ML20073L358
| ML20073L358 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | West Valley Demonstration Project |
| Issue date: | 04/19/1991 |
| From: | Yeazel J ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| To: | Hurt R NRC |
| References | |
| REF-PROJ-M-32 NUDOCS 9105130304 | |
| Download: ML20073L358 (27) | |
Text
-).k
[
Department of Energy M pfu 2
1 Idaho Operations Office
{
5, West Valley Project Office g
P.O. Box 191 West Valley, NY 14171 April 19. 1991 Mr. R. Davis Hurt U
S. Nuclear Regulatory Ctruission lleackW.,
War'ingtor! D. C.
20555
SUBJECT:
Intograted Radwaste Treatrent System (IRTS) Canptign #20 Run Report J
Dear Mr. Hurt:
Enclosed for your information is the Run Report for the Integrated Radvaste Treatment System (IRTS) Carpaign #20. 'Ihis report provides details concernin3 the operational run of the IRTS includirg: process description, operational details, system performance, lessons learned and the results obtained.
Carpaign #20 presrM 50,700 gallons of supernatant containing 328,000 curies for a cumulative total of 612,000 gallons containing 5,135,000 curies removcd frca Tank 8D-2.
Campaign #20 was a four column Run in a D-A-B-C configuration. '1he average Canpaign #20 decontanination factor was 62,900.
Sincerel,
]
t f0 l
}
&Q
?, -
J.
an Y el, M; Jer ations Maintenance, Ergineerin3 and Constniction West Valley Project Office Enclosure cc:
J. E. Solecki, DOE-ID CBL:013:91 - 0679:91:01
'I CBL/sl 9105130304 910419 FDR PROJ M-32 PDR
LO A IRTS Process Control Engineering from. Ext. 4283, MS W.
A tener e : DC:91:0019 om February 20, 1991 sumen IRTS Campaign'No. 20 Run Report to P. J. Valenti
- MS-W cc:
M.N. Baker........W R.F. Gessner.. 201 W.F. MacKellar.55A K.E. Sarriers.....X S.M. Bames.......M J.B. Grw1..... 39 S.A.tbcVean.....W D.J. Sawyer... 205 H.
Boyd......Z-26_
A.J. tbwell......W D.K. Marsh.......X H.J. Shaffner....X J.J. Bx2#...... 07 R.F. Itzo.... Z-18 0.C. Meess... Z-26 0.L. Shugars.....B D.E. Carl.........I M.L. Jeffe......X B.J. Miller... 206 G.A. Smith.......W J.D. Chanberlain.40 P.S. Klanian.....J -
D.F. Pezzimenti..W D.J. Stmxf...Z-26 R.W. Dallas.......X R.E. Lannte.. 07 D.K. Ploetz... 305 D.L. Wiltse......R 1
M.W. Damertw.... 40.
D.R. Leap..... 42 W.G. Poulson.. 307 Original NC D.G. Fel& an......R R.J. Leendowski.B C.F. Ross........W IRTS PCE Lettertog R.J. Fussner......X L.L. Lincoln.....X G.J. Ibbbins.....W r"DC:91' Letter tog D.H. Garl and......R B.W. Liskow......R A.F. Russillo....R
= ' ^ ~ ~ ^ ~
Transmitted for ycur information and use.is the IRTS Campaign No. 20 Run Report.
If you have any questions regarding the information in this report, plea.ie contact the undersigned (Ext. 4283).
0 g
J. C. Cwynar, Manager Mail Stop - W' IRTS Process Control Engineering West: Valley Nuclear Services Co., Inc.
JCC:jbc J
Attachment:
IRTS Campaign No. 20 Run Report SRC4002
, February 28, 1991 DC:91:0019 6
I RUN REP 0RT 1
INTEGRATED RADIOACTIVE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM i
CAMPAIGN N0. 20, September 17, 1990 - November 2, 1990 Information Contributed By:
M. N. Baker G. J. Robbins C. F. Ross G. A. Smith SRC4002
February 28, 1991 OC:91:0019 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Summary Table of Run Statistics Table 2 - Comparison of Statistics from Previous Campaigns to this Campaign Table 3 - Detailed Tables of Run Statistics Table 4 - Drum Testing Results Table 5 - Drum Production Rates Table 6 - STS Process History Table 7 - Summary of Suspect Drums SRC4002 i
February 28, 1991 DC:91:0019
-c e
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - STS Breakthrough Curve Figure 2 - Drum Cell Radiation Levels Figure 3 - STS System DF Figure 4 - IRTS High Level Waste Tanks, 80-1 and 8D-2 Figure 5 - STS Zeolite Usage SRC4002 ii
4 RUN REPORT LEE CAMPAIGN NO. 20
SUMMARY
Integrated Radwaste Treatment System (IRTS) Campaign #20 was initiated on September 17, 1990 and concluded on November 2, 1990, after processing approximately 50,705 gallons of 8D-2 liquid.
