ML20076K767

Advises of Intentions in Response to Generic Ltr 83-28, Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events. Nuclear Util Task Action Committee & BWR Owners Group Responses Endorsed

ML20076K767
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper
Issue date:	09/06/1983
From:	Kuncl L NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8309150263
Download: ML20076K767 (2)

Text

. _..

- ~ _. _..

i GENERAL OFFICE Nebraska Public Power District

" " L'R"0a"i4'f"!s "** "

t September 6, 1983 j

QY l

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Licensing Washington, DC 20555 i

Attention:

D. G. Eisenhut, Director Subj ect: Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events (Generic Letter 83-28)

Reference:

1)

Letter, D. G. Eisenhut to All Licensees of Operating Reactors et al, " Required Actions i

Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events (Generic Letter 83-28)", dated July 8, 1983

2) BWR Owners' Group letter, T. J. Dente to D. G. Eisenhut, " Schedule for Submittals in Response to NRC Generic Letter 83-28",

dated September 6, 1983 This letter describes the District's intentions in submitting our l

response to NRC Generic Letter 83-28, Reference 1.

1 The District has retained the services of a consultant to assist in the assessment of the capabilities of our Cooper Nuclear Station with respect j

to the NRC proposed actions resulting from the Salem event.

In parallel with this effort we are actively participating in the BWR Owners' Group program to provide a uniform approach in addressing required actions i

l that have a generic application to BWR plants. We endorse this program which is discussed in Reference 2.

In addition, the District is a member of a Nuclear Utility Task Action Committee (NUTAC), formed on September 1, 1983, for the specific purpose of defining an appropriate j

vendor interface program in response to Section 2.2.2 of Reference 1.

In accordance with the referenced Generic Letter our 120 day response will describe the current status of conformance with the positions stated therein. We anticipate, however, that the results of the afore-mentioned industry group programs will have an affect on our plans and schedules for any needed improvements. We will discuss this impact in our 120 day response letter when the group programs are more fully developed.

Nf g r a r e,,,

//o t

PDR

.. ~. -

O '

• D. G. Eisenhut September 6, 1983 Page 2 Picase contact my office if you have any questions on this matter.

Sincerely, d.

L. G. Kunc1 Assistant General Manager - Nuclear GAT:cmk

___