ML20076L927
| ML20076L927 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 09/12/1983 |
| From: | Williams J CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, LOZ-83-0141, LOZ-83-141, NUDOCS 8309190146 | |
| Download: ML20076L927 (2) | |
Text
I A M- '
THE CINCINNATI ' GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY as CINC'NNATI, OHIO 45201 September 12, 1983 LOZ-83-0141 N
- s. wituAus, an
/
- '"I "cso'[c".'*12"s PR(NC1 PAL STAFF '
.u RA \\
ENF 0/RA
\\
SCS Docket No. 50-358 A/RA
\\
PAO PRP
\\
SLO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2Ta%
\\ RC Region III JWSF
/
799 Roosevelt Road UE' e
\\
j
[g Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Attention:
Mr. J.G. Keppler Regional Administrator Gentlemen:
RE:
WM. H.
ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 1 10CFR50.55(e), ITEM Q-10, POTENTIAL DEFICIENCIES IN THE CATALYTIC INC. QA & CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS W.O.
57300, JOB E-5590, FILE NO. 956C, Q-10 This letter constitutes an interim report concerning the subject condition, initially reported to the Commission on August 12, 1983, as a potentially reportable deficiency under the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e).
On July 22, 1983, Catalytic, Inc. of Philadelphia, PA, a contractor who performed maintenance construction activities until May 1983 at Zimmer, received an anonymous transmittal containing three personal logs from Catalytic construction i
l personnel previously assigned to the Zimmer project.
Contained within these documents were alleged incidents which could l
represent deficiencies in construction work performed by Catalytic and monitored by its quality assurance program.
On August 26, 1983, Catalytic notified CG&E that their review of the documents identified thirty-four (34) problems or allegations.
Catalytic stated that, while four (4) items require additional evaluation by CG&E, "no undocumented quality related items were specifically identified by the subject logs and affidavits which Catalytic and CG&E did not have previously identified through implementation of their QA/QC programs".
Thus, Catalytic's review concluded "that no 10CFR21 reportable defect or non-compliance exists for items which Catalytic had direct control and access to information".
To confirm their conclusions, Catalytic has made recommendations that further reviews be accomplished by CG&E on the four items which Catalytic could not assess.
8309190146 030912 PDR ADOCK 05000358 1983 S
A L Mr. J.G. Keppler Regional Administrator September 12, 1983 i
LOZ-83-0141 Page 2-t'
~ Based on an initial review of the Catalytic response, there are several items where CG&E considers that additional information is required to determine reportability.
CG&E is presently reviewing Catalytic's evaluation and will provide the results of this review in a follow-up report by November 30, 1983.
.We trust the above will be found acceptable as an interim report under 10CFR50.55(e).
Very truly yours, 1
THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY By h
/
. WILLIAMS, JR.
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
}
DJS/ HRS /JLO/sfr cc:
NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement Washington, D.C.
20555 NRC Senior Resident Inspector ATTN:.
T.P. Gwynn NRC Zimmer Project Inspector, Region III i
ATTN:
E. R. Schweibinz 4
i
.~,
.