The target dilution factor was 3.0:1 water to 39 wt",supernatant (baseline supernatant).
Cesium j
removed from 8D-2 solution was 209 kilocuries for the supernatant processing to the LWTS and 119 kilocuries removed during loading of Column C with cesium (See below).
This resulted in a total of 328 Kilocuries of Cesium -137 removed from Tank 80-2 during Campaign 20.
IRTS procedures were modified to allow an increase in flow rate through the STS ion exchange columns to a maximum of 8 gpm (increased from the previous maximum of 6 gpm).
These modifications also allowed continuous operation of the LWTS evaporator without piacement of the system in standby during STS to LWTS transfers.
Shortly after commencement of supernatant processing, an abnormally high system effluent cesium concentration was observed.
Ion exchange Lolumn C, the fourth column in sequence for Campaign 20, showed evidence of containing a heel of cesium-loaded zeolite.
Decontaminated supernatarit was eluting cesium from this heel, causing high cesium effluent.
Following IRTS Campaign 19. a method of dumping Column C was used which emptied all the zeolite out of the column bottom plug.
This procedure had been used successfully once following Campaign 17.
Due to the cesium in the effluent it was necessary to discontinue supernatant processing, saturate Column C, dump and recharge it with clean zeolite.
The IRTS operations prior to saturation of Column C were designated Campaign 20A.
Following recharging of Column C, IRTS operations were designed as Campaign 208.
Campaign 20A processed 7,080 gallons of supernatant and SRC4002 -
DC:91:0019 February 28 1991 0
produced 103 drums d CSS cemented wance.
Campaign 208 processed 43,625 gallons of supernatant which resulted in a CSS production of 558 drums.
Both segments of Campaign 20 were run in STS ion exchange column sequence D-A-B-C.
The target dilution factor was 3.0:1 based upon 39 wt%
concentration in 8D-2.
A total of 328 kilocuries of cesium was removed uuring Campaign 20.
209 kilocuries was removed during processing of supernatant and 119 kilocuries was removed during saturation of Column C.
The weighted average decontamination factor was 64,909 for Campaign 20.
At of the end of Campaign 20, the total volu'ae of supernatant removed from 8D-2 is 612,000 gallons, with approximately 207,500 gallons remaining to process assuming a final level of 32 inches at completion of supernatant processing.
The necessity of dumping two columns of zeolite during Campaign 20 (one following Campaign 20A and one following Cam::aign 20B) resulted in a usage of 2,766 kg (dry weight) of zeolite. The total zeolite usage to date is 33,393 kg, or approximately 72% of the 46,169 kg total allowable for supernatant prccessing. This allowable usage is based upon a total usage for supernatant and sludge washing processing of 60,000 kg dry weight and a requirement of 10 column charges (13,831 kg) for sludge washing.
Campaign 20 was not a typical campaign. Therefore, using statistics from this campaign for predictions of total zeolite usage is not appropriate. Assuming a supernatant volume of 45,000 gallons and a zeolite usage of 1,383 kg (one column charge) per campaign is a reasonable assumption. Using these values, a total of 5 campaigns, using 6,915 kg of zeolite are required. This would result in a total zeolite usage of 40,222 kg for supernatant processing.
This is approximately 87%
of 46,169 kg allowable.
See figure 5 for a plot of zeolite usage to date.
i SRC4002 -
February 28 1991 DC 91:0019 4
During Campaign 20A, the Liquid Waste Treatment System (LWTS) received a total of 2 batch transfers from STS totaling 22,506 gallons of process liquid which was evaporated to produce 4,066 gallons of concentrates.
Campaign 208 resulted in 11 batch transfers for 103,510 gallons of process liquid which produced 22,374 gallons of concentrates.
The grand total for all of Campaign 20 was 126,017 gallons of process liquid and 26,440 gallons of concentrates.
Cement Solidification System (CSS) processed 26,440 gallons of concentrates and produced 661 drums total for both segments of Campaign 20.
The total CSS production at the completion of Campaign 20 was 10,336.
Table I shows a summary of run statistics.
Process completion status at the end of this campaign is 79.5% based on c total drum production of 13,000 drums.
DISCUSSION:
STS OPERATION Campaign 20 STS operations commenced on September 17, 1990.
A change was made to procedures and technical requirements allowing an increase the STS column solution flow rate from a maximum of 6 gpm to 8 gpm.
The STS system was started at this h.v.ier rate of 8 gpm.
After the system was filled with supernatant, it became apparent that the cesium concentration in the STS system effluent was abnormally high.
The proper positioning of all system valves was verified.
Valves which isolate raw supernatant from decontaminated supernatant were inspected for seal drainage by check of leakage from the valve cavity bleed.
