ML20076G405
| ML20076G405 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1983 |
| From: | Harrington W BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20076G397 | List: |
| References | |
| 83-137, NUDOCS 8306140662 | |
| Download: ML20076G405 (2) | |
Text
7-t o,.,..,
EOSTO N EDISON COMPANY 800 BOYLsTON STREET 50sTON MAssADHUBETTs 02199 WILLIAM D. HARRINGTON May 31, 1983
- " '" I" ~ ~ '""
BECo Letter No. 83 - 137 Mr. Richard W. Starostecki, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293
Subject:
Inspection 83-07
Reference:
NRC Letter to Boston Edison, dated May 2, 1983.
Dear Sir:
This responds to the one violation identified during a routine safety inspection conducted between March 22, 1983 and April 18, 1983, and communicated to Boston Edison in Appendix A of the reference.
Notice of Violation A (Inc 83-07-02)
Technical Specification 6.8. A requires that written procedures be implemented that meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of USNRC Regulatory i
Guide (R.G.) 1.33.
Regulatory Guide 1.33 requires _ procedures for equipment control and maintenance.
Station Procedure TS 82-43, Resin Removal From the i
Reactor Building Vent Duct, Revision 2, requires the redundant ' A' Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS) train be demonstrated operable prior to removal of the
'B' SGTS train from service for inspection and cleaning.
Contrary to the above, on March 30, 1983, Procedure TP 82-43 was not implemented
-in that the redundant SGTS train (' A') was not demonstrated operable prior to inspection and cleaning of the 'B' IGTS train.
Response
Our immediate corrective action was to demonstrate operability of SGTS train (A) by acceptable performance of surveillance test Procedure 8.7.2.6 (One Train. of Standby Gas Treatment System Inoperable) in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 3.7.B.1.c.
This action was completed March 30, 1983.
In addition, the Chief Operating Engineer counseled the personnel involved for l
failing to implement the requirements of Procedure TP 82-43 (Rev. 2) and on the importance of procedural adherence and maintenance of an accurate status (aware-ness) of plant conditions.
This counselling was completed on March 30, 1983.
I l
'9306140662 830609
~
PDR ADOCK 05000293 G
T
-e-CDETON EDISDN COMPANY Mr. Richard W. Starostecki, Director Page 2 May 31, 1983 To preclude recurrence, Procedure TP 83-43 has been revised to include 1) the applicable Technical Specification section reference, 2) a requirement for a j
pre-work discussion with the Nuclear Watch Engineer regarding the sequence of areas to be inspected and work scope and 3) the requirement to verify oper-ability of the redundant SGTS train.
This was completed on April 6,
1983.
Full compliance was achieved on April 6,1983.
We believe this submittal satisfactorily addresses the issue identified in IE Inspection 83-07. Should you have any questions concerning this response, please contact us.
Very truly yours, Commonwealth of Massachusetts)
County of Suffolk
)
Then personally appeared before me W.D. Harrington, who, being duly sworn, did state that he is Senior Vice President - Nuclear of Boston Edison Company, the applicant herein, and that he is duly authorized to execute and file the submittal contained herein in the name and on behalf of Boston Edison Company and that the statements in said submittal are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
My Commission expires:O&21,/933 M4 Notary".jublic
\\,
.