ML20073P862

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-271/91-09.Corrective Actions:Installed Hardware Change, Performed Engineering Evaluation of Viable Hardware Alternatives & Implemented Appropriate Hardware Changes
ML20073P862
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/1991
From: Murphy W
VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
BVY-91-54, NUDOCS 9105230225
Download: ML20073P862 (2)


Text

VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION y

BVY 91-54

^-

(XNyj>o)

. 4+ s Ferry Road, Brattleboro, VT 05301-7002 amam orra

,q

,w w,,

Q) x = 77 e

May 15,1991 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention:

Document Control Desk

References:

a)

License No. DPR 28 (Docket No. 50-271) b)

Letter, USNRC to VYNPC, dated 9/22/89; Inspection Report 50-271/89-13 c)

Letter, USNRC to VYNPC, dated April 12, 1991; Inspection Report 50-271/91-09 d)

Letter, VYNPC to USNRC, BVY 90-100 dated October 12, 1990

Dear Sir:

Subject:

Reply to Outstanding item; Inspection Report 91-09 This letter is written in response to an outstanding item described in section 7.0 of Inspection Report 91-09 (Reference c), concerning the turbine building roof vent radiation monitoring system.

Backaround in response to NRC followup item 84-11-05, Vermont Yankee established procedures for appropriate monitoring of post accident releases through the turbino roof vents using existing area radiation monitors.

In a subsequent inspection Report, 89-13 (Reference b), we were requested to submit our procedures to NRR for their review.

During preparation of our submittal we decided that relocation of two ARM's would enhance our ability to perform post accident monitoring of the roof vents.

These were relocated during the 1990 refueling outage, and Reference d) was submitted on October 12, 1990.

We were recently informed by Reference c) that NRR has determined that our present method of monitoring the turbine building roof vent releases in a aost-accident condition is inadequate to satisfy the regulatory position stated n NUREG 0737.

Concurrent with our actions in preparation for submittal of our procedures for post accident monitoring to NRR, we periodically sampled the roof vents to reassess the need for monitoring of these vents during normal operations.

i f

i

[* h 9105230225 910513 PDR ADOCK 05o00271 Q

PDR 1

-vp

- ~ _

~. - _.

e e-VERMONT YAN.sEE NUCLE AR POWER CORPOR ATION e

U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 15,1991 Page 2 These samples showed that the releases out of the turbine building roof vents were very low but detectable. Using conservative assumptions and ground level dispersion factors the maximum additional infant thyroid dose is calculated to be about 0.5 mrem /yr. The maximum beta and gamma air doses are calculated to be about 8E-4 mRadlyr and 4E 3 mRadlyr respectively.

Proposed Actions As a result of the determination by NRR that our post accident monitoring is inadequate, our analysis of release data taken at the roof vents during plant operation, and our desire to fully resolve this issue, we propose the following actions.

1.

We will install a hardware change that will either eliminate the release, reroute it via a monitored discharge path or provide local monitoring for the turbine building roof vents.

2.

We will perform an _ engineering evaluation of viable hardware alternatives and advise you of our course of action by 12/1/91.

3.

We will implement the appropriate hardware changes no later than the end of the refueling outage in the fall of 1993.

Until the implementation of the permanent hardware changes, we propose to continue to use our existing procedures for monitoring post accident releases through the roof vents and will revise the FSAR to ensure consistency with the operating procedures. We will also revise our Off Site Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and appropriate procedures to include periodic grab samples and calculations to quantify releases through the roof vents during operation. We will include these releases in our semiannual effluent release reports. These interim l

provisions will be implemented by October 1,1991.

We trust that the information provided adequately addresses your concerns; however, should you have any questions or desire additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation WarrenTP. M rphy7&

d I

Senior Vice President, p

tions cc:

USNRC Regional Administrator, Region i USNRC Resident inspector, VYNPS USNRC Project Manager, VYNPS l

1

_.