Continuous leakage would indicate faulty valve seals. This could allow cross contamination of the decontaminated supernatant stream by raw supernatant.
These checks, which were performed per 50p 50-36, indicated no improper positioning or valve seal leakage and resulted in no improvement in the STS system effluent.
To eliminate the increased flow rate as a possible cause for SRC4002. -
___u.i.Ji al.-
A e
i-t-e
-e.4a--
a-a-..---
e+
--.-.4
_s4.i-
- 4-.
a-e e.i.E__
ae-February 28 1991 0C:91:0019 the abnormal effluent activity, the total flow rate through the columns was decreaseo to 3 gpm. This reduction in flow rate had no beneficial effects on the system effluent.
The STS system effluent cesium concentration continued tu slowly increase.
In order to investigate the cause of high activity problem the system was flushed with deminerali::ed water and placed in a standby mode.
A series of actions, performed in parallel, were taken to determine the cause of the increased cesium concentration of system effluent.
The first was to perform a pressure test of each individual column. A work order was issued to perform the tests as described in S0P 50-37.
No measunble pressure decay was observed during any of the column pressure tests.
This eliminated vahe leak-through as the cause.
Ion Exchange Column C was the first column to be loaded with zeolite of the newest lot (batch) purchased.
Although this new lot of zeolite was certified by the manufacturer, the next action was the performance of testing by Analytical and Process Chemistry (A & PC) which verified the zeolite was acceptable for use.
The zeolite used in Column C actually har a higher efficiency than the older lot of zeolite.
Verification of ion exchange column valve integrity and good zeolite efficiency led to the likelihood that a heel of cesium loaded zeolite had remained-in the column when it was dumped.
The sodium present in the decontaminated supernatant has been shown to elute cesium from a loaded zeolite heel.
This elution would cause higher than normal cesium concentration in the column effluent.
Note that IX Column C was dumped following Campaign 19 using a method which had been used only once previously.
Following Campaign 17, Column A was successfully dumped using this method.
This method dewaters the column with all zeolite still contained in the column.
Then the bottom plug is removed and the zeolite removed from the column by flushing it out of the open bottom dump valve.
This method of dumping the column allows the zeolite to be dumped in four locations, one below each IX column.
Utilization of the SRC4002.
February 28 1991 0C:91:0019 4
J-nozzle results in the zeolite being dumped in one. location, near the 80-1 Tank wall. Dumping in one location is undesireable due to build up of a zeolite pile. - The method used, however, does not refill the column with water because the open bottom dump valve drains liquid from the column at a greater rate than the flush flow rate.
It is possible that some zeolite may bridge and hang up in the column.
There is no assurance that water will fluidize all the zeolite and facilitate it's removal from the column.
In order to confirm the suspicion that a heel of loaded zeolite existed in the column, an elution test was performed.
This test entailed passing
' decontaminated supernatant through Column C while sampling the column influent and effluent to determine if elution was taking place.
The column effluent was steadily increasing, which indicated a heel of loaded zeolite was present.
Column C was thus shown to be unacceptable for use due to the high cesium effluent.
In order to make the column acceptable for use as a final column, the zeolite had to be removed from the column and fresh zeolite loaded into it. To achieve efficient use of the zeolite, Column C was placed on line with raw undiluted supernatant to saturate the zeolite with cesium. The column was then emptied of zeolite by sluicing via the J-nozzle and the heel was discharged through the bottom dump valve.
- Following this, Column C performed as expected of a normal final column containing fresh zeolite.
The remainder of Campaign 20 (208) STS operation proceeded without any other notable problems.
Following completion of Campaign 20, the lead column, Column D, was sluiced via the J-nozzle and then sparged per a work order.
The sparge should reduce the heel of loaded zeolite to an acceptably small amount that will not significantly effect column effluent cesium activity.
Note-that sparging of Column D following Campaign 16 allowed acceptable use of Column 0 as a fourth column.
For the start of Campaign 21, two drums of zeolite will be placed in column D to test the effeciveness of the
-sparge.
SRC4002 - - - -
. February 28 1991 0C:91:0019 e
Durir.g riser work being performed between the second and third operating phases of STS, the hydraulic arm winch cable broke.
This allowed the hydraulic arm to slide down the mast, stopping on the toe plate at the bottom of the mast (see also CM 90124).
STS personnel were able to place a basket sling around the arm cart to safely secure it shortly after it had dropped.
After much planning, the arm was removed from the riser and disposed of.
This failure of the hydraulic arm did not cause a delay in operations during Campaign 20.
LWTS OPERATION To facilitate the increased flow rate of the STS and LWTS, LWTS procedures and Technical Requirements (TRs) were modified to allow operation of the LWTS Evaporator on a continuous basis.
This is referred to as " Feed and Bleed" due to the fact the Evaporator Feed Tank 50-15B -is filling from Decontaminated Supernatant Storage Tank 80-3 and is supplying the evaporator at the same time.
