ML20073F475

Panda Readiness Assessment Plan

ML20073F475
Person / Time
Site:	05200004
Issue date:	09/28/1994
From:	GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20073F482	List: ML20073F475
References
PROC-940928, NUDOCS 9410030115
Download: ML20073F475 (8)

Text

...

l i

i PANDA Readiness Assessment Plan i

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

i PANDA is a large-scale integrated SBWR containment experiment i

that will be performed by the Paul Scherrer Institut in Wuerenlingen, Switzerland. The test facility is an approximately l

1/25 volumetric, full scale height simulation of the SBWR containment system. This test is a key part of the SBWR Test Program described in NEDC-32391P. The PANDA Test Program i

objectives are specified in Section A.3.1.3.2 ofNEDC-32391P and the PANDA Test Specification (GE document 22A5587 Rev A).

i P

1 1.2 Purpose i

The purpose of this readiness assessment is to assure the technical adequacy of the facility and personnel to conduct the upcoming PANDA tests in accordance with the test requirements. The specific goal is to ensure that all preparations are either complete or proceeding so that testing may be initiated with high confidence that quality results will be obtained.

I i

l I

i i

l 9410030115 940928 i

FDR ADOOK 05200004

^

PDR

s 1.3 Assessment Team The readiness assessment will be conducted by a team of engineers from GE, EPRI, and ENEA.

Representatives from the DOE and NRC will also participate as obseners.

The participants are listed below:

Name Organization TR McIntyre GE-NE - Leader JE Torbeck GE-NE PF Billig GE-NE DA Kaye GE-NE WR Usc, GE-NE V Cavicchia EPRI Consultant P Masoni ENEA (PANTHERS Proj Mgr)

T Cook DOE R Camp DOE Consultant J Kudrick NRC A Drozd NRC R McIntyre NRC 1.4 Methodology The scope of the readiness assessment is presented in Section 2.0. The work will be carried out by review of facility dccumems, observation of the physical conditions of the test loop, and interviews with facility personnel.

The assessment will be divided into horizontal and vertical reviews. The hodzontal review will consists of determining the overall readiness of the facility, its personnel, and documentation. The vertical review will look at a more detailed examination of a part of the facility (e.g., a single instrument line, data calculation, etc.) to verify the technical adequacy and correctness of the work.

j l

6 1.5 Schedule The assessment is planned for October 19-21,1994.

The work will begin each day at 9:00 AM at PSI.

During the opening session, the team will decide which tasks are to be conducted as a single team and which ones will be assigned to sub-groups. At the closing session, preliminary findings and recommendations will be presented to PSI.

.2.0 SCOPE OF THE REVIEW 2.1 Quality Assurance l

Quality Assurance (QA) Plan and conformance with l

a.

the plan.

I

b. Procedure to assure consistency between l

information that can be found in more than one document (e.g., instrument lists).

i i

1 2.2 Facility Assessment l

a.

Facility as-built documentation including fabrication drawings, as available.

b, For unavailable or incomplete documents, status i

and procedures to finalize documentation.

c.

Physical condition of the test facility.

d. Vertical Review: Confirm compliance of as-built piping drawings for a key system (e.g., air supply piping) by tracking the line from its source through the facility.

e.

Facility specifications.

l r

f. Compliance to controls on facility documentation.

g. Adequacy of verification on facility documentation.

h. Status and adequacy of spare parts on site or

[

deliverable times.

e-!

i. Evidence of permanent labels on facility l

components (e.g., valves) and applicable instruments (e.g., pressure transducers).

l i

P b

9

~

2 3 Instrumentation and Data Acquisition System a.

Calibration procedures.

b. Compliance to controls on calibration.

c.

Adequacy of documentation and verification on instrument installation and calibration, including assurance that all instruments will be recalibrated before expiration of the calibration.

d. Identification of criticalinstruments for testing.

e.

Vertical Review: For a select number of instruments, trace the history and layout of each instrument through the following stages:

i) procurement ii) calibration iii) installation iv) connection to control room v) field test vi) data recording

f. DAS validation and control.

2 4 Data Reduction a.

Documentation and verification of software configuration.

b. Vertical Review: For a select number of calculations, review the software for agreement with the calculated parameter.

i

l l

2.5 Test Plan & Procedures

a. Adequacy of Test Plan to satisfy test objectives.

b. Compliance of document with QA procedures.

c.

Evidence of administrative controls on tests.

d. Process of preparation, review, and revision of Test Procedures.

i Identification of test prerequisites, initial e.

conditions, and acceptance criteria.

f. Procedures to resolve unexpected results or l

unanticipated behavior dunng testmg.

l 2.6 Process Control System r

a.

Adequacy to satisfy Test Procedures.

b. Documentation of verification of controls.

F 2.7 Shakedown Tests a.

Results of conducted shakedowm tests and compliance with QA procedures.

b. Status of remaining shakedown tests.

l t

2.8 Personnel

a. Responsibility assignments including backups for key roles.

I

b. Adequacy of training or background to meet responsibility requirements.

i t

9 4

e

i i

2.9 Ne-test Analyses a.

Status and schedule for completing pre-test analyses.

b. Adequacy of controls and verification.

2.10 Test Schedule i

a.

Evidence of test schedule and agreement with SBWR program integrated schedule.

b. Detailed Action Plan to track critical path and maintain schedule.

-f 2.11 Occupational Safety and Health a.

Evidence of facility safety plan.

i

b. Safety training requirements.

i c.

Compliance with local statutes.

i e

i i

5 l

I

)

b 1

l

3.0 CONCLUSION

31 Preliminary Assessment l

At the conclusion of the readiness assessment, the review team will present their conclusions and findings l

at the close-out meeting. Open items from the assessment will be presented and a schedule to close the items will be developed and agreed upon by all l

parties.

j i

3.2 Final Assessment i

i A written draft final assessment will be prepared by October 28 and sent out for comment. All comments will returned by November 4, and a final assessment report issued be November 11,1994.

The final assessment and documentation of closure of i

open items will be filed in the test program's Design Record File.

i 1

i i

(

i i

I i

I'

-