ML20074A152
| ML20074A152 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1983 |
| From: | SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20074A149 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8305120332 | |
| Download: ML20074A152 (1) | |
Text
[
that the Staff "is satisfied" by a LILCO commitment to comply with GDC 1 during' operations, we believe a more accurate char-i acterization is the following: the Staff testified in the reopened proceeding that given LILCO's refusal to adopt the Denton definition of "important to safety," even LILCO's com-mitment to "do in the future what had been done in the past" would not constitute an acceptable basis for licensing Shoreham.
(Findings S7B:40, 42, 46, 64, 66, 70).
See Section II.B.2(c) below.
Indeed, even LILCO agreed that the dif ference in safety classification terminology would lead to confusion between LILCO and the Staff during operations.
(Finding S7B:43).
We concur with the Staff's observation that LILCO's fail-tre to acknowledge the applicability of regulations to equip-meht beyond that defined as safety-related will result in a lower standard of performance during operation.
( F,ind ing S7B:44).
Poor performance is likely to occur with respect to treatment of nonsafety-related equipment (including both maintenance and surveillance), compliance with NRC reporting
( footnote con' t from previous page) respect to the operation of Shoreham, LILCO's quality as-surance and quality standards for nonsafety-related SS&Cs are inadequate]"; "LILCO satisfied the Staff's concerns about compliance with GDC 1 during operations by commit-ting to make cortain changes to the Shoreham PSAR and other LILCO documents
"; and "The Staff believes that (the LILCO) commitment [to amend the FSAR] will ensure that GDC-1, as the Staff interprets it, is met during operation."
8305120332 630509 PDR ADOCK C5000322 C
PDR -
-