Formerly, the evaporator was required to be placed in standby prior to and during transfers from the STS to the LWTS. These transfers are normally of 6-7 hours duration.
The operation of the evaporator during the transfers increased the throughput capacity of the LWTS sufficiently to easily keep pace with the increased flow rate of 8 gpm.
A malfunctioning evaporator density transmitter caused a loss of approximately 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of evaporator operation during troubleshooting and replacement of the transmitter.
STS was requested to decrease the. flow rate for approximately 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br />.
SRC4002 -
February 28.1991 DC:91:0019 S'.
CSS OPERATION The High Shear Cement Solidification System-(HSCSS) produced a total of 661-drums of low level waste at 40 gallons of waste per drum. A total of 103 drums were produced during the 20A segment of Campaign 20 and 558 drums were produced during the 208 segment of Campaign 20.
A total of 442 (66.8% of the total produced) low dose shield drums, suitable for placement in the Drum Cell ninth layer, were produced and segregated in the Drum Cell.. All of the low dose shield quality drums were produced during the 208 segment-of the campaign.
A gel time of 104 minutes was obtained by lab, analysis for Tank SD-15Al concentrates sample _ log number 9000089.
The acceptable gel time is a range of minimum 5 minutes to maximum of 30 minutes per WVNS-PCP-001 (Process Control Plan). A work order was issued to obtain an "in process" gel time of the first drum of cemented waste produced each
)
shift.
Prior to producing a second drum, the gel time of the first was Verified to be within the 5-30 minute range specified in the PCP. All of the in-process gel times fell within the range specified. Refer also to IRTS Campaign 19 Run Report for information on previous out-of-specification lab gel times.
CSS processing was interrupted for approximately 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> due to electrical and limit switch problems at the Drum Cell, CSS processing was also interrupted when, during a loadout of CSS drums, the drums were advanced while the drum transporter drawbridge was in the raised (closed) position (see also Cm 90121).
Two drums exited the M-45 conveyor and tipped against the back of the drum transporter.
The two drums were slightly damaged.
After an initial evaluation, the two damaged drums were set aside and operations were resumed with visual verification that the drawbridge was in position to accept drums prior to loadout. The automatic sequence of operations for loadout was changed by IRTS Engineering to lower'the drawbridge prior to raising the M-45 lift table. The lift table, prior to this change, raised before the SRC4002. -
~.
.w drawbridge lowered.
The drums on the lift table obscured the operator's vision of the drawbridge.
CSS operating procedures were modified as required to_ reflect these changes.
i DRUM CELL OPERATIM Operation of the IRTS Drum Cell continued in support of CSS operations.
The-Drum Cell experienced problems with an electrical short in the cable-from the drum grabber to the cable reel, an electrical short in the control panel, and a limit switch malfunction.
These problems caused an approximate 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> loss of CSS production time.
Other than the above mentioned problems, the IRTS Drum Cell operated without difficulty.
DECONTAMINATION FACTORS:
A graph of the decontamination factors (DF) obtained in STS is shown in figure 3.
Transfer DF is the instantaneous factor, calculated for each transfer from STS to LWTS.- Cumulative DF is the weighted-average of the transfer DF's.
TANK LEVELS:
This campaign continued to decrease the. level in Tank 80-2 by processing supernatant._ A graph of High Level Waste Tanks 8D-1 and 8D-2 is included for informational purposes, see figure 4.
The level in Tank 80-1 is at or near the level' desired.- This level is required to limit radiation levels at the M-4 and M-5 risers to desirable levels and maintain coverage of.the zeolite pile in 80-1.
SRC4002 - -
. February 28 1991-DC:91:0019
, u PRODUCT ACCEPTANCE:
The waste form classification analyses for drums produced is as follows:
Campaign 11, Class "C" Low level Waste; verification complete.
Campaign 12, Class "C" Low level Waste; verification complete.
Campaign 13, Class "C" Low Level Waste; verification complete.
Campaign 14, Awaiting QA update.
Campaign 15, Awaiting QA update.
Campaign 16, Awaiting QA update.
Campaign 17, Awaiting QA update.
Campaign 18, Awaiting QA update.
Table 7, Summary of Suspect Drums and Test Results, contains a list of all drums that have not been produced in accordance with the Process Control Plan (PCP).
SRC4002 -...
. ~.,... ~,
g39 Breakthrough Curve 1
t 100 4
y
~
i C
m i
u
,0 t
c-m a
i 1r om 3
so a
e 1
r y
2 j
to Column D i
W 40 l
L_
i
.m C
i E
a r-e g
20 i
I a
r
~
~-
_ _ _ __________ Column A_ _ _ _ _ _
~
i i
i i
i O-100 200 300 400 500 i
i Litres (xiOOO) i
.j SRC4002
' 1
mbniar,f 28, 1991 FIGtilE 7 DC 91:0019 DRUM CELL RADIATION LEVELS
,...q,,,,i,...,....,....,....,....,....,....
