ML20072P942

Corrects Statement Made to NRC Re Plant Emergency Planning Procedures Contained in 910401 Transmittal to NRC

ML20072P942
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	08/30/1994
From:	Hairston W GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:	Russell W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LCV-0461, LCV-461, NUDOCS 9409090018
Download: ML20072P942 (2)

Text

_

i t

Georcia Power Company 333 Piecmont Avenue

• Atlanta Georgia 30308 Teleonone 404 526-3195 l Maihng Adoress:

40 inver ness Center Parkway Post o" ce Box 1235 brmingnam. Alabama 35201 l Teleonene 205 858-5581 "v souven emnc swem

w. o. Hairston. it August 30, 1994 trecutive Vice Presiaent

• * ^ ' " "' "'

LCV-0461 l Docket Nos. 50-424 50-425 Mr. William T. Russell Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commision Washington, D. C. 20555 i

Dear Mr. Russell:

The purpose of this letter is to correct a statement made to the NRC concerning the Vogtle Project Emergency Planning Procedures contained in an April 1,1991 transmittal to your office. Specifically, on page 12 of attachment 1 of an April 1,1991 letter to 1 i Mr. Thomas E. Murley, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation from Mr. R. P.

Mcdonald, Executive Vice President - Nuclear Operations of Georgia Power Company concerning a 10 CFR 2.206 petition filed by Messrs. Hobby and Mosbaugh, the following statement was made regarding notification practices in 1990 at the corporate offices of the Vogtle Project in Birmingham, Alabama.

9 Vogtle Project emergency p lanning procedures require the duty manager to j notify senior corporate management, including both Mr. Dahlberg and l Mr. Farley, in the event of a significant event at Vogtle. The actual practice i

regarding notification is that the On-Call Project Manager or the Director of Corporate Response comacts Mr. Hairston or Mr. Mcdonald and then ,

Mr. Hairston or Mr. Mcdonald contacts Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley.. ..Of j course, if such an event triggers the foregoing emergency notification procedures, then Mr. Farley would also be notified.. )

The first part of the first sentence is correct in describing the procedures' requirements to contact " senior corporate management'" in significant events. However, the procedures did not specifically require notification of both Mr. Dahlberg and Mr. Farley. The second

! sentence accurately describes the sequence of calls: the On-Call project Manager or Director of Corporate Response notified the on-duty senior corporate executive (which was required by procedure) and the senior corporate executive made funher notifications (which was not addressed specifically by procedure).

' The actual procedures refer to " Senior Corporate Management," "GPC Corporate Management" and the

" Duty Executive" depending on the type of significant event.

I 94o9090018 940930 g0)

PDR ADOCK 05000424 g PDR ,1 0

I [ l

e A

Georgia Pon.er n Mr. William T. Russell . Page 2 We apologize for any inconvenience caused by the inaccuracy. Please feel free to call me ifyou have any questions regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

, d$

W. George Hairston, III WGH,III/gmb cc: Georgia Power Company Mr. C. K. McCoy Mr. J. B. Beasley, Jr.

Mr. M. Sheibani NORMS U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrative Mr. D. S. Hood, Licensing Project Manager 4RR Mr. B. R. Bonser, Senior Resident Inspec*or, Vogt!e Charles Barth, Esq., Office of General Qurnel Document Control Desk '

tcy.o46

.-