ML20076D505
| ML20076D505 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 07/23/1991 |
| From: | Peevy J UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| ULNRC-2442, NUDOCS 9107290210 | |
| Download: ML20076D505 (8) | |
Text
. - - -.
' Uwox
~
E1.x. cruic Camay nant July 23, 1991 UIERC-2442 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, D.C.
20555 Centlemen:
In complying with the Fitness For Duty Rule, 10CFR26.71(d), Recordkeeping Requirements, please find enclosed Union Electric's Callaway Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data for the six (6) month period be-ginning Janaary 1.1991 and ending on June 30, 1991.
Enclosures include:
Attachment A - Fitness For Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Attachment B - Random Testing Program Results/ Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances (Five Year Record)
Attachment C - Fitness For Duty Managemerit Actions in regards to:
- Initiatives Taken
- L:ssons Learned
- Reportable Fitness For Duty Events under 1CCFR26.13 If you have any questions in regards to the Performance Data Reported, please contact me at (314)676-8246.
EP-James R. Peevy Manager-Operatica Support (Fitness For Duty Manager)
JRP/RCR/DMK/bb g(!
9107290210 910723 PDR ADOCK 05000483 R
PDR I
.;.,o u v v.
Main) AcMiest PO Box 62G Fulton, MO 65251
' 1r 1
I 4
cc: 'ABert Davia, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137-
~
R. L..Itague Chief, Project Section 3C U.S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn-IL 60137
.B. Li Bartlett /D. R. Calhoun Resident NRC Inspector, Callaway Plant Callaway Resident Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR #1 Steedman, MO 65077 M. D. Lynch Licensing Project Manager, Callaway Plant Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S._ Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop-13-E 21 Washington, DC_ 20555 Shaw, Pittman, Potts, & Trowbridge 2300 N. Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037 l.
i
l 9
Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Union Electric Company
. lune 30, 1991 Company 6 wnns Eneng Callaway Suclear Plant Locanon Donna M. Knoepflein 314/676-8211 conmctName Phone (inctuce area code)
Cutoff s: Screen / Confirmation (ng'mi)
O Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana 20 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 f 250 Barbiturates 300 250 j
Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyctidine 25 / 25 Benzodi a r ers t nits 300 / 250 Opiates 300 / 150 Alcohol (% BAC)
.04%
/
Long Term Short Term Testing Results Contractor Contractor Ucensee Employees Personnel Personnel Average Numberwith Unescorted Access 1033 239 15 Referred Access Categories Tested Positive to EAP Restored Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre employment 30 0
0 0
0 0
Pre-badging 17 0
17 0
to o
Periodic 0
0 0
0 0
0 Forcause 0
0 0
0 0
0 Post accident 0
0 0
0 0
0 Random 526 0
110 1
4 0
Follow up 4
0 0
0 0
0 Other 2
0 0
0 0
0 Total 579 0
0 0
127 1
14 0
ATTACllMENT A
ii 3
B 9
iI T
9 1
N ED il C
I ATTA 299 1
i secna ts s
b t
u lu S
se c
i R
1 f
9 i
9 c
m e
1 0
a 4
5 p
r 6
1 S
g a
1 o
0 o
0 0
0 0
r 1
o o
r f
P l
s g
0 s
t n
4 7
e i
8 4
T t
1 4
0 o
1 1
3 1
s 4
1 e
e T
v 0
i 9
t m
9 i
1 s
o 4
o 5
0 d
P 6
n o
o 0
o 0
0 0
O a
0 d
R e
m r
ifn oC 989 1
5 4 3 2 1
d s
e d
e t
e s
n e
i s
ts T
s p
e e
e e
n in e
t T
im ld a
r z
a s
o e
e a
i i
u la v
i f
v v
n e
s ta c
d it it oi u
i it d
t s
h s u
ia te e
y a
n l
c o
o i
s h
n h
z b
iv o
po ir c
ia p
o n
r i
o j
P aP e
d P
a o
p m
h lc r
e a
I G%
M C
O A
P A
B B
n
July 23, 1991 Page 1.of 4
-Fitness For Duty Management Actions Initiatives Taken l
Union-Electric purchased additional blind saaples spiked with ephedrine to ensure the DHHS Laboratories providing services to Union Electric are not mis identifying ephedrine in the urine for amphetamines.
Because of reports (within the transportation industry) of some laboratories, during their testing process of urine specimens, mis-identifying ephedrine in the urine for amphetamines, and in discussions between Union Electric's Medical Review Officer and Dr.- Willett of Duo Research, it was decided Union Electric would purchase these additional blind samples. These blind samples re structured to challenge the capabilities of laboratories we use to deter-a mine =if athis error, or potential for this error, does exist.
To date, four (4) samples have been utilized-for this purpose, three (3) of
- which have been-returned with final results and one (1) of-which is still pending.
All four (4) samples were spaced out in the testing process at approximately monthly intervals.
All three (3) specimens for which test results to date are available were tested in;our on-site testing facility and at both DHHS Laboratories provi-ding services to Union Electric, and the'results have all been negative for amphetamines at all three (3) testing facilities (ie: the correct result).
ATTACHMENT C
m Page 2 of 4 Lessons Learned During this reporting period, we experienced an occurrence in which the temperature of a urine specimen measured outside of the acceptable range (low side) of 90.5* F - 99.8' F.
The; container in which the specimen is provided holds 120 ml and is a wide base type container. The amount of specimen provided in this case was 10 -
15 ml. - This was not an adequate amount of urine specimen to completely sub-morge the temperature probe.
Fitness For Duty Program Management determined the unacceptable temperature measurement was uni'due to the specimen being altered or diluted, but was due to the amount of specimen provided was insufficient to obtain an accurate
]
- measurement.
Since an accurate temperature measurement could not be obtained, the specimen i
could not continue.to be processed as a partial specimen and was discarded.
j The individual providing'the insufficient specimen was required to repeat the
)
process and did_ provide an. ample specimen approximately 2-3 hours later. The specimen was within the acceptable temperature range _and no trace of drugs was-indicated in the test results, At the time of this occurrence, our procedure did not address how this type l
of-situation should be-handled, q
l Subsequent to this occurrence, Fitness For Duty Program Management:
-1)
Requested our Medical Review Officer to evaluate our specimen containers, temperature measuring device, and provide us with a recommendation as to the minimum amount of specimen required
'in order to obtain an accurate temperature measurement whereas the specimenLean be retained and processed as a partial specimen until 60 ml of urine specimen is collected.
The MRO's recommen-dation is 30 ml.
12 ) Our procedure is currently _being revised to provide Collection Site Personnel the following guidance:
Added definition for:
Partial Soccimen - A urine specimen that contains,-at a minimum, 30 ml of urine, but-less than-60 ml of urine.
L ATTACl! MENT C i
i
=_
~^
.O Page 3 of 4 Lessons Learned (continuedi 2)
Added note in procedure:
Note - Urine specimens provided that do not meet the definition of a Partial Specimen (minimum of 30 ml) cannot be processed in accordance with this procedure.
In these cases, the insufficient specimen must be discarded and the employee instructed to repeat the process until a sufficient urine specimen can be provided.
Added paragraph to identify: Urine specimens that measure at a minimum of 30 m1 but less than 60 ml are considered partial specimens and are processed as such, l~
[-
ATTACRMENT C l
l.
Page 4 of 4 Events Reported In Accordance With 10CFR26.73 No events occurred during this reporting period requiring reporting in accordance with 10CFR26,73, i
f i
t I
i l
I L
ATTACILMENT C
.