0.18
/-
'~
.r l\\
~
I.
\\
- \\
I l:
j\\
\\
o'ss
.j
/
\\.._.._. C R A N E M A I N T. _
Z j
x oc
\\
i N
E
\\
I 0.12
\\
l i
(TI j
I
/
CONTROL ROOM
.n.
l tu
\\
r 3
8S
!'N !
/
WEST WALL
- I l
I,N.y Z
~
p
~
ri
,\\
lN o
/
,/s
.f
- \\
t-
/g
/
\\,
'/
4 0.06 H
)
,N
\\ l/
~
./
'N /
O 4
\\
\\
/
\\
E
(./
- N/
~
0.03 -
l J
~%
N s/
s-
~
0 I....t....I....I....t....l....I....t....I....l....l....I....I....I 1000 3000 5000 7000 9000 11000
$3000 0
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 ORUMS Sf!C4002 '
5 0
I L
iii l
4 I
i 4
i
{
Q 4
i 4
i I
3 s
E 8
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
o
\\
j j
L l
O
.w l
U m
1 g
o l
m oo C
i O
l w4 x
'1
~
[
CI).p w
Hm t
m W C a
c o
I u.
m w
C.,
D t=
.w C
m L
I C
o
.w m
a C
(U
-J o
m j
a c
CD (D
.u o
c_
l m
W re
/
a s
s
's a
o s a 3
g n
E' i
,,,t i
i g
1 t
g
[
a G
a 8
^
w I
(000T X)
JOQDEd UOTTEUTWEQUODa0
. _ ~ _ -.. _. -
4 OO l4 4 4 4 g4 3 4 4.l4 l4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ji4 4 4 l4 4 4 4 l4 4 ! 4 l4 j
4 4 4 E
R l
E 8
)
O CD t
M 1
Zp L
E i
GJi E
i b
=
IN 3
a WW 3
g 3
ao mi w
n b C21 -
Hl Q
7 1
d CU w
Cui C
g w
i l
ll a
Ig m
a O
O C:
R
[m C
m m!
8 z
=
8 g
C a
H
.E g
i E.
?
a V
ci t t t t 1 f f f f f I f i I f f 1 ? I f f f f f f f I I I ? f f (N
s o
C 8
8 8
8 8
8 2
6
~
n g
m (000TX)
SNOTIV9
iruary 28,-1991
'Jit F. 5 DC:91:001'
-Zeolite Usage For Supernatant Processing
~
~
i 40 --,.........,........................................,....,.........,........,....,
i
/
i
/
t o
o t
o
/
j drojected t
x
..u
=
c Actual cn
-rA m
.g x
C 20 g
m cn m
m L
a m
20 y
.r-4 i
r-s a
m N
0 -
i....i....i........i........i................ m............................ -
50 150 250 350 450 550 650 750 850 0
100 200 300
.400 500 600 700 800 li Supernatant (xiOOO)
SitC4002,
DC:91:0019 February 20, 1991 TABLE 1 IRTS CAMPAIGN NO. 20 RUN REPORT
SUMMARY
TABLE OF RUN STATISTICS 1.
TRANSFERS 8D-3 TO SD-15B A. Campaign Nos. I thru 19 5,704,921 'l 1,507,245 gal.
B. Campaign No. 20 476.973 L 126.003 cal.
TOTAL TO DATE 6,181,894 L 1,633,248 gal.
2.
LWTS PROCESS VOLUMES 2.1 Total Feed to Evaporator A. Campaign Nos. 1 thru 19 5,728,604 L 1,513,342 gal.
B. Campaign No. 20 495.419 L 130.876 gal.
TOTAL TO DATE 6.224.023 L 1,644,218 gal.
2.2 Potal Concentrate A. Campaign Nos. I thru 19 1,367,798 L 361,335 gal.
B. Campaign No. 20 84,765 L 26.440 cal.
TOTAL TO DATE 1,452,563 L 387,775 gal.
3.
DRUMS PRODUCED
- A. Campaign Nos. 1 thru 19 9,675 B. Campaign No. 20 661 TOTAL TO DATE 10,336 4.
CURIES OF CESIUM 137 REMOVED FROM 8D-2 A.IRTS Campaign Nos. 1 thru 19 4,807 KCi S.!RTS Campaign No. 20 328 KCi TOTAL 5,135 KCi 5.
PROCESS COMPLETION A. Curies Percent Complete:
0.782 B. Drums Percent Complete:
0.7951 Includes 5 drums removed from pile and core bored (#72847, 72791, 72949, 71004,72813,71144,72835) which are now located in Lag Storage and does not include 1 drum which was left.
