ML20076K928
| ML20076K928 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/09/1983 |
| From: | James Smith LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, SNRC-960, NUDOCS 8309150315 | |
| Download: ML20076K928 (3) | |
Text
O 8
5 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY l
Ol SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION l
- r
.:- - w w4 P.O. DOX 618, NORTH COUNTRY ROAD + WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 Direct Dial Number September 9, 1983 SNRC-960 i
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Schedule for Submittals in Response to NRC Generic Letter 83-28 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-322
References:
1)
Letter, D.G.
Eisenhut to All Licensees ot Operating Reactors et al, " Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events (Generic Letter 83-28)," July 8, 1983 2)
Letter, T.J.
Dente to D.G. Eisenhut, " Schedule for Submittals in Response to NRC Generic Letter 83-28," September 6, 1983, BWROG 83-29
Dear Mr. Denton:
This letter requests an extension of time for our submittal in re-sponse to NRC Generic Letter 83 - 28 (Reference 1) for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1.
Long Island Lighting Company is a member of the BWR Owners' Group (BWROG) and we have endorsed the BWROG response (Reterence 2) to NRC Generic Letter.
We are participating in the Group's generic evaluation and, in order to effectively utilize this BWROG effort, a time extension is necessary.
In parallel with the BWROG program, which will result in the development of certain generic information and BWROG-recommended guidelines, LILCO is assessing the Shoreham capabilities with respect to the NRC-proposed actions re;ulting from the Salem event.
After completion of the BWROG-developed guidelines for assessing plant capabilities in response to Reference 1, we will provide the NRC with the requested documentation for the Shoreham assessment which incorporates these guidelines and a schedule for program implementation.
Our response will be provided by February 29, 1984.
I$
1 8 D 8309150315 830909 PDR ADOCK 05000322 l
A PDR F C-8935.1
SNRC-960 September 9, 1983 Page 2 Should you wish to discuss our response program in detail, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Very truly yours, u
~
J.
L.
Smith Manager, Special Projects JPM:jm cc:
C.
Petrone, NRC Resident Inspector All Parties Listed in Attachment 1
. u ATTACHMENT 1 i
Lawrence Brenner, Esq.
Herbert H.
Brown, Esq.
Administrative Judge Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Karla J.
Letsche, Esq.
Board Panel Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Christopher & Phillips Commission 8th Floor Washington, D.C.
20555 1900 M.
- Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Dr. Peter A.
Morris Administrative Judge Mr. Marc W. Goldsmith Atomic Safety and Licensing Energy Research Group Board Panel 4001 Totten Pond Road U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Ualtham, Massachusetts 02154 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue Dr. George A.
Ferguson Suite K School of Engineering San Jose, California 95125 Howard University 2300 Fifth Street Washington, D.C.
20059 Stephen B.
Latham, Esq.
Twomey, Latham & Shea 33 West Second Street Daniel F.
Brown, Esq.
P.O.
Box 398 Attorney Riverhead, New York 11901 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel f
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ralph Shapiro, Esq.
Commission Cammer and Shapiro, P.C.
Washington, D.C.
20555 9 East 40th Street New York, New York 10016 Bernard M.
Bordenick, Esq.
David A. Repka, Esq.
Matthew J. Kelly, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory State of New York Commission Department of Public Service Washington, D.C.
20555 Three Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Mr. James Dougherty 3045 Porter Street Washington, D.C.
20008
-