ML20076D302
| ML20076D302 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1983 |
| From: | Tauber H DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| EF2-64-584, NUDOCS 8308230337 | |
| Download: ML20076D302 (2) | |
Text
--
Hany Tauber Group Vice Presdent Detroit Edison ?"WJ=
August 17, 1983 EF2 - 64,584 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr. Youngblood:
Reference:
Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341
Subject:
Proposed FSAR Revision to Meet Revised Meteorological Monitoring Requirements This is to confirm a discussion which took place between Larry E.
Schuerman and the NRC Licensing Project Manager, M. David Lynch on July 14, 1983 regarding which version of Regulatory Guide 1.23, Section C.4. System Accuracy, should be applied to Fermi 2.
The 1972 NRC approved version specifies some unattainable accuracies on a few meteorological parameters. The proposed Revision 1, dated September, 1980 reduces these accuracy requirements slightly to those which can be reached with proper operation and mainten-ance procedures.
We agreed with M. David Lynch to document our intent to meet the latest NRC proposed criteria for meteorological instrument accuracy. Accordingly, attached is a marked up copy of the Fermi 2 FSAR page A-15.
This change will be included in a forth-coming amendment to the FSAR.
Should you have any further questions, please contact Mr. Larry E.
Schuerman (313) 586-4207.
Sincerely,
[//W
//
$y a
cc: Mr. B. Little
/
g Mr. M. D. Lynch
\\
8308230337 830917 PDR ADOCK 05000341
) \\
A PDR
EF-2-FS AR REGULATORY GUIDE 1.22 (2/1972), PERIODIC TESTING OF PROTECTION SYSTEM ACTUATION FUNCTIONS The current Fermi 2 provisions for periodic testing of protection system actuation functions conform to the requirements of this guide.
Refer to Subsections 7.2.1.1, 7.2.2.2, 7.4.2.2, 7.6.1.1, 7.6.1.2, 7.6.1.4, 7.6.1.7, 7.6.1.8, 7.6.1.13, 7.6.1.14, 7.6.2.1, 7.6.2.2, 7.6.2.3, 7.6.2.4, 7.6.2.7, 7.6.2.8, 7.6.2.9, 7.6.2.11, 7.6.2.12, and 7.6.2.14 of this FSAR.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.23 (2/1972), ONSITE METEOROLOGICAL PROGRAMS The Fermi 2 onsite meteorological programs fulfill the require-ments of this guidege.xce sect:o, 6 3% ent
,4 c curacy, T h e.
Fe rg 1 M e.te... l.pd b a. Ac y:sd.pt t A e S ystem mee.ts+1oe system acteacy regnh4me4 4 o*
or details on the Fermi 2 meteorological program, refer to Sub-gi: tion 2. 3. 3.3 of this FS P. wore A Wsw 1 O/lWo) 4hRey lsb y (, d e. 1.1Q to REGULATORY GUIDE 1.24 (3/1972), ASSUMPY N USED FOR EVALUATING
~
THE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF A PRESSURIZED WATER REAC'IOR RADIOACTIVE GAS STORAGE TANK FAILURE Regulatory Guide 1.'24 does not apply to this FSAR since the Fermi 2 power plant utilizes a BWR.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.25 (3/1972), ASSUMPTIONS USED FOR EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF A FUEL HANDLING ACCIDENT IN THE FUEL HANDLING AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR BOILING AND PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS The analysis of the fuel handling accident, as discussed in Subsection 15.1.23 of this FSAR, is in conformance with the regulatory position of this guide.
REGULATORY GUIDE 1.26 (2/1976, Rev. 3), QUALITY GROUP CLASSIFICA-TIONS AND STANDARDS FOR WATER, STEAM, and RADIOACTIVE-WASTE-38 CONTAINING COMPONENTS OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS The Fermi 2 design is not in full conformance with the require-ments of this guide.
The design is based on the commitment in the PSAR as accepted by the AEC-DL in the Safety Evaluation l
Report (SER) Section 3.3.3, page 16.
The Fermi 2 project con-j siders the extent to which the design conforms to this guide to be adequate.
For details, refer to Subsection 3.2.2 of this FSAR.
A-15 Amendment 38 - July 1981