SRC4002 i
ut,:91:Uu19 February 20, 1991 TABLE 2 l
IRTS CAMPMGH N0. 20 RUN REP _QRI C.0MPARISON OF STATISTICS FROM PREVIOUS CAMPAIGNS TO THIS CAMPAIGN CAMPAIGN CAMPAIGN CAMPAIGN RQ.,_.18 H0. 19 EQdQ
$TS Volume of 80 2 Supernatant(a) 39,804 49,186 50,705 Processed (Gal.)
Total Volume Processed (includes 112,5'10 123.048 140,985 flush and dilution Water) (Gal.)
Column Breakthrough (*.)
Lead Columa 65 97 99.5 2nd Column 1
1.2 5.6 Average System DF 33,642 94,977 62,909 Average Cs-137 in Effluent (uti/mt) 0.02
.017
.026 LWTS Concentrates (b)
Volume (Gal.)
21,747 27,218 26,440 Average Cs-137 (uci/ml)
.11
.072
.206
.c 5 S Drums Produced 549 675 661 Average Cs-137/ Drum (Ci)
.021
.01
.025 Average Drum Contact Dose Rate (mR/hr) 20 12 25 (a) See Table 6 for volume of supernatant recycled.
(b) Tank heels:
CAMPAIGN 18 CAMPAIGN 19 CAMPAIGN 20 SD-15Al 20 Gallons 20 Gallons 22 Gallons SD-15A2 2 Gallons 2 Gallons 2 Gallons 70-0-1 50 Gallons
.68 GallqDi 60 Gallons TOTAL 72 3allons 90 Gallons 84 Gallons SRC4002 - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ -
3bruary 28,.991 OC:91:0019 TME3
~
I R T S C4fMIGi W. 20 RN IERRT KTAllED TME E (F RM STATISTICS Q118N SSHME: P-A-6-C 1)
TRNERR ID-3 to ED-15 1
2 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 A. DATE 1990 9/17 9/18 1y5 10 6 10/8 1y10 10/D IW12 lyl7 IW22 10/23 10/24 10/25 B. STS RW RATE (gn).
8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 M/A 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 C. D-001 SMRE W.
9002592 9002609 9002341 9002793 9002793 9002826 9002fm 9002867 WA 9002966 9002989 900011 9003062
- i. Csl37 (tCiM) 454 543 623 381 381 453 404 434 WA 402 E9 392 391 11.las(wt%)
10.55 11.03 11.m 10.75 10.75 9.94-10.43 10.16 WA 9.70 9.70 9.70 9.46 lit. Density (grM) 1.074 1.078 1.078 1.076 1.076 1.069 1.073
.l.071 WA 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 D. CE5HM-137 ALTIVITY (QllifW EITtifMIS) 1.
lead Calm D (tLIAL) 12.00 29.00 79.50 141.00 151.00 190.00 259.0 268.0 M/A 286.00 313.0 390.0 588.0 it. 2ruf Coltar. A (uCiM) 0.35 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.36 0.45 0.94 1.25 M/A 5.08 7.80 21.80 7.00 E. C0tifW NFJKRGERGl (%)
- 1. teal Colm D 2.6 5.3 12.8 30.0 39.6 41.9 64.1 61.8 WA 71.1 66.73 99.5 WA
- 11. 2ruf Colm A 2.9 1.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 WA 1.8 2.5 5.6 WA i
F. s-3 SN R E W.
9002597 9002614 9002346 9002783 9002803 9fGR?A 9002848 9902871 9002E 3 9002954 9002996 9fvfVK1 9003081
- i. Cs-137 (tfi M )
0.0594 0.1700 0.0035 0.0212 0.0153 0.00 m 0.0067 0.0106 0.0106 0.0159 0.0020 0.0041 0.0062 I
li.105 (wt %)
8.26 10.31 11.05 11.03 10.31 9.94 9.82 9.58 8.62 4.40 7.77 9.61 9.58 lii. Density ( y M )
1.055 1.072 1.078 1.078 1.072 1.069 1.068 1.066 1.058 1.023 1.051 1.066 1.066 1
- i. Transfer DF 5878 2969 177310 20696 23794 51595 56592 38426 WA 10996 185025 94865 64235
- 11. Ctmulati e DF 5878 4714 59774 49272 44041 45220 46880 G5837 45837 - 41556 55397 59296 62909 H. 5D-15B S4fitE m.
