.

Tha actions taken to accomplish the task were as follows:

(P:tvide specific details, use ateach===ts as necessary).

i Upon completion of the VERIFICATION STATEMENT this form is to accompany correspondence through the approval process.

Once correspondence is approved, as applicable, distribution of this form shall be as follows:

original to originator, copy to verifier.. copy to file, other copies as necessary.

J