ML20076K135
| ML20076K135 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1994 |
| From: | Kohn M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, P.C. (FORMERLY KOHN & ASSOCIA |
| To: | Bloch P, Carpenter J, Murphy T Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20076K138 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#494-15822 93-671-01-OLA-3, 93-671-1-OLA-3, OLA-3, NUDOCS 9410270189 | |
| Download: ML20076K135 (1) | |
Text
,
)5822-KOHN, KOHN, & COLAPINTO, PC.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW DOCKETED USNPC 517 FLCADA AVENUE NW WASHNGTON. DC 20001-1850 (202} 234-4663. FAX (202] 462-4145
.g 4v,: s=
,,;,. :y,,,,c_N...
- cv,: w vs ete czawa..
OFfIE F1.
<.;m ; lEOis ;Z DOCXEiiM i
,m 4 wm w
.mm a coopen s ce. -
BR/ h,,
ANNEPE R KRCNTAOt
- Qg{ghgp {},
{ggg atu, ose...
Via facsimile Hon. Peter B.
Bloch, Chair Hon. Thomas D.
Murphy Hon. James H.
Carpenter Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
~
Re:
In the Matter of Georgia Power Company, et.al.
(Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Unics 1 and 2) Docket Nos.
50-424-OLA-3 & 50-425-OLA-3, ASLBP No. 93-671-01-OLA-3
Dear Sirs:
Please find enclosed two pleadings of Intervenor:
1)
Intervenor's Request to Strike NRC Staff's Response to Summary Disposition of the Illegal License Transfer Issue; and 2)
Intervenor's Motion to Postpone Deposition of NRC Personnel Until Conclusion of License Transfer Hearing.
Additionally, as you are aware, Mr. John Lamberski transmitted a letter via facsimile on October 7, 1994 indicating that Licensee would be filing a reply on October 14, 1994.
Mr.
Lamberski indicates that citations to depositions that have not been transcribed constitutes inadmissible evidence.
Intervenor disagrees.
Nonetheless, to moot this for the time
- being, Intervenor is transmitting herewith an affidavit from his counsel attesting to the factual aesertions contained in depositions that have not been transcribed.
Because the statements constitute admissions by a party opponent, they are outside the hearsay exception and, for the purpose of summary decision, an af fidavit by the individual who heard the statement should constitute admissible evidence.
Of course, at the hearing, Intervenor can elicit the required testimony directly from the witnesses.
thank you for your consideration of these matters.
Sincerely, MV Michael D.
Kohn Attorney for Intervenor cc:
Service List C:\\ FILES \\301\\BLOCH.LET 9410270189 941013 PDR ADOCK 05000424 m()0 O
PDR 1)
,