9002608 9002630 9002733 9002789 9002814 9002835 9002864 9002ffB 9002907 90023'71 9002980 9003023 9003067
- i. Cs-137 (tCi/al) 0.0777 0.1860 0.0633 0.0199 0.0132 0.0010 0.0081 0.0132 0.0110 0.0780 0.0049 0.0032 0.0043
- 11. TDS (wt %)
8.50 10.19' 8.50 8.01 9.46 9.58 9.86 9.94 8.62 12.36 7.656 8.38 9.22 lii.[knsity (grM) 1.057 1.071 1.057 1.053 1.065 1.066 1.068 1.069 1.058 1.089 1.050 1.056 1.063 I. Voltae Reoelved j
(Litres) in SD-ISB 51097 34 V 39906 45974 44195 39823 43582 41998 29824 47723 41470 47116 26E31 J. Omulative Voltma 51097 85186 125092 171066 215261 255084 296666 340664 340664 3 E387 429857 476973 476973 l
l SRC4002' 17
ebruary 28, 1991 0C:91:0019 TABLE 4 IRTS CAMPAIGN N0. 20 RUN REPORT DRUM TESTING RESULTS CONCENTRATES BATCH 79 80 81 82 83 LWTS TANK SD 15A1 SD 15A2 SD-15A1 SD 15A2 SD 15Al LAB ANALYSIS No.
9002651 9002808 9002882 9002912 9003089 TOTAL SOLIDS %
37.69 37.21 38.66 40.1 40.71 Cs-137 CONCENTRATION 5.17E 01 3.64E 01 5.98E 02 5.89E 02 2.84E-02 (uC1/mL)
POUNDS CENENT +CaNo3 46,968 47,424 87,552 38,760 80,712 NUN 8ER 0F DRUNS 103 104 192 85 177 TOTAL GALLONS 4,120 4,160 7,680 3,400 7,080 CURIES PER DRUN (Average) 0.078 0.055 0.009 0.009 0.004 RADIATION DOSE (mR/hr) Per Drum 70 55 10 10 6
PRESOLIDIFICATION RESULTS >700 PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI
+
IN CELL TEST RESULTS 80934 80364-81127 80936 81793 DRUN N0./ PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI
>700 PSI Total Coment' 301,416.LBS.
Total Number of Drums 661 Total Volume Solidified 26,440 Gallons Total: Curies Solidified 17.05 Ci SRC4002 18 -
t
-.s-,
.,I.-,-[-.
-.-,,e,
, _, _ - -.,. - -,,,,,1..
a--.
~u
...,,.,,.e.,.
-#w m-i*me,._
- --y.
r-.
,www,,re--,
-ye-r
February 28, 1991 00:91:0019 TABLE 5 IRTS CAMPAIGN NO. 20 RUN REPORT DRUM PRODUCTION RAT [1 DAILY WEEXLY CUMULAT!YE DAIE AVERAGE TOTAL TOTAL Campaign il 06/01 to 06/17 33 401 Campaign #2 06/27 to 07/08 45 783 Campaign #3 07/18 to 08/05 35 1,347 i
Campaign #4 08/22 to 09/26 30 1,681 Campaign #6 12/05 to 12/13 45 2,009 Campaign #7 01/23 to 02/23 50 2,607 Campaign #8 03/06 to 04/13 60 3,303 i
Campaign d9 04/24 to 05/26 58 3,988 l
Campaign #10 06/19 to 06/22 37 4,136 Campaign #11 07/26 to 08/24 58 4,778 Campaign #12 09/05 to 10/13 50 5,421 Campaign #13 10/23 to 11/10 62 5,921 Campaign #14 11/20 to 12/15 67 6.532 Campaign #15 01/22 to 02/14 59 7,124 Campaign #16 03/12 to 04/16 42 7,808 Campaign #17 05/08 to 06/15 60 8.451 Campaign #18 06/28 to 07/25 45 9,000 Campaign fl9 08/09 to 09/13 38 9,675 Campaign #20 09/24
-39 09/25 58 09/26 6
103 9,778 10/10
( 7.
10/11 17 10/12 45 104 9,882 10/15 56 10/16 47 10/17 53 10/18 36 192 10,074 10/19 85 85 10,159 10/29 10/30 47 10/31 44 11/01 51 177 10,336 SRC4002 -
- bruary 26, 1991 DC:91:0019 TABLE 6
~.
IRTS CAMPAIGN NO. 20 RUN REPORT STS PROCESS HISTORY SFUNLTMT RIDCESSED Cs-137 Cs-137
- U 40 10171 If M Ni m Y IDil!ML CDEENTRAT101 TRNEUMD Cs-137 HECYCLED Cs-137 Cs-137 FD%INifE DILUTIG1 G1tH1 U11M4(S)
If1 E2 10 tWIS REMMD TO E2 R& DAD FDD,'ED INEU-2ia)(b)
CRfAIG1 @7Ef8 TE RATIO SFOUCE UMID (tCi/nt )
(Gallms)
FCi (Gallms)
{ FT,il_
DriL (KC !)
