ML20073M914

Response to 830407 First Set of CP Interrogatories & Request to Produce.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence

ML20073M914
Person / Time
Site:	Clinch River
Issue date:	04/21/1983
From:	Gross P JOINT APPLICANTS - CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR
To:	National Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club
References
NUDOCS 8304220290
Download: ML20073M914 (4)

Text

.. . _ . - _ - _ _ .

J%usacanarsronDums ApYi1C2i, 1983

'83 APR 21 P4 :17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1 ' gek/

Liiwiwiwiiiu LLLiiuuii LiLiLiiiiuiLiiii

)

In the Matter of )

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY )

)

PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ) Docket No. 50-537

)

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY )

)

(Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant) )

LiiiLLLi LiLiiiLLLLLLLLLiiiiiwiiiiiiiii)

APPLICANTS' RESPONSE TO NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., AND SIERRA CLUB'S FIRST SET OF CONSTRUCTION PERMIT INTERROGATORIES imiimmL&NDiBEQUESTmT0_EBODUCELT0m&EELIC&BTS_imii Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.740b, and in accordance with the Board's Order of March 10, 1983, the United States Department of Energy, Project Management Corporation, and the Tennessee Valley Authority (the Applicants) hereby respond to the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and the Sierra Club's First Set l

of Construction Permit Interrogatories and Request to Produce to l Applicants, dated April 7, 1983.

l 8304220290 830421 PDR ADOCK 05000537 G PDR r

- O 1 .. - .. . . ._ - = _ - _ _ _ .__ _

5 2DtBEIQ9ntDIY

1. Identify and describe in detail all analyses, statements and conclusions contained in Appendix A (and Attachments) of the SER with which you are in disagreement. The response to this interrogatory must include a detailed description or explanation of all bases for Applicants' disagreement.

a. As to each such analysis, statement or conclusion, describe in detail all analyses performed by Applicants which support Applicants' position.

b. Identify and provide any documents which support the bases for Applicants' disagreement.

BeBPDDBe The Applicants have reviewed Appendix A of the SER and agree with the overall conclusions in Appendix A. The Applicants have not conducted a review to determine whether or not they agree with every analysis, statement, and conclusion in Appendix A and attachments thereto. Therefore, the Applicants are not aware of any disagreements with such analyses, statements, and conclusions which might materially affect the overall conclusions.

IDtBIID9BtDIY

2. Describe in detail the methodology which Applicants believe should be used in developing a bone dose value for evacuation Protective Action Guides (PAG).

6

a. Describe in detail any analyses, calculations ,

or studies performed by Applicants in developing a bone dose PAG.

b. Identify and provide all documents used by Applicants in responding to this interrogatory.

BBBPDDBB Applicants have not determined a methodology which should be used in developing a bone dose PAG.

a. The Applicants have not developed a bone dose PAG.

b. The Applicants have not used documents in responding to this interrogatory.

O a

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGUI ATORY COMMISSION

.In the matter of UNITED STATFS DFPAR1t1ENT OF ENERGY DOCKET NO. 50-537 PROJECT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION TENNFSSFE val. LEY AUTil0RITY AFFIDAVIT OF PETER J. GROSS, Peter J. Cross, being duly sworn, deposes und says as follows:

1. That he is employed as Assistant Director, Public Safety Division, CRRRP Project, and that he is duly authorized to answer Interrogatories 1 and 2 in the First Set of Construction Ponnit Interrogatories.

2. That the above-mentioned and attached answers are true and correct i

to the best of his knowledge and belief. ,

(lY

,/ fr) yature>

Subscribed and sworn tn before me this //,, ay of @ , 1983.

V My C r{%Of01ahn rvanc mission Expire > April 28.1W.

' . 1g l 00 T 9-939 Sid 390IN >lWO d88d3 IWQ)0 : 06T/Wk0 i

' w