ML20072T248

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Unresolved Item Identified in Insp Repts 50-454/90-25 & 50-455/90-25.Clarification Re Selection of ANSI Code Requirement for Performing post-mod Testing Encl
ML20072T248
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/14/1991
From: Kovach T
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Davis A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
ZNLD732, NUDOCS 9104180043
Download: ML20072T248 (3)


Text

.

Commonwealth Edison g

1400 Opus Place

(

Downers Grove, lilinois 60515 March 14,1991 Mr. A. Bert Davis Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn,IL 60137

Subject:

Byron Station Units 1 and 2 Reply to Unresolved Item Inspection Report Nos. 50-454/90025 & 50-455/90025 NRC_DocheLNos. 50 4ELamL50-455

Reference:

a)

February 15,1991 letter from M.P. Phillips to Cordell Reed transmitting the results of a Routine Safety Inspection at Byron Station

Dear Mr. Davis:

The referenced letter transmitted Inspection Report 50 454/90025; 50 455/90025. An unresolved item was identified concermng the selection of ANSI code requirements for performing post modification testing. A written response was requested and is contained in the Attachment to this letter.

If you have any questions regarding this response, please direct them to

. this office.

Very truly yours, kfj (5:w/ get T.J. Kovach Nuclee.r Licensing Manager Attachment ec:

NRC Resident Inspector - Byron NRC Document Control Desk G.M. Nejfelt - RIII ZNLD732 MAR 181991 wwnu.

9104180043 910314 ADOCK 0500 4

{DR

COMMONWEALTH EDISON RESPONSE UNRESOLVED ITEM f

50 455/90025-01 During a review of modification M6 2-89-652 for replacement of the hydrogen gas totalizer the NRC inspectors found that:

a) Dual editions of the ANSI Standard Code for Pressure Piping (ANSI B31.1 1973 and ANSI B31.1 1977) were allowed to be arbitrarily chosen by Sargent & Lundy per Procedure 303.2 for testing Class b piping (procedure file no. "F.2739, L-2739, Amd.10,10 3186).

At the time of the exit, the facility was in the effort of obtaining the rationale for allowing dual editions of a code to be the effort of obtaining the rationale for allowing dual editions of a code to be concurrently applicable (e.g., basis of Sargent & Lundy Procedure 303.2 changed by Amendment No. 7).

b) The pneumatic test pressure to verify the integrity of the Unit 2 Hydrogen Totalizer from the site hydrogen storage tank was performed at 125 psig. Using ANSI B31.1 - 1977, the test pressure of 125 psig was correct; however, no indication was made in the modification package that this pressure was held for a minimum of10 minutes. Using ANSI B31.1 - 1973, the minimum test pressure required would have been 150 psig.

Given this, the inspectors posed two questions:

Question 1:

How are post modification test criteria verified to be correct 7

Response

" Introduction" to both the 1973 and the 1977 Editions states in part that, "... After Code revisions are approved by ANSI they mny be used by agreement between contracting parties...". Commonwealth Edison and S&L agreed, for reasons listed below, to adopt the 1977 Edition of ANSI B31.1 for Examination, Inspection and Testing.

The initiating document for this action was S&L Engineering Change Notice (ECN) 7809, dated May 14,1984. Tlus ECN was subsequently incoraorated into F/L-2739 Amendment 10, dated October 31,1986. 30th ECNs and specifications are reviewed and approved for use by Commonwealth Edison in accordance with Quality Assurance Procedures QP 31 and QP 3 2.

Commonwealth Edison chose to adopt the 1977 Edition of ANSI B31.1 for Examination, Inspection and Testin g, due to relaxation of requirements for Initial Service Leak Test. The 1973 Edition requires that this test be performed at design pressure, whereas the 1977 Edition requires the test be performed at normal operating pressure. The benefit of performing the initial service leak test at normal operating aressure is that the system can be brou ght up to test pressure much more quickly and with less labor invo: ved.

Commonwealth Edison decided to leave the option for an installer to perform the test at desig'n aressure (1973 Edition) should the metaller decide that an ac ded confidence" would be provided by testing at the higher pressure. Initial Service Leak Tests to either the 1973 or 1977 Code Edition is acceptable to Commonwealth Edison's Nuclear Engineering Department.

2HLD712/7

w 2-Plant design changes are controlled under two main programs, Modifications and Minor Changes. The current modification program provides a detailed list of potential testing requirements which are selected by either Nuclear En ineerinU or the Station

~

Technical Staff and reviewed by the ap icable 'Iechnical Staff Group Leader and Assistant Technical taff Supervisor. In addition, modification tests are written and approved by the Station On Site Review function. Minor changes are controlled under a separate system similar to Byron's program for maintenance work.

Testing of minor changes is specified by the Technical Staff System Engineer and approved by the Station On Site Review fun" tion as part of the installation authorization. Minor Change testing may be documented within the Nuclear Work Request (NWR) program without specific written instruction.

To further clarify:

BAP 1610 8, section E.5.c.2 requires the completion of the testing equipment checklist (BAP 1610 BT2). This requires identification of three phases of testing for the modification (construction testing, modification testin ; and equipment operability testing). Acceptance criteria for the n otification test is identified in part b of the checklist, BAP 1600 7 (Minor Changes Which do not Change Function) and BAP 1610-8 read as follows:

" Development of test requirements, acceptance criteria and procedures shall be based on design test requirements to include but not limited to applicable codes and standards and applicable Nuclear Engineering Department (NED), designer test requirements".

Question 2:

What is thejustification for accepting the Unit 2 Hydrogen Totalizer pneumatic test that is described as acceptable?

Response

Due to maintenance on the hydrogen system, numerous mechanical connections were also being tested in addition to the totalizer.

Given the system configuration, greater than 10 minutes would haw elapsed between pressurization at 125 psig and inspection. ANSI B31.1-1977 does not require detailed documentation similar to ASME Section III. Although no specific documentation exists stating that the system was maintained at pressure for 10 minutes, CECO believes the test was performed satisfactorily and is considered acceptable.

ZNLD732 EtiLD732/8

_