1 5
no dilute B-C-D-A B
28b0 24,185 262 0
0 262 6,836 2
6/88 no dilute C-D-A-B C
2600 15,800 155 0
0 155 6,681 3
7/88 no dilute D-A-B-C D
2600 26,356 259 0
0 259 6,422 4
4/83 no dilute A-B-C A
2600 17,000 167 4,003 39 206 6,215 5
9+10/88 no dilute IFA BLC 2400 0
0 30,200 274 274 5,942 6
12/88 no dilute A-B-C-D A
19 %
17,800 133 0
0 133 5,W9 7
1+2/89 2:1 B-C-E '
B 19W 35,342 265 0
0 265 5,544 8
2+3/89 2:1 C-D-A C
1930 34,040 255 0
0 255 5,289 9
4+5/89 2:1 D-A-B-C D
19W 35,101 263 0
0 263 5,026 10 5/B9 2:1 A-B-C A
1885 10,900 78 13,200 31 109 4,917 11 8M9 2:1 B-C A B
1885 35,095 250 0
0 250 4,667
,t G?
10'89 2:1 C-D-A-B C
1885 33,363 238 0
02 238 4,429 13 nG+11,Y3 2:1 D-A-B-C D&A 1855 28,333 199 14,767 42 241 4,188 14 12/89 2:1 B-C-A B5C 1810 33,873 232 19,180 131 363 3,825 15 1+2/%
2:1 D-A-C MA 1810 33.300 228 34,434 202 430 3,395 l
16 364/90 3.6:1 C-A-B C
1790 46,578 316 0
0 316 3,079 17 6/90 3.6:1 A-B-C-D A
1790 45,236 315 1,458 7
315 2,763 l
I8 43/9Ci 3.0:1 B-C-D-A B
1790 39,EDI 270 0
0 270 2,4 93 19 9/13/9 3.0:1 C-D-A-B C
1090 49,184 203 0
0 203 2,291 20 11/07/90 1.0d D-A-B-C 0,C 1090 50,705
_209 32.855 119 328 1,963 611,996 4,297 150,094 545 5,135
.(a)
To*al cc h of Cesiun-137 rworted in Safety Analysis R ort (576) rwort decayed to 7-2188 - 7,098 KCi mims cries of Cesita-137 process i
(b)
Enchdes apgnxistely.489 KCf Cesitn-137 left in 32-inch heel in Tank ED-2 at the end of stpematant processing estimted as follabG:
Volme of 32 inch heel - 80,464 gallms Voltre of strematant in heel - 72,916 gallons Volme of solids in heel - 7,5 8 gallons Curies of CS-137 in heel - 489 KCi (Ref.: 00E/fE-44139-14, Page A2)
[(7.29 E44 call (3.785 E413 d/ call (1.79 E+03 tCt/rt)]
6 10 tcyjcg SRC4002 !
Jarnary 17, 1991 DCt9110019 2512 msaesmarMa. m marmest anessere aanscr auss IRN 104-i DQE OMAlDi SRIAL QEGE G2KR9tG nrTTrm fIMIR llMIR IDifR IUUtf ieourru 11 & grnty mrmrtl 7/29/88 3
7247 0900
!R8EKIB On intI:n in dazn WM 2,4440 7
73033 05013 1R 8 Mal witint, rrrthin n414cwn.
%CVB9 9
74Q14 05G56
!FA M2/90 16 71B22 0 90049 1R D 017 r m 10 IB 71ED5 O(KUD WA
%3AB 11 75KD OfB101
!R EKL5 On tpilcn cf raw wets aihd cn trn cf Enbhad trniv+-
3/23AB 7
71277 IFA
!R 8Hn5 Irw h Iztio (i.e. 0436). ;- W la urrp is
.0.5% to 0.M.
13/41D 14 77074 OfB135
!R 19-148 Mista at-iftnn irttiHm to 14 77073 c: Der.
14 77314 14 77305 14 77304 14 7745 14 77331 l
14 77401 l
14 77330 j
14 77333 14 77344 14 77345 14 77402 14 77404 14 77403 14 773:B 14 77333 14 77399 14 7594 14 77212 14 7722 14 77222 8/J7/90 19 83336 093106 19 80329 19 80198 19 83199 19 IKD00 19
- 80401, 19 80404 39 80403 19 80400 29 80805 19 (KD98 19 EKD99 19 EKQ33 SFC4002 -
133.7 nts ammaarn a er naar 53MEK W M IERS
@2DUEIDO mx tok IRIE OtsatN SRIE mtrCE G24GMNI h< m m flMIR MMER MMER MREP inn u,m11 & <T m rr n m ni 19 7tI411B 2
715G 090042 Icw h twirt
/
7/24118 3
72!D9 0900G p
av2yss 4
7zm osooQ p
IVM4s 12 76392 agaoc p
IV44s u
774a1 0e00u p
IV44s u
7/213 oe00c p
IV44s u
77829 come p
IWi&ts 14 7m3 osooQ
!VA S
SRC4002.
-