ML20072Q442
| ML20072Q442 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 09/02/1994 |
| From: | Lamberski J TROUTMANSANDERS (FORMERLY TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMA |
| To: | Barth C NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| References | |
| CON-#394-15672 2.206, OLA-3, NUDOCS 9409120062 | |
| Download: ML20072Q442 (2) | |
Text
p REATED CORRESPONDENCE TROUTMAN SANDERS nn~-
"fSfR'C
. 7...T.9..". " P. 7..i.,,,,^..T....%^."',
^
t NATIONSBANK PLAZA 600 PEACHTREE STREET. N E, SulTE 5700 94 SEP -6 P3 ~35 ATLANTA GEORGIA 30308-26 TELEPHONE: 404 885-3000 FACSi,AILE.404 885 3900 JOHN LAMBERSKI 3'M September 2,1994 00CKE F] g. *"' r" c
Charles Barth, Esquire Office of General Counsel One White Flint North Stop 15B18 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Re:
Georgia Power Company (Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2)
NRC Docket Nos. 50-424-OLA-3,50-425-OLA-3; License Amendment for Transfer to Southern Nuclear Operating Company
Dear Charles:
On March 30,1994 I wrote you in response to two questions you asked. One of your questiens was "what was the GPC procedure that stated, in case of a significant event at Plant Vogtle, the on-call Project Manager was to notify both Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley."
In response to that question, I stated that Plant Vogtle Procedure No. VNS-EP-04, entitled " Duties of the On-Call Project Manager," describes the reporting of significant events by the corporate " duty manager." Section 4.2.1 of the procedure must be read in conjunction with Plant Vogtle Procedure No. VNS-EP-05 and the " Telephone List - On-call Project Manager." (footnote omitted)
In addition, I referred you to GPC's April 1,1991 response to the Section 2.206 petition of Messrs. Marvin Hobby and Allen Mosbaugh, Attachment 1, p.12 and Exhibit 18.
GPC recently corrected that portion of GPC's April 1,1991 response referenced in my March 30 letter. Ssc letter from GPC's Mr. George Hairston to Mr. William Russell of the NRC, dated August 30,1994, a copy of which is attached. In 1990, the " Telephone List
- On-call Project Manager" was a subset of the Corporate Emergency Telephone Directory.
Although that telephone list was used in conjunction with Procedures VNS-EP-04 and 05, it did not require the On-call Project Manager to contact each of the individuals listed under the heading " Georgia Power Company Corporate Management." As stated in the attached 94o912o062 940902 PDR ADOCK 05000424 Sd c
i..UUTMAN SANDERS 4.:n ~A.a..A%.t.=
Charles Barth, Esquire September 2,1994 Page 2 August 30 letter, the procedure required only that the On-call Project Manager contact the on-duty senior corporate executive. The procedure did not require that Mr. Dahlberg or Mr.
Farley be contacted, although, as stated in GPC's April 1,1991 response, they would have been contacted by Mr. Mcdonald or Mr. Hairston.
Very tru
- yours, k
O x
John 12mberski cc:
Service List h
9 t
i
==
sG-3J 4 i-s- ' Uc.10
--Ji
<U M L t EN3 L t.
1J AH k. L c.
MDng Ad:Irrw l
40 Irterness Certer Sa*wa<
Post C:rcs Scs '255 0mncham. A'abama 35201 Teachone 205 86s.$$61
.he scutwn e'e:tre syvom N-e7N$s,xnt August 30, 1994 Near owa*'
LCV-0461 Docket Nos. 50-424 50-425 Mr. William T. Russell Director, OfBce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commision Washmgton, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Russell:
The purpose of this letter is to correct a statement made to the NRC concerning the Vogtle Project Emergency Planning Procedures contained in an Apn! I,1991 transmittal to your office. Specifically, on page 12 of attachment 1 of an April 1,1991 letter to Mr. Thomas E. Murley, Director, OfEce ofNuc! car Reactor Regulation from Mr. R. P.
i Mcdonald, Executive Vice President - Nuclear Operations of Georgia Power Company concerning a 10 CFR 2.206 petition filed by Messrs. Hobby and Mosbaugh, the following statement was made regarding notification practices in 1990 at the corporate ofEces of the Vogtle Project in Birmingham, Alabama.
Vogtle Project emergency planning procedures require the duty manager to notify senior corporate management, including both Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley, in the event of a significant event at Vogtle. The actual practice regarding notification is that the On-Call Project Manager or the Director of Corporate Response contacts Mr. Hairston or Mr. Mcdonald and then Mr. Mairston or Mr. Mcdonald contacts Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Far!cy.....Of coune, if such an event triggers the foregoing emergency notification procedures, then Mr. Fariey would also be notified...
The first part of the first sentence is correct in describing the procedures' requirements to contact " senior corporate management'" in significant events However, the procedures did not specifically Inquits notification ofboth Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley. The second sentence accurately describes the sequence of calls: the On-Call project Manager or Director of Corporate Response notified the on-duty senior corporate executive (which was required by procedure) and the senior corporate executive made further notifications (which was not addressed specifically by procedure).
' The actual ; exdures refer to "Semor Corporate Management." "GPC Corporate Management' and the
" Duty ExecutiW' deperuhng on the type of significant event.
h W
._ _ --.,,,,. n 2 ; u,. y e x._ u,g w;, ;.
--~o
- '- - ' - ' ~
L
^^
g
- .c Georgia Power d Mr. William T. Rusacil page 2 We apologize for any inconvenience caused by the inaccuracy. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions re8arding this matter.
Sincerely, _
- i
\\
- .
- G b i
M W. George Hairston, III WGH.III/gmb cc:
Georais Power Company Mr. C. K. McCoy Mr. J. B. Beasley, Jr.
Mr. M. Sheibani NORMS U S Nuclear Reaulatory Comnussion t
Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrative Mr. D. S. Hood, Licensing Project Manager, NRR Mr. B. R. Bonsor, Senior Resident Inspector, Vogtle Charles Barth, Esq., OfBee of General Counsel Document Control Desk t
ICV 4461 i
i 9
TOTAL P.03
{
.-